560°
9.0

IGN-Far Cry 3 Review

IGN:Jason Brody cries out in horror the first time he watches his brother murder a man. When the sibling kills again, there’s a vulnerable tremble to Jason’s whimpering whisper. “I can’t do this, Grant.”

realiks4166d ago (Edited 4166d ago )

Great. My most anticipated game of this year. Will have lots of fun traveling around islands and swimming through the sea/ocean, fighting with sharks and tigers.
One of the best wildlifes out there (AC3 and RDR were great too).

A little bit tired of urban places. Fresh air we needed.

guitarded774166d ago

This has been my most anticipated FPS of the year.. I'm glad it got a good score from IGN, but I was gonna get it good or bad score. It's nice to have a diverse outdoor setting... sometimes just trees gets as boring as just buildings. I thought Dead Island did a good job of mixing the two.

BattleTorn4166d ago

I was going to mention Dead Island!

For some reason, I now relate the two.

Last year I fell in love with Dead Island, which released Sept.4th 2011, which means it wasn't quite going to be able to compete with the blockbusters that release shortly after (Gears3, and BF3 at the time)

When Far Cry 3 was originally dated Sept6th 2012, I thought "Oh, no. It's a September "fuck up""
Then, they delayed! I thought "It IS a fuck up" or else they really, really want to perfect their COD-MP - which I didn't like the footage of.

Since I've seen the SP free roaming gameplay!! OMG! This will be an awesome game to end my fall with, and take me through my holidays.

I don't get games that I beat, and move on. I like a game I can sink into, and have it be my "staple" for some time. Far Cry is looking to have it in spades!

JellyJelly4165d ago

IGN scores

Far Cry 3 - SP campaign 25-30 hours, original story and great voice cast and characters, open world and open-ended gameplay, clever AI and lots of different ways to approach objectives, graphics that blow Blops 2 out of the water.
IGN verdict 9.0

COD Black Ops 2 - SP campaign 4-6 hours, no originality whatsoever, sub-hd graphics, extremely linear AI and levels (make enemeies stop spawning by moving forward), broken multiplayer, PS3 version completely broken (reviewers didn't even mention), even re-uses the same graphical assets from past games.
IGN verdict 9.3.

"Far Cry 3 is important for the same reason as Far Cry 2. It’s a shooter that considers shooters thoughtfully, both in the way they’re designed and the way we play them, and then asks us to do the same."

COD Black Ops 2 is nothing at all like that but still gets higher scores from both IGN and Gametrailers. They didn't even bring up the glitches and the fact that the PS3 version is broken.

Who do these guys write for? Us gamers or Activision, or Doritos even?? Bunch of hypocrites.

braydox214165d ago

yeah this game wasn't on my radar and particular didn't have an interest after farcry 2 which was difficult to find my way around and do the side quests, although it was very fun. but then when i was seated at the eb games expo 2012 and i saw the game play i just went estactic and holy crap this game looks great on a 30m television (lol) no but seriously this turned me onto wanting this game just in one showing.

Virus2014166d ago

If you need fresh air then go outside.

Chuk54166d ago

This game is gonna be a dark horse this year, I'm saying.
The wait just got longer.

Kingdom Come4166d ago (Edited 4166d ago )

I think you're right, along with Walking Dead: The Game.

It's a shame that for many gamer's, this title wasn't already on their radar, I've had my Pre-Order for age's.

Nimblest-Assassin4166d ago

Dark horse my ass... this game is a full blown contendor

Chuk54166d ago

I haven't played it yet so I can't say for sure, but looks promising. By dark horse I mean it's not on everyone's radar. It's off a lot of people's radars, but I think it will surprise.

Kingdom Come4166d ago (Edited 4166d ago )

The game looks absolutely stunning, I'm not surprised at all by the overwhelming reception its receiving, 10/10 from Eurogamer, 9/10 from IGN. Ubisoft truly deserve these scores for the years of work that have been poured in to the development of this sequel, coupled with the task of improving on the heavy criticism's thrown by the gaming community, Far Cry 3 is a brilliant accomplishment...

Release date can't come soon enough.

JohnApocalypse4166d ago

Just pre-ordered it now. One of the best things about this game is that it comes out in the Europe before the US

Swiggins4166d ago

Tell us poor Yanks how it is will you? lol

Animal Mutha 764165d ago

That makes a refreshing change.

Show all comments (50)
70°

Our Favorite Villains in Gaming - Roundtable

There have been plenty of great villains in video games over the years. Now it's time for the VGU crew to name a few of their favorites.

90°

Which Far Cry Should I Start With? - A Beginner's Guide 2023

If you’re new to this long-running franchise, we’ve got you covered.

