150°

Microsoft's new Xbox will include improved Siri-like speech recognition

Microsoft will greatly improve its speech recognition technology inside the next Xbox, The Verge has learned.

Read Full Story >>
theverge.com
shutUpAndTakeMyMoney4095d ago ShowReplies(2)
Ripsta7th4095d ago

I dont think so. Kinect alredy has decent voice recognition and Kinect 2.0 can only improve it , and knowing MS they probably throw big stacks of money when doing they research

Yi-Long4095d ago

... it's something I will probably never use anyway.

I would rather see Microsoft bragging about new great games coming to their next-gen console, instead of hyping a 'gimmick'.

Highlife4095d ago

player "xbox power on"
xbox "That will cost 1000 ms points shall I charge your card?"

Perjoss4095d ago

"I would rather see Microsoft bragging about new great games coming to their next-gen console, instead of hyping a 'gimmick'."

If you build it, they will come.

Yi-Long4095d ago

"If you build it, they will come."

Really!? Microsoft built Kinect. Where are all those great Kinect games!?

Just like Playstation Move doesn't have any great games which we will look back to fondly 15 years from now, neither does Kinect.

Not even the Wii really has any stand-out motion-controlled game. Yes, Mario Galaxy and such are amazing games, but they would have been at least as great when you would control them with a normal controller.

This whole motion-gaming has been 1 huge 'gimmick', kinda like the whole 3D hype which added very little/nothing to gaming, and I don't see 'speech recognition' really enhancing any games either.

Yes, it could have it's uses in SOME games, IF they get the tech down, but only as, tada, a gimmick...

saladthieves4095d ago (Edited 4095d ago )

I really don't give a damn about how brilliant the speech recognition is going to be in the next Xbox.

AS LONG AS IT HAS WHAT I ONLY WANT - GAMES!

greenpowerz4095d ago

Why is this news making you Sony fans so angry?

Yeah Yeah Yeah Yi-Long thinks something from MSFT is pointless and won't be using it because it's disappointing. I'm surprised you like anything about your 360? assuming you have one.

Speech Recognition tech is so unpopular and pointless=in Sony land :P

"I would rather see Microsoft bragging about new great games coming to their next-gen console, instead of hyping a 'gimmick'"

MSFT isn't bragging about anything the news comes from supposed shared info that got out. That's envious troll talk.

RuleofOne343 4095d ago

They invest about 9.5 billion in R&D a year as a whole.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 4095d ago
MasterCornholio4095d ago (Edited 4095d ago )

It wont be that bad but it will have its own set of problems.

user39158004095d ago

Im beginning to wonder, Skype, windows 8, stream, speech recognition improvement, move engine, more apps, faster cue in, illumiroom, 9 new ips, sutface, kinnect 2.0, MMOs, 3d, blu ray, masive storage, cloud, new controller, and what else you are not telling us? Sounds good enough to me, bring it on, fight on, sony and ms will rock.

Yi-Long4095d ago

....cause pretty much none of that sounds great in my mind.

- Skype: Don't care.

- W8: Could be nice for a tablet or phone. Don't want it on my laptop. Don't want it on my PC. Don't want it on my console. It's a touch-OS and I'm not going to want to touch my laptop-screen, my monitor, or my plasma.

Can it be used for a tablet-controller!? Sure. Can't see myself caring much for such a controller though.

- Stream: Stream what!? Games? Nope. Video? I'll download instead.

- Speech Recognition: Don't care.

- More Apps: I'm buying a GAMES-console. I don't really use any of the apps on the 360. Ijust want to play games. Crazy but true.

- Faster cue in: Ok....(!)

- Illumiroom: No idea what this is so can't comment on it.

- 9 new IPs: Cool, depending on what kinda games they are. If it's Kinect-crap, I couldn't care less.

- Surface: Could have it's use in some games, as a nice add-on or gimmick. Nothing more. Won't be a reason for me to pick up a console though.

- Kinect 2.0: Hahahahahahaha. Funny. Myeah. Not for me.

- MMO's: Could be cool. Don't know. Depends on which and how.

- 3D: Don't want. Don't care.

- BluRay: Cool!

- Massive Storage: Cool!

- Cloud: Ok I guess. Not a system-seller.

- New controller: the 360 controller only needs an improved D-Pad as far as I'm concerned. Everything else is great.

