460°

Pachter has lost his mind: RAM Equals Innovation, Xbox 720 wins Because of Skype & TV

Playeressence's Furious Francis discusses Michael Pachter's latest Wii U hate/blind, bias predictions. PS4's RAM will lead to innovations we have never seen before, PS3/Xbox 360 to be outsold by the PS4/Xbox 720, and the Xbox 720 has been declared the winner before the console has even been announced.

Read Full Story >>
playeressence.com
Theyellowflash304057d ago

Usually he's just wrong, now I think he's actually crazy.

LOGICWINS4057d ago

Either that, or he knows something big about the 720 that we don't.

black9114057d ago (Edited 4057d ago )

Why the Freak Do we even listen to this guy? He's The Skip Bayless of The Gaming Community!!!!

http://blogs.miaminewtimes....

amiga-man4057d ago

As has been said the opposite normally happens to what he says, so I'm quite relieved he didn't choose the PS.

NewMonday4057d ago

is the TV tuner the same idea as Torn, NASNE and PlayTV that Sony used outside the USA?

and Skype has many other services that do the same like Tango.

and some time back their was news Sony is setting up an MSO itself, so I still don't see an advantage for MS yet.

knowyourstuff4056d ago

He's not crazy, he's just out of touch boob and knows nothing about gaming, why people buy games, why people stay away from certain games/consoles. He's just a boob who doesn't game, and as a non-gamer he is personally more interested in non-gamer related things like skype and tv-tuning.

More RAM does mean a Developer can do more on screen, so with less limitations they will be able to do more. If you call it innovation then fine, that's one way of putting it. Another way might be "better AI, more complex things on screen and under the hood happening all at once to make a more real, visceral experience". It doesn't mean innovation is guaranteed, just more possible with less limitations.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 4056d ago
AngelicIceDiamond4057d ago (Edited 4057d ago )

Pachter might know something that we don't about MS. He must of saw what MS was doing therefor getting all excited and and jumps the gun and claims the 720 a winner.

Not even Pachter is that dumb enough to make that stray prediction without having some sort evidence backing it.

Pachters not even a real gamer hes a tech enthusiast. Lets wait and see what MS announces before hasting such claims.

EDIT: So fanboys are claiming victory with the PS4 over MS unannounced console. And now Anylist are claiming victory with unannounced Xbox over the PS4?

https://www.google.com/url?...

What is gaming news coming to 0_O people.

HammadTheBeast4056d ago

Actually Patcher is dumb enough. He said Wii would fail based on nothing at all. And in terms of sales, it did amazingly.

joab7774057d ago

It may be true. Xbox, imo, will choose a different path and they may sell more consoles or make more money but it doesnt matter. Why? The wii sold a gazillion consoles and was very successful but not many of us talk about it when talking about this gens greatest moments. This could happen if microsoft chooses to take the casual route. Both, according to him will be very successful but in different ways. The xbox may end up being the console evryone owns because its cheaper and does alot of entertainmemt stuff. But, the ps4 may be the place that all hardcore gamers go for the best games. Thats fine. I will buy a ps4 at launch and if microsoft can convince me its worth owning an xbox too, i will biy one. I just think that many ppl ultimately get both. Its just that the new xbox may become the new wii.

pandaboy4057d ago

are you guys serious here? this article is completely nonsensical. Pachter's predictions seem to be spot on and coincide with the information we have. There is a reason he has the job he does and you guys troll the internet desperate to degrade him.

