60°

Top 5 Character Sources Disney INFINITY Must Reference for Future Playsets

Disney INFINITY has recently announced it's first few playsets, few of which appeal to gamers who grew up in the 80s and 90s. This articles recommends 5 sources that Disney should tap if they want to get buy-in from the older gamer.

Read Full Story >>
gamercheeese.com
pr0t0typeknuckles4075d ago

if they pit gargoyles and any characters from studio dhibi in it then im more likely to buy this just for those, but lets be honest those are some slim chances.

BlackIceJoe4074d ago

Gargoyles and Tale Spin would be awesome. I still don't understand why Disney has not made a live action movie of Gargyles. It could be like their version of Lord of the Rings.

The Great Mouse Detective would be great. The same with Rescuers down under.

Having Studio Ghibli games could be fun. But Disney would then have to license them & I don't think they would do that.

3-4-54074d ago

* TailSpin

* DarkWing Duck

Such good shoes back when cartoons on tv were awesome.

anyways yea both of those would sell.

70°

Avalanche Studios Staff Reach Two-Year Union Contract

After six months of negotiating, Avalanche Studios staff have successfully unionized with a new two-year collective bargaining agreement.

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
thorstein11d ago

Sega unionized, now Avalanche. Rafiki: It is time

XiNatsuDragnel11d ago

Unionization is the future homie

70°

5 Retro Disney Games That Need Modern Remakes

Before games inspired by movies and TV shows became blatant cash grabs, there was a time when players actually had some solid titles inspired by various IPs, and Disney made some of the best

Read Full Story >>
insidethemagic.net
Yi-Long534d ago

Quackshot for me, simply because I think there’s a lot of potential for improving on the original and I would love a great platformer starring Donald in a world-traveling Ducktales-style adventure.

50°

How Disney has underachieved with Star Wars video games

Has Disney done more harm than good to Star Wars when it comes to gaming?

Read Full Story >>
aiptcomics.com
Gridknac535d ago (Edited 535d ago )

Thats not a question that even needs to be asked. Anybody that is a fan of Star Wars and video games knows EA could fuck up a 1500lb steel BB in the middle of a cotton field barefooted. It truly is a travesty that EA is one of the most profitable game companies. Any company that would have made as many missteps with franchises as they did would have folded under and had all of its licenses pulled. Because of MT that litter their games, EA is artificially kept relevant in the industry. They are able to hold on to these licenses with the billions they milk out of gamers every year. So hell yeah Disney underachieved. But we all knew that was going to happen the minute news broke they were partnering with EA.

anast534d ago

It's the refusal to do what it takes to get an actual creative project off the ground. Instead Disney and co. pushed out minimal viable products for the majority of its gaming life cycle.

Gridknac534d ago

Its especially sad that Disney obtained Lucasart Games in the buy out, but chose to close the studio and outsource its game development. Just look at the list of games Lucasart was a part of creating. What exec looked at this list and thought "No, we would be better off letting EA handle things".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wi...

CrimsonIdol533d ago

Yeah but in reality Lucasarts was dead a long time before Disney bought it out and officially closed it down. They were already outsourcing other developers to make their games, and had long since killed off their legendary in-house original IP studios in favour of making the big bucks with the star wars IP

ZeekQuattro533d ago

By the time Disney came around Lucasarts Games was already in disarray. Be it Star Wars Kinect or Star Wars 1313 that was in development hell before the buyout I can see why Disney wanted them shutdown. There are other missteps as well. Long story short Lucasarts would of went under eventually at the rate they were going.