So no, certainly not convinced yet, especially not after the last 3-4 years of MS making really poor decisions and shifting it's focus from being a great games-console to the whole Kinect-crap and apps for the dashboard.

I loved my original Xbox, and I love my 360, but the direction MS has been heading these last few years have left me disappointed and skeptical about the future.

greenpowerz4095d ago (Edited 4095d ago )

There will be games.

The only reason you have a problem with everything MSFT has to offer other than wanting games is because that's the only thing PS3 fanboys feel Sony has over the 360(even if half of PS3 exclusives are Japanese filler or games constantly delayed or canceled)

You have an unhealthy hate for xbox/MSFT and you very skillfully stealth troll MSFT articles hence your bubble count.

Yi-Long4095d ago (Edited 4095d ago )

... funny how I'm a Sony fanboy or stealthtroll when I'm mentioning my complaints about the direction MS has taken the last 3-4 years...

... and how some were saying the complete opposite when 3-4 years ago it was Sony who was screwing up in some major ways and I would comment on that...(!)

I guess it easier to just lob someone in some kind of pre-determined 'category' in order to dismiss their opinion or arguments, instead of just listening to the complaints and seeing of there's any truth in them(!)

For your information, I have both a 360 and a PS3 this generation. I don't have a Wii for obvious reasons. My girlfriend does.

I have more games for my 360 than I do for my PS3. I love XBLA, for which I have at least 40 games, probably more. In fact, XBLA has been pretty much my favourite aspect of this generation. And I have called both Super Meat Boy as well as Trials Evolution some of my absolute favourite games this generation (or, in fact, of my lifetime).

There's a long post-history attached to my name you can check out. You'll see I'm positive AND negative about both consoles, cause neither is great nor horrible. They have their pros and cons.

And with MS' attention to Kinect these last 3-4 years, and them neglecting new original cool IP's, it's only natural that I have been a bit more negative and skeptical of MS lately, considering I have no interest in Kinect (or motion gaming in general, or gimmick-based releases in general), nor dashboard apps.

But hey, you just go ahead with your rash judgements. I guess that's cool too(!)

TheGamerDood4095d ago

wow you can't even joke around here without being voted down a troll. grow a sense of humor N4G, damn.

Gazondaily4095d ago (Edited 4095d ago )

But shutupandtakemymoney IS a troll. He may have joked in this instance, but in almost every other post of his, he posts his completely useless flamebait opinions.

Good_Guy_Jamal4095d ago

Ha ha ha ha. That there is a keeper. Totally how I imagined Project Natal before it became Kinect. Bubs

AngelicIceDiamond4094d ago

Yeah, and if Sony who announce this you would be like "aww your sooo brilliant Sony" "Leave it up to Sony when it comes to innovation."or "Ohh its gonna be so cool I'll say Siri(or whatever) bring up my huge AAAAAA super powerful exclusive games."

That's the real humor around here.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4094d ago
GalacticEmpire4095d ago (Edited 4095d ago )

Apple's Siri is one of the best developed commercially available speech recognition systems on a consumer device and it's still pretty crap. I highly doubt MS has put in the massive investment necessary to improve on it.

edit: @below Those kind of demonstrations rarely translate to real world application because the conditions in which its works onstage do not reflect real life. I still have my doubts that MS put more money into this sort of research than Apple, who make more money on ONE of their products than MS makes altogether.

http://www.forbes.com/sites...

Unless of course you have some solid numbers to compare?

I agree that a Sony-Google partnership would be glorious.

kwyjibo4095d ago (Edited 4095d ago )

Watch this - http://www.youtube.com/watc...

Microsoft have been throwing loads of resources at this. I'd argue that Microsoft have put more resources into this than Apple with their Siri acquisition. I reckon Google is even further ahead though.

Speech is perfect for the living room. Sony should partner with Google for their speech tech.

----

Edit - Apple only acquired Siri in 2010 and only for around £200M. This is the core of their speech recognition product.

Microsoft and Google have been doing speech stuff for a lot longer. Their TellMe acquisition happened in 2007 for example.

Here's an article about Google from 2007 -
http://radar.oreilly.com/20...

They were offering a hotline search service. The only real motivation for this was to harvest as much real world speech data as possible to build better recognition engines.

GalacticEmpire4095d ago

Apple may have aquired Siri tech but you think they just left it alone when they got it? I still see no evidence to back up your original comment that MS put more investment into voice tech than Apple.

