360°

IGN - PS4: How Sony is Setting its Sights on World Domination

How the PlayStation 4 reveal showed a much more global Sony than we’ve seen before.

GribbleGrunger4066d ago (Edited 4066d ago )

This is actually quite a good read. I don't often agree with IGN but I do here. Whether Sony can achieve what is proposed remains to be seen because you can't discount Microsoft who have proven themselves to be a formidable opponent. When all is said and done, I think that parity in hardware and consumer penetration is the best we can really hope for. Negating the mythical console race would perhaps help alleviate any unnecessary friction between the camps.

Here's to a frownless future!

ShugaCane4066d ago

The more competition there is between the constructors, the more they will try to impress us and thus the more amazing games we are going to be able to play. At least, this is my logic. The PS4 set the bar pretty high, and I sincerely hope Microsoft has some amazing stuff to show, so that Sony will do its best to bring even more incredible things. And then Microsoft (and Nintendo hopefully) will counter-attack. And then Sony. And so on. Gamers will benefit from that dynamics.

GribbleGrunger4066d ago (Edited 4066d ago )

And it's sound logic. The alternative is to stifle the tech advantages of another console with contractual obligations. It's a more half empty than half full approach, but it helps prevent developer migration. This would negate the process you have suggested but would also make sure that one company didn't rise above the other. Let's hope it never comes to that ... Which is why I think it's best to hope for hardware parity.

Let the contest be limited to 1st party software and THEN we'll see the consoles push each other hard.

MikeMyers4066d ago

There will never be technical parity because the PC is always pushing forward. In consoles we had the technically superior Xbox over the PS2 and then we had the technical advantages of the PS3 hardware to that of the Xbox 360. The differences didn't seem to matter two generations ago so why would it now? People should be supporting the PC market more if they want the most advanced hardware. Consoles shouldn't be the lead platform, the PC should be. From there games should be scaled to bring out the strengths of each console.

Cupid_Viper_34066d ago

@ MikeMyers
"People should be supporting the PC market more if they want the most advanced hardware."

I don't think you get it son. The people who wants "the most advanced hardware" already own a super expansive, top of the line PC. The rest simply don't want to deal with it, as it's not a straight forward thing.

You can brag about your modded 1000 HP Toyota Supra all you want to, but a 500 HP formula formula 1 car will kill it on the track. Why? Optimization. It has been built from the ground up with one purpose in mind, the track. So it's not always about Moa Powah, it's sometimes about how fast and precisely can you take corners.

And that's the approach a console manufacturer takes as opposed to the PC which is an all purpose machine. So chill out with the PC stuff for a bit, if people wanted to game on PCs they would have done it by now. We all own one don't we?

dcbronco4066d ago (Edited 4066d ago )

@Mikemyers

I disagree but from the standpoint that since consoles are closed systems they are a better platform to see what best parts can do when optimized. If consoles were to update more often it would be the best situation.

I am hoping Steambox will be just that. A system that takes a small selection of parts that make a total of 3 or 4 specs for game makers to target. Those specs would then be used by each PC manufacturer to make a case around. Maybe Nvidia GPUs to couple to a specific AMD APU or Intel CPU and the same for two AMD GPUs. Let that stand for two or three years until a new spec is launched. And all cases should be upgradable to cut customer cost.

Or console maker can just launch new consoles every 4 or 5 years.

4066d ago
Denethor_II4066d ago

"You can brag about your modded 1000 HP Toyota Supra all you want to, but a 500 HP formula formula 1 car will kill it on the track. Why? Optimization."

Don't forget power to weight ratio.

MikeMyers4066d ago (Edited 4066d ago )

Cupid Viper, no matter how much you optimize the games on consoles they can and have been trumped on the PC. Battlefield 3 is a perfect example of how it chugged along at 30fps on consoles and was 720p with way less players online. On the PC they did a heck of a lot more. So why should EA make it for the console as the lead platform when we know they can and did more?

Each generation we see consoles compete with PC games early on as the PC front continues to push forward. Sure not all games make the best use of what PC's can offer but that is because the marketing and support is often in favor for the consoles.

