340°

Sony boss: PS4 will appeal to women too

TheSun:

Brit Mr House says the games console will feature a raft of new features to broaden its appeal beyond young male gamers.

Read Full Story >>
thesun.co.uk
Root4038d ago (Edited 4038d ago )

It can appeal to them but it dosen't mean it's going to target them.

I mean Drive Club, Killzone SF and inFAMOUS SS....well those first party launch games speak for themselves really. They are all targeted a core male gamers.

I think it's fair to say the majority of core male gamers make up the gaming community, the ones who actually go out there and buy games/consoles at launch or within the launch window. I don't see why developers would waste time trying to appeal to everyone, take what you have, if people are actually interested in something they will come to you.

JoGam4038d ago

The PS4 target gamers. Men, Women, Children. "GAMERS"

Root4038d ago (Edited 4038d ago )

...I never said it didn't

I was just pointing out that core gamers are mainly made up of male gamers, just like back when the PS1 first launched or the N64, NES, SNES, Megadrive etc

Why waste your time seeking out more of an audience when you already have a good install base now. If people are actually interested in gaming they will come to you. We don't need any casual crap to try and scoop them up because after a while they will loose interest and will go off to the next new shiny thing. Core gamers are here to stay

We had that "Nerdy Guys and their computer games" stereotype for a reason you know back in the 80s/90s.

Ezz20134038d ago

sadly my girlfriend don't like video games
but i know girls who play pretty much every sony 1st/2nd/3rd party game
so i don't know what the Big deal here
they are gamers as we are

and also as long as sony keep bring TONS of hardcore games like this gen
and at the same time make few games for casual demographics
i will be happy :)

Reverent4037d ago

If JoGam doesn't get a "Well Said" bubble, nobody deserves one, ever.

RememberThe3574037d ago (Edited 4037d ago )

I think this has been the PlayStation philosophy all along. All inclusive but catering toward the core.

But bubbles for stating it so frankly. Well said.

EDIT: @Reverent: You get one too. I'm handing out bubbles like their candy over here! Keep it coming N4G, I got lots of love to give!

Skips4037d ago (Edited 4037d ago )

Pretty much, Sony is in it mainly for the gamers. I honestly don't see that changing.

@whoyouwit04 below...

Sony =

"We’re All About the Gamers”
http://www.playstationlifes...

"PS4 is “gaming console at heart”"
http://www.vg247.com/2013/0...

with a little casual on the side...

"I think the key is to have people — and increasingly women — with different sensibilities creating different games. It is not all about shoot ’em up games."

While

Microsoft =

"“Xbox isn’t a gaming console."
"Xbox is a family entertainment center."
http://www.worldtvpc.com/bl...

"Our audience is leaving us behind,"
"Women are the new core"
http://n4g.com/news/1220604...

I think we all know which direction these two are heading in...

lol

silkrevolver4037d ago

@ Root:

You did specify core MALE gamers.
It appeared as if you were implying those games were for men only.

DeadlyFire4037d ago

Sony says everyone is a gamer. We aim to please.

Even your girlfriend that doesn't play games. She would if one of them caught her attention. Video games are the new era of board games and everyone has their favorite.

PopRocks3594037d ago

@silkrevolver

Games of those caliber do often get marketed towards men, but that certainly doesn't mean that women cannot enjoy them. Call of Duty has a reputation of being for the "fratboy" gamer. I know more than a couple of women who enjoy the game though, as well as other AAA 'core' games, like Assassin's Creed (which I think could be considered more gender ambiguous with its marketing).

Dee_914037d ago

wuuuuttt
And here I am thinking women were included in the gamers category

So there it is.
Sony PlayStation 4
Appeals to Gamers ... AND WOMEN !!

BISHOP-BRASIL4037d ago

Pretty much the #1 mistake you can make in attacting female gamers is making "girly" games... Just because she's a girl doesn't mean she want to play barbie on pony land or kitchen simulation, even on pre-school toys this sexist notion is (slowly) dieing. Now it can be done right, having a more broad spectrum of main characters (not just more females), which more girls can relate to (the testosterone filled action shooters are usually quite out of touch, although there are still more girls today enjoying those) would help a lot.

