100°

Halo 4′s Campaign Mode Already Completed By One Million Gamers

Just a few days after the launch of the latest Halo 4 game which has been created by 343 Industries, they have revealed that over 1 million Halo 4 players have now completed the game’s campaign.

Not only that but 6 percent of those players have finished the game on its Legendary difficulty setting, with all million players clocking up 13.5 million hours of gameplay in the process.

Read Full Story >>
geeky-gadgets.com
DarkBlood4177d ago

i started on legendary solo at launch

aviator1894177d ago

I sweated bullets, but I finished it. :D

Convas4177d ago

I started it on Heroic Solo. Cruised through without any problems.

I'm on Mission 7 on Legendary Solo. Been raped every step of the way. ESPECIALLY by the Prometheans and their ridiculously effective teleportation move.

So many deaths ...

brish4177d ago

I googled to find out how long the campaign is and found this:

http://www.nowgamer.com/new...

Why is it so impressive that a lot of people were able to beat a short campaign?

vikingland14177d ago

I agree it's not the longest (6hrs) but with Spartan Ops it will have some more play time. Which is fine by me.

Summons754177d ago

6 hours on easy...

It's a lot longer and harder when you go up the difficulties.

aviator1894177d ago

Beating Halo games on easy is always short.
If you are actually up for the challenge and are prepared to gruel your way through more advanced ai, you should always start on heroic or legendary.

I finished on legendary and beat the game in about 11 hours or so. (I always time myself on legendary Halo games. :p)

brish4177d ago (Edited 4177d ago )

The graphic on the site shows the game was beaten in about 6 and a half hours on heroic difficulty.

Here is a direct link to the image:
http://nowgamer.net-genie.c...

Lvl_up_gamer4177d ago (Edited 4177d ago )

MGS4 can be completed in 4 hours.

Took me 9 hours to beat Halo 4 on normal, 10 hours on Heroic and 15 hours on legendary.

I finished COD MW in 4 hours on normal.

Needless to say, there are far shorter campaigns in other big budget games then Halo 4 especially in speed runs.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4177d ago
+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4177d ago
SCW19824177d ago

Competed? Really, nice to see you proof read before posting your article. Classy!

mi_titan274177d ago

who the heck approved this headline? "competed"

josh143994177d ago

I completed a couple of days after launch on heroic solo. I plan on doing legendary soon but I'm completing Hitman absolution first.

masa20094177d ago

This proves that when you give people a compelling universe and characters in an FPS, they will pay attention and not just rush to MP.

It'll be interesting to know if Black Ops II, with the efforts it put in the SP department, will experience a rebound in terms of player interest for its campaign after the decrease seen in the last couple games.
Probably won't be as much as Halo, but I hope it does pay off to some extent for Trayarch and they continue in that direction.

Show all comments (17)
50°

Master Chief Became More Than A Machine In 343's Halo

In Halo 4, 5, and Infinite, Master Chief became a more nuanced, human character.

In spite of the Halo series’ struggles, 343 deserves praise for adding nuance and characterisation to the ever-beating heart of Halo - The Master Chief. Playing through Infinite, it's abundantly clear that the events of the current and previous trilogies have irrevocably changed the iconic hero. He’s no longer the ‘blank slate’ that was previously presented by Bungie. He’s a fatigued, damaged and fallible protagonist, and one who is meandering through currents of grief, while reveling in his newfound agency. Giving the Chief a compelling and meaningful voice was no small feat, and 343 should be proud of that victory.

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
kingnick407d ago

This article completely misses part of the appeal of the original iteration of character in the original game trilogy. It was the Chief and Cortana vs an entire alien collective. The blank slate Bungie displayed in their games was genius, he was an mysterious hero a wide audience could identify with because he wasn't as clearly defined as most characters.

The books added a lot of lore and backstory but most Halo players just want a fun game with exposition that doesn't get in the way of gameplay, it's why the Cortana level in Halo 3 was derided.

Not every character has to be a damaged soyboy, a soldier has to suck it up and do his duty.

BandarHub406d ago

A lot of people give the 343 version of Master Chief a lot of slack.
But Fundamentally he is still the same character, he just has a couple more dialogues. He has not changed in terms of attitude.
"Not every character has to be a damaged soyboy, a soldier has to suck it up and do his duty."
And that's what he has done at the end of the day, he did his duty. Watch his partner die, and was ready to destroy the weapon in Halo infinite....he is still the same soilder that everyone remembers

Halo Infintes one was a nice balance between both.

slate91406d ago

Chief and the halo franchise became a joke under 343

Sciurus_vulgaris406d ago

The 343i Master Chief has is based on the books. However, in Halo 4-Infinite, the Master Chief overtime become. gradually becomes more willing to show some emotion.

