460°

Far Cry 3 targets Christmas No.1 with massive price drop

Ubisoft's Far Cry 3 appears to be making a late move to claim the Christmas No.1 spot with a substantial price drop at two of the UK's biggest video game retailers.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
hiredhelp4136d ago

Awasome game My GOTY with dishonored

brettyd4135d ago

Probly would be my GOTY but it runs like absolute sh*t on consoles. Never played a game with this much tearing and FR drops. Still like it alot dispite those issues though.. Dishonored gets my GOTY vote.

BlmThug4135d ago

I honestly have not had or noticed any issues regarding Far Cry 3 on the Xbox

iistuii4135d ago (Edited 4135d ago )

@Brettyd Why you get disagrees I don't know. I've got it on PC, I've got a top end machine, & need it for this game but it looks amazing. However I've played it on console & it does tear terrible, has little or no AA & dips a lot in framerate. Why do people either pretend it doesn't happen or refuse to admit it on their beloved console is beyond me.

kevnb4135d ago

Because an average frame rate of 20fps with dips in the teens is fine I guess. If it was that bad on a midrange PC people would have strokes over it.

TUGA4135d ago

I played it on my PS3 and not once have i experienced noticeable framerate drops. The only thing i noticed were some jaggies here and there but far from game breaking. Console gamers don't have to admit something that isn't there.

Baka-akaB4135d ago (Edited 4135d ago )

@iistuii

You gave yourself your own answer with your post .

You wonder why people dont notice major issues with the game on consoles ? Well they didnt play it after or alongside pc version . And when they dont it's quite fine .

Or also they knew what kind of performances to expect there .

Hellsvacancy4135d ago (Edited 4135d ago )

Im playing it on the PS3 and it IS abit shabby, not all the time, ive noticed moments in the game where it runs pretty smooth, but overall it isnt the greatest

Its a fun game, but its one of those time where I think *maybe we do need new consoles after all* because it should run smoother than that

Im buyin/building a PC after Xmas, ill be more than happy to playthrough it again

ThanatosDMC4135d ago

Played it on my friend's dual gtx680 and it ran so well. Tried it on the PS3 and it felt stiff and less fluid. I dont know why. Less decals and flora quality and textures. Btw, why do we have heat vision in the game or whatever you call it. I felt like a noob predator.

But it's still not as lush and jungle crazy as Crysis Ultra.

BattleAxe4135d ago (Edited 4135d ago )

I bought Far Cry 3 on PS3, and it runs quite well. There is the odd bit of screen tearing, but its not severe like there is in a game like Call of Warez; Bound in Blood, and I haven't noticed any substantial framerate drops. Basically whoever is talking about how bad the console version is, is full of shit. I bought it on PS3 instead of PC since I've got more friends to play with on my PS3.

TheFirstClassic4135d ago

That's kinda why I figured I would wait for at least a few months of patches before I get it.

Gazondaily4135d ago

You guys owe it to yourselves to play this on PC. It's incredible. When you set fire to crops with a flamethrower....so much fun.

ABizzel14135d ago (Edited 4135d ago )

There are some nasty fram drops in some sections, but it's till enjoyable.

Edit

Those who say it doesn't have frame drops are lying, or don't know what frame drops look like. There are times where you run around in the open and the game chugs along. It's not game breaking, nor ruins the experience, but it's completely noticeable.

TUGA4135d ago

@ ABizzel1 I have no reason to lie. I haven't noticed framerate drops in FC3. I'm currently replaying Dark Souls (PS3 version) because of the DLC and i have noticed framerate drops multiple times while playing it. I do know what framerate drops are. I've been playing games for over 20 years and i have experienced framerate drops on countless games. FC3 isn't one of those games so curb your tonge before calling people that you don't know liars.