I agree that Google have the better voice tech and are probably market leaders in that area, thanks for that link. However MS aquiring Tellme is no different than Apple aquiring Siri, except that MS have only Kinect voice to show for it and Apple have Siri, which is the shinier turd.

kwyjibo4095d ago

I don't have figures that point directly to speech recognition research, but Microsoft has consistently outspent Apple in RnD.

It's available in their earnings.
http://thenextweb.com/micro...

Apple spend a tiny fraction of their revenues on RnD, less so than many of their competitors.

http://www.asymco.com/2012/...

Loki864095d ago (Edited 4095d ago )

Wow trolls in a MS article, that's new..

Anyways, this has a lot of potential especially if they use an on-board processor which will make it a lot closer to 1:1 with your voice and movements. Only time will tell.

Edit: of course the trolls disagree, there is a lot of potential in this type of voice recognition. The speech to text with Skype will be excellent, being able to get queried results using natural interaction will flow a lot smoother then using certain phrases which you always need to remember or watch your wording. Still on the fence which system to get, but this sounds progressive.

JoGam4095d ago

Whats funny is I hear people complain about how Vita or PS3 years ago didn't or don't have games. We all know Microsoft is in that same boat when it comes to exclusive games, maybe gamers are getting tired of MS announcing features and want games instead. Im not saying voice recognition isn't cool im just saying bring the games too.

Loki864095d ago (Edited 4095d ago )

These are all just rumors and speculations nothing formally announced. It is fairly common to uncover features or new technology before finding out about any new IPs.

JoGam4095d ago

@loki86....Oh I understand this, my comment was in response to your troll comment. See... All of last year MS was all about Kinect. Now next gen leaks and rumors are hitting the net and what people hear from MS? More Kinect. Now im cool with that but maybe some people may feel some type of way because they are not hearing the games. I just hope 2013 is not all about Kinect again.

miDnIghtEr20C_SfF4095d ago

Agreed. The guy who post first, that was marked for trolling has like 16 agrees, and only 5 dis or something like that, and yet you have it reversed 6-12, and you're talking about the actual MS product. LOL.. but because this site is the home of the Sony Fanboy,... his comment dissing the 360 about not having games.. which is also funny btw, since it has the MOST games out of all the consoles... but he gets all the agrees.

Shows you something about this site. Ya..I have 1 bubble. Like I said... Sony strong here... that's why you have to love what happen this gen. :D 3rd place in the USA... (oh i know.. all of a sudden, where most everyone lives that post on this site.. usa doesn't matter.. it's about places that you don't live that now matter!!!1!one!)

Ha.... love it.. and love a good voice system. Can't wait for these new consoles.

MmaFan-Qc4095d ago Show
Show all comments (58)
190°

Xbox Is Not Your Friend

After laying off almost 2,000 people, Xbox finds itself in a position at odds with the community-first image it has cultivated for itself.

Read Full Story >>
kotaku.com.au
TwoPicklesGood4h ago

lol I’m not a big MS gamer but Sony and a number of others have laid off ton of people as well. Where are the ridiculous articles about them not being your friend? Gaming news is such a joke and these sites wonder why they have to beg for money/patreons or flood with 5x more ads.

Profchaos3h ago

I think the sentiment is corporations are there to make money they are not out friends that are harsh and cutthroat when lt comes to the bottom line so why do we proclaim our love for any gaming company from the rooftops when they wouldn't care about us unless we are buying the next thing.

We need to beore objective with how we view these "teams"

Gridknac2h ago

This is the absolute truth. The only part of you these companies, ALL companies, want to be friends with is your bank account. They don't care what they have to say, who's job they have to cut, or what shady underhandedness they must engage in. Bottom line is all that matters.

Vits58m ago

Because people unfortunately make these companies and products part of their own persona, so when they are scrutinized, they see it as an attack on themselves. There is some neuropsychological research around this phenomenon, but it basically has the same effect as religion. It helps foster a sense of community that humans need to feel comfortable. So that is not happening unless we have a sudden surge of people actually understanding how they work and taking control of themselves.

Magatsuhi53m ago

While it's true Sony isn't a friend either, let's not pretend that they're even in the same ballpark as MS's anti consumer practices. Sony is not a friend but atleast they're not an enemy like MS.

derek1h ago

@twopickles, were you not paying attention? Sony was heavily criticized when they laid off people weeks ago, more than Microsoft did with their massive abk layoffs.

