90°

Why gamers should care about 7.1 audio & a list of PlayStation 3 games that support 7.1 audio

7.1 surround sound is the common name for an eight-channel surround audio system commonly used in home theatre configurations. It adds two additional speakers to the more conventional six-channel (5.1) audio configuration. As with 5.1 surround sound, 7.1 surround sound positional audio uses the standard front, center, and LFE (subwoofer) speaker configuration. However, whereas a 5.1 surround sound system combines both surround and rear channel effects into two channels (commonly configured in home theatre set-ups as two rear surround speakers), a 7.1 surround system splits the surround and rear channel information into four distinct channels, in which sound effects are directed to left and right surround channels, plus two rear surround channels. In a 7.1 surround sound home theatre set-up, the surround speakers are placed to the side of the listener’s position and the rear speakers are placed behind the listener.

Read Full Story >>
sony-gamer.com
cedaridge4157d ago

PS3 is indeed a tech BEAST but the problem is unless the game is design for ps3? games like Black ops 2 or nba 2k13 or any multiplat titles doesn't sound the same as xbox 360. 2K on the xbox 360 you can hear footsteps on the court, crowds giving players the blues at the free throw line. It just decoded different from the ps3 version TOO ME! But ps3 EXCLUSIVES games & Bluray movies goes HAM! psn: cedaridge / xbl: cedar4Thunder

CraigandDayDay4157d ago (Edited 4157d ago )

Good to see ya on here, man. lol I'm on my PS3 playing Battlefield BC2 on my Yamaha 7.1 system and wish it had 7.1 surround in the game. It does still sound good though. It sounds a million times better than CoD games haha PM me for my PSN. You're on my friends list.

CraigandDayDay4157d ago

BTW, to anyone wanting a good 7.1 surround system, you can't go wrong with Yamaha or Denon. Both are great receivers. Just make sure you get some good speakers and a good subwoofer to go along with it. The Yamaha SW-315 is an amazing subwoofer I just bought and makes my surround system rumble!!!

cedaridge4156d ago (Edited 4156d ago )

What up Pimp Juice? lol Almost forgot I have a 7.1 HT setup. Yamaha receiver (Dolby Digital HD / DTS HD certified) with the klipse speakers! Everything indeed match from ps3 to receiver down to the speakers. Movie night at the crib is a BLAST and with that NEW Batman gettin ready to drop on Bluray? "U Kno What it is." LOL!!!

CraigandDayDay4156d ago

Hell yeah, man. I can't wait for the new Batman. (Dark Knight Rises)

It's gonna be blasting on my system. What kind of subwoofer do you have? My SW315 is a damn good value. I got it for $265 from Amazon. It's the piano black one. The matte black one is a bit cheaper. I think it's going for around $245. I'm thinking about getting a second one.

MastaMold4157d ago (Edited 4157d ago )

Thats the way I play all my games in 7.1 surround sound and from the top of my head Uncharted 1-3, God of War 3, Killzone 2-3, Lair, Warhawk, Gran Turismo 5 and Metal Gear Solid 4 are all in 7.1 surround sound.

7.1 mostly gets use by Sony's first party devs and because of Blu-Ray they really utilize it. Sony STR-DN1000 google it thats the receiver I own its a beast.

Sent from my PS Vita

vlonjati774157d ago

Masta Im with you,I just built myself the cave (Movie/Game)room,and have a 7.1 Denon surround sound system with Polkaudio speakers & subwoofer.I have all the games you mentioned.They sound awesome.I leave in a house so when I turn it to max the house shakes as if there was a big earthquake :)I also connect my Vita sometimes and it sounds good too.

kopicha4157d ago (Edited 4157d ago )

There are still many gamers out there who actually not have a proper sound system hook up to their consoles even as of today. At least from my own surrounding I can see that. But be it whether it is due to budget constraint of any other reasons, definitely they are missing out on the full experience that most games actually provide. This is especially true for PS3 owners because when come to sound capability, it is simply a beast. I do not have a 7.1 since it would be a space issue for me as I have my consoles in my own room. But I do have a 5.1 setup with Lossless audio support. And all I can say is that never I would want to go back to 2.1 audio. Let alone sound directly from TV.

ninjahunter4157d ago

I got a true 5.1 headset for my PC and man, once you go surround you never go back.

