190°

Far Cry 3 PS3 Install Size Revealed: 6.2GB

While the Blu-ray drive allows for huge gaming experiences that use up the whole 50GB that the discs can hold, an unfortunate side effect is that a lot of games have to have data installed on the PS3 because the data is read slower. Far Cry 3 is one such games, and PSLS can reveal that the game will take up a whopping 6.2GB.

Read Full Story >>
playstationlifestyle.net
ftwrthtx4158d ago

That's a big chunk of game.

dbjj120884158d ago

There are some incredible textures in the game (it seems) so that must make up a bulk of the data.

dazzrazz4158d ago

There are no incredible textures on consoles, everything is low details compared to pc. The only reason they force people to dump most of the game on hdd is extremely slow 2x speed blu ray mounted in ps3 units.

Foolsjoker4158d ago

Not a fan of this becoming the norm for games now.

Dasteru4158d ago (Edited 4158d ago )

@dazzrazz:

2x Blu ray = 9MB/s
Every 1x increase is a constant 4.5MB/s

Every 1x increase on DVD is 1MB/s max but alternates to nearly half at times.

The reason it needs to install data is because it is uncompressed to make use of the extra storage space on the disk.

More data to read = longer read time = installs to compensate.

rainkore4158d ago

That isn't too terrible. It's no World of Warcraft.

FanboyPunisher4158d ago

36GB I think its around these days..lol.

But thats a PC platform not PC. Desktops have tons of space and usually multi drives these days.

I'm getting Farcry 3 for PC def, wouldn't want to do injustice by playing it on console and seeing it in its lesser form.

Anon19744157d ago

It's always been a head scratcher for me why installs on PS3 are an evil thing, but no one bats an eye at mammoth PC installs, which we've been doing for decades. I don't know about the slims but it was one screw to remove my PS3 harddrive chassis and upgrade my drive. It's not like storages space should be a concern.

showtimefolks4158d ago (Edited 4158d ago )

dazzrazz

look man i wish PC gamers had their own sites because all any of you do is come on every article and talk about how superior the PC game is which it is. go enjoy it and leave the console gamers to our low textures and bad exclusives

i am sure you can enjoy halo 4,gears3,last of us,uncharted,god of war,zelda,mari etc,,,on PC oh wait

Farcry 3 looks stunning and i can't wait to get my hands on it. next tuesday mess effect trilogy and far cry 3

JoGam

lol sorry. and i wish you luck in that stay alive part lol

JoGam4158d ago (Edited 4158d ago )

Dude I can't wait till Farcry 33 comes out. Damn you seen footage too? Hopefully im still alive to see it launch. :-)

dirthurts4158d ago

Don't worry. Another year and the new consoles will be looming and things will be a little bit more balanced between pc and consoles again. For a few years.
Some console games do have fantastic textures. It's possible with the right engine.
Don't be dissing the consoles, especially when it's a platform neutral article.

MysticStrummer4158d ago

They do have their own sites, but how can they pretend to be superior if they go to those sites? Most people there have decent gaming PCs, and more than a few will have better tech than the garden variety N4G PC troll has.

chcolatesnw4158d ago

Well after spending 2k on mine i like the bragging rights come with it. And so do others. What if you had a Lamborghini and every neighbour in a 5 block radius had a pos wagon. I would drive up and down and in circles before and after work and every sunday so all them hill billies can see the shiny thing. Its human nature, and i welcome the negatives im going to get from the simple minded fanboys, in fact i embrace them, they make me laugh :DDDDDD

Autodidactdystopia4158d ago (Edited 4158d ago )

I wish console gamers had their own sites to go to all they do is come around here and bitch and discriminate against pc gamers. if you dont wanna hear it go enjoy your low rez stuff you love so much.

this website is for comments... good or bad its gonna happen. LOL

IDGAF about people i just like to argue

but i dont argue when im wrong, that would be....well... wrong.

Ju4158d ago

@chcolatesnw I'd think it's called immature, tbh.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4158d ago
dbjj120884158d ago

That's so much space. I don't mind deleting the install data of games I'm not playing anymore, but I didn't think my 160gb PS3 would fill up this fast.

Conzul4158d ago

http://www.newegg.com/Produ...

It's what I used. I recommend it so HIGHLY that I used capslock just there. That's how HIGHLY.

It'll hold all your PS+ games, your physical media installs, and a large photo/music/video collection to boot. I have a "Cinema" folder with HD movies that's reached 51GB. These drives also reduce loading screen durations, but won't really increase actual in-game fidelity/performance.

And when the PS4 comes out and has a sub-par HDD inside, just swap it with this one from your PS3.

BigStef714158d ago

Is that the highest you can upgrade your hardrive to? I was looking to get a new one for my ps3 but I wanted one that has a TB of storage capacity. What do you think?

Conzul4158d ago (Edited 4158d ago )

@BigStef71

Well they have one higher tiered model that's 8GBSSD/750GBHDD. That's actually the one I have. It costs ~$130 on newegg right about now.