All of the arguments from last gen about how powerful the PS3 was to that of the Xbox360 was and still is ridiculous and the sad thing Is we are already seeing that with the upcoming generation. Seems to me it's not even about how powerful the console is but just a continuous game of Sony fans versus Microsoft fans.

JackBNimble4065d ago

@mikemyers

considering how many AAA games on pc are actually ports fron console games, one would think that the support should be on the console rather then the pc. Don't missunderstand what I am saying here, I am a pc gamer as well, but pc gamers should embrace the ps4 and nextbox because it will make developing and porting better games to the pc. Atleast next gen should be better then this current gen for consoles and pc with what sony has showed us.The easier it is for devs to port the better it is for everyone.

The better the consoles are in general , then the better it will be for pc.

MikeMyers4065d ago

JackBNimble,

That is somewhat true. You see Sony finally not having a Playstation console within their Ivory Tower as they call it. Sony sees the advantage now of not having such proprietary hardware. Where developers can port games easily. The Xbox was already like a PC. I still think the assets should be built on the most powerful device and then tailored to bring out the strengths of each ported system.

The problem we saw on the PS3 is developers didn't really want to take the time exploiting what the PS3 could do and often had issues porting games to it. The PS4 looks to change all that.

As time goes on the next gen consoles will be holding back PC gaming once again. That is where all the marketing is and a lot of times the PC port suffers because of it. Because they too won't take the time to make most of what the latest PC graphics cards can do.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 4065d ago
jp_footy24066d ago

Do you think ps4 is the last console we will buy? Will internet speeds be fast enough to stream all games in 6 years?...

Conzul4066d ago

Nope.
Not to mention that having a console is FUN.
I *like* that big black obelisk under my HDTV.

shutUpAndTakeMyMoney4066d ago

yesterday the ps4 logo was front page of amazon! Marketing is better already!

Gimmemorebubblez4066d ago

Is it just me or is every corporation setting their sights on "World Domination"

I think if Sony wants to dominate the gaming space they need to conserve cash for 2014 and 2015 because that is when EA looses the NFL and Fifa licenses. If Sony can buy those licenses then they will gain a huge edge over MS. They also need to ensure that NONE of their Movies and Music content is available on MS's console.

MikeMyers4066d ago

Well for the first time Sony is actually listening to developers all around the world with the help of designing the PS4. Sony needed to stop making decisions based out of Japan from a Japanese perspective. I support the notion Japan is still very important but it can't be it's main focus. Not when sales are far grater outside of that country.

The PS4 is off to a great start from what I've seen so far. Microsoft is still the wild card.

akaakaaka4066d ago (Edited 4066d ago )

that good news! I hope FIFA goes to KONAMI!
they deserve it!!

I love Sony but sport should be played by anyone not only one console..
I will love if Konami goes exclusive o P and PS4 but is not fair for other gamers..

FIFA should go for a third party plus i bet fifa force whoever has their license to make the game for every console possible including cell phones and Sony or M$ can't do that.

KingofGambling4066d ago

I think baseball is good enough for Sony.

XboxInnovation4066d ago

Just my opinion but Killzone, infamous and knack are not strong enough titles to even sell a console let alone take over Microsoft.

GribbleGrunger4066d ago (Edited 4066d ago )

With respect I think you are wrong there. Knack is an unknown IP so I'd have to agree with you on that, but KZ and Infamous will sell many consoles ... trust me. And the list of replies you get baring this out will attest to that.

Omni-Tool4066d ago

Metal Gear Solid 5: Ground Zeroes will sell consoles. Granted I will have a PS4 at launch. I'm already working my schedule around to possibly take a week off during this holiday season for the launch. I am in full support for sony and I want them to continue making great products.

IAmTheBest354066d ago

sony first party titles have trouble selling though.. at least they have for this past generation.

