900°

Randy Pitchford States He was not lying during Aliens Colonial Marine Demos

Randy Pitchford, president of Gearbox, has stated that he spoke the truth about Aliens Colonial Maines in the past. Recently on twitter he was quick to respond to allegations of lying during presentations which showed the game in a different and seemingly more polished state.

"No one likes to be called a liar, especially if their intent was pure and they always spoke the truth when they spoke it."

Read Full Story >>
pixelsmashers.com
4079d ago
aCasualGamer4079d ago

Randy Pitchford is a liar and a fraud. I can't believe he actually tries to victimize himself.

The gameplay demo that was shown hyped up the game and gave it a certain level of expectation among fans, the final product is a joke in comparison.

I can't believe these con artists can get away with such deceitful marketing. Normally i don't get so mad but when they take gamers, us, for fools i get really realllly pissed off.

yeahokchief4079d ago (Edited 4079d ago )

Perhaps if pc players had a bigger marketshare it would have been viable/profitable to make sure the game had dynamic lighting and was designed properly for high end pcs.

But you don't all buy enough of your games. Reap what you sow. The only way you change this and keep it from happening is by buying more games that do things correctly to show your install base has some weight behind it.

You're an entitled bunch and you need to grow a pair.

OHHHHHH IT DOESN'T HAVE DYNAMIC LIGHTING!!! WAHHHHHHHHHHH WAHHHHHHHHH! MOd it. You love modding things. How hard is it to add dynamic lighting.

Ive seen pitchford show off games before and he comes off as a very honest, gamer's gamer to me. I probably won't buy this game, but i'll still buy gearbox games for sure. They must have been under some type of constraint.

I guess I don't care so much about visual effects so much as the game content and how well the game runs.

In the defense of people who bought the game I thought it was disappointing that the sequence with the turret was completely missing from that video they showed, but for all i know it just glitched out or something in that particular instance.

Baka-akaB4079d ago (Edited 4079d ago )

Uh what's with the pc rant ? The game is mediocre and below its demos on both consoles and pc .

The whole affair is about blatant lies and misinformation , not really about graphics . Game was never touted as the next crysis on any platform

Wagz224079d ago

@yeahokchief so if dynamic lighting is so easy to do…then why the hell was it not in the final product?! And yes dynamic lighting is a big deal because it weighs heavily on the atmosphere of the game, which in aliens is essential. And I also feel we are entitled to what we saw versus the final product. That's like saying, hey look at this nice lamborghini that your going to get, then you get it and its a ford focus haha oh and game content and how the game runs? How bout that AI? Now was that Gearboxes fault or Time Gate, you know the other developers that got outsourced a lot of the game to work on? I can't believe that this game was handled so terribly or how people are actually trying to defend the development of the game at this point.

4079d ago
Jazz41084079d ago

This is the same sort of crap sony pulled with killzone 2 and told everybody it was actual gameplay when it was not. Hyped the ps3 to be a suprr computer repesenting all games at 1080p and 120 fps and laughed at ms when they said 720p was the sweet spot this gen for gaming and then told me to get a second job to buy it. I will never have faith in sony anymore after the crap they pulled this gen and since I enjoy the shooter and rpgs im very happy with the great experiences my 360 has given me this gen even though i currently own two ps3 s they sit and collect dust as I really do not want to spend a couple hours sitting through all there firmware updates and game installs when this gen ms had the better multiplat ganes and thats what I mainly play as I dont really care for ms or sonys exclusives and yes I have played them as with my job in the industry i can take home any game I want and try it. As far as recent activity Sony lied about the extent of there hacking and announced games at the beginning of this gen that are still vapor ware. I also found home to be mis represented and a disaster when it first launced. Btw is home even out of beta yet lol.

GenericNameHere4079d ago

@Jazz4108
Aliens:CM E3 Demo = GREAT!
Aliens:CM full game = The f@ck??!! I paid $60 for a game with horrible AI, graphics, gameplays, story??!! And the multiplayer is buggy too?