Read Full Story >>
gameluster.com
masterfox401d ago

Farcry 3 and literally thats it! lol

GamingSinceForever399d ago (Edited 399d ago )

I recently tried 3 for the first time but the frame rate was a turnoff.

I liked 5 and 6 though.

banger88399d ago

If you have a Series X or S, the Xbox 360 version runs at 60 fps with fps boost. It's a shame the remaster doesn't.

isarai401d ago

2 and 3, pretty much the only ones i really enjoyed. 1 was amazing for the time but aged quite poorly. 4 has the elephant gun, all i can praise from any entry after 3 lol

cooperdnizzle399d ago

Ummmm 3 than stop.

Okay maybe two as well. But yeah probably 3 and then move on.

JEECE399d ago (Edited 399d ago )

Far Cry 2. People constantly rant about games now being too easy, holding your hand, having too many unnecessary RPG-lite leveling features, etc. People specifically complain about open world games being too focused on tons of collectibles and "checkmarks" that just waste time.

Far Cry 2 is an answer to all of those complaints. It was made by Ubisoft before they fell into all the traps discussed above (and before they started inserting towers into their games to defog the map). It has respawning enemies, weapons that degrade, and the collectible diamonds are very useful in the game (which you find in a similar way to the way you find shrines in BOTW with a radar system). The map you have is an in game item you pull out while playing, not a pause menu that is unnecessarily detailed. Also the enemy AI and physics are much better than later entries in the series.

It has a mixed reputation because people at the time said it was too hard, the weapon degradation was annoying, and then respawning enemies were annoying. FC2 came out in 2008, so this was before games like Dark Souls and BOTW had come out and made it cool to like these types of features.

XbladeTeddy399d ago

Far Cry 2, the one with the AI that find you through walls and trees, can one shot you from a mile away and have 100% accuracy? That was frustrating not fun because cheap AI.

JEECE399d ago (Edited 399d ago )

Uhh, I mean, it isn't one of these games where once the enemies have detected you they will magically forget you exist because you walked behind a wall or went into a bush. And yeah the AI isn't stormtrooper level accuracy. Again, these are positives, not negatives to me.

To be fair, I'm really directing this at the people most critical of "Modern Ubisoft" or "Modern Open World" design elements. Like the type of people who fawned all over Elden Ring because it had a clean UI because they are so burnt out by the "checkbox" type of open world design.

If you like those types of games, then a later FC game like 3 and especially 4-5 would be more your style.

Show all comments (11)
120°

Far Cry 3 Is One Of The Most Important Games Of Our Time

TheGamer Writes "Far Cry 3 is a time capsule of what game design was like in the early '00s"

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
Knushwood Butt483d ago

Beat it twice; once on PS3, and once a couple of months ago on PS5.

Doesn't Far Cry 2 have some of the things they are talking about here? Diamond hunting, healing, malaria medication?

shinoff2183483d ago (Edited 483d ago )

I believe 2 did. I highly doubt it was the only game like that though. I imagine the writer isn't old enough to have played part 2 but I also feel it wasn't the first game to introduce stuff like that

They bring up mass effect 2. I felt mass effect 1 was better. It just seem cut down. The citadel was a joke in part 2 compared to 1. How do you cut back on that.

Profchaos483d ago

Having just replayed the entire me trilogy yeah I think 1 was my favourite I think 2 had better cover and shooting mechanics but everything else in 1 was better

jznrpg483d ago (Edited 483d ago )

Mass Effect 1 was the best . It played like an RPG . The other games were more shooter and lost the feel the first game had unfortunately

gurp483d ago (Edited 483d ago )

I played it on PC when it came out, might play it again some time
Far Cry 3 is the best of the series, it was ahead of it's time

Palitera483d ago

It seems the blogger didn’t even play RDR1 if he thinks FC3 brought these elements to the AAA table. Tiktokers always have a new surprise. Smh

Sgt_Slaughter483d ago

"Far Cry 3 is a time capsule of what game design was like in the early '00s"

>Came out in 2012

Okay then

BrainSyphoned483d ago

If we are going to talk early 2000's game design how about start in the year 2000 with games that are a far cry better than something released 12 years later.
"Chrono Cross, Baldur's Gate II, Diablo II, Dragon Quest VII, Final Fantasy IX, The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask, and Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 2, along with new intellectual properties such as Deus Ex, Jet Set Radio, Perfect Dark, The Sims and Vagrant Story."
The article names things Ubisoft has shoved into games to dumb them down and then claims we should rush off to play it. Maybe instead look back at it as the death of originality from Ubisoft and gaming in general.

glennhkboy483d ago

Far Cry 3 & Assassin's Creed VI: Black Flag are 2 of the very best games from Ubisoft. All Ubisoft games since then are all just copying these 2 games.

ChubbyBlade483d ago

This isn’t an early 2000s game…you’re about a decade to early on that one.

Show all comments (13)