Gamingsince19811h ago

I want to know who thought Xbox was community first anyway lmfao

ChasterMies31m ago

That’s Whataboutism. Sony and other game companies didn’t pay more than $80B to buy up publishers. Microsoft said in court that it wasn’t going to have redundancies and fire people. Microsoft told Xbox owners that they would have a AAA on GamePass each quarter. But here we are with Microsoft Game Studios shrinking. Consolidation doesn’t benefit the consumer, and no company has consolidated more than Microsoft.

BehindTheRows26m ago(Edited 25m ago)

Exactly. They love their SonyToo instead of looking at everything in its totality. You spend $80B to buy up so many pubs/devs, you damn well should have something to show for it.

That said, this article is old and someone is clearly looking for clicks!

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 26m ago
cthulhucultist2h ago

ok here is a reality check. Tech companies have been firing thousands of employees the last couple of years.

I find it odd that the percentage of employees sacked from MS

QUOTE
"Microsoft announced approximately 1,900 job cuts across its gaming division, including Activision Blizzard, ZeniMax, and Xbox. 8.6% of its colossal 22,000-strong global workforce. "

is worth writing an article condemning the company, when Sony Interactive fired 8% of its workforce (900 people approximately).

https://news.crunchbase.com...

Is the writer concerned about the percentage of the workforce fired or the number of employees?

Lets not forget that Unity laid off 25 percent of its workforce (1800 people) and Discord laid off 17 percent of its employees.

You also have to take into account the AI issue reported in the article. MS is heavily invested in A.I. They have invested in Open A.I (chatgpt 4+Dalle 3), in Abu Dhabi’s G42 and in French AI company Mistral.

These LLMs have already replaced thousands of jobs as A.I usage becomes more common

https://www.cbsnews.com/new...
https://www.theverge.com/20...
https://tech.co/news/compan...

This is the new reality. Even nvidia CEO said that games will fully A.I generated.

https://www.pcgamer.com/sof...

Nevertheless, no company should be ever viewed as "your friend". MS had numerous anti consumer practices in place and the same is true for Sony (not only in video game space) and Nintendo (60$ dollar games without permanent discounts, remasters of 10 year old game with full price, no console price cuts, expensive joy cons which are prone to drift, to name but a few).

Popsicle2h ago

Must be. Thought it to be common knowledge that no corporation is your friend.

rippermcrip2h ago

Xbox had a community-first image? Since when?

shaenoide1h ago

Any given company is not "friendly"...

Show all comments (21)
270°

Microsoft Seemingly Closes Bethesda France

As part of its plans to cut 1,900 jobs, Microsoft has reportedly shut down operations at Bethesda France, letting go roughly 15 people

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
Hereandthere14h ago

Microsoft should have left them stay 3rd party

GamerRN12h ago

If they are let go, they can be whatever they want. They ARE 3rd party now... 🤦

Barlos9h ago

Yeah, they're also jobless.

GamerRN2h ago

They can form a company if they want, they are just as jobless as if "Microsoft had left them as 3rd party".

peppeaccardo4h ago

"MIcrosoft leaves Bethesda do what they know how to do best" ... close! Oh the irony ....
(Citation from a week old article)

ChasterMies36m ago

I think Microsoft and other game publishers are letting people go because they think ai will replace them. Doesn’t matter how much profit they make. They were always going to be let go.

PassNextquestion14h ago(Edited 14h ago)

Bethesda France was made up of roughly 15 people... they couldn't of being doing much

Bethesda France mainly did publishing and marketing within the region

blacktiger12h ago

that's a shame for you to say that, i'm sure Elite loves hearing what you just said.

Profchaos14h ago(Edited 14h ago)

Bethesda France focused on publishing and marketing in the region. And 15 people lost their jobs as part of the closure.

I wonder if this is part of Microsoft's strategy to abandoned physical media or possibly gamepass advertising makes their roles redundant you don't need to market a game as hard when the majority of players get the game as part of a sub which already promoted upcoming games

Tacoboto14h ago

It's France too, there's a high likelihood only 1-2 people on the team even had an Xbox.

Profchaos13h ago

Possibly guven all the leaks we know the Xbox brand is really struggling in the region.

Yi-Long10h ago

Well, if your consoles and games are barely found in any stores any more, of course you're gonna struggle finding consumers ...

