630°

Would You Spend $400 on a Playstation 4?

Forbes - Another rumor about the Playstation 4 is making the rounds on the internet today, except this one has nothing to do with hardware

remanutd554093d ago

Yes, I would spend up to $499.99 for a ps4.

nrvalleytime4093d ago

That's too much. $499.98 at most.

blitz06234093d ago (Edited 4093d ago )

Yup, willing to spend $400 tops. $450+ I would, depending on how awesome the console is - launch games, new features, etc. Just got a new PS3, so I wanna tell myself don't get a PS4 too early and spend another crapload.

Peppino74093d ago

In a second! I bought the original 60gb. 600 plus tax would prob be my max.

nrvalleytime4093d ago

^ I was kidding, by the way. I never actually purchased a PS3, but I'm far more excited for the PS4 than other potential new console from Microsoft. Not hating on the 360 or 720, but I'm ready for a change.

guitarded774093d ago (Edited 4093d ago )

I spent more than that on a PS3, so yeah... I'd spend $400 on a PS4.

Redrum0594093d ago

My first born...

Naw jk LOL
I'd pay 600 no problem

Anon19744093d ago

I spent $600 on my PS3 ($500 on my 360) but I'm not in a hurry to replace either. That said, a $400 PS4 price tag would probably entice me to pick one up earlier than I was planning. Any more than that and I can wait. It's not like I have a shortage of games to play.

Saigon4093d ago

400$ is the perfect price point. I will be willing to go higher, but that $400 looks sooooo much better.

Sarcasm4093d ago

I'd spend $499.97 at most. Anything pass that is a no no.

TheGamerDood4093d ago (Edited 4093d ago )

I thnk $399 is the sweet spot.

Also if they want to get the jump on MS then they better price it aggressively.

I have the cash to buy it right now plus a couple of game so I'm f**king ready to do this.

Ju4093d ago

Well, $399 would be awesome, $499 probably, too. But I'm in no rush...depends on my urge I might get weak and get it early; but realistically I won't be getting it before spring 14...

deno4093d ago

No that's still to much. $499.97 for me.

DERKADER4093d ago

What price would you pay for a device you know nothing about? I am going to use common sense and wait till we get actual facts before blindly pledging elegance to any device at any price.

SilentNegotiator4093d ago (Edited 4093d ago )

I paid $400 for my Ps3, so yeah, probably.

badz1494093d ago (Edited 4093d ago )

so yeah...why not

thorstein4093d ago

$400 no problem. $450 with an extra controller and/ or launch title.

sobekflakmonkey4093d ago (Edited 4093d ago )

I'd pay $499 easily, not a problem, considering I bought a PS3 when it first came out for like $600 with like 3 games as well and an extra controller, so it was probably like over $700, I go big, that's how I do. lol

ChrisW4093d ago

I'm pretty certain that it'll be a super stripped basic version.

Yi-Long4092d ago

... will it have backwards compatibility!? Will it require game-activation? Will it be region-locked? Will it demand 'always online', what are they going to do with the new controllers and will the be as ridiculously expensive as those WiiU tablets (hell, even normal dual-shock 3's cost 60 euro here in Holland(!) )

... and most importantly, it will depend on the games.

400 dollars/euros sounds like a great price though, so I'll certainly be interested, but like I said, it will depend on a number of things for me. Not just that attractive price.

I do have to say that the last 2-3 years Sony has made some very positive steps to winning me over, with PSN+ probably being their biggest achievement this gen. I'm am pretty confident that Sony is focussed on GAMES, which is what I'm looking for first and foremost with a GAMES console.

andibandit4092d ago

In order to persuade my wife, it would have to have some serious COOP games at that price and none of that Horde/Zombies/Tacked on seperate coop campaign, crap.

morganfell4092d ago

The real question is why wouldn't I spend $400 for a PS4.

Looking at what I spent for a launch 60GB PS3 and all of the enjoyment and enthralling experiences it has brought why would I not want to take that to the next level and beyond for a mere $400.

007Bond4092d ago

HAHAHA We got mommy buying this for you? Trust me if any of you worked instead of playing video games all day you would understand how tough it is to earn money on your own.

500 for a video game console HA!

HappyGaming4092d ago (Edited 4092d ago )

I seriously doubt it would be $400.
I would love it if it was but my gut is telling be $500 minimum. Remember this will be a console that will have 6-7 years of price drops before the PS5 comes out.

