Gc writes, "After having time with the PlayStation’s Cross-Controller feature we can confirm that this is a decent little feature and one that we hope will build on the promising potential. We would love to say that Cross-Controller would become a staple to feature to PS3 games but we have serious doubts that it will even feature in games on a regular basis."
Gary Green said: Namco Bandai heard the call of many fans asking for the PlayStation release of Tales of Graces which was originally released seemingly exclusively for the Wii back in 2009. If you’re acquainted with the Tales series then Graces f won’t be something entirely new to you, yet if you’re a newcomer then you’ll find a plethora of gameplay mechanics and nuances that distinguish this series from other JRPGs. While the game finds itself following the traditional archetype of JRPGs, such as a somewhat clichéd story, Graces has something to offer to both veterans and newcomers alike.
Huzaifah from eXputer: "Sleeping Dogs from the early 2010s is one of the best open-world games out there but in dire need of a resurgence."
You say "yet" as if it's even possible anymore. United Front Games is gone, along with anyone that made this game what it is
That’s what happens when games sell poorly. And I’ve seen people wonder why people cry when a game sells badly… this is your answer.
Majority of the time it's true but if a company/publisher is big (in terms of money), they can take a hit or 2. e.g. I am not worried about Rebirth sales as Square will make Remake 3 anyway but if FF 17 doesn't sell then Square might need to look for alternative. <-- my humble opinion
Oh okay, Activision owned True Crime, but when that didn’t sell as intended it was canceled. Six months later Square Enix bought the rights and changed the title to Sleeping Dogs.*
*As per Wikipedia
Sleeping Dogs was a sleeper hit back then. It was fantastic. It actually still is. Would love a sequel to this, or at least a revive of True Crime series.
A new list goes over eight of the the most useless amiibo, ranging from the Shadow Mewtwo card to the Qbby figure.
So one of the worst idea for video games Sony ps3 doesn't do as well as the wii u. A feature that will take focus away from the tv continuously keeping the player from being immersed in a game is a distraction. Its a silly idea with bad technology in the first place. Learning to use a game controller without looking down at the buttons is something gamers strives to do when they started playing games so forcing someone to do that is silly.
Hot-keys have been in gaming a while where gamers can assign certain actions to specific buttons so the wii u idea is a step back in gaming like the wiimote. Wiimote is an inaccurate controller that mamajority % of Wii games worse to play and now this gimmick the wii u pad is another bad idea that can be solved by using hot-keys. The vita has a way better touchscreen and higher resolution screen than the wii u pad which is silly on Nintendos part for adding shoddy parts on their systems like always.
I know a lot Wii u buyers are beginning to realize what a silly idea it is to constantly look on the wii u pad to interact with the game and press the screen. The expensive screen controller is just a gimmick that siphoned resources that could have made the wii u more powerful. The expensive controller shouldnt be expensive either because the tech in it are old from 10years ago.Wii u is rubbish
it's different...
wii u = dual screen control
ps 3 = has handheld as cross controller..
"We are not saying that one experience is better than the other..."
Name of article:
"PlayStation’s Cross-Controller is good but Wii U does it better"
I well would hope the WiiU does this better than the Vita/PS3 as that's what it was built for!