300°

See Unreal Engine 4 on PlayStation 4

"We've seen the Elemental demo before. The difference is, now it's running in real-time on PS4 dev hardware."

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
thechosenone4038d ago (Edited 4038d ago )

It looks so good but needs more optimization.

FATAL1TY4038d ago

DEEP DOWN > unreal engine 4

JhawkFootball064038d ago

I mean it looks pretty good far away, but those closeups did not impress me at all. I'm sure Epic can find better artists than this.

4038d ago
PLASTICA-MAN4038d ago

Please read this before posting BS like "PS4 looks very bad, thi is was expected etc"

http://www.neogaf.com/forum...

http://www.neogaf.com/forum...

cannon88004038d ago

deep down is the working title for the game, Panta Rhei is the engine's name.

Grap4037d ago

there's no way that video have AA or run on 30FPS. i have to say this video sucks

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4037d ago
vandal GAB4038d ago (Edited 4038d ago )

Here's the new Unreal engine 4 tech demo running on a single GTX 680 and looks far more impressive than this tech demo.

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

and another link from the Nvidia site for any doubters

http://www.geforce.com/what...

4038d ago
DaThreats4038d ago (Edited 4038d ago )

Were they using the final dev kit specs?

BitbyDeath4038d ago

Nope. Sonys own devs didn't have the final specs so no way Epic would have gotten hold of them.

Tsar4ever014037d ago (Edited 4037d ago )

At the press conference 03/20, Mark Cerney said the demo was running on PROTOTYPE ps4 hardware. So it's running on the very earliest hardware specs, 2gb/4gb of gddr5 I believe.

Arai4038d ago

There's also this:
http://www.youtube.com/watc...

New about this is that Capcom decided to develop Deep Down into it's first PS4 title (info March 27th).
Not sure if anyone posted it yet.
Point being you can clearly see that UE4 is not optimized when compared to Panta Rhei/Luminous Studio.

FrigidDARKNESS4038d ago

Lmao this is not ps4 . This is the same demo when epic games debut ue4 on a pc using a gtx 680

Pandamobile4038d ago

They had this running on PS4 with some of the bells and whistles disabled.

Emilio_Estevez4038d ago

Same demo yes, but it is on a PS4 -

'How well can UE4's cutting-edge visuals translate to next-gen console? At GDC 2013, Epic demonstrated last year's Elemental demo running in real-time from a PlayStation 4 development kit. The studio says that this video is actually captured from PS4 hardware.'

That's the caption for the embedded vid

Show all comments (33)
70°

Fortnite maker's appeal in Epic vs Apple case smacked down by Supreme Court ruling

The Supreme Court seems to have given it's final verdict on Epic and Apple's legal battle in the US.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
220°

Epic win: Jury decides Google has illegal monopoly in app store fight

Three years after Fortnite-maker Epic Games sued Apple and Google for allegedly running illegal app store monopolies, Epic has a win. The jury in Epic v. Google has just delivered its verdict — and it found that Google turned its Google Play app store and Google Play Billing service into an illegal monopoly.

Read Full Story >>
theverge.com
gold_drake128d ago (Edited 128d ago )

oooo shiiiit
well, there ya go

but i think the biggest issue are the judges in these cases.
most of them have no clue about all them things.

ii wonder what the judge will decide Epic actually "won" or what the out come is.

Petebloodyonion128d ago

Why are you saying the judge have no cases?
I think the judges shows lots of clairity that in a duality market (APPLE and Android) there's no competition when both are already agreeing on the price.
Do you think there would be deals if Wallmart was the only store where you could buy food?
How would the argument of "but there's competition between Cookies and cereal brands" would hold up when Wallmart could decide that each provider must pay a 30% comission just to display product in store?

There's already tons od laws to make sure that there's not only 1 physical store brand and that store owners can't be in cahoot with competition in order to fix price so why would this be different for Virtual storefront?

gold_drake128d ago

i didnt say that.
read properly next time.

and the digital market is more complex than supernarkets.

Einhander1972128d ago (Edited 128d ago )

"Do you think there would be deals if Wallmart was the only store where you could buy food?"

This isn't even the same types of argument, you have a variety of different devices you can get content on, like Apple pr Google or PC or consoles, all these things plus more compete with each other.

The only winner in this decision are Epic, Microsoft and other people who are already rich. All these greedy companies are using the law to steal profits from each other and it's going to be the consumers who pay more.

All these devices we use are heavily subsidized by the profits these platform holders make from selling peoples products. If you think Epic is going to start charging less for their MTX now or whatever your crazy, consumers are not going to get anything back from the winners here. All consumers get is the privilege to pay more for devices.

Edit:

"Wallmart could decide that each provider must pay a 30% comission just to display product in store?"

Walmart does take a cut of every sale in their stores....thats how they make money. They also sell shelf space, the products that are are in the center instead of the top or the bottom pay to be there and to have higher visibility and easier access. They also sell access because obviously they don't have enough space for every brands products.