IK IR Y IP T4066d ago

For one killzone is generic and garbage period infamous is a very good ip, Lets get real here knack looks like a garbage Katamari rip off. But i will say this the reason I gravitated towards the xbox was because of sony being cheap not adding cross game chat,The generic cross media bar is a joke and xbox live is ten times better hands down,But now I am very satisfied with the new ui pictures that have been released and I know the ps4 will be great but im pist sony promised me the ps3 was going to last 10 yrs thats why I dropped 600 at launch for it and the system has been a paper weight ever since besides the few times I played the first party games which only lasted for no more then 12 hrs.So with all that said and done I will get a ps4 but not at launch no way but microsoft is not sweating sony at all they actually made money off the 360 unlike sony still hasn't made a dime off the ps3.Reguardless as gamers I think we are about to experience the best year in gaming since the super nintendo launched and if anybody is worried its nintendo !

xursz4065d ago (Edited 4065d ago )

This guy doesn't have a clue what generic means.^

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4065d ago
Genuine-User4066d ago

Your opinion is pure ignorance "in my opinion" lol

clintagious6504066d ago

Im guessing u think kinect 2.0 will do better? Just saying because lately ms hasnt really had anything to brag about besides halo 4 & gears. Not really much of a powerhouse unless u include their phat wallet as games lol.

Evil-snuggles4066d ago

amen clintagious650 even wii let go of motion sensor crap it's just a gimmick fad microscam are doubling down on kinect and kinect does not improve game play at all

clintagious6504066d ago

Evil-snuggles

Yeah i mean im just being honest & u can throw in the wii in there aswell. It might not have the best games that cater to the core but nintendo dishes out new innovative ip's for their fan base all the time. Wii u might have a slow start but u can bet when the next zelda and most of nintendos other exclusives hit the system will start selling very well.

I just hope when MS reveals its nextbox that they show 2 or 3 new ip's for their core audience cause i will be disappointed if they show 2 or 3 new kinect games & 1 new ip. That would show me that they are ditching the core base in favor of kinect. Lets hope thats not the case.

Evil-snuggles4066d ago

clintagious650 i agree shigeru miyamoto is a genius the problem with nintendo is there lack of software from third party developers i don't think the wii u can recover is consoles cycle the wii u is to underpowered third party developers are already jumping ship it's the new dreamcast when p4s and xbox 720 are out and third party developers stop makeing game for ps3 and xbox 360 no more third party games for the wii u it's easy to port games from 360 and ps3 to wii u ps4 and 720 game will be more technically advanced and harder to port to wii u

Seraphemz4066d ago (Edited 4066d ago )

Who is saying that those are the only games that the PS4 will have?? Im sure that by E3, SONY will have a couple more exclusives..

Either way though, Killzone and Infamous are great franchises..

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4065d ago
Kingthrash3604066d ago

Wasn't it just yesterday articles were bashing Sony saying they were on the verge of going out of business? Now its "world domination". Lol

squarecircle4066d ago

Are you saying a company that is on the verge of collapse can't possibly set their goals on world domination?

Sega did exactly that, they threw everything they could with the Dreamcast as one big last effort, but it simply wasn't enough.

Cupid_Viper_34066d ago

Are you saying that you believe that Sony is in similar situation to SEGA?

fsfsxii4066d ago

I thought their losses went from being 3 billion usd to 100 million usd.
How do you explain sony being on the verge of collapse??

Kingthrash3604066d ago

No im saying article writers dont know what they are talking about these days. Its like they walk into a conversation hear the last two words ....then write an article about it.

Genuine-User4066d ago

I shall help Sony dominate by buying the playstation 4 and most of its exclusive titles.

Show all comments (57)
280°

Sony Taps Bungie's Head of Revenue to Lead Live-Service Games

Sony has recruited Bungie's head of revenue Jaremy Rich to head up its live-service gaming division, Rich has announced on social media.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
ChasterMies14d ago

Please do not put Destiny’s monetization into Sony’s first party games. The monetization is what’s driving players away from Destiny.

just_looken14d ago

The new temp boss is the sony cfo bean counter so i can see this being a thing get every penny.

Cacabunga14d ago

PlayStation officially losing it.. fans will never support gaas games

just_looken14d ago

@car

The new boss did a interview in japan he wants to tap into the mobile market like nintendio so he give 0 fucks about gamers/fans

https://www.pushsquare.com/...

Redemption-6413d ago

@Cacabunga
You only speak for you and those who think like you, but most fans will support what they want. Playstation and PC fans are literally supporting Helldivers 2 and that is a gaas. Maybe you wouldn't, but many more would if they like it.

