GameRevolution: There have been a slew of next-gen rumors slinging left and right over the past couple of weeks, and none have irked the gaming populace quite as much as anti-used game measures. We've heard talk of it on both the PlayStation and Xbox side of things, so a widespread move could very well be a possibility.
But instead of crying about it, I'm going to try and find a silver lining in all of this mess. Now I know what you're thinking... Is this guy out of his mind? How could limiting the consumer's options possibly be a good thing? Blocking used games will single-handedly destroy retailers like GameStop, bring down rental services like GameFly, and prevent gamers from getting a game on the cheap for making a buck on what otherwise would collect dust.
Believe me, I hear you loud and clear. Blocking used games would have some serious consequences that don't swing in the favor of the consumer, but upon closer inspection, there are also a lot of benefits that should not be overlooked.
Looks like another good update for the game which keeps getting lots of new content.
Watch your back! The new "Thrill of the Kill" update has arrived in World War Z: Aftermath, the ultimate co-op zombie shooter from Saber Interactive.
Wccftech recently took the open world for a spin, driving and shooting tanks in the search for water in Sand Land.
After a demo at PAX East 2024, we sat down with Visions of Mana producer Masaru Oyamada to talk about the Mana series as a whole.
I don't buy many used games now, so I'm unsure how I'd feel about the market going away. Obviously Gamestop is worried though.
Good points.
The only good thing is what it'd do to GameStop
Article: "Games Will Be Cheaper, Have Larger Discounts"
I dunno about that. In terms of economics, customers having *fewer* options has rarely led to prices going *down*. It's usually the opposite.
do people forget things like the game going out of print and buying it use is the only way you can get the game?