KZ2 E3 Demo = WOW!!
KZ2 full game = WOW!!!

You see the difference?

Btw, I doubt you even have 2 PS3s. Why would you buy/get a second one when you clearly felt "lied to" when KZ2 came out? And if they are collecting dust, do something better with them! Give them to a friend or family, or maybe even charity! At least you'd be doing something kind to the world than just ranting on the Internet (not that I have contributed much yet either).

You hate the PS3 for some reason, and you love the Xbox 360. We get it. Now move on with your life.

Wagz224079d ago

@Jazz4108 And your comment relating to Aliens is where exactly? Sure it was wrong of them to say that was in-game footage but at least Killzone 2 still looked amazing and played great. And you not having faith in sony but having full faith in microsoft, the company that has left the core gamer completely. And you want to talk about ripoffs? HD-DVD drive attachment? Charging $100 for a network adapter? More then a 50% failure rate on your console? People bitched about the price of the PS3, but when it was all said and done with buying everything for your 360, your paying a lot more than the PS3 at launch. But that's not to say PS3 hasn't had its problems with PlayStation Network sucking at first, the game installs are annoying, a lot of games running at 720p and sony taking out the other OS feature and causing the hacking relation, but honestly Microsoft has done a pretty good job sticking it to the gamer this gen. But I think the biggest thing that has started to ruin gaming for everyone is DLC, whether on disc or purposely taking content out of the game and then charging extra for it...and I have a bad feeling next gen might be worse.

Athonline4079d ago

I played almost an hour of the MP in Eurogamer Expo 13. The game felt polished enough with only a few minor bugs, which we were told they were planning to fix just they had "an older" release... in fact I found it less buggy than Far Cry 3 and AC III were that day... after the expo when they were "fixing" it looks like they either destroyed it or maybe we were given to play with a trimmed down version of MP, less features, less bugs afterall!

AngelicIceDiamond4079d ago

@Casual Another fail in this generation's book I'm afraid.

DOMination-4079d ago

Who cares? Just don't buy the crappy game. It always looked like it was going to be average. There are plenty of other shooters out and there's Bioshock coming out soon.

If you already purchased it then you have to ask yourself why you did, even though its been critically smashed to pieces in previews and reviews.

Not being rude but there's some pretty amazing games coming out. Unless you've got money to burn why would you even consider buying this at launch? If you're a member of N4G you should have known it was terrible.

Red_Orange_Juice4079d ago (Edited 4079d ago )

game looks like a fan-made mod

Oh_Yeah4079d ago

It's a game based off the lure of a movie, you can't really expect it to be good. So far that I can remember only the batman games were able to pull that off well. But yeah that demo definitely showed a different product, that's the problem..

corrus4079d ago

HAHAHA this guy love to lying how much he licked the a$$ of Nintendo for Wii U and the most funny thing is that stupid Nintendo Fanboys had believed him HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Baka-akaB4078d ago (Edited 4078d ago )

"It's a game based off the lure of a movie, you can't really expect it to be good. So far that I can remember only the batman games were able to pull that off well."

Not really , there have been a few movie based games that were good . Hell when it comes to alien , the alien trilogy games are quite fondly remembered

The problem is that 90% of them are developed in record time , hence rushed so they could release them alongside the theater launches .

And the good batman games (i'm assuming you mean the arkham ones) arent movie based anyway

+ Show (11) more repliesLast reply 4078d ago
MEsoJD4079d ago

They wont be getting any money from in the future without an apology and plausible explanation about this games development. I don't appreciate false advertising.

aCasualGamer4079d ago

Totally agree with you. You'd be a fool to buy this game after what these scam artists have done. Unbelievable that gaming media is so silent about this.