Edit: They have to squeeze the markets pockets like a toothpaste. At first ask for a lot of money slowly bring the price down and get people to push their limits and pay as much as possible for the console.

+ Show (21) more repliesLast reply 4092d ago
aceitman4093d ago

I spent 600$ on the ps3 so yes.

DrRichtofen4093d ago

Me too! And that was in 2007 a year after it first came out

dalibor4093d ago

Why yes I fall into this category as well. That makes us all cousins in the gaming world. People who have bought the PS3 when it was $600. Would I do it again? Most likely. Probably. Oh what the heck you bet I would. It was all worth it in the end even though so many people ahem journalists wanted the PS3 to suffocate and die never to rise out of the grave ever again.

BattleTorn4093d ago

I spent $400 on WII U!!!

SO YEESS!

MmaFan-Qc4093d ago

pretty much, im buying it day one whatever what the price will be, even my pc graphic card is probably more costly than the ps4 so its not really a big deal for me.

T24093d ago

Exactly plus I liked the added benefit of excluding trash whenever possible. The first time I played on xbl I was stunned at the sheer number of idiots yelling, singing, wannabe gangsters .... I almost never use a headset on xbl

deno4093d ago

Same here. It was worth every penny.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4093d ago
Spinal4093d ago

I would especially if it lasts almost 10 years like this gen.

Shadow Flare4093d ago

And judging by the ps3, the launch model will be the best model. So whatever the launch price of the ps4, it could likely be the best version of ps4 to exist. So it's definitely worth the price

Flavor4093d ago

Asking this question on N4G is like asking a dog if he likes bacon.

DOMination-4092d ago

Bubbles+ for funny.

I can't believe there are people posting that they would pay £450. That's more than the ps3 at launch! And we don't know anything about it.

Aceman184093d ago

I spent over 400-500 for both my PS3 and 360. so why wouldn't i spend 400 for the ps4?

journalists and their dumba$$ questions

Aceman184093d ago

Hmm my many disagrees pretty cements my beliefs that this is the worst generation where it comes to gamers.

just because i mentioned both my consoles sad and insecure people disagree totally disregarding the fact that i said i would easily buy the PS4 for $400.

Conzul4093d ago

Um.....we're all adrift in a sea of fanboy, what do you expect? I dislike xbox as much as the next guy, but I admit there was nothing wrong with your comment.

Merrill4093d ago

I hope it's $499.99. I want current and relevant technology in the PS4, I don't want cheap/weak components like the WiiU.

Ripsta7th4093d ago (Edited 4093d ago )

The Wii u is being sold at a loss to nintendo, but they said they make that money back w 1 game they buy so add 60 dollars to the current price n there you have the Wii U's actual price. Basic $360, Deluxe $410
:)

Merrill4093d ago

It's not being sold at a loss because of anything in the WiiU itself, it's only because of the one controller with a screen. Cheap system with an expensive controller.

Double_O_Revan4093d ago

They can't take the whole $60. Then the game company doesn't make money. They profit after their cut of the game. Which is No more $10-15.

Thatguy-3104093d ago

Spent 600$ on the PS3 so I don't see why not lol 400$ will actually be a relief for most that got a PS3 in the beginning of its cycle. I do think though that the price will be 400$-500$. I'll pre order that baby ASAP.

GraveLord4093d ago

A $400 price would be preferable, but yeah I would take the plunge at $500 but I have a feeling most won't. I just hope they price match Microsoft, so that way people will based their purchases on games, not price.

BlmThug4093d ago

I'd gladly spend up to £450

FlyingFoxy4093d ago

That'd get you a nice motherboard, memory and CPU to start building a nice gaming rig with.

UnholyLight4093d ago

I would be happy if both systems are below the $600 range. That's perfect for me.

lilbrat234093d ago

Yes not more though I guess $400 is better then $600 :-)

Jaybronee4093d ago

I'd rather pay more for a top notch console than pay less and get a sub par unit. I thought the $599 was a little high for my first PS3 but it didn't stop me from buying it.

omi25p4093d ago

Nope, I spent £250 on my ps3. Haven't turned it on since November 2011.

Rhythmattic4092d ago

You are far from happy with your PS3 looking at your past comments.

I suggest you sell your PS3, and dont buy a PS4...