XiNatsuDragnel13h ago

Tbh Microsoft I think Bethesda being 3rd party same with Activision would probably more competitive than thus scenario imo

Profchaos11h ago(Edited 11h ago)

I think it would have been better for all parties really especially gamers

TheColbertinator12h ago

The recently purchased Activision French offices might take over all the licensing and marketing for Microsoft in France from now on.

Show all comments (18)
280°

Xbox's Preservation Step Sets A Much-Needed Example, Especially For Nintendo

Hanzla from eXputer inquires: "If Xbox can care about preserving its games and legacy, what exactly is wrong with Nintendo, trying to kill game preservation single-handedly?"

purple10111d ago

Ahh yes the good old game preservation of saving all your games to a removable hhd on the Xbox 360, taking it round your mates house, setting up multiple tvs to
Be met with “save data corrupted, please re download”

Or how about removing 360 games
From the store
, download them now or else, and, better hope to god that save data doesn’t corrupt, or it’s lost for ever

Nice one ☝️

Zeref11d ago

It's better than what Nintendo and Playstation is doing. It might not be perfect but at least they are TRYING. Unlike the others.

DarXyde11d ago

Trying? Take off the blinders for a moment, mate.

1. A failure to preserve games is just that: a failure to preserve games. Don't try to sugarcoat it: NO ONE is doing it properly. Better than awful is nothing to write home about.

2. At the time of this comment, isn't it the case that you need an internet connection to play Xbox games even if you buy physical discs that are hardly in circulation anymore? I don't have a Series X and I can't verify, but I think that is correct. I'm fairly certain you can at least play PS5 games at version 1.0 (not much of a win really when many games require day one patches). I think Microsoft's all digital, licensing approach is by far more aggressive than anyone else's. They really try to push you to game pass where you lose your entire library by umm.... Skipping a month of payments.

I don't think anyone is doing it right whatsoever. Don't get me started on Nintendo, who goes after anyone looking to preserve their games better than they ever would with extreme litigation.

Don't be a simp for any of these companies. Get it together.

PhillyDonJawn11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

@DarX never speak on Xbox again. You lost all credibility with your internet connection comment. Smh you have 0 clue and misinformed yet speaking on something you don't no squat about.

Einhander197211d ago

What has Sony done exactly? You guys keep deflecting to Sony but I am not actually seeing any results, and ai am certain nothing that you can come up with even comes close to what Microsoft has done and what they have tried and failed to do, like tie all your disks to your account on xbone.

Microsoft removed their whole indie section when they moved to the xbone because they were going to only allow games on the service that came from a publisher, id@xbox started after xbone launched and it only exists because Sony embraced indie and Microsoft was forced to cancel their plans and reverse course.

And every single game that was part of games for windows live including disk games (I have gta 4 on disk that won't work) so hundreds of games that use that DRM no longer work unless the company themselves patched it out which of course very few did.

MrBaskerville10d ago

Not trying. Tried. they killed of the backcomp program years ago. They set something up again, but sounds like it's more of an attempt to save the current library on whatever they are planning next. With luck they save everything and more, but let's see. I could see them killing off parts of the OG xbox and 360 libraries. Can't imagine that they would allow us to play Forza 5-7 in the future.

With that said, I do like what they've done and really wish they could have done more.

shinoff218310d ago

Zeref

So killing off physical media is trying what exactly. Ms don't really give a fk if you think they do your kidding yourself.

Profchaos10d ago

They are not trying this team is established for forward compatability the team is. It interested in preserving Xbox or 360 games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 10d ago
isarai11d ago

Is that why Hellblade 2 is digital only?

Zeref11d ago

Just because it's digital only doesn't mean you can't preserve it. Just put it on an external and you have the exact same functionality of what a disc does.

MrNinosan11d ago

Guess you're trolling, but if you actually think that's how it works, I'd recommend buying some braincells.

mkis00710d ago (Edited 10d ago )

Volitile vs nonvolitile data. A disc will not corrupt either. A drive can be corrupted.

Einhander197211d ago

This is just a scammy PR move to distract from the fact they are going digital only and trying to push streaming and subscriptions only.

No gaming company has pushed harder to remove ownership than Microsoft.

Without discs there is no preservation, preservation can't be done by the rights holders it can only be done by the consumers, anything else is a lie.

11d ago Replies(3)
Einhander197211d ago

Anyone remember xblig which Microsoft removed their whole 360 indie section removing hundreds of games from people?