Jacobster4057d ago (Edited 4057d ago )

I understand what you are saying but Analysts from any industry do get things wrong more often than not especially when forecasting the future and especially predicting the overall sales of a new console cycle! I guess time will tell :)

MEsoJD4057d ago (Edited 4057d ago )

It's funny how people lose their shit over Pachter's opinions. He's not always right, but I appreciate his perspective.

ritsuka6664057d ago

It's incredible how upset you are that a Pacther made a comment you don't agree with.

falcon794057d ago

Considering 1GB of RAM is all they need for games NEXTGEN as that equates to 4GB for devs as it gets compressed so please tell me what game will use more than that on textures ??

jmac534056d ago

It's more than just "textures". Pretty much all of the information will be funneled through the RAM include physics info and OS functions.

a_squirrel4056d ago

Try running your OS with 256MB SRAM and 256MB VRAM (Or just 512MB)

Windows 98 can. *laughs*

KwietStorm_BLM4056d ago

1GB equates to 4GB for devs. Lol yea you really just said that.

Gildarts4056d ago

Skype would be a pretty steady drive for Sales if its integrated right and advertised it right. Many people use Skype now, about half a billion. Microsoft can take SOME of that cake. But that will definitely not be what will make the 720 the "winner". If Microsoft doesn't focus on games this Gen all they would have is casual gamers. The PS4 right now sounds like it's the place to go for core gamers. But we won't know for sure until Microsoft shows what strategy they're going to use.

Jazz41084056d ago

Cant we wait till both systems are fully disclosed before we speculate a winner. This is madness.

Anomander4056d ago

How dare you make sense on this forum ;)

showtimefolks4056d ago

patcher oh patcher you will never learn to keep your mouth shut, i bet you he just says stuff just to start a controversy

babadivad4056d ago

Who the fuck is Patcher. People post his articles all the damn time but who the fuck is he and why should we care???

chaos-lockheart4056d ago

Like I said before, I can take his job anytime. I can BS more.

+ Show (10) more repliesLast reply 4056d ago
CouldHaveYelledUiiW4057d ago

For Consoles Ram does = Innovation BUT
if that is the case then Nintendo takes the lead as innovators once again.
(Remember the one of the complaints about PS360 development...)

Yeah, I used to be more patient with Pachter but now I'm just getting the "I will make more $ by helping turn WiiU into a 3rd Party" Vibe from him.

You broke my heart Pachter... I trusted you... I trusted you...

Theyellowflash304057d ago (Edited 4057d ago )

I don't think RAM equals more innovation. I think more RAM equals better graphics/better media functions.

Innovation is done through gameplay, not RAM. It's the same reason why Chrono Trigger, an almost 20 year old game is far more innovative than Final Fantasy 13

CouldHaveYelledUiiW4057d ago (Edited 4057d ago )

"Innovation" has a wide swath of meanings.

You are taking a particular definition.
You are talking about Gameplay (Like Z-Target Lock) and I am talking about System Architecture (Like Cartridges to Disc format).

Innovation is just a beneficial change (or just a change).

But in terms of Gameplay and System Power:

1) Miyamoto said last week that somethings in the new Pikman could only be done through more processing power.

2)He also said the same thing about Super Mario Galaxy, whose ideas were originally tested on the Gamecube and later finalized on Wii because it was more powerful.

So, what I am saying is Power does not =Innovation
But it can hinder Innovation.

Majora's Mask could not be done on an Atari 2600
Halo could not be run on NES.
Golden Eye could never be run on SNES.

Wii can't handle WiiU games not because of graphics but because of concepts- Wii does not have the Power to stream to a 2nd screen.

But we all know great games were on all of the systems I mentioned.
And some of the games are better Gameplay-wise or just as good as the games that are around today.

Zelda 1 is one of my favorite Zelda's but so is Z: SS.
Old School Doom is still fun even though new FPS's are deeper.

jmc88884057d ago (Edited 4057d ago )

RAM gives you the ability to load more things into memory from a disc or hard drive so it's ready to be processed.

It doesn't affect power, it's just the ram CAN BE a bottleneck.

Thus if you reduce the bottleneck, then you will see performance increases because the data will be there when the processor/gpu is ready for it. If the processor is waiting, then it slows things down.

Right now on the PS3/360 what you have is that games are quite far beyond that old hardware so to make the games work on the PS3/360 they had to use tricks to get it to load the bigger worlds, but all of this had a price by reducing what it could do elsewhere.