RonRico4134d ago

Yup, like 20fps or so. Wish it was smoother because it kind of messes with my eyes after a while.

acemonkey4134d ago

i got the no rock no cam glitch and plus that one relic block

+ Show (12) more repliesLast reply 4134d ago
Thatguy-3104135d ago

Agreed. Overall GOTY for me is Journey but if I have to chose a retail game it will have to be Far CRy 3. I guess I loved it so much because it caught me by surprise. First in the series I played. I really enjoyed the open world aspect of it which I rarely do when it comes to games like these. Great game and hope it gets more recognized through the holiday.

smashman984135d ago

Pc gamers get disagrees not because they're wrong but because they love to exaggerate

chaldo4135d ago

@smashman98

You mean because they are jealous? :x

Norrison4134d ago

@smashman98
20 fps isn't an exageration, that's exactly what analysis say, and 20 fps IS a really bad framerate.

@Chaldo
We're jealous of? 20 fps with ultra low settings when we have 60+ on ultra?

finbars754135d ago

GOTY for sure.there are some minor glitches with the game but nothing that bothered me.But regardless it is an absolute fantastic game that everybody should experience.Great acting,awsome story,gameplay and mechanics are spot on.This and Dishonored are my two favorite games this year.

showtimefolks4135d ago

I don't know if I am one of the lucky ones but I haven't had a issue with my copy of the game on ps3. Maybe it's just that as a console gamer I don't notice small things any more lol

Anyway a excellent game must have. If this had come out in September or October this would be a huge sell(it still will I think) but it would have gotten more media attention and some GOTY

Sarcasm4135d ago

Same here my personal GOTY for a number of reasons. 1. It's actually a good game and I was addicted 2. I didn't expect number 1.

My runner up would be The Walking Dead games.

Nick_5154135d ago

GOTY for me, by far, is Persona 4 Golden. It's pretty damn good.

ChronoJoe4135d ago

Console gamers are used to it. Killzone 2-3 drop to like 15 frames per second but not one reviewer even picked that up.

It's not that big of a deal, though. Far Cry is at 20-30 95% of the time, dipping to 15-20 on rare occasion.

As for screen tearing, some people it bothers. Others don't see it at all. Personally I don't see it. I focus on other things, like my crosshair and whatnot, and I miss the torn tearing completely.

I guess it's one of those things where it's hard to unsee once you start looking for it. Tearing that is.

RonRico4134d ago

IMO KZ2 and 3 looks much smoother than FC3. More sharp too.

ChronoJoe4133d ago

I haven't found FC3s framerate too be bad at all to be honest but KZ2 / 3 do look a lot better. Less jaggies, Killzone 2 / 3 have much more visual polish.

Not that relevant though since FC is open world so it's harder to achieve the same level of graphical fidelity.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 4133d ago
forum674135d ago

Its already being sold for $20 (Rs1000) in India. I guess $20-$30 would be a proper price drop.

TheyDontLoveYou4135d ago

To bad all of the games are going to suck in the sales department cause of call of duty. The game should be priced at 20. Maybe then it would take Christmas.

Y_51504135d ago

If that's the price in the US, I'm getting it for sure!

Ninjamonkey824135d ago (Edited 4135d ago )

Was in GAME yesterday saw it selling for £25

The_KELRaTH4135d ago

I picked up the Lost Expeditions version in Game on Saturday for £20.49 (even though it was priced at £22.49).

Show all comments (66)
70°

Our Favorite Villains in Gaming - Roundtable

There have been plenty of great villains in video games over the years. Now it's time for the VGU crew to name a few of their favorites.

90°

Which Far Cry Should I Start With? - A Beginner's Guide 2023

If you’re new to this long-running franchise, we’ve got you covered.

Read Full Story >>
gameluster.com
masterfox402d ago

Farcry 3 and literally thats it! lol

GamingSinceForever401d ago (Edited 401d ago )

I recently tried 3 for the first time but the frame rate was a turnoff.

I liked 5 and 6 though.

banger88400d ago

If you have a Series X or S, the Xbox 360 version runs at 60 fps with fps boost. It's a shame the remaster doesn't.

isarai402d ago

2 and 3, pretty much the only ones i really enjoyed. 1 was amazing for the time but aged quite poorly. 4 has the elephant gun, all i can praise from any entry after 3 lol

cooperdnizzle401d ago

Ummmm 3 than stop.

Okay maybe two as well. But yeah probably 3 and then move on.