Blacktric4079d ago (Edited 4079d ago )

It's good to know that there are people out there who doesn't fell for the sh*tty ploys of developers like these. I'm with you 100% with that. He either tells the truth and apologizes from everyone, especially the people who purchased the game. Or he will lose another loyal fan like me who loved most of their previous work.

------------

"Ive seen pitchford show off games before and he comes off as a very honest, gamer's gamer to me. I probably won't buy this game, but i'll still buy gearbox games for sure. They must have been under some type of constraint."

Oh look, an apologist's already popped up.

"OHHHHHH IT DOESN'T HAVE DYNAMIC LIGHTING!!! WAHHHHHHHHHHH WAHHHHHHHHH! MOd it. You love modding things. How hard is it to add dynamic lighting. "

Jesus christ....

Hydralysk4079d ago (Edited 4079d ago )

@aCasualGamer

The gaming media is always quiet about this kind of stuff. They won't risk their relationship with a big publisher, otherwise they might not get advance copies of Borderlands 3 when it eventually comes out, and by god they need those hits.

Conzul4079d ago

Yeah after Sess gave it 2/5 I said screw it. Terrible game.

EZMickey4079d ago

This is not recognised as false advertising.

Where creative media is concerned there has to be some kind of leniency with what is shown versus what is delivered because for marketing's sake they developers have to release gameplay footage but it's still a work in progress so they can't be accused of false advertising if shortly after that footage was released they made a decision that would affect it's presence in the final product.

Game developers are actually more entitled and protected in this regard than any consumer. If they could be held accountable for this sort of thing, demos and gameplay previews would be a scarce and/or very controlled and limited thing.

I agree with those of you seeking an apology though. He may not like being called a liar, but who cares. Don't use your public reach for defending your ego, try using it to hear and apologize to the masses out there who just paid full price for a subpar action game.

Jacobster4079d ago

All advertising is usually on a false premise as advertisers tend to play on our emotions and never highlight the faults with their product offering :)

DragonKnight4078d ago

@FreddyAintDead: There's a difference between showing a work in progress and showing something that's not at all representative of the final product. Nothing of the demo was in the game at all. People loved what they saw in the demo, they didn't get that in the game. False Advertising plain and simple.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 4078d ago
SilentNegotiator4079d ago

Agreed. Even if there were "circumstances" that make Randy somewhat innocent, they still didn't give the gamers good information.

And he's President of Gearbox, so I don't buy him being innocent.

aCasualGamer4079d ago

Yeah. Innocent, ppppfffft. This guy oversees the company and every decision the company makes. He should have told the publishers the game wasn't ready, even though he was expecting some legal actions. You can't bring out a half assed product and expect gamers to pay $59 for it. Not only didn't he inform the gaming community that the game wouldn't match the previously released "gameplay" demo but he actually says he told the truth.

solar4079d ago

never liked the guy. still dont like him. probably never will.

showtimefolks4079d ago

i still like gearbox and randy because they also made brothers in arms.

randy is one of my favorite gaming people because he is always active on social media and a lot of time he tells it how it is

so one bad game, which wasn't even a in home development, this may have something to do with sega and 20th century fox

otherZinc4078d ago

Wow!

This is what limited RAM will do.

This guy lied his as* off.

Sandmano4078d ago

I wrote a blog post about this whole fiasco, check it out

http://n4g.com/user/blogpos...

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 4078d ago
Kalowest4079d ago

Is he trying to replace Peter Molyneux?

herbs4079d ago

He went full Molyneux lol, and you don't ever go full Molyneux.

Kalowest4079d ago

LMFAO, I love the Tropic Thunder reference.

thirtyandnerdy4079d ago

Yeah, I'm not tooting a horn or anything, but from the get-go I suspected this game was gonna be garbage. If I had seen the demo footage that's linked in the article I may have thought different, as it looked really good. I was SO excited for this game back when it was announced on the PS2. Gearbox needs to get their shit together. First Duke and now Aliens... come on.

