370°

Why Sony Should’ve waited to Unveil the PS4 at E3

GamersBliss.com writes: "The gaming industry has been a big game of poker. With short stacks coming and going, to even seeing big companies go on tilt and lose all of their chips. Yep here is to looking at you THQ, thanks for the wonderful memories. In the past big names like Sega and even the legendary Atari lost their stacks. Newbies from small time fund-raisers have recently come into the game, Occulus, and the Ouya to name a few. But none are as big as the current chip leaders at the table: Nintendo, Sony and Microsoft. So why would Sony raise the stakes so high on a hand that isn’t made yet?"

Read Full Story >>
gamersbliss.com
jony_dols4071d ago

Sony still have to unveil the actual console which is an event in itself & no doubt they will have a few more unseen 1st-party exclusives that they are saving especially for E3.

I thought that semi-reveal last month was pretty inspired as it has the whole gaming world talking and has left us wanting more. E3 is going to be the best in years!

THESHAUNZY4071d ago

Ps1 e3 1995....Ps2 e3 2000... psp e3 2003...

sashimi4071d ago

We are in the future, Not everything has to be done exactly as in the past, unless you are Amish.

Cupid_Viper_34071d ago (Edited 4071d ago )

"Why Sony Should’ve waited to Unveil the PS4 at E3"

Erm...Maybe the author have already seen the PS4, but the rest of the world haven't. Sony simply announced the PS4 at their event. What they've done is clever really. It's called the "Sniper Effect" where you've heard the shot fired, seen the dead person on the floor, but you don't know "where" the shooter is. So an entire battalion is halted by a single shot as every one is now seeking cover.

Secondly "So why would Sony raise the stakes so high on a hand that isn’t made yet?"

Again Sony haven't revealed their hand, they've simply raised the blinds "poker anyone?" as opposed to just giving giving their competition a free look at the next turn. Sony is saying "here's Killzone, and inFamous, (pretty impresive) But I'm have over over 3 generations of successful IP's that I'm sitting on, so come at me."

So if anyone thinks that what Sony showed is all they've got, then they haven't been gaming for too long.

dafegamer4071d ago

uhhm they could lose steam from other companies.
Sony was smart to gain all the attention for themselves

Saigon4070d ago

This article seemed more of a bash at the Sony brand rather than talk regarding the main issue the author saw which was not showing the actual console, which was eventually mentioned. The author thinks that the gameplay provided from the KZ demo was fake, because of what was done with KZ2. From that comment, I don't think the author actually attended or specifically watched the presentation. That KZ video look like actual game play, and if I remember correctly it was later confirmed, as with the new inFamous title and the other titles shown that some elements shown within the presentation of the games was actual gameplay.

If the rumors are correct, I think the author will be even more disappointed when MS has its reveal party. I really can't wait for this event because I need to see what I am purchasing. The PS4 is already on my radar, just need the system price and a decision will be made on the Next Xbox, based on what is shown. Or maybe I would have to get it anyway for my wife.

RyuStrife4070d ago

Revealing @ E3 is a stupid idea. Sony would have to do a reveal of the PS4, talk about all the features, show games and tech demos, talk about PS3, upcoming games for the PS3, talk PS Vita, PS Vita games, psn updates etc...then all that plus data of sales to satisfy shareholders. All within at most 3 hours (Sony had been doing it @ 2 hours). PS Meeting was about 2 hour. Too much to say/do in too little time.

With the PS meeting done and tech stuff out of the way, they can show more games, more game demos, feature focused demonstration, talk PS 3, Vita, data, price cuts, psn, and whatever they want to talk about. Plus all hardware revisions should be about finalized.

HappyGaming4070d ago (Edited 4070d ago )

@Ashunderfire86 PS3 was announced at E3 2005 not 2006.

@Saigon
The author shouldn't write articles about something he hasn't researched. It was gameplay:
http://www.youtube.com/watc...

Notice how this demo plays differently from the one on the 20th of February!

gaffyh4070d ago

4 months isn't enough time to market and unveil a console. If they are targeting a November release date, they needed to reveal at least something before E3. And it looks like MS is set to do the same.

Announcing what they did in February is the best decision Sony ever made. It gives developers enough time to take a look at all the hype and good ideas that Sony has brought to the table, and decide whether or not they wish to develop a game for the system.

kupomogli4070d ago

@Gumtrol

It was funny when Anthony took the controller.

Saigon4070d ago (Edited 4070d ago )

@Gumtrol

That was a great video, I have been meaning to find that video for a while, thank you.