Huey_My_D_Long13d ago

@Redemption-64
Look, Im not making any judgement calls about this guy, but I will say that Helldivers 2 GaaS model is unique to Helldivers, and legit the only other game I can think of thats similiar was the Avengers game except HD2 pass is still better.
The fact that you can earn in game currency in a way that doesnt make you feel like you have to grind forever, as well you being able work on that pass that you bought...on your own time without a time limit...that right there is fucking huge to me, and I can't name any game other than avengers that avoided trapping players with FOMO logic...I think GaaS on HD2 shouldn't be compared to the rest of the industry...it should be copied.

Einhander197213d ago

Cacabunga

Helldivers 2...

Redemption-64

In Europe it's a 60 40 split favoring PC.
In the US its a 60 40 split favoring PS5.

So PlayStation owners supported the game just fine, it's not getting carried by PC or anything like that.

FinalFantasyFanatic13d ago

@just_looken,
I'm perfectly fine with the way Nintendo entered the mobile market, I never touched their mobile games, meanwhile, the console/handheld stayed the way it is. As for being a bean counter, he's probably going to reel in these massive budgets that Sony's studios have had lately, I haven't played Spiderman 2, but I cannot see how they almost tripled the budget for that game.

@Redemption-64,
That's an exception to the rule, I'm expecting a lot of these GAAS games from Sony to fail, to be fair, they only need a few to succeed, but I would have preferred that they put more of their resources into other types of games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 13d ago
DivineHand12514d ago

True their monetization is driving players away and at the same time, their decision to chop out content and convoluted systems is keeping new players away from the game.

Joe91314d ago

I don't think that will happen based on how things worked out at Naughty Dog now that we know what we do, seems they had the option to fully commit to live service games or stay making single player experences so they gave up on their live service game. We are not sure how things came about with Bend making a live service game but I hope that was not a forced situation. Sony doesnt seem like they are forcing studios to switch up but we will see, Sony's bread and butter is single player games it is how they dominated the console market.

Obscure_Observer14d ago

Yeah, I though Sony learned something from all their failures in the LS segment under Bungie´s disastrous leadership and supervision which led to games been cancelled, studios closed and all the people laid off.

Looks like Bungie still plays a major role in Sony´s LS initiative and Sony is not backtracking on their GaaS plans.

S2Killinit14d ago (Edited 14d ago )

Are we forgetting that Destiny is also a highly successful franchise? I feel like that definitely deserves mention here.

Besides, there is no reason why a person cant learn from past experiences.

Joe91313d ago

I agree, people act as if Destiny flopped when it came out lol it took 9 to 10 years for the numbers to fall yet people are still playing it add the success of Helldivers 2 no wonder Sony is going forward down this path.

S2Killinit13d ago

Personally, I see no problem with Sony also having service games as long as they make good ones, and more importantly they deliver the AAA story driven games that they are known for. So yeah, I agree 100% with you.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 13d ago
Christopher14d ago

I mean, this person made some pretty bad decisions at Bungie. I hope they've learned from them because I definitely don't see those type of ideas as good for PlaySation in general.

CrimsonWing6913d ago (Edited 13d ago )

Honestly, what’s to learn from? How to make people happily continuously dump money into a single game over its life-time? Buy season passes continuously for several years with a smile on our faces?

GaaS is a design decision that is everything wrong with this industry. The fact that Helldivers 2 did so well and people defend the monetization because it was $40 and is a fun game, scares the sh*t out of me to see that the door is open and all shift will probably be to replicate that in future games. We already know the ROI for traditional game dev cost isn’t doing it for them.

I thought with Jimbo leaving we’d see a change for the better… I’m not so sure now.

S2Killinit13d ago

Service games are being offered by everyone. Sony cannot afford to only create single player AAA games. No one can. They already said they will be doing both.

Abnor_Mal14d ago (Edited 14d ago )

Ps5 gamers in 2023 seemed to play more live service types of games, so regardless to how people feel about them, numbers don’t lie and Sony is going where the money is. I mean look at the excitement around Helldivers2, people are showing that they want live service games.

