Even though the Assassin’s Creed games are some of the most tedious I have ever played, the fifth installment, while keeping the game play style consistent with its predecessors, adds extra features in an attempt to create a larger and more engaging world.
This time around, you’re not playing as boring Altair or Ezio “Mama Mia!” Auditore. For the majority of Assassin’s Creed III, you follow the journey of the half Native American Ratonhnhaké:ton, nicknamed Connor ‘cause you gotta give the voice actors a break
Non-playable characters in certain games are meme material, thanks to their foolish behavior. These are the big-budget games with the dumbest NPCs.
Bethesda makes the most consistently stupid NPCs, like really bad... yet I still can't help but love playing their games. Guilty pleasure, I guess. *sigh* 😩
Every Bethesda game and Every Halo game. This list needed to have Cyberpunk somewhere.
Here are the most peaceful areas in games that are otherwise quite violent, offering players respite from chaos in the game world.
My first thought was the safe rooms in the resident evil series. When you hear that enchanting music you know you’re safe.
Afterlife in Cyberpunk 2077 is a peaceful area? Erm, hands down and very hard to miss, Misty Olszewski's Esoterica is the absolute epitome of peaceful areas in that game.
The "last of us" deer location i found to be a welcoming respite. It was nice to not have someone trying to eat me.
With the recent reveal of Assassin’s Creed Mirage and the promise that the series will return to its roots, there hasn’t been a better time to get stuck into Assassin’s Creed’s back catalog, whether it’s replaying an old favorite or getting lost in previously looked-over classic.
I really enjoyed Assassins Creed 3. My only complaint was that I didn’t enjoy when I had to switch from Connor to Desmond. It’s a personal preference, but Connor’s story was just more fun for me.
On a side note, Black flag was the most enjoyable of the AC games I played.
"Desmond Miles’ story is worthless"
Uh, what? O_o
The fact that you're no good at playing a game shouldn't be a reason to look at it in a completely subjective manner and give it score that it simply doesn't deserve...
And why did this guy even review the game if he clearly has such contempt for the entire AC series? O_o
I agree completely with this guy's review.
I think that AC 3 has a lot of problems, but it also has a lot to do.
This game is a lot of fun so far what I've played, I do feel that maybe ubisoft should have worked less on how large the game is and work on pacing and story telling a little more. I feel a bit lost in the story with how much there is to do.it all becomes a bit overwhelming. For me if the bugs were fixed, the sorry telling was a bit more fluid and the game was a little easier to understand it would be a 10/10. But for me so far its a 7.5-8/10
This reviewer obviously sucks at this game and is just a hater.
He downscores the game because he's not a person who likes doing side activities/collecting stuff etc. Guess what dude. they are OPTIONAL but don't downgrade a game for that as negative.
At first it was kind of tedious having to play an 'Epilogue' style tutorial until Sequence 6, but now that I am finally Connor, I have forgotten all about it.
I haven't really ran into any bugs so far. I assume they happen after Sequence 6.
Right now I give this game a 8/10, but now that I am about to begin the fun part (play as Connor, collectibles, hunting, side missions etc) - It may raise the score to 9 or 9.5/10
Note to reviewer : Quit reviewing games if you can't review them properly.