DA_SHREDDER4157d ago

I've had everything from Bose systems, shelf systems, 2.1 computer systems, and 7.1 surround sound headsets. All I can say is that the sound quality for the expensive systems is overrated, and over priced. If you want decent sound, just get a really good 2.1 computer system. I just bought the Genius 70 watt 2.1, and sure it might not be as loud as my bose system, but considering the difference between the price tags, I wish I would have just got a cheap but good pc 2.1 a long time ago. I regret giving Bose 1 cent of my money for their over priced crap.

As for being a tech junkie, If you have a ps3, just get the offical wireless headset. It has virtual surround sound and it is amazing. As for that saying, once you go 7.1 , you'll never go back. Trust me, after many years of going through home theater and suped up car stereos, you'll get tired of spending all that money on over priced hardware that you can practically get something comparable at a fraction of the price.

_LarZen_4157d ago

Oh...gues I should just deliver back my B&W 805D speakers then since quality aint worth it.

Hmmm...on the other hand...it could be you dont know what your talking about.. :p

ninjahunter4157d ago

Well, luckily i dont care much about quality. I honestly cant tell the difference between a compressed and uncompressed audiofile. And a good sense of directionality is just such a nice treat, its really something i wouldnt want to give up.

kopicha4157d ago

well... when you get to the level of those really high end stuffs, almost all are the same in the sense that you get almost very very little upgrade but at a much much much higher cost. This is normal in almost everything from LED panels, home theatre and etc. That's something unavoidable. A costly process but for those who appreciate it, they will love it regardless. But there is one thing I would not quite agree in a way. 7.1 headset are good in their own ways. But its never in anyway comparable to a decent HT setup. It is like comparing HT to actual cinema sound setup which at most time it is not whether our sound system is not as good as those from cinema, but rather because most home environment are not able to produce the same acoustic environment. So comparing a 7.1 headset to a decent 7.1 HT would be the same thing like what I said. I too have a decent 7.1 headset that I use with my PC. I love them too. But never it can compare to even my actual 5.1 that my consoles are connected to.

Aghashie4157d ago

I agree w u on the official wireles headset. That thing is cheap and the sound is par w others more expensive sets I have tryed. also agree w u on the bose brand. on the other side... I do think that enjoying a game w 7.1 sound is an experience from what no one could ever get tired. once you go there, you don't want to go back. if u can't afford an expensive quality sound system, then at least, get the ps3 headphones. you won't regret it.

Bimkoblerutso4157d ago

...it's absolutely true that there's a ton of overpriced crap out there, but recommending a 2.1 system over a 7.1 system is ridiculous. I mean, you can get some great sound from a good 2.1 system, especially if you don't have the money or space to set up a 7.1 system.

But all barriers of entry aside, a 7.1 system is going to deliver the best aural experience you can get in gaming right now.

I will say that there are some brands out there in the audio world that consumers should avoid at all costs (*cough*Bose*cough*Monster), simply because of the ridiculous price:quality ratio, but that shouldn't dissuade anyone from investing in 7.1 ALTOGETHER.

kopicha4157d ago

@Bimkoblerutso

agree with your point. no one with a 2.1 system have fail to impress by the experience after playing the same game at my place when compared to their 2.1. I do understand that there are some barriers to certain people to own a proper surround set up. For those people I would then highly recommend a 7.1 headset. Since thats the closest you can get while it save both cost and space.

on a side note I also forget to point out one thing. a serious audiophile would not buy Bose speakers in the first place. They are just similar to Monster products which are usually overrated and most importantly overpriced.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4157d ago
Amplitude4157d ago

Warhawk and LAIR are definitely my favorite uses of 7.1. They were craaazy

mayberry4157d ago

I have wondered too why game review sites never list this awesome feature that only the sony playstation 3 can do as a plus. I dont have it, but my friend does, and playing killzone with 7.1 audio is an experience on another level.

SnakeCQC4157d ago

stick to 5.1 most people havent but many games, movies and blu rays and its great. 7.1 is still not widely supported

Show all comments (25)
280°

Sony Taps Bungie's Head of Revenue to Lead Live-Service Games

Sony has recruited Bungie's head of revenue Jaremy Rich to head up its live-service gaming division, Rich has announced on social media.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
ChasterMies14d ago

Please do not put Destiny’s monetization into Sony’s first party games. The monetization is what’s driving players away from Destiny.

just_looken14d ago

The new temp boss is the sony cfo bean counter so i can see this being a thing get every penny.