Jazz41084093d ago

I would be okay paying that for the new 360 but not a ps4. Just my opinion and I have a right to it. I will pick up a ps4 at sometime but im more excited to see my 360 updated but thats me.

yeahokchief4093d ago (Edited 4093d ago )

yeah $4oo is okay.

i want the console, required cables and a game for just under $500 and we're good. (and no required monthly subscription service, but an optional one is cool)

i agree with remanutd55. going over $500 makes me start thinking of waiting for the price cut.

Mounce4093d ago

I'd spent $400.

$450 for a bigger HDD if worth it.

Pillsbury14093d ago

I would spend 399.99$ not a penny more! ;p

4093d ago Replies(1)
showtimefolks4093d ago

my max price is $599 but i think its a safe bet to assume it will be between $400-450 and may support 2 SKU's

N4g_null4093d ago

If so then great for there fans. Wouldn't it be great if we saw the second coming of the ps2?! still not keen on sonys game play. If they get that right then the price doesn't even matter.

Flipgeneral4093d ago

Same, I would go up to $499. Time to put aside $100/month so I can get all the goodies with it.

Hope my PS stereo headset will be compatible

Sevir4093d ago

$600+tax and 200 for accessories and games

I'm fully prepared to spend 400+ for a PS4. Its a Freakin No brainer! YES!!!!

MEsoJD4093d ago

I predict no more than $399.00 in the US.

ZoyosJD4093d ago

If it's less than $500 I'm donating the difference to charity.

GuyThatPlaysGames4093d ago

Why not? I spend $1,000 on mine 2 days after release. The normal price when it first dropped was $600+ so why complain about it?

colonel1794093d ago

The sweet spot for a PS4 with the right features and specs is $499, which I see more realistic than $399. The times have changed since the PS3 launched at $599 and I think that more people will be willing to pay for the PS4 this time. Also, considering that Sony might me preparing a good launch line up, it's going to be an easier choice.

The only problem I see is that Sony fails at the marketing. They used to be great at it, and hopefully with the new agency they hired, they'll get it right this time.

kparks4092d ago (Edited 4092d ago )

Hell yeah I'd spend 799 on one.. Logic tells me the price will most likely be 499 and I believe that's a pretty good price point.

BLuKhaos4092d ago

Hell no.
I'll only get one if it costs $300 and has at least 15 games I know for a fact I will enjoy.

Azfargh4092d ago

Yes, but not at launch.

The fat PS3 was enough trouble with its 3-year-life...

Sony should fire their engineers for such mistake.

Syntax-Error4092d ago

With today's economy, $299-349 will be a safe price point. They couldn't even move Vita's @$249. Parents will see PS3 and 360's at $200-300 and buy those before newer systems. Hardcore gamers are a small percentage oompared to the masses. A $400 systems seems okay in your eyes, but too much for the average. A game system is not an iPhone, so don't expect it to be shelves as a MUST HAVE.

Bobby Kotex4092d ago

I gladly spent $400 on a PS3 when the price was reduced in 2009. If the PS4 is launched at this price, I'll definitely buy it.

4092d ago
+ Show (30) more repliesLast reply 4092d ago
-Mezzo-4093d ago

Yes,...Yes i would.

Gladly Even.

GalacticEmpire4093d ago

I would take Sony's arm off for that price.

Show all comments (303)
60°

Disney Dreamlight Valley teases part two of paid expansion

Disney Dreamlight Valley devs have officially teased the second part of the paid expansion titled The Spark of Imagination.

60°

Best Stardew Valley Farm Names – 100 Funny, Nerdy, Cute Ideas and More

Starting out a new farm, but need help choosing a name? Check out this article for a 100 farm name ides for Stardew Valley.

170°

Bethesda Needs to Reduce the Gaps Between New Fallout and Elder Scrolls Releases

Waiting a decade for new instalments in franchises as massive as Fallout and Elder Scrolls feels like a waste.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
-Foxtrot10h ago

Microsoft have Obsidian but I feel it's Bethesda who just don't want to play ball as they've always said they want to do it themselves.

Once MS bought Zenimax in 2020 they should have put the Outer Worlds 2 on the back burner, allow Bethesda to finish off its own Space RPG with Starfield (despite totally different tone why have two in your first party portfolio with two developers who's gameplay is a tad similar) and got Obsidian for one of their projects to make a spiritual successor to New Vegas.

When the Elder Scrolls VI is finished Bethesda can then onto the main numbered Fallout 5 themselves.