So no, you don't have increases with RAM, with the new console you simply won't have the bottleneck because you won't have to rely on those tricks because the amount of RAM will be sufficient. That's not increase, it's simply removing the slow down from the system.

It's like saying if you are driving you push the gas pedal to go, but with the 360/PS3 if they were a car, you were at the same time hitting the gas and brake at the same time. So is it correct that you have a more powerful car by simply taking your foot off the brake when you hit the gas? NOPE.

But your care will go faster than it would have otherwise.

Simply because you removed what was holding it back.

Basically with the PS4, 8GB's of GDDR5 means that in its lifetime it will have enough memory to not have to worry about resorting to such tricks. If anything it's a bit of a waste seeing that the power of it won't really be able to utilize more than 3 GB's or so of it for gaming in it's fullest extent. Now the reason for this is because it will be a 1080p gaming system, thus those size textures don't utilize 8gb's.

Most of the power of the system will be used to run things that aren't a big user of RAM, but ARE a big user of the power inside the system. Thus what I am saying is the DX11 type effects will tax the systems power whereas the 1080p textures will use up more overall ram than these but use less of it's power. So 8 GB's is a little bit of overkill, but it's an amount that is pretty much justified. It is the right amount. It's just too bad the GPU/CPU combo is a little lacking. Still good, but a little lacking. But overall 8gb's is more appropriate for the size of 1600p or even 4k (3840x2160) gaming. But the system will only be a 1080p gaming machine.

Of course probably 2gb's will be reserved for the OS so you'll have 6gb's or so used for the actual gaming, while the GPU will only be able to push about 3 GB's of it. The remaining is just there for any wasteful process that is invented between now and it's end of life so it's there just in case.

A good example is the GTX 670. They have two varieties. They have a 2gb version and a 4gb version. There is NO difference between the two at 1080p gaming. Even at higher resolutions there is negligible difference.

So really to properly utilize 8gb's of GDDR5 you would literally need a game utilizing the full power of 3-4 PS4's if they were somehow linked and capable of pooling the power together. Then be displaying it to a 4ktv, with monster textures.

Ju4056d ago

I agree with everything you said but the assessment that the 8GB won't be used. This machine has 8GB guaranteed. Believe me, designers will find a way to fill it up and it has nothing to do that it will "only" output 1080p. You are simply not limited to use the same textures over and over again, you are not limited to duplicate geometry over and over again. Worlds can be bigger; sections of the world unique. Set pieces designed differently for various areas. And, well, I'm telling you PCs will hold the consoles back. You'd need VRAM to store all those data; the fastest GPU can't swap those in and out in time to support more than you have VRAM available. 3GB and 6GB cards are coming, but it doesn't help that the majority of cards are sold with 1 or 2GB. And well, of course, with 8GB you can push texture resolution. No more blurry textures on close ups, etc. 4K resolutions isn't the only reason why this makes sense. Well, KZ SF ran probably on 1.5GB, but it only was one level. You could actually load the whole game in one piece and never see a loading screen or a reload.

falcon794056d ago (Edited 4056d ago )

You guys are all thick the wiiu has 4GB on devkits thats official only speculation got us to 2GB ?

ps4 has 8GB on devkits,neogaf,kotaka ect all said the amounts were devkits,so either way wiiu has 4GB and ps4 has 8GB thats the truth with RAM,Nintendo havn't said it has 2GB in retail sites and fanboys stated this.

So if wiiu has half on retail so does ps4 ?

wiiu can technically offer 1.5GB for games and let me just say with S3TC u can compress textures by 4x the amount ect this makes u fit alot more in,vram is used for video so your main RAM isnt needed for this,its mainly just texture compression but it allows for more RAM than the original amount.

Wiiu has IBM 32MB eDRAM on the MCM and there is said to be more ?