In a PS3 system, about 690GB of that is recognized. Just go with that one. Totally worth it vs. a slower but larger drive.

insertcoin4158d ago

Sometimes I think the digital revolution is just a conspiracy by the hard drive manufacturers to force me to buy their products and waste my time downloading and deleting and downloading and deleting again.

ftwrthtx4158d ago

They want all of us to invest into their largest, most expensive HDs aruond.

ab5olut10n4158d ago

or in a $99 500GB drive. that too is a thing.

ftwrthtx4158d ago

I have a 500GB HD. It is down to 40GB free. I hate having to redownload games, so I need a bigger drive.

animegamingnerd4158d ago

why did sony ever feel the need for the installs on the PS3 i will never know why

bubblebeam4158d ago

Decreases load times, as Blu-ray reads slower than DVD.

I would love it if they gave the option to install every game. It really isn't a hassle. I just read the manual or get something to eat while it is installing, AND I put up with less issues in the game.

It's a win-win situation.

Siren304158d ago

I've never had a problem with installs either, I usually do my workouts while waiting so I don't feel guilty sitting several hours while playing the game.

animegamingnerd4158d ago

i see why but the problem i had with PS3 installs was that i have a old 40 gig PS3

bubblebeam4158d ago

@animegamingnerd

I understand. I'd hate to be the guy to suggest getting a bigger HD, as the 3rd party ones are very cheap.

I never had that problem myself, as I have an original 'Phat' PS3 (love saying that), and intalls weren't a big issue back then. I ended up buying a slim a few years later, and that's when installs became more popular.

The big boy only gets taken out when I need to play some old PS1 and PS2 games. It is in mint condition.

Oh_Yeah4158d ago (Edited 4158d ago )

Because for most games the ps3 needs them in order to keep performance up to par. The bluray drive spins at speeds of only 2x which is slow..so it needs help with streaming the data ya know? That's where the installs to the hard drive come in. Depends on the type of game and how it was coded also.. Such as God of War 3 which is around 40 gbs and it needs no install.

mushroomwig4158d ago

It's not Sony, it's the developers. Look at the Uncharted series, not a single install required.

Ben_Grimm4158d ago

Far Cry 3 is very different in terms of gameplay and design from the Uncharted series.

onandonandon4158d ago

Uncharted takes a few mins to start though

Norrison4158d ago

Uncharted is linear, far cry is open world, get some common sense.

Minato-Namikaze4158d ago

Infamous doesn't have installs does it?

floetry1014158d ago (Edited 4158d ago )

Infamous doesn't have to be reproduced on 3 different platforms with stricter publishing deadlines either.

Look at it logically. Far Cry 3 is a multi-platform title and unquestionably a much, much larger and more detailed world than either Infamous 1 or 2. Uncharted is made by a development team that know the console inside-out and better than anyone in the business because they produce games EXCLUSIVELY for it.

If people are annoyed by game installations (something that has been happening with games for almost 3 decades), then I weep for the future.

Ju4158d ago (Edited 4158d ago )

I'd guess there is a way to dynamically cache the data. But the fact is, both games load assets from HDD because it is quite faster. And yes, UC is easier to implement because it is linear. Try going backward in the game and you see some hick ups.

Using the HDD to cache data is a great idea. Pre-loading in an open world game makes the whole experience while playing a bit smoother. But true, Infamous2 is "open" and does not install, but probably does just what I mentioned. It dynamically caches textures when loading the first time. Would probably work with FC also, but gives you some "pop ins" at first (???). Level design can also a factor. How assets are placed in the world can make a difference. FC is very "random" in that aspect. Can be another reason that dynamically loading won't work. I'm just speculating, but there are just various reasons why things are implemented how they are.

@above. Ubi took the time to optimize the PS3 quite a bit. So your argument is invalid there. (see link above).

MariaHelFutura4158d ago

Yes Infamous 2 has an install, it is 1.3 GB/1300 MB. But yes, most PS3 exclusive games don't have massive installs.

SoundGamer4157d ago

Borderlands 2 didn't require an install on PS3 either.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 4157d ago
AKS4158d ago

Why do you think a HDD was included with every single PS3? To give you some extra space to download porn?

Having a standard HDD can reduce load times and make things run smoother. It can also reduce the work the Blu-ray drive has to do. Try listening to the Blu-ray drive when you're playing a really demanding game that has no install. It tends to be very busy. I had a BD-ROM drive go out on me before. I'd much rather put the stress on the hard drive than have to replace a Blu-ray drive again.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4157d ago
Show all comments (56)
70°

Our Favorite Villains in Gaming - Roundtable

There have been plenty of great villains in video games over the years. Now it's time for the VGU crew to name a few of their favorites.

90°

Which Far Cry Should I Start With? - A Beginner's Guide 2023

If you’re new to this long-running franchise, we’ve got you covered.

