Gamersyndrome's thoroughly unimpressed review of Dead Space 3. The review looks at how this latest installment stretches the otherwise winning Dead Space too thin and also how it relies upon featuring too much from the previous games.
If EA and Motive Studio plan on remaking all the main Dead Space entries, they have to change a lot of what made Dead Space 3 so divisive.
Simple, do not bother with a Dead Space 3 remake. Rather have a new entry for Dead Space.
Remaking 3 would need to be a reworked and somewhat changed remake as 3 was flawed in most peoples eyes and the worst entry.
WTMG's Kyle Nicol:
"Was Dead Space 3 really that bad?
Well, it’s a complicated question. Dead Space 3 is undeniably the weakest of the trilogy. It’s a game that deviates so far from the original formula, that it throws a lot of what made Dead Space special in the first place out of the window. Although, where it does make up for it is one of the best cooperative shooters on the market, even after all this time. Do I recommend playing this game ten years later? Hell yes. But make sure your expectations are in the right place. It has a lot of problems that bring it down."
With the upcoming Dead Space Remake, we replay and rank the original three games.
Dead Space
Dead Space 2
The Callisto Protocol
...
...uhm...
...
...Lost Planet 3?
They need to seriously continue this ip with a new entry. Even if it's just another movie I don't care I love everything about this game.
Don't agree at all.
The game works well, plays well. 5.5 is comical.
Worst score this game could get is an 8.
Tbh, Dead Space 3 deserves a solid 8 at the very least. A 5.5 is just offensive since the reviewer clearly doesn't know what a 5.5 game is really like.
B.S. Review! Hating on a game because EA is Greedy is foul all to itself. The game is good and I wish someone else was in charge of it so it would get its do respect.