310°
8.0

IGN: Playstation All-Stars Battle Royale Review

Colin Moriarty:
"I know it’ll be hard for some skeptics to believe, but PlayStation All-Stars is its own game, and it even happens to do some things better than what inspired it. Give it a try and see for yourself."

+ Fun, dynamic gameplay
+ Unique goal and scoring system
+ Robust roster of characters, stages
+ Great cross-play, cross-save Vita/PS3 options

– Lack of presentational quality

Chuk54174d ago

I'm happy this game turned out well. I liked what I played of it. they should getr weirder with the characters next time though. Like, throw captain blasto in there or something.

NeverEnding19894174d ago (Edited 4174d ago )

It should be a 9/10. I guessing the docked point is because IGN has an app on Xbox Live.

Edit: Uh oh, the people agreeing with me didn't realize I was being sarcastic :|

blitz06234174d ago (Edited 4174d ago )

8 is a damn good score, especially with all the hate the game was getting before this day.

Interestingly enough, the only con he mentioned in the end was the lack of presentational quality, so 8 seems too low if you only judge by the summary. Still, if that's the only thing that stood out negatively, I have a lot to look forward to in the game

JoGam4174d ago

I just read the Walking Dead review and IGN gave that game one negative too but scored it higher. Reviews are too funny.

xursz4174d ago

why would you complain over a 1/10 difference in your opinion to his?

shammgod4174d ago

Reverse trolling?!?! Nice touch!

Outside_ofthe_Box4173d ago (Edited 4173d ago )

lol I just addressed you in the gamespot review.

http://n4g.com/news/1124672...

Looks like good or bad review people like NeverEnding are going to be bringing up the "live app" when it comes to PS games.

Edit:

Anyway we should be giving SuperBot a lot of credit for being able to make this game so solid that a lot of reviewers are actually judging the game on it's own merit and thereby seeing how good Battle Royale really is.

It's really tough for a dev to make a game in genre that is dominated by a great and established game without people comparing it to the standards of that established game.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4173d ago
Jinkies4174d ago (Edited 4174d ago )

An 8 really, from what i've played of it, it's at least a 9

So the same old crap Black Ops 2 gets a 9.3 for example, yet a well made, creative new game like this gets an 8.

I'm not saying an 8 is rubbish or I'm not happy with it, it's just the review dosen't really fit the score, I mean it sounds like he enjoyed it alot...

Hell even an 8.3/8.5/8.8 since the scoring has reverted back to the old ways but just an 8....come on IGN, even Borderlands 2 DLC for example, Mr. Torgue's Campaign of Carnage Review got an 9.3

See blitza0623 gets it above

"Interestingly enough, the only con he mentioned in the end was the lack of presentational quality, so 8 seems too low if you only judge by the summary"

Thats what I'm talking about, the review dosent really match the score.

Chuk54174d ago

Well, it's not the same reviewer. It's not like tom chic who gave halo 4 a 1, and then gave black ops 2 a four. Different writers at ign.

kopicha4174d ago

IGN is IGN. Their review score is last thing on earth that matters

ape0074174d ago (Edited 4174d ago )

this is a clone of Smash, CoD is CoD, many copied and many failed

Jinkies4174d ago (Edited 4174d ago )

Super Smash Bros is basicaly a clone of the Arcade game the Outfoxies...whats your point.

If the same old game with minor improvments can keep getting good scores why is it games like this where the developers have slaved over the game to make it good get lower ones despite it being a nice change the standard FPS games we keep getting.

Besides like I've said above the only con he mentioned was the Presentation but even then how did menus and cut scenes drop it by 20 in the review. It dosent really make sense, it seems like a small flaw to drop the score that low. It's at least a solid 9 by what he's writen about it

SoapShoes4174d ago

Call of duty was just a Medal of Honor clone and a clone of every other shooter when it made the switch to modern.

ape0074174d ago

smash bros is the king of that genre and MOH was made by former IW devs

Sizzon4174d ago

Yes it is a clone, a big Playstation fan myself, just gotta accept the facts here.

despair4173d ago (Edited 4173d ago )

@ape007

you do realise that MoH has been around longer than Call of Duty right? Also this game has more differences than similarities to Smash, play it first then criticize.

Count4173d ago

The ''same old game'' with ''minor improvements''? Sounds to me like you're undermining the games in question a lot.

Firstly, compare the Outfoxies arcade game that Super Smash Brothers was based off of to any Super Smash Brothers game. You cannot sit there and tell me that it's ''minor improvements'' and the ''same old game''. Honestly.

kupomogli4173d ago

@Count

Exactly, and you can't say the same about Playstation All Stars. The games while looking the same, are very different.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 4173d ago
Norrison4173d ago

It's clear you don't know how epic the DLC is in Borderlands. If you don't like the review go find another review, there's plenty with better scores.

ambientFLIER4173d ago (Edited 4173d ago )

Creative new game? Really????? Lol. It's smash brothers with Sony characters. I have nothing against it; the more the merrier, in fact, but creative it is not...

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4173d ago
WildStyles4174d ago

This game is getting nothing but 8's and 9's. Can't wait to play this.

NastyLeftHook04174d ago

stop complaining! an 8 is a good score! well done super bot!

KingOptimusAscend1114174d ago

Yes!!! Finally IGN does something right.

Show all comments (49)
40°

A Decade Later: 5 Things PlayStation All-Stars Battle Royale Did Well

While Playstation All-Stars Battle Royale didn't get the best review, there are still some aspects of the game that deserve some credit.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
80°

PlayStation All-Stars Battle Royale Launched 10 Years Too Early

Though PlayStation All Stars Battle Royale is a bit of a cult classic, it could have been a big hit if it launched in 2022 instead of 2012.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
Inverno520d ago

It wouldn't have mattered, Sony would've rushed it out and left it to die. More so now than before with their focus now being on SP narrative driven AAA games.

CrimsonWing69520d ago

Oh, but somehow Smash Bros. 64 made it work?

It just couldn’t compete with Smash Bros. and it wasn’t a free-to-play game like Multiversus.

PapaBop520d ago

I think it released at the right time. It's just after the success of Smash and Multiversus, it's finally time for a sequel.

spoonard520d ago

I'd be all in on a remake or remaster of the original. I enjoyed it because I didn't sit there and compare every aspect to SSB. I just enjoyed it as it was.

Magatsuhi520d ago

Sony should make part 2 and dump a good amount of money on it. Scrap super only kills and it's bound to succeed.

Father__Merrin520d ago

Yes the power kills spoilt it completely WTH was they thinking you should have hp bar that's it

Show all comments (9)
100°

God of War: Ragnarok Weirdly Makes PlayStation All-Stars Battle Royale Canon

God of War: Ragnarok has plenty of fun references to PlayStation history, but now fans have discovered a conversation that calls back to PlayStation All-Stars Battle Royale — the crossover fighting game released for the PlayStation 3 and PlayStation Vita.

Nyxus527d ago

I wouldn't say canon. More like an easter egg.

Deathdeliverer526d ago

That’s interesting. It actually does make it canon lol. He mentioned it in a mainline game. I’d say that’s pretty cool.