And if that is not game play, I don't know what is!!!

@gaffyh

I agree, A June Reveal wouldn't have been enough time to actually market and release this system. I think both MS and Sony are making the right decision to reveal before E3...That part that gets me more, is that I suspect if MS had the reveal in February, that all the game journalist, or the so called journalist would have been giving them nothing but praise..

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 4070d ago
Thatguy-3104071d ago

Exactly. Now that they have some info out of the way now they can focus more on games and connectivity. Everything seems very spaced out for a reason.

Merrill4071d ago

I'm so glad these no name "journalists" don't have real jobs where they could actually influence choices with their terrible opinions within Sony regarding the PS4.

I'm sure the Xbox 720 will have the perfect reveal to them.

AngelicIceDiamond4071d ago

People are wondering if Sony jumped the gun announcing a PS4 this early.

It just means Sony is 100% ready and dedicated to next gen. They don't want to make the same mistakes they made with the PS3 at the beginning of the gen.

Sony did shock the world by revealing a brand new console. Despite last year with early rumors stating PS4 getting released in 2014.

MysticStrummer4071d ago

The way I see it, the first reveal was like an extended teaser trailer at the movies. More info that tantalizes but also leaves questions. Sony is going to slowly reveal more info and keep PS4 in the spotlight throughout the year. I'd say it's a great strategy. I always enjoy E3, but now I'm looking forward to it more than usual.

RioKing4070d ago

I'm pretty confused as to why you have so many disagrees to this 0_o

forcefullpower4071d ago

Does now one get it yet why Sony didn't reveal the console. Microsoft tweeted themselves what a stupid idea not to show the console. So what Sony have done is push MS to show their console earlier in April. Yet Sony still said they had not fully completed the console. So what they are doing is making them reveal to much to early. They will then counter at E3 with additional features or hardware inside.

This is like a boxing match. Sony make the first hit see them get annoyed and make a move too quickly and they let loose there best shot while side stepping and letting loose a power house punch knocking them to the floor.

hehe.

Have had a few beer and got bored of the usual car analogies.

Peace and love and all that shit.

SlyGuy4071d ago

If Sony waited until E3, we would have to read a "Why Sony Should Have Revealed the PS4 Prior to E3" article.

Zool 084070d ago

All Sony showed was a taste of things to come

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 4070d ago
Outside_ofthe_Box4071d ago

Other than the fact that people wouldn't be b***ing about not seeing the console, I don't see why they should have waited.

wishingW3L4071d ago (Edited 4071d ago )

they did it at the right time and most gaming websites like Destructoid, GameTrailers, IGN and even Pachter agrees with it.

brave27heart4071d ago

Except anything that comes out of Patchfaces mouth is guaranteed garbage. Not much of an endorsement. Agree they did it at the right time though.

MysticStrummer4071d ago

You just agreed with Pachter's guaranteed garbage.

bicfitness4071d ago

Yeah, because months of hogging the spotlight and of getting into mindshare is a TERRIBLE thing. /s

The articles just get worse and worse.

miyamoto4071d ago

so the damage control continues...

zebramocha4071d ago

Shouldn't you be making wiiu games instead if commenting a stupid Sony article.

bicfitness4071d ago (Edited 4071d ago )

"Damage control" will be the spin that we have to listen to at the end of April when Nintendo misses their hardware targets and Iwata commits seppoku live on Nintendo direct.

What Sony is doing is aggressive and smart. Shows a shift in philosophy from how they started last gen, that's for sure.

GribbleGrunger4071d ago (Edited 4071d ago )

It's incredible that the writer of the 1000th article about this event chose to offer reasons why they shouldn't have revealed it. He's in the net but still thinks he's swimming with the dolphins.

I hope he changes his mind because then I'd be able to call him 'Flipper' [dear God did I write that?]

Godmars2904071d ago

Though now they have room to go into detail about the system, rather than simply announce it.

It is just a box after all.

GribbleGrunger4071d ago (Edited 4071d ago )

Agreed. We've spent a whole generation saying 'It's about the games', but suddenly we want to change that to 'It's about the box.' That just doesn't sound right to me.

I'm currently drinking tea out of a chipped cup but the tea still tastes great.

Show all comments (83)
280°

Sony Taps Bungie's Head of Revenue to Lead Live-Service Games

Sony has recruited Bungie's head of revenue Jaremy Rich to head up its live-service gaming division, Rich has announced on social media.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
ChasterMies19d ago

Please do not put Destiny’s monetization into Sony’s first party games. The monetization is what’s driving players away from Destiny.

just_looken18d ago

The new temp boss is the sony cfo bean counter so i can see this being a thing get every penny.