Everyone look at the comments from Michel Ancel and TTgames ect they basically say because of memory and the gpu we can do alot more ?? Ancel said its very powerful and has zero memory or texture resolution limitations wiiu texture res is 8096x8096 look it up,its when Ancel said movie quality textures on wiiu are possible,Moonlith soft said zero cpu limitations on X.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4056d ago
Viper74057d ago (Edited 4057d ago )

Let's say..

Ram equals more moving space when developing games. That would probably get closest to the truth. With it you can for example store more stuff to the background (mostly content like 3D-models, textures and audio).

Many of the games stream the content from HDD or disc which is a bit slow as you still need to have it on RAM if you want to use it.

KwietStorm_BLM4056d ago

RAM will never mean innovation. It cannot. It is an essential part for any computer to operate. Increasing the amount does not equal innovation. Not even using a "Non standard" type equals innovation. The way it is used or implemented is a different story, and that comes down to the people, the developers, the architects.

CouldHaveYelledUiiW4056d ago (Edited 4056d ago )

Yes but we are not talking about Computers-

We are talking about Consoles adopting a Computer mainstay.

PS3 an 360 did not have a significant amount of Ram- now they are using Gigs.

That is a NEW TREND an Innovation.

It does not matter if you're impressed by it- it's still something "New" and it is beneficial so it qualifies as an Innovation.

Qrphe4057d ago (Edited 4057d ago )

Power has always allowed for innovation every generation and it always will.

Theyellowflash304057d ago

Except for the PS3 and Xbox 360. This generation brought a bunch of cover based and first person shooters. Hardly innovative in my opinion.

Godmars2904057d ago (Edited 4057d ago )

Because PC was the measured standard this gen whereas before devs had to focus on the hardware they worked with.

Therefor, power does not allow or equal innovation.

3GenGames4057d ago

You possibly should join him in looking for it, as yours seems to have disappeared too. Or you just don't know proper English.

SolidDuck4057d ago

Does anyone actually listen to patcher? He has been full of bs for along time. Sometimes I read it just to laugh.

RandomDude6554057d ago

He's always been a fucking idiot. People are just now figuring this out?

Show all comments (106)
80°

Nintendo's Massacre Of The 3DS And Wii U Is Finally Complete, Regrettably

Hanzala from eXputer: "The cruel hammer of Nintendo has fallen. Farewell, 3DS and Wii U, you surely brightened my life and many others; you won't be forgotten."

280°

Xbox's Preservation Step Sets A Much-Needed Example, Especially For Nintendo

Hanzla from eXputer inquires: "If Xbox can care about preserving its games and legacy, what exactly is wrong with Nintendo, trying to kill game preservation single-handedly?"

purple1015d ago

Ahh yes the good old game preservation of saving all your games to a removable hhd on the Xbox 360, taking it round your mates house, setting up multiple tvs to
Be met with “save data corrupted, please re download”

Or how about removing 360 games
From the store
, download them now or else, and, better hope to god that save data doesn’t corrupt, or it’s lost for ever

Nice one ☝️

Zeref4d ago

It's better than what Nintendo and Playstation is doing. It might not be perfect but at least they are TRYING. Unlike the others.

DarXyde4d ago

Trying? Take off the blinders for a moment, mate.

1. A failure to preserve games is just that: a failure to preserve games. Don't try to sugarcoat it: NO ONE is doing it properly. Better than awful is nothing to write home about.

2. At the time of this comment, isn't it the case that you need an internet connection to play Xbox games even if you buy physical discs that are hardly in circulation anymore? I don't have a Series X and I can't verify, but I think that is correct. I'm fairly certain you can at least play PS5 games at version 1.0 (not much of a win really when many games require day one patches). I think Microsoft's all digital, licensing approach is by far more aggressive than anyone else's. They really try to push you to game pass where you lose your entire library by umm.... Skipping a month of payments.

I don't think anyone is doing it right whatsoever. Don't get me started on Nintendo, who goes after anyone looking to preserve their games better than they ever would with extreme litigation.

Don't be a simp for any of these companies. Get it together.