Soldierone4079d ago

It was announced during the PS2 timeframe? That explains a whole lot lol

Gearbox needs to take time to actually revamp things. If they don't want to do that, or its too time consuming, then scrap it. Releasing piles of crap for 60 dollars then saying "oh well back then this was good" is not wise.

DeltaCanuckian4079d ago

No, there was a game with the same title announced in 2001 but it was a different publisher and developer. This was announced in 2008. No connection besides the game's name.

Soldierone4079d ago

Well there goes that excuse then lol. This game looks like a PS2 title, thats why it made sense. 2008 though, and it can't even compete with Doom 3? Something is wrong.

thirtyandnerdy4079d ago

Agreed. And @Delta_Canuckian-- gotcha, my bad. =)

porkChop4079d ago

How do you blame them for Duke? That wasn't their game! All they did was bring 3DR into their studio and let them finish the game. They bought the Duke rights to make future games, but they didn't make DNF.

MrUndrhill4079d ago

Yeah that is true, but they still released it. Buying the rights and making a great DN game is one thing, but buying them and pushing a janked mess out the door is another. After this ACM debacle it seem a pattern is emerging: 1) get rights to popular license 2) hype/hype/hype 3)cobble together other studios junk work 4)Put it out at 60 dollars and claim "fan service"

Bimkoblerutso4078d ago (Edited 4078d ago )

To be perfectly honest, I gave them the benefit of a doubt with DNF because they had come in at the end of a notoriously crazy development cycle, but after Aliens...I don't know, man.

It makes me wonder if Borderlands is just kind of a fluke success story.

Irishguy954079d ago (Edited 4079d ago )

Yeah, even that infamous demo that was initially shown and wasn't in the final game. Was absolutely dreadful. You were an observer to what was happening around you. Nothing more.

And the physics was also completely dreadful and the Ai sucked too. (From the small amount of Aliens that did come at you).

It's mad to me because that is where it's hype came from. Showing people will be wowed by nothing but visuals. It was literally him running around watching **** happen and pretending to be influencing it.

zerocrossing4079d ago

"Randy Pitchford States He was not lying during Aliens Colonial Marine Demos"

Telling a fib, stretching the truth, misleading people... Doesn't matter how you word it, anyway you spin it the Aliens Colonial Marine Demos was a blatant lie!

Root4079d ago (Edited 4079d ago )

No kidding right

I mean the guy made it piut like they made the entire game when they didn't.

I have to admit though they almost got me, I thought it was going to be amazing. Not to mention all the hype it got for the Wii U version.

badjournalism4079d ago

"It was true when I said it, so nannynanny booboo!"

Yeah, no.

Show all comments (160)
130°

Gearbox confirms layoffs following sale by Embracer

Gearbox Entertainment has confirmed layoffs at the company, following the announcement of its sale by Embracer.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
UltimateOwnage14d ago

I’m glad Embracer is selling them. I hope someone other than MS buys them and frees them up to make great games.

Knightofelemia14d ago

Says right in the article Take Two bought Gearbox off of Embracer.

Sgt_Slaughter14d ago

Reading the article is hard for most people it seems

Knightofelemia13d ago

@Sgt Slaughter

I just like how when a studio automatically goes up for sale. People automatically think Microsoft is just going to jump on it like a fat kit eating a cake.

SimpleSlave14d ago

I mean, having multiple CEOs is a redundancy, soooo... Good luck Randy!!!

160°

Layoffs Hit Gearbox Staff Hours After Embracer Sale

Less than a day after the news that Take-Two Interactive would acquire Borderlands developer Gearbox Entertainment from the embattled Embracer Group, layoffs have already begun. In the hours since former Gearbox employees were made redundant, they've taken to Twitter, and while the total number of staff impacted remains hard to determine, it sounds significant.