Read Full Story >>
gameluster.com
masterfox401d ago

Farcry 3 and literally thats it! lol

GamingSinceForever399d ago (Edited 399d ago )

I recently tried 3 for the first time but the frame rate was a turnoff.

I liked 5 and 6 though.

banger88399d ago

If you have a Series X or S, the Xbox 360 version runs at 60 fps with fps boost. It's a shame the remaster doesn't.

isarai401d ago

2 and 3, pretty much the only ones i really enjoyed. 1 was amazing for the time but aged quite poorly. 4 has the elephant gun, all i can praise from any entry after 3 lol

cooperdnizzle399d ago

Ummmm 3 than stop.

Okay maybe two as well. But yeah probably 3 and then move on.

JEECE399d ago (Edited 399d ago )

Far Cry 2. People constantly rant about games now being too easy, holding your hand, having too many unnecessary RPG-lite leveling features, etc. People specifically complain about open world games being too focused on tons of collectibles and "checkmarks" that just waste time.

Far Cry 2 is an answer to all of those complaints. It was made by Ubisoft before they fell into all the traps discussed above (and before they started inserting towers into their games to defog the map). It has respawning enemies, weapons that degrade, and the collectible diamonds are very useful in the game (which you find in a similar way to the way you find shrines in BOTW with a radar system). The map you have is an in game item you pull out while playing, not a pause menu that is unnecessarily detailed. Also the enemy AI and physics are much better than later entries in the series.

It has a mixed reputation because people at the time said it was too hard, the weapon degradation was annoying, and then respawning enemies were annoying. FC2 came out in 2008, so this was before games like Dark Souls and BOTW had come out and made it cool to like these types of features.

XbladeTeddy398d ago

Far Cry 2, the one with the AI that find you through walls and trees, can one shot you from a mile away and have 100% accuracy? That was frustrating not fun because cheap AI.

JEECE398d ago (Edited 398d ago )

Uhh, I mean, it isn't one of these games where once the enemies have detected you they will magically forget you exist because you walked behind a wall or went into a bush. And yeah the AI isn't stormtrooper level accuracy. Again, these are positives, not negatives to me.

To be fair, I'm really directing this at the people most critical of "Modern Ubisoft" or "Modern Open World" design elements. Like the type of people who fawned all over Elden Ring because it had a clean UI because they are so burnt out by the "checkbox" type of open world design.

If you like those types of games, then a later FC game like 3 and especially 4-5 would be more your style.

Show all comments (11)
120°

Far Cry 3 Is One Of The Most Important Games Of Our Time

TheGamer Writes "Far Cry 3 is a time capsule of what game design was like in the early '00s"

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
Knushwood Butt483d ago

Beat it twice; once on PS3, and once a couple of months ago on PS5.

Doesn't Far Cry 2 have some of the things they are talking about here? Diamond hunting, healing, malaria medication?

shinoff2183483d ago (Edited 483d ago )

I believe 2 did. I highly doubt it was the only game like that though. I imagine the writer isn't old enough to have played part 2 but I also feel it wasn't the first game to introduce stuff like that

They bring up mass effect 2. I felt mass effect 1 was better. It just seem cut down. The citadel was a joke in part 2 compared to 1. How do you cut back on that.

Profchaos483d ago

Having just replayed the entire me trilogy yeah I think 1 was my favourite I think 2 had better cover and shooting mechanics but everything else in 1 was better

jznrpg482d ago (Edited 482d ago )

Mass Effect 1 was the best . It played like an RPG . The other games were more shooter and lost the feel the first game had unfortunately

gurp483d ago (Edited 483d ago )

I played it on PC when it came out, might play it again some time
Far Cry 3 is the best of the series, it was ahead of it's time

Palitera482d ago

It seems the blogger didn’t even play RDR1 if he thinks FC3 brought these elements to the AAA table. Tiktokers always have a new surprise. Smh

Sgt_Slaughter483d ago

"Far Cry 3 is a time capsule of what game design was like in the early '00s"

>Came out in 2012

Okay then

BrainSyphoned483d ago

If we are going to talk early 2000's game design how about start in the year 2000 with games that are a far cry better than something released 12 years later.
"Chrono Cross, Baldur's Gate II, Diablo II, Dragon Quest VII, Final Fantasy IX, The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask, and Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 2, along with new intellectual properties such as Deus Ex, Jet Set Radio, Perfect Dark, The Sims and Vagrant Story."
The article names things Ubisoft has shoved into games to dumb them down and then claims we should rush off to play it. Maybe instead look back at it as the death of originality from Ubisoft and gaming in general.

glennhkboy483d ago

Far Cry 3 & Assassin's Creed VI: Black Flag are 2 of the very best games from Ubisoft. All Ubisoft games since then are all just copying these 2 games.

ChubbyBlade482d ago

This isn’t an early 2000s game…you’re about a decade to early on that one.

Show all comments (13)