Cacabunga14d ago

PlayStation officially losing it.. fans will never support gaas games

just_looken14d ago

@car

The new boss did a interview in japan he wants to tap into the mobile market like nintendio so he give 0 fucks about gamers/fans

https://www.pushsquare.com/...

Redemption-6414d ago

@Cacabunga
You only speak for you and those who think like you, but most fans will support what they want. Playstation and PC fans are literally supporting Helldivers 2 and that is a gaas. Maybe you wouldn't, but many more would if they like it.

Huey_My_D_Long14d ago

@Redemption-64
Look, Im not making any judgement calls about this guy, but I will say that Helldivers 2 GaaS model is unique to Helldivers, and legit the only other game I can think of thats similiar was the Avengers game except HD2 pass is still better.
The fact that you can earn in game currency in a way that doesnt make you feel like you have to grind forever, as well you being able work on that pass that you bought...on your own time without a time limit...that right there is fucking huge to me, and I can't name any game other than avengers that avoided trapping players with FOMO logic...I think GaaS on HD2 shouldn't be compared to the rest of the industry...it should be copied.

Einhander197214d ago

Cacabunga

Helldivers 2...

Redemption-64

In Europe it's a 60 40 split favoring PC.
In the US its a 60 40 split favoring PS5.

So PlayStation owners supported the game just fine, it's not getting carried by PC or anything like that.

FinalFantasyFanatic13d ago

@just_looken,
I'm perfectly fine with the way Nintendo entered the mobile market, I never touched their mobile games, meanwhile, the console/handheld stayed the way it is. As for being a bean counter, he's probably going to reel in these massive budgets that Sony's studios have had lately, I haven't played Spiderman 2, but I cannot see how they almost tripled the budget for that game.

@Redemption-64,
That's an exception to the rule, I'm expecting a lot of these GAAS games from Sony to fail, to be fair, they only need a few to succeed, but I would have preferred that they put more of their resources into other types of games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 13d ago
DivineHand12514d ago

True their monetization is driving players away and at the same time, their decision to chop out content and convoluted systems is keeping new players away from the game.

Joe91314d ago

I don't think that will happen based on how things worked out at Naughty Dog now that we know what we do, seems they had the option to fully commit to live service games or stay making single player experences so they gave up on their live service game. We are not sure how things came about with Bend making a live service game but I hope that was not a forced situation. Sony doesnt seem like they are forcing studios to switch up but we will see, Sony's bread and butter is single player games it is how they dominated the console market.

Obscure_Observer14d ago

Yeah, I though Sony learned something from all their failures in the LS segment under Bungie´s disastrous leadership and supervision which led to games been cancelled, studios closed and all the people laid off.

Looks like Bungie still plays a major role in Sony´s LS initiative and Sony is not backtracking on their GaaS plans.

S2Killinit14d ago (Edited 14d ago )

Are we forgetting that Destiny is also a highly successful franchise? I feel like that definitely deserves mention here.

Besides, there is no reason why a person cant learn from past experiences.

Joe91313d ago

I agree, people act as if Destiny flopped when it came out lol it took 9 to 10 years for the numbers to fall yet people are still playing it add the success of Helldivers 2 no wonder Sony is going forward down this path.

S2Killinit13d ago

Personally, I see no problem with Sony also having service games as long as they make good ones, and more importantly they deliver the AAA story driven games that they are known for. So yeah, I agree 100% with you.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 13d ago
Christopher14d ago

I mean, this person made some pretty bad decisions at Bungie. I hope they've learned from them because I definitely don't see those type of ideas as good for PlaySation in general.

CrimsonWing6913d ago (Edited 13d ago )

Honestly, what’s to learn from? How to make people happily continuously dump money into a single game over its life-time? Buy season passes continuously for several years with a smile on our faces?

GaaS is a design decision that is everything wrong with this industry. The fact that Helldivers 2 did so well and people defend the monetization because it was $40 and is a fun game, scares the sh*t out of me to see that the door is open and all shift will probably be to replicate that in future games. We already know the ROI for traditional game dev cost isn’t doing it for them.

I thought with Jimbo leaving we’d see a change for the better… I’m not so sure now.

S2Killinit13d ago

Service games are being offered by everyone. Sony cannot afford to only create single player AAA games. No one can. They already said they will be doing both.