Read Full Story >>
pushsquare.com
Knightofelemia20d ago (Edited 20d ago )

I am glad to see Gearbox under Take Two. But lay offs I am not surprised they aren't the only company cutting staff and they won't be the last. And I have a feeling the Borderlands movie honestly will tank when it comes out. The cast is just wow a complete mess Lilith is too old Roland is to small and scrawny. They are missing Brick and Mordecai and I don't think Tiny Tina will be as bat shit nuts as she is in the games.

19d ago
Inverno19d ago

The movie will definitely flop. It has all the usual actors that have casted in all these video game movie adaptations. Whenever I see Kevin Hart or The Rock or Jack Black i just know it's a cash grab. More so when it's all three together. (The Rock isn't in it)

Juancho5119d ago

When you see actors like that in a movie you can expect it to be bad, i definitely do. They have good chemistry but the movie doesnt shine because it just banks on their presence and people going to see them.

Inverno19d ago

Pfft, literally said yesterday how it must be nerve wracking for the devs and then this shite. People aren't looking to get fired, and these companies don't care in the slightest.

Andrew33619d ago

People aren't looking to get fired. Good insight.

kaos8919d ago (Edited 19d ago )

Inflation post 1/20/2020 is really causing pain to everyone. The cherry on top was companies waiting post 11/8/2022 to start doing layoffs. Hmm, I wonder why they waited past that date... Staring with Google in January 2023 and everyone following suit there after.

anast19d ago

Companies that over-hire should be fined heavily and the CEO loses his/her bonus during layoffs, and that money can go to the workers that they laid off.

Leeroyw18d ago

There's a lot going on in this post that needs further scrutiny.

anast18d ago (Edited 18d ago )

It's a game forum. But you are free to chose one and argue it.

Shiore2u19d ago

I hope Pitchford got let go for the sake of employee safty. The man is a walking grease fire waiting to happen.

250°

Embracer Group Looks to Sell Video Game Studio Gearbox

The game developer is best known for Borderlands, which has generated more than $1 billion in revenue

Read Full Story >>
bloomberg.com
persona4chie218d ago

Hey n4g, can we maybe not allow articles where you can only read 3% of it before hitting the pay wall?

Snookies12218d ago

The disagrees were from people that already paid, haha.

neutralgamer1992218d ago

They just bought them not long ago. This is absurd. Embracer owns so many gaming studios and IP’s. They just don’t know to manage them right TBH

Give us saints row 1-2 proper HD remaster (3-5 million in sales confirmed as long as no major bugs)

Focus on AA games that cost less than 40 million go develop while funding 2-3 major AAA titles. Those smaller titles should aim for 8/10 type games with focus on fun and be released within 2 years while bigger games are given 3-5 years

Sniperwithacause218d ago

You got it all figured out!
Sounds like you need to send over your resume to corporate office! Lol
All jokes aside. They need to figure it out quickly.

neutralgamer1992218d ago (Edited 218d ago )

Lol no they need suits and number crunchers haha

What use to be available to us as bonus content for free by unlocking or cheat codes is now micro transactions

Gaming is generating so much money that we have so much soulless content simply for money grabs

Ristul217d ago

Embracer's problem is that they have spent too much on acquisitions of game studios and when they did, interest rates were lower when compared to today. With higher interest rates on their loans, they have to sell studios to raise capital.

crazyCoconuts218d ago

Sounds like a multi-million dollar "oops"

BrainSyphoned218d ago

If they would have bought Bethesda their stock would have crashed and sunk the company a couple days ago.

1Victor218d ago (Edited 218d ago )

I’ll be the jerk that says it
Get’m Microsoft get’m, or Sony 🤷🏿

Outside_ofthe_Box218d ago

Hopefully Microsoft saves us and buys them. Gaming has never been better because of them!

shinoff2183218d ago

If your not a borderlands fan what have they made good

dumahim218d ago

@shinoff2183
Brothers in Arms series.

1Victor218d ago (Edited 218d ago )

Thank you your disagrees makes me feel good to know you don’t think I’m a jerk 🤣

Show all comments (27)