Not saying that either way is what Sony is doing (in fact, doesn't look like it at all, more like a more broad demographic target in ads or something like that, not changing the developers' focus), just throwing it out there: a less "sexist" (if it can even be called that) gaming industry is not necessarily a bad thing, it doesn't mean more focus will be given to crappy girly games (at least not if they know what they are doing).

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 4037d ago
4038d ago Replies(3)
rainslacker4038d ago

I think it depends on what exactly they're trying to attract. If it's the female demographic at large, then yeah, most of the games you mentioned probably aren't going to do it, because they haven't really done it before. If they are trying to attract the "core" female players, then they already play and probably like those games, so no real change here.

Women make up 40% of game players in the US according to the ESRB. But that number doesn't say what kinds of games they play. There are just things out there that attract females more than men, whether it's biology or society is rather moot, and to attract them they have to really appeal to the market they are trying to reach, regardless of gender, sex, nationality, or gaming preferences.

I agree with your assessment of the core gaming community. Women exist among us for sure, but they obviously aren't the target demographic, as core games tend to be geared towards males in general to increase sales.

antz11044037d ago

"It will appeal with the release of Old Spice through a special port in the back.....of yeah, and the games. They'll like the games too."

Xelestial4037d ago

Women do tend to like certain things just like men tend to like certain things. However, personality type overrules gender every time.

There shouldn't be a problem if Sony decides to make more games with realistic female protagonists for example, or more games with a focus on story. But if they are going to try to aim for what some people think women like (people with closed minds) like pink, shopping and Farmville or whatever, yeah that'd fail.

But plenty of men like casual games as well...I think all of us can agree we'd probably like them to stay on the core gaming audience, which is made up of plenty of men and women (I don't know any girls that don't play games...and I don't know any that play casual games. However I know several men who play casual games)

4038d ago Replies(1)
TheTwelve4037d ago

The kind of girls I care about all loved Journey...

Veneno4037d ago

Heavy Rain I noticed was popular with women too.

MoveTheGlow4037d ago

The kind of girls I care about (my friends) tend to play a lot more CoD than my guy friends. And win.

ALLWRONG4037d ago

Amazing how positive the comments are now when you compare them to here http://n4g.com/news/1220604...

DOMination-4037d ago

I was going to say the same thing

vega2754037d ago (Edited 4037d ago )

Come on man you know what site this is and you know the double standards and hypocrites that run it. If ms or Nintendo does something (especially ms) they are abandoning the harecore.if dony does it, its good. If ms copies something its they lack innovation. If sony copies its they are improving the tech.

Come on you been here long enough to know better.

xursz4037d ago (Edited 4037d ago )

The difference being:

this is an opinion piece by PSLS...

and not comments from an employee saying publicly,

"our audience left us behind"..."women are the new core".

Just pointing that out.

edit: disagrees for stating facts... Gotta love it.

maniacmayhem4037d ago

@ Xursz

"this is an opinion piece by PSLS...

and not comments from an employee saying publicly,"

Really, let us take a look at the actual article and the quote in it...

"Sony Group CEO Andrew House shared the company’s desire to allure more than just gamers with the PlayStation 4. He told Sun City:

I think the key is to have people — and increasingly women — with different sensibilities creating different games. It is not all about shoot ’em up games.

He added more to the mix:

The key is getting games developers — who are going to make the next Angry Birds — excited about the PS4. And they are."

Now do you see why you have the disagrees.

xursz4037d ago (Edited 4037d ago )

I guess that sums up the comments regarding women being the new core and the core audience leaving them behind. Carry on.

SilentNegotiator4037d ago (Edited 4037d ago )

How does "Women are the new core" compare to "increasingly women"?

Oh right, because you're always trying too hard to find Ps3 fanboi hypocrisy.

BlmThug4037d ago

Honest to ***, that's exactly what I was thinking when reading the comments on here. I am no fanboy of consoles, i'll buy where the core games are and the comments on here reek of double standards

loulou4037d ago

lol

you just cannot beat a fanboy. sony can do no wrong on n4g. no matter what they do, the n4g dwellers will lap it up.

it is such a shame that n4g has a gutter community. the fast flow of stories (90% pure rubbish)which bring the occasional piece worth reading is not really replicated elsewhere

Dee_914037d ago (Edited 4037d ago )

It appears in that article some people didnt actually read that article and assumed that " women are the new core" meant that the next xbox will focus more on or target women or casual gamers instead of appealing to women or casual gamers.And for that I can sort of excuse them and put slightly more blame on the people making the titles.

