170°

Rainbow 6 Patriots development wrapped up by Ubisoft Toronto

Ubisoft Toronto has finished working on its portion of Rainbow 6 Patriots, studio boss Jade Raymond has told VG247′s Sam Clay.

After a core development team shuffle back in 2012, it was reported that Ubisoft Montreal would continue work on the single-player portion, while the Toronto team would handle the MP missions.

The team working on the title is believed to be around 200 strong and while originally thought to be heading to PC, PS3 and Xbox 360, it’s likely the game will be released on next-gen – either in tangent or exclusively.

Dark5tar14031d ago

I'm excited for this game, it's been a while since the previous Rainbow Six game.

sitharrefus4031d ago

Yes I can not wait for this game to come out, I still play Vegas 2 online:D

PRHB HYBRiiD4031d ago

I hope it's a lot like vegas awesome co-op game..one of the best imo.

BattleAxe4031d ago

One of the best franchises of this generation, although, I wish they would have patched a fix for the 1080p resolution bug on the PS3 version of RSV1. Lets hope that Ubisoft gets their server issues ironed out quickly with the release of the next installment.

malokevi4031d ago

They could just give me the multiplayer portion, right now, for current gen, and I would be a sold customer.

The idea that its already finished is... unnerving.

mochachino4031d ago

R6 games were some of my fav FPS games this gen. They had more open environments and a better cover system than most games today.

Also loved the strategy element and how neither you or the enemies were bullet sponges. The only problem with it were the stories. Definitely made you afraid of getting shot at which almost all FPS games SP lack.

Can't wait.

Summons754031d ago

You should play the older ones. Vegas was godawful because they stripped the strategy down to nothing. This game looks like they're bringing it back.

Neonridr4031d ago

try playing the old ones and just feel the controls and how awkward they are..

I love the Vegas games though, they were so much fun.

KwietStorm_BLM4031d ago

I don't feel Vegas was awful at all. Actually I think it was a good medium between old Rainbow and most other shooters today. Hell there's still more tactical play in Vegas than most shooters. I miss terrorist hunt and the customizing my soldier.

Bathyj4031d ago

I loved the older ones but I love Vegas too. A good mix of strategy and shooting. You always had options on how to tackle a room.

I just hope they dont screw it up like Ghost Recon Future Soldier. Taking out the squad commands and giving them AI where they were constantly sprinting off in front of you, leaving you to not sneak around but constantly chase after them. Giving squad orders is why I like these games.

Sam Fisher4031d ago

After the stunt they are doing with ac. Yea, i also would like to inherit some debt owed to me aswell >:(

NYC_Gamer4031d ago

I won't buy another R6 game until they produce a true tactical experience

KwietStorm_BLM4031d ago (Edited 4031d ago )

And what does that mean exactly? Please don't just say like old Rainbow Six. I'd honestly like an opinion.

malokevi4031d ago

This game can't come soon enough. Loved Vegas and Vegas 2... but I have real nostalgia for the days of Rainbow Six 3.

Show all comments (19)
60°
5.5

Soul Covenant (PC VR) Review - CGMagazine

Soul Covenant feels like a game from the early 2000s, with its repetitive gameplay loop, waggle controls, and nonsensical story.

Read Full Story >>
cgmagonline.com
130°

Cold VR is all About Acting Super Hot

Indie developer Carlos Alfonso is working on Cold VR, a game where standing still isn't an option. The complete opposite to SUPERHOT VR.

Read Full Story >>
xrsource.net
Abnor_Mal5h ago

This sounds very interesting, Superhot was a great game to take inspiration from.

Babadook73h ago(Edited 3h ago)

I liked the VR version of SUPERHOT. If this ends up being as good I'l pick it up (once available) for PSVR2.

230°

Tomb Raider Remastered just quietly censored one in-game detail

Tomb Raider 1-3 Remastered players are ticked off by the game’s most recent patch, which censors in-game pin-up posters of Lara Croft.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbible.com
rlow16h ago

This is why gaming is screwed. When people change things to fit someone’s agenda, it’s a slippery slope downhill.

Christopher5h ago(Edited 5h ago)

Even if that agenda is of the developer? Way to remove developer rights.

***One player called it a “huge problem with modern games,” saying they can now be “ruined AFTER people buy them”.***

The level of drama. Yes, I recall sitting there for more hours than I did anything else in the game. These two pinups are the core of the game, after all!

coolbeans4h ago(Edited 4h ago)

rlow1's cringe catastrophizing aside, I do think developers *ought* to strive to maintain an original work to the best of their ability. The language of a "remaster" tacitly implies that - for good or ill - what's being resold is what fans remember but better.

Profchaos4h ago

Games can be ruined after purchasing them yeah we know this not from this but from GTA IV which had half it's radio content patched out due to licensing expirations and to me that was a huge deal.

This pin up poster is a bit of nonsense but the whole argument of modern games can be ruined post launch is Absol true.

DedicatedDark3h ago(Edited 3h ago)

It's not their work to censor. They are incharge of restoration & remastering the work, not overwriting it.

Barlos1h ago

It's not the agenda of the developer though, they're pandering and trying to increase their ESG score.

Way to support censorship...

victorMaje1h ago

It’s not the end of the world for sure, but I understand the hate towards this kind of change. I believe it’s also a matter of principle.

Imagine a Picasso painting being restored & the restorer deciding there aren’t enough strokes, or some lines aren’t straight enough or curved enough…not sure it would/should sit well with people.

Have all original devs signed off on this change? Even if it’s the case, are we saying older gamers are better mentally equipped to process what was there than current gamers, hence the change?

Enough time ago the case was made that games are an art form. We’re supposed to have won that case.
So which is it? Are games art or not?

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1h ago
Eidolon2h ago

Hasn't this been happened for over a decade since remasters? I can't see that it's any worse now. Maybe if Sweet Baby starts getting their hands on remasters we will definitely have a problem.

Rebel_Scum4h ago

tbh I dont see something like this as censorship. Does anyone else not find it strange for someone to stick pin ups of themsleves in a locker room?

Now of it was a pin up of some half naked firefighters it might make sense as Lara might like that, and if they removed that I would cry censorship. But removing pin ups of the main character, yeah I get it.

Barlos1h ago(Edited 1h ago)

It's a game, and they were placed there for the audience. It's not real life. If it was, she wouldn't have fought a T-Rex now would she?

Yes, it's censorship but it's a bit less in your face. If they were in the original game, then they should have been in the remasters. It's bad enough that they have that ridiculous unnecessary warning at the start, but then they start removing things post launch. I don't care how small the change, they shouldn't be doing it. It's nothing but ESG pandering but in a subtle way.

Rebel_Scum39m ago

Look bro, if you have pictures of yourself naked on a bear skin rug up in your house let me tell you, its not normal.

SimpleDad1h ago

By the year 2030, this remaster collection will totally be changed and censored. Probably will remove Lara as a playable character. It's ridiculous. Glad that my family didn't buy this.
I still have Tomb Raider 2 PS1 as a memory.

CobraKai1h ago

It’s mentioned in the article, and it’s a point i 100% agree with, it’s the fact that they can censor a game after you buy it. That’s total bullshit.

Killer2020UK44m ago

Whilst it's an overreaction to say this has "ruined" the game, it's still problematic that this has happened post launch and for many, post-purchase.

I don't want someone to change a product for the worse after I've bought it. The same goes for implementing micro transactions after reviews.

I wonder why they did this? Nobody was kicking up a fuss as far as I'm aware.

maykhausonninh37m ago

Nobody was kicking up a fuss as far as I'm aware.