PhillyDonJawn4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

@DarX never speak on Xbox again. You lost all credibility with your internet connection comment. Smh you have 0 clue and misinformed yet speaking on something you don't no squat about.

Einhander19724d ago

What has Sony done exactly? You guys keep deflecting to Sony but I am not actually seeing any results, and ai am certain nothing that you can come up with even comes close to what Microsoft has done and what they have tried and failed to do, like tie all your disks to your account on xbone.

Microsoft removed their whole indie section when they moved to the xbone because they were going to only allow games on the service that came from a publisher, id@xbox started after xbone launched and it only exists because Sony embraced indie and Microsoft was forced to cancel their plans and reverse course.

And every single game that was part of games for windows live including disk games (I have gta 4 on disk that won't work) so hundreds of games that use that DRM no longer work unless the company themselves patched it out which of course very few did.

MrBaskerville4d ago

Not trying. Tried. they killed of the backcomp program years ago. They set something up again, but sounds like it's more of an attempt to save the current library on whatever they are planning next. With luck they save everything and more, but let's see. I could see them killing off parts of the OG xbox and 360 libraries. Can't imagine that they would allow us to play Forza 5-7 in the future.

With that said, I do like what they've done and really wish they could have done more.

shinoff21834d ago

Zeref

So killing off physical media is trying what exactly. Ms don't really give a fk if you think they do your kidding yourself.

Profchaos4d ago

They are not trying this team is established for forward compatability the team is. It interested in preserving Xbox or 360 games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4d ago
isarai5d ago

Is that why Hellblade 2 is digital only?

Zeref4d ago

Just because it's digital only doesn't mean you can't preserve it. Just put it on an external and you have the exact same functionality of what a disc does.

MrNinosan4d ago

Guess you're trolling, but if you actually think that's how it works, I'd recommend buying some braincells.

mkis0074d ago (Edited 4d ago )

Volitile vs nonvolitile data. A disc will not corrupt either. A drive can be corrupted.

Einhander19725d ago

This is just a scammy PR move to distract from the fact they are going digital only and trying to push streaming and subscriptions only.

No gaming company has pushed harder to remove ownership than Microsoft.

Without discs there is no preservation, preservation can't be done by the rights holders it can only be done by the consumers, anything else is a lie.

5d ago Replies(3)
Einhander19725d ago

Anyone remember xblig which Microsoft removed their whole 360 indie section removing hundreds of games from people?

5d ago
5d ago
Zeref4d ago

Do you know you can put your games on an external and preserve them that way? There are no benefits to discs. ZERO. Idk why some of you are still obsessed with them.

DarXyde4d ago

Because games like Persona 5 exist. It's STILL V1.00. On Playstation, that's a win because 1.00 is installed on the disc—no need to download anything.

If a game does not require any updates, it's all on the disc.

Extremely low bar in the modern era, of course. It's not much of a win by any stretch.

But for now, physical media does have a purpose, at least on Playstation.

Einhander19724d ago

That is factually not how game licensing works, try plugging your hard drive into someone else xbox, It's not going to work, and it won't work if the licensing servers ever go down.

Einhander19724d ago

Anyone remember games for windows live.

I have around a dozen games, some on Steam itself that will not work because Microsoft shut off the licensing servers.

BehindTheRows4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

I do. I STILL have games (Gears of War being the big one) I cannot access because Games for Windows LIVE is total garbage and no one has held Microsoft accountable.

Zeref4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

You don't have an Xbox apparently. Because you can 100 percent plug in your external and play games from it on any Xbox console lol. You just have to be logged in to prove ownership.

Chevalier4d ago

"You don't have an Xbox apparently. Because you can 100 percent plug in your external and play games from it on any Xbox console lol. You just have to be logged in to prove ownership."

Damn how many times do people got to explain your idiocy to you? You can take a copy of Persona 5 like someone used as an example and play that game on ANY console WITHOUT logging in which means I can lend the game to a friend without internet and they can play my game. Can you lend your hard drive to anyone without logging in for them to play? NOPE. That is a huge difference and if you think otherwise then sorry you're an idiot.