Abnor_Mal14d ago (Edited 14d ago )

Ps5 gamers in 2023 seemed to play more live service types of games, so regardless to how people feel about them, numbers don’t lie and Sony is going where the money is. I mean look at the excitement around Helldivers2, people are showing that they want live service games.

Christopher14d ago

They play long-time existing live service games like CoD, Fortnite, Apex Legends, Destiny 2, and the like. Mass majority of new live service games are considered failures and aren't moving gamers away from older games.

just_looken14d ago

Yep the huge issue with live service is they need paid players along with a reason to play them.

You forgot mobile market that also taps into that player base as well as the eve online style games there is only a certain amount of krakens/whales blind supporters compared to the amount of live service games we have its not sustainable math wise.

700 restaurants making food for every seat for 1000-3000 eaters just does not work out

Einhander197214d ago (Edited 14d ago )

Christopher

I am not a big live service fan and literally own zero of the games you listed, but that is not true, unless you call games that aren't the top games to be failures.

There are tons of live service games that are profitable.

Games don't have to be the biggest game ever they just need to make more than they cost.

I challenge you to show professionally prepared data that shows that more live service games fail than make enough to keep going.

Because all the data that I have seen shows that live service is less of a gamble than making a big AAA budget game which needs to survive off retail sales.

FinalFantasyFanatic13d ago

I sometimes wonder if we're at saturation point, where it's hard for a new game to join those ranks unless it's particularly exceptional, people only have so much time and money to devote to these types of games.

romulus2314d ago

Correction, they have no issue playing good live service games

shinoff218314d ago

Lol it's not even a quarter of the ps5s sold. Helldivers may have been a hit but let's not say most are enjoying it because truth is most(the real most ) don't care about it.

S2Killinit13d ago (Edited 13d ago )

I play what is fun. If a live service game is good I’ll play it as long as its not a money scheme which Helldivers is not.

And Im a single player gamer.

mastershredder14d ago

How do you kill a franchise that already been killed?
Destiny’s grind, cash-in-on-playbass-cha-Ching, and pop-culture-insertion mainstream-me-too bs totally killed any rep Bungie had. Sony/Bungie, if you are doing this to ward-off players, it’s already working.

crazyCoconuts14d ago

Headline truncated:
"... off a cliff"

Show all comments (43)
80°

Sony May Soon Let You Decide How Much NPCs Talk In Games

Sony has patented to add multiple dialogue modes to let players switch between how many conversations with NPCs they want in the game.

blackblades20d ago

Sony is like the only ones outta the 3 that has atuff like like this pop up changing thing in ways.

just_looken20d ago

Sony in the past has always been first at bat with new ideas/tech but in the end never fully use it or just toss it away.

blackblades20d ago

I think they did use some but yeah most usually never happened but at least they thought about it. Sony seeks things like this and other, Nintendo seek different ways of playing going by there different controler designs and console designs.

just_looken20d ago (Edited 20d ago )

some of the other stuff sony want's/owns never used
https://gamerant.com/sony-p...
https://gamerant.com/sony-p...
https://www.eurogamer.net/s...
https://metro.co.uk/2023/03...
https://decrypt.co/114754/s...

monitor/adjust game difficultly as you play
https://www.techradar.com/g...

Sony nfts
https://www.theblock.co/pos...

Pay ai to play the game for you
https://thebusinessofesport...

Oh all the above last 12 months

I just imagine a evil scientist with test subjects when it comes down to sony recent patent reports.

Kaii20d ago

Will we get dialogue options that won't spoil puzzles in a matter of seconds? :p

280°

Judge rules in PlayStation's favour in $500m patent infringement lawsuit

Genuine Enabling Technology was seeking damages, claiming the tech allowing PlayStation consoles and controllers to communicate infringes its rights.

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
S2Killinit22d ago

Big victory for Sony. And a long time coming.

DarXyde21d ago (Edited 21d ago )

Crazy to think the savings from this lawsuit allows them to develop one AAA game.

Make it Bloodborne 2, please and thank you.

21d ago
Profchaos22d ago

Sounds like patent trolling they tried the same thing against Nintendo with the same pattern.

Motion and control input traversing over higher and lower frequencies seperate from each other allowing the controller to do both

Pyrofire9521d ago

Patents suck. Most of them are complete garbage.

Knightofelemia21d ago

So to recoup the money Genuine is going to take on Nintendo or Microsoft next. I hate patent lawyers they are some of the worst bottom feeders out there.

Show all comments (13)