What do you know, people based their opinions off the title instead of the article itself... Welcome.... to the great land.... of N4G

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 4037d ago
Bathyj4037d ago

"It can appeal to them but it dosen't mean it's going to target them."

Bingo. Thats all I came to say.

delboy4037d ago

Appeal to them, make a wii sports game.
Target them, make a wii sports game and a sixaxis dildo and bundle it with ps4. :-)

Bigpappy4037d ago

You can make it appeal to women and then not target them. What is the point of that?

But my question to Sony is how will they do it. M$ is going to use Kinect to attract that demographic in a big way. In fact, they already have. Sony will need to have something similar are more accessible to move them away from Xbox. I know several women who bought 360 with Kinect just for Zuma Fitness. That is despite the Wii being way cheaper.

Nilemonitors134037d ago

The controllers will really REALLY vibrate, thats how, jk

AngelicIceDiamond4037d ago

@Root “I think the key is to have people — and increasingly women — with different sensibilities creating different games. It is not all about shoot ’em up games.” Mr House, president and chief executive of Sony Computer Entertainment, also wants the PS4 to appeal more to families in general.

"Also wants the PS4 to appeal more more families in general."

That's gonna be one of the focuses on both the new Xbox and Wii U. It's inevitable there's a huge market for it. But that does not mean a shortage of Core games for either console (Maybe Wii U)

Sony is a company first. A 100 or so people who disagree is the minority. If you don't like casual then that's to bad others do. I don't care for casual either but like I said there is a market for it. just because you don't like something doesn't mean Sony won't do it, they will do it. And if woman/casual market want casual family oriented games then Sony will do it. And your just gonna have to deal with it.

The question is, is how much will Sony cater to the casual crowd next gen?

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 4037d ago
whoyouwit044038d ago ShowReplies(3)
yewles14038d ago

I'd rather see Sony let third parties handle casuals and first party handle hardcore... then again, more Journey/Flower/Heavy Rain/Beyond/Unfinished Swan-type games wouldn't hurt either.

Qrphe4038d ago

It's certainly appealing to all the "gamer gurl xD" audience who will be streaming their cleavage to teens while also playing Modern Warfare 4.

Show all comments (108)
70°

Disney Dreamlight Valley teases part two of paid expansion

Disney Dreamlight Valley devs have officially teased the second part of the paid expansion titled The Spark of Imagination.

70°

Best Stardew Valley Farm Names – 100 Funny, Nerdy, Cute Ideas and More

Starting out a new farm, but need help choosing a name? Check out this article for a 100 farm name ides for Stardew Valley.

180°

Bethesda Needs to Reduce the Gaps Between New Fallout and Elder Scrolls Releases

Waiting a decade for new instalments in franchises as massive as Fallout and Elder Scrolls feels like a waste.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
-Foxtrot11h ago

Microsoft have Obsidian but I feel it's Bethesda who just don't want to play ball as they've always said they want to do it themselves.

Once MS bought Zenimax in 2020 they should have put the Outer Worlds 2 on the back burner, allow Bethesda to finish off its own Space RPG with Starfield (despite totally different tone why have two in your first party portfolio with two developers who's gameplay is a tad similar) and got Obsidian for one of their projects to make a spiritual successor to New Vegas.

When the Elder Scrolls VI is finished Bethesda can then onto the main numbered Fallout 5 themselves.

The Outer Worlds 2 started development in 2019 so putting it on the back burner wouldn't have been the end of the world, they'd have always come back to it once Fallout was done and it would have been nicely spaced out from Starfields release once they had most likely stopped supporting it and all the expansions were released.

If they did this back in 2020 when they bought Zenimax and the game had a good, steady 4 - 5 years development, you might have seen it release in 2025.

We are literally going to be waiting until 2030 at the very earliest for Fallout 5 and all they seem bothered about is pushing Fallout 76.