Using your Walmart analogy, how long do you think Walmart would stay in business if they just let anyone walk into their store and sell things without helping to pay for the upkeep of the stores and other costs? They wouldn't that's why things don't work like that.

That is what Epic wants, they want to use these devices with out paying to help maintain them.

Petebloodyonion128d ago (Edited 128d ago )

@Gold _Drake
Sorry bad writting from my part I meant to say Why do you think Judges have no clues?

@Einhander1972
Last I checked tons of small developpers and consummer association complained about the 30% tax cut that Sony Steam, Google, Apple are charging so why do you say only Epic benefit from that decisision is beyond me. Heck I recall this article making the headline recently
https://www.gamesindustry.b...

As for Walmart Upkeep, I would like to remind you that it's Wallmart and other store who need to cut in THEIR profit margin if they want to match price seen in other stores and not the other way around like in the digital market where Game publisher must sign price parity clause to please Google, Apple, Valve and Sony
https://www.linklaters.com/...
https://www.ign.com/article...

128d ago
Extermin8or3_127d ago (Edited 127d ago )

Thst isn the issue here. Thr issue ws the secret deals Google was doing to lower its cut for certain big apps publishers and only them and the fact that a requiremenf for said deals was nof helping epic games sefup its own mobile store.

Einhander1972127d ago (Edited 127d ago )

"Last I checked tons of small developpers and consummer association complained about the 30% tax cut that Sony Steam, Google, Apple are charging so why do you say only Epic benefit from that decisision is beyond me. Heck I recall this article making the headline recent"

Yes, yeah developers and other people who are selling things to you may benefit but the main benefit is these large companies who want to bypass fees.

But at the end of the day they are not going to start charging you less, they are going to charge the same but get more profits.

And the link you posted about the case against Sony is filed by Alex Neil a certified con artist who doesn't care about consumers they just want a huge personal payout.

And as for parity clauses again the money is going to come from the consumers one way or another, these people are fighting to take each others profits, if the parity clauses are blocked we'll pay more for hardware.

The idea that any of these changes are going to make things cheaper for the consumer are a joke, the only thing that changes is who gets the profits.

And as for Walmart, you missed what I was saying Walmart may lower the price on an item but they just charge the manufacturer of that item more to stock it on the shelves.

In some ways the digital stores are better because they don't charge an upfront fee to put an item on the store they instead charge a fee per sale. Which if they have to reduce the fee that charge for sales they would likely recoup that money by charging a fee to sell something on the ap store. Which also would benefit the rich companies over small developers who would be able to pay upfront fees that smaller developers may not.

Which is the reason Walmart only stocks the major brands and not a bunch of start up small brands, because the major brands can pay for shelf space.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 127d ago
1Victor128d ago

Don’t hold your breath yet there’s a long road ahead with the appeals process then the Supreme Court will have the last words and I don’t see this court going against the big corporations earnings.

I’m been known to be wrong some times and truly hope I am on this one

anast128d ago

The pot has been stirred.

Einhander1972128d ago

This is terrible news for consumers, while Epic and others get richer we'll now have to pay more for our devices.

ChasterMies128d ago

How? Android phones like Samsung Galaxy are not subsidized by purchases from Google Play Store. And Google can’t quit on Android because of how much money Google makes from Google search on Android.

Einhander1972128d ago (Edited 128d ago )

Google pays Samsung billions to have their store on Samsung phones.

Samsung also offers it's own store.

neutralgamer1992127d ago

Einhander1972

samsung has it's own store but how many know about that store? its like comparing MS store to other well known stores

GamerRN128d ago

So does this mean Apple also has a monopoly?

Plague-Doctor27128d ago

No. The cases argued were different.

Epic sued Apple for a monopoly over iOS. Apple said iOS competes with Android, MS, Nintendo, Sony, etc for Fortnite. Therefore there is market competition and no monopoly. The judges agreed.

Epic sued Google over a monopoly on android devices. Because Google was found to have shady deals preventing phone manufacturers from putting competing stores on phones as a default app, among other shady dealings, they found google has a monopoly on android marketplaces specifically.

Basically, Apple being a walled garden actually kind of protected them

ChasterMies128d ago

Android isn’t a walled garden tied to hardware like iOS. Android is like Windows or Linux for PCs. Any phone manufacturer can use Android and any seller can have their own store on Android. But Google used its muscle to tie up 90% marketshare for apps on Android. That’s monopolistic behavior.

Hofstaderman128d ago (Edited 128d ago )

Phil and slimey company sitting up and plotting.... expect to hear how Sony is anti-gamer for refusing to have GamePass on their ecosystems they may very well do this to avoid 2027 . I can imagine his email to Satya...."we got them" lol.

Show all comments (33)
80°

The Epic Game Store Has Two Freebies This Week

The Epic Game Store has two free titles they are giving away this week.

Read Full Story >>
terminalgamer.com
Minute Man 721139d ago

Got them both to play with my kids