JEECE401d ago (Edited 401d ago )

Far Cry 2. People constantly rant about games now being too easy, holding your hand, having too many unnecessary RPG-lite leveling features, etc. People specifically complain about open world games being too focused on tons of collectibles and "checkmarks" that just waste time.

Far Cry 2 is an answer to all of those complaints. It was made by Ubisoft before they fell into all the traps discussed above (and before they started inserting towers into their games to defog the map). It has respawning enemies, weapons that degrade, and the collectible diamonds are very useful in the game (which you find in a similar way to the way you find shrines in BOTW with a radar system). The map you have is an in game item you pull out while playing, not a pause menu that is unnecessarily detailed. Also the enemy AI and physics are much better than later entries in the series.

It has a mixed reputation because people at the time said it was too hard, the weapon degradation was annoying, and then respawning enemies were annoying. FC2 came out in 2008, so this was before games like Dark Souls and BOTW had come out and made it cool to like these types of features.

XbladeTeddy400d ago

Far Cry 2, the one with the AI that find you through walls and trees, can one shot you from a mile away and have 100% accuracy? That was frustrating not fun because cheap AI.

JEECE400d ago (Edited 400d ago )

Uhh, I mean, it isn't one of these games where once the enemies have detected you they will magically forget you exist because you walked behind a wall or went into a bush. And yeah the AI isn't stormtrooper level accuracy. Again, these are positives, not negatives to me.

To be fair, I'm really directing this at the people most critical of "Modern Ubisoft" or "Modern Open World" design elements. Like the type of people who fawned all over Elden Ring because it had a clean UI because they are so burnt out by the "checkbox" type of open world design.

If you like those types of games, then a later FC game like 3 and especially 4-5 would be more your style.

Show all comments (11)
120°

Far Cry 3 Is One Of The Most Important Games Of Our Time

TheGamer Writes "Far Cry 3 is a time capsule of what game design was like in the early '00s"

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
Knushwood Butt484d ago

Beat it twice; once on PS3, and once a couple of months ago on PS5.

Doesn't Far Cry 2 have some of the things they are talking about here? Diamond hunting, healing, malaria medication?

shinoff2183484d ago (Edited 484d ago )

I believe 2 did. I highly doubt it was the only game like that though. I imagine the writer isn't old enough to have played part 2 but I also feel it wasn't the first game to introduce stuff like that

They bring up mass effect 2. I felt mass effect 1 was better. It just seem cut down. The citadel was a joke in part 2 compared to 1. How do you cut back on that.

Profchaos484d ago

Having just replayed the entire me trilogy yeah I think 1 was my favourite I think 2 had better cover and shooting mechanics but everything else in 1 was better

jznrpg484d ago (Edited 484d ago )

Mass Effect 1 was the best . It played like an RPG . The other games were more shooter and lost the feel the first game had unfortunately

gurp484d ago (Edited 484d ago )

I played it on PC when it came out, might play it again some time
Far Cry 3 is the best of the series, it was ahead of it's time

Palitera484d ago

It seems the blogger didn’t even play RDR1 if he thinks FC3 brought these elements to the AAA table. Tiktokers always have a new surprise. Smh

Sgt_Slaughter484d ago

"Far Cry 3 is a time capsule of what game design was like in the early '00s"

>Came out in 2012

Okay then

BrainSyphoned484d ago

If we are going to talk early 2000's game design how about start in the year 2000 with games that are a far cry better than something released 12 years later.
"Chrono Cross, Baldur's Gate II, Diablo II, Dragon Quest VII, Final Fantasy IX, The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask, and Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 2, along with new intellectual properties such as Deus Ex, Jet Set Radio, Perfect Dark, The Sims and Vagrant Story."
The article names things Ubisoft has shoved into games to dumb them down and then claims we should rush off to play it. Maybe instead look back at it as the death of originality from Ubisoft and gaming in general.

glennhkboy484d ago

Far Cry 3 & Assassin's Creed VI: Black Flag are 2 of the very best games from Ubisoft. All Ubisoft games since then are all just copying these 2 games.

ChubbyBlade484d ago

This isn’t an early 2000s game…you’re about a decade to early on that one.

Show all comments (13)