11d ago
11d ago
Zeref11d ago

Do you know you can put your games on an external and preserve them that way? There are no benefits to discs. ZERO. Idk why some of you are still obsessed with them.

DarXyde11d ago

Because games like Persona 5 exist. It's STILL V1.00. On Playstation, that's a win because 1.00 is installed on the disc—no need to download anything.

If a game does not require any updates, it's all on the disc.

Extremely low bar in the modern era, of course. It's not much of a win by any stretch.

But for now, physical media does have a purpose, at least on Playstation.

Einhander197211d ago

That is factually not how game licensing works, try plugging your hard drive into someone else xbox, It's not going to work, and it won't work if the licensing servers ever go down.

Einhander197211d ago

Anyone remember games for windows live.

I have around a dozen games, some on Steam itself that will not work because Microsoft shut off the licensing servers.

BehindTheRows11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

I do. I STILL have games (Gears of War being the big one) I cannot access because Games for Windows LIVE is total garbage and no one has held Microsoft accountable.

Zeref10d ago (Edited 10d ago )

You don't have an Xbox apparently. Because you can 100 percent plug in your external and play games from it on any Xbox console lol. You just have to be logged in to prove ownership.

Chevalier10d ago

"You don't have an Xbox apparently. Because you can 100 percent plug in your external and play games from it on any Xbox console lol. You just have to be logged in to prove ownership."

Damn how many times do people got to explain your idiocy to you? You can take a copy of Persona 5 like someone used as an example and play that game on ANY console WITHOUT logging in which means I can lend the game to a friend without internet and they can play my game. Can you lend your hard drive to anyone without logging in for them to play? NOPE. That is a huge difference and if you think otherwise then sorry you're an idiot.

Tacoboto11d ago

"No gaming company has pushed harder to remove ownership than Microsoft."

Ubisoft is literally erasing games people bought from their libraries... My PS1-3 discs are useless on modern hardware. Nintendo's re-published and resold almost their entire Wii U library, and the eShop is completely dead with no BC mechanism in the Switch software. Microsoft publishes everything they make today day one on Steam and Xbox/Windows. Sony only brings to PC the titles they think you might want some years later and Nintendo won't even design a functional long-lasting joystick.

You're absolutely trolling and not serious if you think Microsoft today is the worst offender.

shinoff218310d ago

Yay steam

Not everyone fks with computers though. The disc is still the best way as a console player. Period.

Tacoboto10d ago

How do Sony and Nintendo feel about these discs from 2001-2013?

Don't be stupid, you know Xbox is the best at this today.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 10d ago
Hofstaderman11d ago

Nobody wants this. Sales or the lack of it in the case of XBOX is very telling. I wonder how the adorably all digital series X will fare. Adorably dismal perhaps?

crazyCoconuts11d ago

Only time will tell, but for from someone like me suspecting that Xbox is trying to gracefully exit the console market, that "forward compatibility" team is trying to get Xbox games playing on Windows PCs. I mean, it's nice that they're not planning on exiting with a "enjoy your games while the hardware still works" message, so that's nice. They still have a brand to protect via Microsoft so probably feel obligated to have a better exit strategy.

Xeofate10d ago (Edited 10d ago )

That is not their plan, their plan is to transfer users accounts to the cloud.

Phil Spencer himself said as much a few months back, plans could have changed but I think people are reading way too much into one statement where Phil said he would allow Epic on xbox because he wants to be able to sell xbox games directly on other platforms. Aka, instead of selling Sea of Thives through PSN he wants to have an xbox store to sell his games on PlayStation without giving PlayStation any money.

Again, it's extremely unlikely that Phil plans to put PC on xbox and licensing would prevent them from just giving out other publishers games purchased on xbox copies of thier games on PC, Microsoft does not own their games.

crazyCoconuts10d ago

The thing that doesn't align with the cloud strategy is the giving up on exclusives. You'd still need strong exclusives for cloud streaming - it's still a "platform" , just with a lower upfront hardware investment. I feel like they've learned what PS learned with PSNow long ago. We're not ready to stream games and it's only gonna lose them money to try at this point

FinalFantasyFanatic10d ago

I would love that, I'd buy up some of the Xbox games if they could run on PC, like the Rare Replay, Lost Odyssey and Dead or Alive Ultimate, probably a pipe dream though.

Show all comments (43)