150°

Why Destiny's reveal was underwhelming

Original-Gamer.com: Sunday afternoon, the press embargo for Destiny's official reveal was lifted and Bungie released the first ViDoc. I gathered a bunch of what I thought would be important facts and weeding out details that'll be reitterated over the next several months before an anticipated holiday 2013 release. Last Tuesday when I realized what the ARG was all about, the first question that popped into my head was why Bungie would want to put out a major reveal a few days before the anticipated PlayStation 4 reveal on the 20th.

Read Full Story >>
original-gamer.com
theBAWSE4077d ago

It was poor and rushed and showed nothing much...ms said this will he revealed to stop the ps4 hype train...its only made the ps4 reveal even more enticing to me.

further more its a multiplat title

Godmars2904077d ago

By what little I can understand of the article, which for being short manages to ramble and poorly gets to the point, its more to bolster the PS4 reveal. That Bungie or Activision are getting out the news ahead of Sony's announcement to remind everyone that its a multiplatform title and not just one the Xbox. That more of the game will be shown on the 20th.

IronFistChinMi4077d ago

Microsoft said no such thing, how could they when it's an Activision game?

aviator1894077d ago

"ms said this will he revealed to stop the ps4 hype train"

such a false statement.. no one said anything of the sort.

Heavenly King4077d ago

well, it could be true. Ex-Epic Cliff said: “The real reason Bulletstorm was built was because Gears [of War] wasn't ready for this spring and we needed a product to fuck with Killzone.” Who the hell would have motivated that? M$ obviously.

So this is not a surprise at all if true, if M$ paid some small cash to Activision so that they reveal the game prematurely in order to stop some PS4 hype.

spicelicka4077d ago

@Heavenly King

But Bulletstorm was released on ps3 as well so why would MS waste money on endorsing it's release?? Epic is an independent studio, Cliff was referring to Gears in terms of the Epic making money because it's their only major game. MS wasn't affected by it at all and it wasn't an xbox exclusive so how would it change anything??

ANd beside, there were many other games coming out at that time, like crysis 2 so it doesn't make shit sense to me.

Heavenly King4077d ago

I agree. I remember when KZ3 was about to be released, and Ex-Epic Cliff said: “The real reason Bulletstorm was built was because Gears [of War] wasn't ready for this spring and we needed a product to fuck with Killzone.” Who the hell would have motivated that? M$ obviously.

So this is not a surprise at all if true, if M$ paid some small cash to Activision so that they reveal the game prematurely in order to stop some PS4 hype.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4077d ago
listenkids4077d ago

It was rather lackluster, a shame, It was full of intrigue and I wanted something.. different. Always online FPS, i'm not much in the mood for it. To each his own.

Blastoise4077d ago

Is the "Always Online" thing confirmed? If so, that's a bit of a downer =/

barb_wire4077d ago

Yes, I've read it on multiple sites.. there is a "single player" component but in order to get the most out of the full game - you have to be online.

Find it very striking that the PS3 version isn't supposed to come out until Fall 2014 as per the contract.

Thatguy-3104077d ago

Seems very haloish which isn't my thing. I'm still open minded to how it will work but for now I'm not psyched up for it. Like theBAWSE said I for one am more psyched up for what's to come out on the 20th. Still will keep my eye on this title as more info is released.

Summons754077d ago

No gameplay, I was disappointed.

aviator1894077d ago

yes there was...not much, but there was gameplay.

majiebeast4077d ago (Edited 4077d ago )

I would be more hyped if they announced Planetside 2 for ps4. I just felt this was rushed and not ready to be shown yet.

krisq4077d ago

PlanetSide is Sony's game. There is 99% chance that it's coming to PS4 IMO.

Blackdeath_6634077d ago (Edited 4077d ago )

if it can run on ps4 they will consider it. no reason not to unless there is technical barrier as with the ps3 but planetside is a very cpu and ram intensive game. recommended specs are atleast 8gb of RAM an intel core i5 or higher which is a 3.3GHz quad core and 1GB of VRAM the rumoured specs we have heard of so far fall short of all those requirements apart from the GPU. i'm sure sony will make it work if they wanted to but that just shows you how far consoles are from pc. the good thing about consoles is that the developers make their game around the console hardware whereas on pc the developers make the game and its up to you to have a strong enough pc planetside however was built from the ground up to be a pc game that will last a very long time even if pc hardware advances significantly thats why there is a hidden Ultra setting in the game files i would say a 70% to 80% chance.

Drekken4077d ago

Planetside 2 runs rough on even the best of machines. They will need to do some serious tweaking to get it running smooth on a console. I hope they can pull it off though. I think it will boil down to the amount and speed of the ram and videocard.

Show all comments (36)
90°

Destiny 2: The Final Shape Developer Gameplay Preview

Bungie - "Join our development team to see the new updates arriving with Destiny 2: The Final Shape. Releasing on June 4, 2024."

InUrFoxHole7d ago

What is this she/her, he/him bs?

140°

Bungie Replaces Marathon Director Amid Leadership Shakeup, Fears of Layoffs

Amid ongoing anxiety within Bungie following layoffs last year, the studio is now preparing for another shakeup, this time on Marathon.

Kaii29d ago

Layoffs should be hitting the incompetent management at this point.

Profchaos29d ago

Talk about mismanaged Bungie is a studio of tremendous potential and have made some of the greatest shooters to date. Sony pushed them to just make another Destiny style game and consult on other studios live service games and are now getting thrown under a bus as the pivot away from predominantly gaas games is unfolding.