Christopher14d ago

They play long-time existing live service games like CoD, Fortnite, Apex Legends, Destiny 2, and the like. Mass majority of new live service games are considered failures and aren't moving gamers away from older games.

just_looken14d ago

Yep the huge issue with live service is they need paid players along with a reason to play them.

You forgot mobile market that also taps into that player base as well as the eve online style games there is only a certain amount of krakens/whales blind supporters compared to the amount of live service games we have its not sustainable math wise.

700 restaurants making food for every seat for 1000-3000 eaters just does not work out

Einhander197213d ago (Edited 13d ago )

Christopher

I am not a big live service fan and literally own zero of the games you listed, but that is not true, unless you call games that aren't the top games to be failures.

There are tons of live service games that are profitable.

Games don't have to be the biggest game ever they just need to make more than they cost.

I challenge you to show professionally prepared data that shows that more live service games fail than make enough to keep going.

Because all the data that I have seen shows that live service is less of a gamble than making a big AAA budget game which needs to survive off retail sales.

FinalFantasyFanatic13d ago

I sometimes wonder if we're at saturation point, where it's hard for a new game to join those ranks unless it's particularly exceptional, people only have so much time and money to devote to these types of games.

romulus2314d ago

Correction, they have no issue playing good live service games

shinoff218313d ago

Lol it's not even a quarter of the ps5s sold. Helldivers may have been a hit but let's not say most are enjoying it because truth is most(the real most ) don't care about it.

S2Killinit13d ago (Edited 13d ago )

I play what is fun. If a live service game is good I’ll play it as long as its not a money scheme which Helldivers is not.

And Im a single player gamer.

mastershredder14d ago

How do you kill a franchise that already been killed?
Destiny’s grind, cash-in-on-playbass-cha-Ching, and pop-culture-insertion mainstream-me-too bs totally killed any rep Bungie had. Sony/Bungie, if you are doing this to ward-off players, it’s already working.

crazyCoconuts14d ago

Headline truncated:
"... off a cliff"

Show all comments (43)
80°

Sony May Soon Let You Decide How Much NPCs Talk In Games

Sony has patented to add multiple dialogue modes to let players switch between how many conversations with NPCs they want in the game.

blackblades20d ago

Sony is like the only ones outta the 3 that has atuff like like this pop up changing thing in ways.

just_looken20d ago

Sony in the past has always been first at bat with new ideas/tech but in the end never fully use it or just toss it away.

blackblades20d ago

I think they did use some but yeah most usually never happened but at least they thought about it. Sony seeks things like this and other, Nintendo seek different ways of playing going by there different controler designs and console designs.

just_looken20d ago (Edited 20d ago )

some of the other stuff sony want's/owns never used
https://gamerant.com/sony-p...
https://gamerant.com/sony-p...
https://www.eurogamer.net/s...
https://metro.co.uk/2023/03...
https://decrypt.co/114754/s...

monitor/adjust game difficultly as you play
https://www.techradar.com/g...

Sony nfts
https://www.theblock.co/pos...

Pay ai to play the game for you
https://thebusinessofesport...

Oh all the above last 12 months

I just imagine a evil scientist with test subjects when it comes down to sony recent patent reports.

Kaii19d ago

Will we get dialogue options that won't spoil puzzles in a matter of seconds? :p

280°

Judge rules in PlayStation's favour in $500m patent infringement lawsuit

Genuine Enabling Technology was seeking damages, claiming the tech allowing PlayStation consoles and controllers to communicate infringes its rights.

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
S2Killinit21d ago

Big victory for Sony. And a long time coming.

DarXyde21d ago (Edited 21d ago )

Crazy to think the savings from this lawsuit allows them to develop one AAA game.

Make it Bloodborne 2, please and thank you.

21d ago
Profchaos21d ago

Sounds like patent trolling they tried the same thing against Nintendo with the same pattern.

Motion and control input traversing over higher and lower frequencies seperate from each other allowing the controller to do both

Pyrofire9521d ago

Patents suck. Most of them are complete garbage.

Knightofelemia21d ago

So to recoup the money Genuine is going to take on Nintendo or Microsoft next. I hate patent lawyers they are some of the worst bottom feeders out there.

Show all comments (13)