Mass Effect 3's storyline, changed at the last minute, may have originally had more in mind than it was allowed to say. Check out this article which discusses the cut content and what gamers should know about its meanings, as they may have been the original message the work delivered to the player's psyche.
Based on one narratively fitting ending in Mass Effect 3, Prothean squadmate Javik is highly unlikely to return in the next Mass Effect game.
He was one of my least favorite characters. I wish they would have done the Proths different.
This Canada Day, explore our homeland with the best video games that have adapted or reimagined the Great White North in digital form.
Mass Effect 3 is remade, rebuilt, and remastered thanks to a huge Mass Effect mod which changes almost everything in the Bioware RPG, as we await Mass Effect 4
Yeah I have wondered if this conspiracy has been true since I first saw the original ending.
Synthesis is evil
EA was all like "Come to the Dark side, we have cookies!" I wouldn't be surprised if they deadass tried to do it though. It IS EA...
Interesting theory lol
o__o
The Dark Energy ending was that Dark Energy was destroying the galaxy, making sun become unstable as in the mission you had to stay in the shade, and that Reapers forestalled the build-up via the Harvest. That's why Humans became important in ME3: a Human Reaper would have stopped the Harvest cycle and saved the galaxy.
But in regard to this article's title, yes, EA/Bioware did indoctrinate/brainwash fans of the series. By focusing on it as a media vehicle rather than a simple game they created a situation where they could peddle any amount of crap and people would buy it. Square's done the same thing with FF.