RaidenBlack9h ago(Edited 9h ago)

Its not just only Todd not playing ball.
Obsidian have made a name for themselves in delivering stellar RPGs, but most famous once have always been sequels/spin-offs to borrowed IPs like KOTOR 2, Neverwinter Nights 2, Fallout: New Vegas, Stick of Truth etc.
Obsidian wants to invest more in their own original IPs like Outer Worlds or Pillars of Eternity with Avowed.
Similar to what Bluepoint & inXile wants to do or Kojima is doing (i.e not involving anymore in Konami's IPs).
So yea, even if New Vegas has the most votes from 3D Fallout fans, Obsidian just wants to do their own thing, like any aspiring dev studio and MS is likely currently respecting that.
But a future Fallout game from Obsidian will surely happen. Founder Feargus Urquhart has already stated an year ago that they're eager to make a new Fallout game with Bethesda, New Vegas 2 or otherwise. Urquhart was the director of the very first 1995's Fallout game after all.
And don't forget Brian Fargo and his studio inXile, as Brian Fargo was the director of Fallout's 1988 predecessor: Wasteland

KyRo6h ago(Edited 6h ago)

Obsidian should take over the FO IP. They're do far better with it than Bethesda who hasn't made a great game for almost 15 years

RaidenBlack7m ago(Edited 6m ago)

@KyRo
So, by 15 years, you mean Fallout 3 was the last great game Bethesda made?
You don't consider Skyrim a good game, which came out 13 years ago?
I'd consider Fallout 4 a pretty decent game as well. It's Story & RPG elements were a bit downgrade from New Vegas but the exploration and shooting on the other hand, were upgrades.
FO76 was disappointing and Starfield could've been better at launch I'll agree.

Duke195h ago(Edited 5h ago)

I disagree. Part of these games is the support for the mod community. If they move to releasing a "next game" every 2 or 3 years, the modding support plummets and the franchises turn into just another run of the mill RPG.

Make the games good enough to withstand the test of time, to keep people coming back to them and expanding on them with mod support.

--Onilink--3h ago(Edited 3h ago)

I dont think anyone is saying they need to come out every 2 years (not to mention almost no game is released that quickly anymore)

By the time Fallout 5 comes out, it will be more than 15 years since Fallout 4 came out (same with ES6 coming out 15 years after Skyrim). Even if you want to use F76 as the metric for the most recent release, that one came out in 2018. It will be a miracle if F5 comes out before 2030

The point is that for a studio that doesnt seem to operate with multiple teams doing several projects at once, that their projects normally take 4-5 years as a minimum, and that now they even added Starfield to the rotation, it becomes a 15+ years waiting period between releases for each series, which doesnt make sense. Imagine that Nintendo only released a mainline Mario or Zelda game every 15 years…

They either need to start developing more than 1 project at a time, let someone else take a crack at one of the IPs or significantly reduce their development times

Duke191h ago(Edited 1h ago)

Why should someone else take a crack at one of the IPs? Look at what happened to Final Fantasy as a recent example - there is pretty clear FF fatigue setting in because they are now pumping out titles in the franchise every few years. Pumping out more games faster doesn't always make a series better.

There are plenty of options to make new games, not just create more titles in the same universe at a faster pace.

mandf3h ago

Yeah I’m going to say it, who cares about the modding community when making a game? Half the time developers only tolerate modders because they fix there game for them.

Skuletor4h ago

Yeah, let's all advocate for smaller gaps between series' releases, then we'll probably get headlines about how the series have dropped in quality and they could have benefited from more time in the oven. Let them cook.

SimpleSlave3h ago

"how the series have dropped in quality and they could have benefited from more time in the oven" So every Bethesda game then? Got it.

Listen, I would agree if this was about From Software or something, but Bethesda?

🤣

C'mon now. What timeline are you from?

Skuletor1h ago

Think about it, they're already bug filled messes on their current schedule, can you imagine how much worse it would be if they rushed things?

Duke191h ago

I mean you aren't wrong. People are going to complain about anything

isarai3h ago

Hows about you focus on quality, just a thought 🤷‍♂️

Sciurus_vulgaris2h ago

Bethesda [or Microsoft] would have to reallocate internal and external studios towards fallout and elder scrolls titles. Bethesda has the issue of developing 2 big IPs that are large RPGs on rotation. If you want more Fallout and Elder Scrolls, development will have to be outsourced.

Show all comments (19)