110°

Sony's PlayStation 4 Reveal - Did It Meet Our Expectations? - Push Square

Push Square: "Just moments before Wednesday’s big PlayStation 4 press conference, we rounded up as many Push Square staff members as we could get our hands on, in order to discuss our hopes, dreams, and fears for Sony’s next generation platform. Now, with the console blown wide open, we’ve repeated the more-challenging-than-it-sound s task, herding up a familiar roster of names for a good old chinwag about the impending system and its coming out party."

Read Full Story >>
pushsquare.com
JoGam4077d ago (Edited 4077d ago )

It met mine. That's all that matter to me. Its my money and Sony is getting it. If its wrong, then I don't wanna be right. Sheeeet.

shivvy244076d ago

Gaikai , GDDR5 , Controller with amazing features , awesome new interface and Awesome exclusives ! ITS A WIN !!!

morkendo234076d ago (Edited 4076d ago )

"did Sony ps4 meet my expectations?"

IMO my only!!! expectations is games,games,games
bluray movies. all the rest not interested dont play online,not interested in someone taking over my gameplay by remote,not interested in showing my game play online nor "share" it with anyone online. nor am I interested in social networking.
so did ps4 meet my expectation?? gaming/movies wise YES!!

those of you under the age of 50 might not understand where im coming from with not wanting to socialize online (privacy). all those features not really necessary rather have a ps2 with ps3 graphic's

unchartedxplorer4076d ago

It surpassed my expectations. I was only expecting them to announce it. But the new controller, more online features and the explaining of the specs not to mention the awesome-looking KZ Shadow fall gameplay really impressed me.

Irishguy954076d ago (Edited 4076d ago )

It was a good show but...I don't get why so many people go on about the Ram. Look, Ram is important. But it's not THAT important. It's important when you don't have enough. Having 8GB's means they have enough to support the features they are implementing. 4GB's to 8 GB's does not improve the CPU and GPU. Obviously 4Gb's was enough for them or Sony wouldn't have put 4 in it in the first place. Sony through it up to 8 just to outdo MS.

In fact, you often hear people with a lack of knowledge on Tech quoting the amount of Ram it has. If I ask them what CPU or GPU they have they won't have a clue. It's the same for PC's labtops and Consoles. I actually had a friend come up and tell me "I got a new laptop and it has an Nvidia graphics card" with a look of amazement on his face....I was like..."Do you know which one?" He replied " An Nvidia one!"...... Yeah...probably a shit one that you bought without knowing it was actually shit

Nicaragua4076d ago (Edited 4076d ago )

It's because we are at a stage in technology where there isn't a vast difference between gaming cpu's, so there isn't much to discuss.

Kill zone on the ps4 isn't going to require vastly more CPU than KZ3 did on the ps3 - the AI and physics are going to be pretty similar.

The large amount of RAM though allows for bigger levels and better textures,and those are what is going to get noticed.

r1sh124076d ago (Edited 4076d ago )

LOOOLLLL... OMG
RAM is important, because it allows the CPU to access data quickly in any order the CPU prioritises.
The higher the ram the more can be stored and in turn the more can be accessed quickly by the CPU.
Not only that, the speed of the RAM is just as important.
So yes RAM will improve CPU performance (in being able to access the data and process it).

RAM and graphics cards are the first things to become a drawback of consoles. The CPU's these days can process insane amounts of data.

Im 100% sure the current processor in the PS3 will work just as good as the PS4 processor (To a point) before it would need to be 'upgraded'.

Try this, build a PC slam the most powerful I7 processor in it, and only allow the PC to have 2Gb ram or something and run a very resource heavy piece of software/game (whatever).
Then do the same with 4Gb ram and let me know the difference.

EDIT:

Just saw @Nicaragua comment, 100% correct. Lets not forget actual CPU processing will reduce thanks to cloud (one day).

Its not about Sony outdoing MS by having more ram.

personally I would have loved it both Sony and MS give us something like 16Gb ram, that would be pretty great (IMO).

kikizoo4076d ago

guys,ram is obviously important, but don't forget texture streaming ! (uncharted, etc)

PS4isKing_824077d ago

Sony hit it out of the park. But this E3 will be a grand slam of epic proportions. Console reveal, price, release date and a ton of new games!!!!

No, it didn't meet my expectations, it destroyed them!

StrongMan4077d ago

IT SUCCEEDED MY EXPECTATIONS BY A LONG SHOT!!!

shutUpAndTakeMyMoney4076d ago

At this point I can care less what xbox does.. Features aside sony is bringing the games! I am pretty sure sony has enough features to satisfy. What else could people want?

4076d ago
Smeagol20334076d ago

no it was a waste of my precious time. $ony, the ps2 days are over. What a shoddy show

BanBrother4076d ago

Who is going to believe a 500 and something year old lunatic that lives in a cave anyway, whose only social interaction is with his even more deranged and psychotic split personality, which is all the more insane as the love triangle that exists is fulfilled by a RING!!!.

Smeagol20334076d ago Show
unchartedxplorer4076d ago

I really hope you are sarcastic.

stage884076d ago

"Smeagol2033 joined N4G 3 hours ago"

Ah, now it makes sense.

finbars754076d ago

wow I was going to say the same for your comment except that you nust butthurt withought the Sony fanboy part.

BanBrother4076d ago

"your public hair"

No, I am pretty sure my hair is private.....

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4076d ago
Show all comments (42)
70°

Disney Dreamlight Valley teases part two of paid expansion

Disney Dreamlight Valley devs have officially teased the second part of the paid expansion titled The Spark of Imagination.

70°

Best Stardew Valley Farm Names – 100 Funny, Nerdy, Cute Ideas and More

Starting out a new farm, but need help choosing a name? Check out this article for a 100 farm name ides for Stardew Valley.