Tacoboto4d ago

"No gaming company has pushed harder to remove ownership than Microsoft."

Ubisoft is literally erasing games people bought from their libraries... My PS1-3 discs are useless on modern hardware. Nintendo's re-published and resold almost their entire Wii U library, and the eShop is completely dead with no BC mechanism in the Switch software. Microsoft publishes everything they make today day one on Steam and Xbox/Windows. Sony only brings to PC the titles they think you might want some years later and Nintendo won't even design a functional long-lasting joystick.

You're absolutely trolling and not serious if you think Microsoft today is the worst offender.

shinoff21834d ago

Yay steam

Not everyone fks with computers though. The disc is still the best way as a console player. Period.

Tacoboto4d ago

How do Sony and Nintendo feel about these discs from 2001-2013?

Don't be stupid, you know Xbox is the best at this today.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4d ago
Hofstaderman4d ago

Nobody wants this. Sales or the lack of it in the case of XBOX is very telling. I wonder how the adorably all digital series X will fare. Adorably dismal perhaps?

crazyCoconuts4d ago

Only time will tell, but for from someone like me suspecting that Xbox is trying to gracefully exit the console market, that "forward compatibility" team is trying to get Xbox games playing on Windows PCs. I mean, it's nice that they're not planning on exiting with a "enjoy your games while the hardware still works" message, so that's nice. They still have a brand to protect via Microsoft so probably feel obligated to have a better exit strategy.

Xeofate4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

That is not their plan, their plan is to transfer users accounts to the cloud.

Phil Spencer himself said as much a few months back, plans could have changed but I think people are reading way too much into one statement where Phil said he would allow Epic on xbox because he wants to be able to sell xbox games directly on other platforms. Aka, instead of selling Sea of Thives through PSN he wants to have an xbox store to sell his games on PlayStation without giving PlayStation any money.

Again, it's extremely unlikely that Phil plans to put PC on xbox and licensing would prevent them from just giving out other publishers games purchased on xbox copies of thier games on PC, Microsoft does not own their games.

crazyCoconuts3d ago

The thing that doesn't align with the cloud strategy is the giving up on exclusives. You'd still need strong exclusives for cloud streaming - it's still a "platform" , just with a lower upfront hardware investment. I feel like they've learned what PS learned with PSNow long ago. We're not ready to stream games and it's only gonna lose them money to try at this point

FinalFantasyFanatic4d ago

I would love that, I'd buy up some of the Xbox games if they could run on PC, like the Rare Replay, Lost Odyssey and Dead or Alive Ultimate, probably a pipe dream though.

Show all comments (43)
90°

Nintendo's War Against Player-Made Content Will Hurt The Company In The End

Danish from eXputer: "Nintendo has historically gone against player-made content and emulation of its games. This has done much to harm the company's image."

XiNatsuDragnel11d ago

I agree nintendo hire some these folks to help in your games it'll help imo.

banger8811d ago

They need to stop announcing these mods and fan remakes until they're finished. Finish it, upload it, and then if Nintendo dmca's it tough shit. Once it's online, people can share it around, even if the original download gets taken down.

Jingsing10d ago

True, but most modders need constant admiration during the process to motivate them.

PRIMORDUS10d ago

Yup, once it's a torrent nothing can be done Nintendo is helpless at that point. But it would be wise if they just had a site on the dark web, it's also easy to use with Tor and no one will bother you.

mastershredder10d ago

This is all coming from the mouth of short-sighted fandom and grifting madness.
No.... it wont. There is a clear defined reason why they don't. This is nothing new. Make your own shi7 from your own original ideas especially if you are trying to capitalize of it it. Duh.

Yeah, hire people that have zero respect or understanding for an established process. Wow. Yep. Totally makes sense.

shinoff218310d ago

Those guys that made that sonic game got a gig from sega or something along those lines and that game was dope as hell. One of the best sonics as of late.