Obscure_Observer406d ago

"However, in Halo 4-Infinite, the Master Chief overtime become. gradually becomes more willing to show some emotion."

Which is awesome! I love how Master Chief become more John and less soldier.

Sciurus_vulgaris406d ago

I didn’t even notice my typos,lol

50°

Halo's Identity Problem Began With an Admirable Mess

It’s a law of nature that eventually, every long-running game franchise will have a particular entry that gets dinged for straying too far from what made it so fun in the first place. Your Super Mario Sunshine, your Dragon Age II, Assassin’s Creed III, and so on. Whether or not that opinion changes more favorably over time, the initial specter of negativity will forever hover it. Microsoft’s Halo is no exception, except that negative specter hasn’t hovered over one particular game, but one whole studio.

The3faces526d ago

True Halo 4 was a sign of 343i's incompetence and the decline of Halo.

180°

10 Years Later, Halo 4 Proves Itself a Disappointing Omen for Halo Infinite

Halo 4 released 10 years ago today, and its disappointing reception was just an omen of things to come with 343 Industries at the helm.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
Sonyslave3535d ago (Edited 535d ago )

Halo 4 and infinite have a 87 on metacritic and five a 84🤣. 343i need contents and everything else will play it self out.

ChasterMies534d ago

Halo 4, 5, and Infinite reviews are good examples of the pressure on review sites to score everything between 8-10 out of 10.

ChubbyBlade534d ago

As if reviews scores are any indication of a franchises health.

Halo has been in shambles for YEARS

-Foxtrot535d ago

Halo 4-6 are like the Star Wars sequel trilogy

They all just seem like a brand new games with small connections to the last one but no solid arc connecting them, you’re just told stuff that happened off screen in between the games and nothing makes sense

It’s like they didn’t plan a new trilogy out

CoNn3rB534d ago

That's actually a pretty good way to sum it up

LucasRuinedChildhood534d ago (Edited 534d ago )

I would argue that the new Star Wars trilogy is still better. lol

Most Halo fans would kill for the equivalent of The Force Awakens at this stage (a competent rehash of what came before it). Halo Infinite tried to be that but was undercooked and failed. Halo 4 wasn't that either - they started messing with the formula straight away although the story was okay.

There was nothing particularly compelling about Halo 5's story besides the fake plot they advertised. The Last Jedi is a divisive movie but as RedLetterMedia would say, it was "sporadically interesting" because it tried some new things and set up things that could have been great (like Kylo teaming up with Rey after backstabbing Snoke). That conversation with Yoda is great and it felt like the real Yoda, not that CGI thing in the prequels.
- "Skywalker, still looking to the horizon. Never here, now, hmm? The need in front of your nose."
- "The greatest teacher, failure is ... Luke, we are what they grow beyond. That is the true burden of all masters."
- "That library contained nothing that the girl Rey does not already possess." (because she already took them, haha).

The Rise Of Skywalker is the only one where loads of stuff happens off screen ("Palpatine has returned") in between and nothing makes sense because ... they just needed a main villain and 100 star destroyers to blow up. They could have done something much better.

MrChow666534d ago

no, all disney star wars sucks also disney marvel and everything godamn disney touches

534d ago Replies(3)
Yui_Suzumiya534d ago

Um, didn't Halo 4 have the best campaign out of the new Trilogy? Lol

ChubbyBlade534d ago

Yep and even then it wasn’t very good.

Levii_92534d ago

I'm getting a good gaming laptop soon and i'm finally going to play through the Halo franchise again plus Infinite but i never played Halo 4 before .. can anyone tell me how's the campaign in comparison to the games before it and compared to Halo 5 ?

Stanjara534d ago

Halo 4 campaign great, multi bad.
Halo 5 campaign trash, multi good.

Best Cortana halo 4.

ChubbyBlade534d ago (Edited 534d ago )

Halo 4 was when they started turning it into a “modern” game. Aka taking tips from CoD.

The older titles were sandbox based with weapons that all filled a niche and vehicles that did the same. Open levels with multiple ways to approach in different spots with different weapons etc.

Halo 4/5 doesn’t have that. It’s a linear shooter and nothing else. The story is alright but that’s about it. If it wasn’t a halo game, it would be ok but because it is a halo game, it’s outshone by the previous games.

It’s a hell of a lot better than 5 though. I found infinite pretty meh

Show all comments (25)