180°

Bethesda Needs to Reduce the Gaps Between New Fallout and Elder Scrolls Releases

Waiting a decade for new instalments in franchises as massive as Fallout and Elder Scrolls feels like a waste.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
-Foxtrot12h ago

Microsoft have Obsidian but I feel it's Bethesda who just don't want to play ball as they've always said they want to do it themselves.

Once MS bought Zenimax in 2020 they should have put the Outer Worlds 2 on the back burner, allow Bethesda to finish off its own Space RPG with Starfield (despite totally different tone why have two in your first party portfolio with two developers who's gameplay is a tad similar) and got Obsidian for one of their projects to make a spiritual successor to New Vegas.

When the Elder Scrolls VI is finished Bethesda can then onto the main numbered Fallout 5 themselves.

The Outer Worlds 2 started development in 2019 so putting it on the back burner wouldn't have been the end of the world, they'd have always come back to it once Fallout was done and it would have been nicely spaced out from Starfields release once they had most likely stopped supporting it and all the expansions were released.

If they did this back in 2020 when they bought Zenimax and the game had a good, steady 4 - 5 years development, you might have seen it release in 2025.

We are literally going to be waiting until 2030 at the very earliest for Fallout 5 and all they seem bothered about is pushing Fallout 76.

RaidenBlack10h ago(Edited 10h ago)

Its not just only Todd not playing ball.
Obsidian have made a name for themselves in delivering stellar RPGs, but most famous once have always been sequels/spin-offs to borrowed IPs like KOTOR 2, Neverwinter Nights 2, Fallout: New Vegas, Stick of Truth etc.
Obsidian wants to invest more in their own original IPs like Outer Worlds or Pillars of Eternity with Avowed.
Similar to what Bluepoint & inXile wants to do or Kojima is doing (i.e not involving anymore in Konami's IPs).
So yea, even if New Vegas has the most votes from 3D Fallout fans, Obsidian just wants to do their own thing, like any aspiring dev studio and MS is likely currently respecting that.
But a future Fallout game from Obsidian will surely happen. Founder Feargus Urquhart has already stated an year ago that they're eager to make a new Fallout game with Bethesda, New Vegas 2 or otherwise. Urquhart was the director of the very first 1995's Fallout game after all.
And don't forget Brian Fargo and his studio inXile, as Brian Fargo was the director of Fallout's 1988 predecessor: Wasteland

KyRo6h ago(Edited 6h ago)

Obsidian should take over the FO IP. They're do far better with it than Bethesda who hasn't made a great game for almost 15 years

RaidenBlack43m ago(Edited 43m ago)

@KyRo
So, by 15 years, you mean Fallout 3 was the last great game Bethesda made?
You don't consider Skyrim a good game, which came out 13 years ago?
I'd consider Fallout 4 a pretty decent game as well. It's Story & RPG elements were a bit downgrade from New Vegas but the exploration and shooting on the other hand, were upgrades.
FO76 was disappointing and Starfield could've been better at launch I'll agree.

Duke196h ago(Edited 6h ago)

I disagree. Part of these games is the support for the mod community. If they move to releasing a "next game" every 2 or 3 years, the modding support plummets and the franchises turn into just another run of the mill RPG.

Make the games good enough to withstand the test of time, to keep people coming back to them and expanding on them with mod support.

--Onilink--3h ago(Edited 3h ago)

I dont think anyone is saying they need to come out every 2 years (not to mention almost no game is released that quickly anymore)

By the time Fallout 5 comes out, it will be more than 15 years since Fallout 4 came out (same with ES6 coming out 15 years after Skyrim). Even if you want to use F76 as the metric for the most recent release, that one came out in 2018. It will be a miracle if F5 comes out before 2030

The point is that for a studio that doesnt seem to operate with multiple teams doing several projects at once, that their projects normally take 4-5 years as a minimum, and that now they even added Starfield to the rotation, it becomes a 15+ years waiting period between releases for each series, which doesnt make sense. Imagine that Nintendo only released a mainline Mario or Zelda game every 15 years…

They either need to start developing more than 1 project at a time, let someone else take a crack at one of the IPs or significantly reduce their development times

Duke192h ago(Edited 2h ago)

Why should someone else take a crack at one of the IPs? Look at what happened to Final Fantasy as a recent example - there is pretty clear FF fatigue setting in because they are now pumping out titles in the franchise every few years. Pumping out more games faster doesn't always make a series better.

There are plenty of options to make new games, not just create more titles in the same universe at a faster pace.

mandf3h ago

Yeah I’m going to say it, who cares about the modding community when making a game? Half the time developers only tolerate modders because they fix there game for them.

Skuletor5h ago

Yeah, let's all advocate for smaller gaps between series' releases, then we'll probably get headlines about how the series have dropped in quality and they could have benefited from more time in the oven. Let them cook.

SimpleSlave4h ago

"how the series have dropped in quality and they could have benefited from more time in the oven" So every Bethesda game then? Got it.

Listen, I would agree if this was about From Software or something, but Bethesda?

🤣

C'mon now. What timeline are you from?

Skuletor2h ago

Think about it, they're already bug filled messes on their current schedule, can you imagine how much worse it would be if they rushed things?

Duke192h ago

I mean you aren't wrong. People are going to complain about anything

isarai4h ago

Hows about you focus on quality, just a thought 🤷‍♂️

Sciurus_vulgaris3h ago

Bethesda [or Microsoft] would have to reallocate internal and external studios towards fallout and elder scrolls titles. Bethesda has the issue of developing 2 big IPs that are large RPGs on rotation. If you want more Fallout and Elder Scrolls, development will have to be outsourced.

Show all comments (19)