I'd love to see a world where Bungie can focus on telling great sci fi stories again away from a live service dungeon but we all know that's a pipe dream

Rynxie29d ago (Edited 29d ago )

Are you serious? Do you just talk out of your arse naturally, or did it take years of being a POS?

Profchaos29d ago

You normally get so offended by internet comments or did it take years of being soft

purple10129d ago (Edited 29d ago )

Yes I see your point mate, someone clearly didn’t read the article.

Specifically the bit:

“Notably, multiple sources at the time and since have shared that Sony has largely left the studio to sort out its own troubles and was not responsible for the layoffs, with CEO Pete Parsons taking responsibility.“

He’s just spouting nonsense

Huey_My_D_Long29d ago

lol what so fucking hilarious is that you called him out so bad he projected him being offended onto you.

Its been well documented that Bungie's management has been more responsible for their shortfalls, even mentioned in said article that we are commenting on.

Its ok, just admit you didn't read the article.

MIDGETonSTILTS1729d ago

Arrowhead Studios will be Sony’s GaaS consult now.

Gameseeker_Frampt29d ago

I like how for some, it is never Bungie's fault. Microsoft, Activision, and now Sony - it is everyone else who is pushing Bungie to make all these bad decisions.

-Foxtrot29d ago

Thrown under the bus?

Are you joking? This is all Bungie, we all thought it was 100% Activision but it's clear the higher ups at Bungie don't have a clue how to run the studio and are more bothered about saving their own skin and the money that they rake in.

Sony gave them an extra $1.2 Billion to make sure that employees didn't leave and they didn't have to cut anyones jobs. Where did that money go because Bungie still cut peoples jobs and I bet you the higher management still kept a hold of their big fact paychecks and bonuses.

Sony invested poorly in this and the best thing they can do now is throw the old Bungie management out and take hold of the studio fully.

MIDGETonSTILTS1729d ago

Don’t throw the baby out with the bath water. Somebody at Bungie is the golden goose making great shooting mechanics, and the rest need to justify their paychecks.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 29d ago
Fearmonkey29d ago

This studio has had three owners and its never worked well with any of them....Management has issues

ChasterMies29d ago (Edited 29d ago )

Worked very well for Microsoft. Microsoft’s mistake was letting Bungie go.

Fearmonkey28d ago

it worked so well with MS that they so wanted to be away from them they bought the company back. Only to do it again with activision-blizzard, and then sold to Sony...Sony shouldn't have bought them...Bungie hasnt been the same for a long time..

250°

Microsoft Fires Back at FTC's Accusation on Layoffs in Activision Blizzard Legal Battle

Microsoft's legal counsel has responded to the accusations leveled yesterday by the FTC within the legal battle for the acquisition of Activision Blizzard.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
70d ago Replies(1)
XiNatsuDragnel70d ago

Microsoft thinks they did right thing did they? Imo you could've merge Activision into other sectors.

Jin_Sakai69d ago

When a mega corporation is more powerful than the federal agency. Who do we have left to fight against these practices?

Eonjay69d ago

Microsoft isn't more powerful than the government and that's why you see them giving so much money to politicians. It cliche, but it's up to us to select representation that won't cave to corporate donors.

But yeah Microsoft doesn't have any defense against layoffs. No one made them do it and the went ahead with the merger knowing quite clearly that it would impact employees.

jznrpg69d ago

@Eonjsy if they weren’t more powerful the money wouldn’t work.

Inverno69d ago

Apparently the layoffs were going to happen either way, and I'm inclined to believe it because Activision is beyond scummy. I'm instead wondering why Acti hired so many people in the first place.

theindiearmy69d ago (Edited 69d ago )

Same reason a lot of tech hired a lot during covid. People were staying home, consuming a lot of personal media (buying more games, watching more shows, etc.) Companies thought investing the increased revenue in more talent would reap benefits long term. Turns out, that wasn't the case. It just led to the companies being bloated. But in a lot of cases, they were bloated even before the covid hiring sprees. Activision had 13,000 employees this time last year. Nintendo has 7,000. Keep in mind this doesn't include contract or outsourced work, which I guarantee you Activision does a lot more of than Nintendo. Makes you wonder what the hell Activision needs so many people for. They don't even make a console like Nintendo does. It sucks that people are losing their jobs, but in my opinion, a lot of these companies are still bloated even after the layoffs.

Killa7869d ago

Of course it was always going to happen... This deal was such a joke.

gold_drake69d ago (Edited 69d ago )

i dont believe that for a second.
activision had their hands full with upcoming cod titles and current ones before the merger.

and mobile games ha

Abriael69d ago

Yeah totally. In a year in which everyone's firing developers left and right, Activision *of all companies* was gonna avoid that.

My god.

gold_drake69d ago

what are u talking about ?
the merger proceedings went on for more than a year before it was actually over.

before that, there were no major layoffs. and activision was busy making games. not just one mind you.

maybe try and think for second before u comment something.

Abriael69d ago

Imagine thinking that a company like Activision would not partake in this layoff fest. Do you miss Bobby Kotick perchance? 🙄

The only one who's not thinking is you. All the big companies doing layoffs are "busy making games." That doesn't mean they're not laying off people. Take-two announced today that they're gonna have a big cost reduction plan coming (IE: many more layoffs) and they have 52 games in development.

You really can't see past your console wars, can you? 🤨

gold_drake69d ago

its ok, you dont quite seem to understand.

bless ya.

Hofstaderman69d ago

@Abriael come next week there will be no more console wars.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 69d ago
Show all comments (19)