Cacabunga18d ago

PlayStation officially losing it.. fans will never support gaas games

just_looken18d ago

@car

The new boss did a interview in japan he wants to tap into the mobile market like nintendio so he give 0 fucks about gamers/fans

https://www.pushsquare.com/...

Redemption-6418d ago

@Cacabunga
You only speak for you and those who think like you, but most fans will support what they want. Playstation and PC fans are literally supporting Helldivers 2 and that is a gaas. Maybe you wouldn't, but many more would if they like it.

Huey_My_D_Long18d ago

@Redemption-64
Look, Im not making any judgement calls about this guy, but I will say that Helldivers 2 GaaS model is unique to Helldivers, and legit the only other game I can think of thats similiar was the Avengers game except HD2 pass is still better.
The fact that you can earn in game currency in a way that doesnt make you feel like you have to grind forever, as well you being able work on that pass that you bought...on your own time without a time limit...that right there is fucking huge to me, and I can't name any game other than avengers that avoided trapping players with FOMO logic...I think GaaS on HD2 shouldn't be compared to the rest of the industry...it should be copied.

Einhander197218d ago

Cacabunga

Helldivers 2...

Redemption-64

In Europe it's a 60 40 split favoring PC.
In the US its a 60 40 split favoring PS5.

So PlayStation owners supported the game just fine, it's not getting carried by PC or anything like that.

FinalFantasyFanatic18d ago

@just_looken,
I'm perfectly fine with the way Nintendo entered the mobile market, I never touched their mobile games, meanwhile, the console/handheld stayed the way it is. As for being a bean counter, he's probably going to reel in these massive budgets that Sony's studios have had lately, I haven't played Spiderman 2, but I cannot see how they almost tripled the budget for that game.

@Redemption-64,
That's an exception to the rule, I'm expecting a lot of these GAAS games from Sony to fail, to be fair, they only need a few to succeed, but I would have preferred that they put more of their resources into other types of games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 18d ago
DivineHand12518d ago

True their monetization is driving players away and at the same time, their decision to chop out content and convoluted systems is keeping new players away from the game.

Joe91318d ago

I don't think that will happen based on how things worked out at Naughty Dog now that we know what we do, seems they had the option to fully commit to live service games or stay making single player experences so they gave up on their live service game. We are not sure how things came about with Bend making a live service game but I hope that was not a forced situation. Sony doesnt seem like they are forcing studios to switch up but we will see, Sony's bread and butter is single player games it is how they dominated the console market.

Obscure_Observer18d ago

Yeah, I though Sony learned something from all their failures in the LS segment under Bungie´s disastrous leadership and supervision which led to games been cancelled, studios closed and all the people laid off.

Looks like Bungie still plays a major role in Sony´s LS initiative and Sony is not backtracking on their GaaS plans.

S2Killinit18d ago (Edited 18d ago )

Are we forgetting that Destiny is also a highly successful franchise? I feel like that definitely deserves mention here.

Besides, there is no reason why a person cant learn from past experiences.

Joe91318d ago

I agree, people act as if Destiny flopped when it came out lol it took 9 to 10 years for the numbers to fall yet people are still playing it add the success of Helldivers 2 no wonder Sony is going forward down this path.

S2Killinit18d ago

Personally, I see no problem with Sony also having service games as long as they make good ones, and more importantly they deliver the AAA story driven games that they are known for. So yeah, I agree 100% with you.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 18d ago
Christopher18d ago

I mean, this person made some pretty bad decisions at Bungie. I hope they've learned from them because I definitely don't see those type of ideas as good for PlaySation in general.

CrimsonWing6918d ago (Edited 18d ago )

Honestly, what’s to learn from? How to make people happily continuously dump money into a single game over its life-time? Buy season passes continuously for several years with a smile on our faces?

GaaS is a design decision that is everything wrong with this industry. The fact that Helldivers 2 did so well and people defend the monetization because it was $40 and is a fun game, scares the sh*t out of me to see that the door is open and all shift will probably be to replicate that in future games. We already know the ROI for traditional game dev cost isn’t doing it for them.

I thought with Jimbo leaving we’d see a change for the better… I’m not so sure now.

S2Killinit18d ago

Service games are being offered by everyone. Sony cannot afford to only create single player AAA games. No one can. They already said they will be doing both.