The Outer Worlds 2 started development in 2019 so putting it on the back burner wouldn't have been the end of the world, they'd have always come back to it once Fallout was done and it would have been nicely spaced out from Starfields release once they had most likely stopped supporting it and all the expansions were released.

If they did this back in 2020 when they bought Zenimax and the game had a good, steady 4 - 5 years development, you might have seen it release in 2025.

We are literally going to be waiting until 2030 at the very earliest for Fallout 5 and all they seem bothered about is pushing Fallout 76.

RaidenBlack8h ago(Edited 8h ago)

Its not just only Todd not playing ball.
Obsidian have made a name for themselves in delivering stellar RPGs, but most famous once have always been sequels/spin-offs to borrowed IPs like KOTOR 2, Neverwinter Nights 2, Fallout: New Vegas, Stick of Truth etc.
Obsidian wants to invest more in their own original IPs like Outer Worlds or Pillars of Eternity with Avowed.
Similar to what Bluepoint & inXile wants to do or Kojima is doing (i.e not involving anymore in Konami's IPs).
So yea, even if New Vegas has the most votes from 3D Fallout fans, Obsidian just wants to do their own thing, like any aspiring dev studio and MS is likely currently respecting that.
But a future Fallout game from Obsidian will surely happen. Founder Feargus Urquhart has already stated an year ago that they're eager to make a new Fallout game with Bethesda, New Vegas 2 or otherwise. Urquhart was the director of the very first 1995's Fallout game after all.
And don't forget Brian Fargo and his studio inXile, as Brian Fargo was the director of Fallout's 1988 predecessor: Wasteland

KyRo5h ago(Edited 5h ago)

Obsidian should take over the FO IP. They're do far better with it than Bethesda who hasn't made a great game for almost 15 years

Duke194h ago(Edited 4h ago)

I disagree. Part of these games is the support for the mod community. If they move to releasing a "next game" every 2 or 3 years, the modding support plummets and the franchises turn into just another run of the mill RPG.

Make the games good enough to withstand the test of time, to keep people coming back to them and expanding on them with mod support.

--Onilink--2h ago(Edited 2h ago)

I dont think anyone is saying they need to come out every 2 years (not to mention almost no game is released that quickly anymore)

By the time Fallout 5 comes out, it will be more than 15 years since Fallout 4 came out (same with ES6 coming out 15 years after Skyrim). Even if you want to use F76 as the metric for the most recent release, that one came out in 2018. It will be a miracle if F5 comes out before 2030

The point is that for a studio that doesnt seem to operate with multiple teams doing several projects at once, that their projects normally take 4-5 years as a minimum, and that now they even added Starfield to the rotation, it becomes a 15+ years waiting period between releases for each series, which doesnt make sense. Imagine that Nintendo only released a mainline Mario or Zelda game every 15 years…

They either need to start developing more than 1 project at a time, let someone else take a crack at one of the IPs or significantly reduce their development times

Duke1949m ago(Edited 46m ago)

Why should someone else take a crack at one of the IPs? Look at what happened to Final Fantasy as a recent example - there is pretty clear FF fatigue setting in because they are now pumping out titles in the franchise every few years. Pumping out more games faster doesn't always make a series better.

There are plenty of options to make new games, not just create more titles in the same universe at a faster pace.

mandf2h ago

Yeah I’m going to say it, who cares about the modding community when making a game? Half the time developers only tolerate modders because they fix there game for them.

Skuletor3h ago

Yeah, let's all advocate for smaller gaps between series' releases, then we'll probably get headlines about how the series have dropped in quality and they could have benefited from more time in the oven. Let them cook.

SimpleSlave2h ago

"how the series have dropped in quality and they could have benefited from more time in the oven" So every Bethesda game then? Got it.

Listen, I would agree if this was about From Software or something, but Bethesda?

🤣

C'mon now. What timeline are you from?

Skuletor44m ago

Think about it, they're already bug filled messes on their current schedule, can you imagine how much worse it would be if they rushed things?

Duke1949m ago

I mean you aren't wrong. People are going to complain about anything

isarai2h ago

Hows about you focus on quality, just a thought 🤷‍♂️

Sciurus_vulgaris2h ago

Bethesda [or Microsoft] would have to reallocate internal and external studios towards fallout and elder scrolls titles. Bethesda has the issue of developing 2 big IPs that are large RPGs on rotation. If you want more Fallout and Elder Scrolls, development will have to be outsourced.

Show all comments (17)