Sony bought Gaikai during the summer of last year for a whopping $380 million. Now, they’ve shown what their investment was for.
-PSLS
GameInformer- "We recently spoke with Gaikai CEO David Perry about all things PlayStation Now. The longtime developer joined the cloud-gaming company in 2009 and in 2012 Sony acquired it to form the core of PlayStation Now. Check out our interview as we touch on signing with Sony, remote play, what it takes to get a game on PS Now, expansion to more devices, overcoming rough cloud-gaming experiences, and looking to the future."
Great interview and some good opinions about the future of gaming. Sony will dominate if they get the pricing right and bring playstation now to browsers and TV sets. Imagine buying a Sony Bravia and being able to play ps1 and ps2 games without a console? Thats a huge selling point right there. Something they need right now as there TV department is leaking money badly.
With major gaming platforms like the PS4 and the PC planning to have a streaming service available in the near future, We have to wonder, "What about Microsoft?"
i think this is going to be one of the best E3's ever. Sony has a lot in store and MS knows it's all or nothing.
E3 2014>the olympics>superbowl>world series>lunar moon-landing>sock-'em-b oppers V2.0
Awesome so I can get on twitch and stream gamers streaming HD remakes epic no need to even play no more.
I really don't see the market for this to be honest. I know I will get disagrees but seriously the cost to return ratio is not there right now.
I applaud Sony for making a go of it but I just don't see the "huge quantity" of people needed to pay for this. Most gamers have the old consoles anyway so won't bother to stick with a service that provides backwards compatibility. If it could be provided at a small fee, like $5 per month and still make money then I could see it but is demand really there or will it just be a quick fad where people buy in for a month or two because it is the new thing and then drop it?
Far too small a margin to be realistic IMO and that does not take into account the fact that the broadband infrastructure will not support high quality visuals with no lag time or the net neutrality rulings that are going to continue the bandwidth throttling, data cap pricing pogrom that is happening right now. I think that streaming games will come but it is not ready for prime time yet.
I could be wrong but I think this is a waste of money that could be spent on new games.
@The_Infected "Microsoft talked about cloud power more than anything and they seem to be showing the least of all the other big players."
Which is more realistic?
1. Computing a whole game on a server, sending player inputs across the net to that server, and then sending the results back to the same gamer with out lag or visual compression artifacts at a cost that consumers are willing to pay for. All on games that are old and or currently on the market to own forever at a decent price?
2. Computing physics, AI, visual backgrounds, game hosting providing level playground for all players?
Sony’s recent announcement of the Gaikai-powered PlayStation Now has got everyone very excited. It’s understandable: the promise of being able to remotely stream games is an attractive one, especially when it’s sold under the premise of being able to do it anywhere, from any device. But all is not as good as it seems. Here are 7 reasons why you should be worried about Sony’s streaming service.
8 pages, for an article that could of fit on 1, 2 at most...
I stopped at 2...
"#6. No Games have been announced."
People just create articles for the hell of it I see. What do you mean no games have been announced when they said they will include the entire PS3 library...lmfao!!!
"1. We Don’t Know the Price"
Sorry, but that doesn't mean we should be afraid. It is a service that is elective, not needed for other functions to work on your devices.
"2. Your Internet is Probably Not Good Enough"
Sorry again, but the US statistics say otherwise. Avarage household internet speeds are well above the suggested 5Mbps minimum, at 8.5Mbps.
"3. It’s Only Going to be on PS3 and PS4 (At Launch)"
Fear? for this? Come on, thats like saying don't get an Xbox One because it wont have twitch at launch...
"4. Sony’s Not Great at Internet Services"
Fair enough. But again, not really something to be totally afraid of.
"5. It’s Only Coming to the USA"
No, it was recently stated that Europe would have it this summer as well... *EDIT* My mistake, its only US, sorry UK
:(
"6. No Games Have Been Announced"
Are you serious? No games announced makes it a scary thing?
Whens the last time a service blatantly told you every movie that is available on say, netflix from its inception?
"7. You’ll Need A DualShock 3 (Even When You’re Mobile)"
False. You will need a controller for these games, but that doesn't mean it has to be a dualshock3.
The only legitimate concern I saw in any of those was Sonys network strength. But now that they are using a subscription service, they have been much more forward thinking in regards to server power. We should see much more from sony by the end of summer, if not earlier.
*EDIT* Sorry, late to the party with the USA only launch, that sucks a bit. Still need to wait and see what they say about that.
Folks must generally be stressed out.. I'm not hearing anything else than worry around. Worried about the PS+, worried about PS4 launch, worried about Xbox One..
Chill guys.. They know what they are doing, and generally they know better than you so stop worrying..
*Throws money at the screen*
AMazing. Now when? And how much?
wow, that sounds awesome!!
"PS3 Backwards Comp on ANY Device"
So I can play FULL PS3 games on Vita?
I'll stick with PS3. But any device sounds odd because of the lack of buttons.