Abnor_Mal18d ago (Edited 18d ago )

Ps5 gamers in 2023 seemed to play more live service types of games, so regardless to how people feel about them, numbers don’t lie and Sony is going where the money is. I mean look at the excitement around Helldivers2, people are showing that they want live service games.

Christopher18d ago

They play long-time existing live service games like CoD, Fortnite, Apex Legends, Destiny 2, and the like. Mass majority of new live service games are considered failures and aren't moving gamers away from older games.

just_looken18d ago

Yep the huge issue with live service is they need paid players along with a reason to play them.

You forgot mobile market that also taps into that player base as well as the eve online style games there is only a certain amount of krakens/whales blind supporters compared to the amount of live service games we have its not sustainable math wise.

700 restaurants making food for every seat for 1000-3000 eaters just does not work out

Einhander197218d ago (Edited 18d ago )

Christopher

I am not a big live service fan and literally own zero of the games you listed, but that is not true, unless you call games that aren't the top games to be failures.

There are tons of live service games that are profitable.

Games don't have to be the biggest game ever they just need to make more than they cost.

I challenge you to show professionally prepared data that shows that more live service games fail than make enough to keep going.

Because all the data that I have seen shows that live service is less of a gamble than making a big AAA budget game which needs to survive off retail sales.

FinalFantasyFanatic18d ago

I sometimes wonder if we're at saturation point, where it's hard for a new game to join those ranks unless it's particularly exceptional, people only have so much time and money to devote to these types of games.

romulus2318d ago

Correction, they have no issue playing good live service games

shinoff218318d ago

Lol it's not even a quarter of the ps5s sold. Helldivers may have been a hit but let's not say most are enjoying it because truth is most(the real most ) don't care about it.

S2Killinit18d ago (Edited 18d ago )

I play what is fun. If a live service game is good I’ll play it as long as its not a money scheme which Helldivers is not.

And Im a single player gamer.

mastershredder18d ago

How do you kill a franchise that already been killed?
Destiny’s grind, cash-in-on-playbass-cha-Ching, and pop-culture-insertion mainstream-me-too bs totally killed any rep Bungie had. Sony/Bungie, if you are doing this to ward-off players, it’s already working.

crazyCoconuts18d ago

Headline truncated:
"... off a cliff"

Show all comments (43)
80°

Sony May Soon Let You Decide How Much NPCs Talk In Games

Sony has patented to add multiple dialogue modes to let players switch between how many conversations with NPCs they want in the game.

blackblades24d ago

Sony is like the only ones outta the 3 that has atuff like like this pop up changing thing in ways.

just_looken24d ago

Sony in the past has always been first at bat with new ideas/tech but in the end never fully use it or just toss it away.

blackblades24d ago

I think they did use some but yeah most usually never happened but at least they thought about it. Sony seeks things like this and other, Nintendo seek different ways of playing going by there different controler designs and console designs.

just_looken24d ago (Edited 24d ago )

some of the other stuff sony want's/owns never used
https://gamerant.com/sony-p...
https://gamerant.com/sony-p...
https://www.eurogamer.net/s...
https://metro.co.uk/2023/03...
https://decrypt.co/114754/s...

monitor/adjust game difficultly as you play
https://www.techradar.com/g...

Sony nfts
https://www.theblock.co/pos...

Pay ai to play the game for you
https://thebusinessofesport...

Oh all the above last 12 months

I just imagine a evil scientist with test subjects when it comes down to sony recent patent reports.

Kaii24d ago

Will we get dialogue options that won't spoil puzzles in a matter of seconds? :p

280°

Judge rules in PlayStation's favour in $500m patent infringement lawsuit

Genuine Enabling Technology was seeking damages, claiming the tech allowing PlayStation consoles and controllers to communicate infringes its rights.

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
S2Killinit26d ago

Big victory for Sony. And a long time coming.

DarXyde26d ago (Edited 26d ago )

Crazy to think the savings from this lawsuit allows them to develop one AAA game.

Make it Bloodborne 2, please and thank you.

26d ago
Profchaos26d ago

Sounds like patent trolling they tried the same thing against Nintendo with the same pattern.

Motion and control input traversing over higher and lower frequencies seperate from each other allowing the controller to do both

Pyrofire9526d ago

Patents suck. Most of them are complete garbage.

Knightofelemia26d ago

So to recoup the money Genuine is going to take on Nintendo or Microsoft next. I hate patent lawyers they are some of the worst bottom feeders out there.

Show all comments (13)