120°

Peter Moore: Top 20 games generate 80% of the revenue, "Everything else just falls off the cliff"

GamingVogue writes: Peter Moore is a very well known industry figure and he doesn’t shy away from tough questions.

Read Full Story >>
gamingvogue.com
Mr Tretton4184d ago

"Anything that doesn’t hit that top 20 or 25 finds it very difficult to justify itself, its existence, and you kind of wonder why you did it.”

It's called ART. Though I understand that the game industry is mostly screwed in these regards. Way too expensive of an art form.

Where does this guy think big ideas and success come from? Small places. Then they evolve into the only thing this guy cares about, money.

Thank hell for that 20 percent. Much of the creativity that the 80 percent rips off and commercializes comes from there.

JellyJelly4184d ago

“We’re accused of being too safe, but then I’ll point to Mirror’s Edge — not a commercial success in the broad terms that we look at it, but certainly as an innovation, was brilliant. The art style, the character herself, the idea of taking this kind of parkour thing but a backstory of authoritarianism in cities, it was brilliant. Again, and you take risks — we don’t get credit a lot for the risks we take."

I know you are eager to bash Peter Moore (former M$ exec and all) but at least try reading the whole article before you do.

Soldierone4184d ago

They don't take risks. That was a shot, it hit, but didn't hit big with money....so where is the sequel? We won't see one because EA rather play it safe.

They'd get credit for the game if the sequel was even in the works right now, but its not. This just proves mr Trettons comment....you grow something.

The way he says it, you either hit or miss, you don't grow anything. Mirrors Edge could easily evolve into something great if EA would just take the risk....

Godmars2904184d ago (Edited 4184d ago )

Thing is they'd still be playing it safe if something like Mirror's Edge was a sales as well as review success. Only instead of possibly biding their time with a sequel, hopefully fixing what was wrong, they'd have shoved another game right after it with the same and greater flaws. There are just too many instances of them doing just that.

Better they wait than grind it to nothing.

sjaakiejj4184d ago

SoldierOne

New IPs are equivalent to taking risks, and EA has been producing more of them than most other publishers.

Where's a Mirror's Edge sequel? If you build a product and it loses money, it's only logical from a business point of view that you're not going to do the same thing again. It's called risk assessment - a new product has a high likelihood to fail, but may offer a big return. A sequel to a product that failed has a much higher likelihood to fail, and will at most offer a very small return.

It doesn't make any sense for them to produce a sequel if it's guaranteed to fail. That's not taking risks, that's committing corporate suicide.

zeal0us4184d ago

I guess the last two MoH games fell off the cliff then.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4184d ago
showtimefolks4184d ago

That's why this industry will be not sequels because ts too much about money and new IP's going forward are too big of a risk. Think about it moving forward games will cost 40 plus million atleast the big ones and would you risk that type of money if a return isn't a sure thing?

Whether we like it or not people buy sequels and their favorite franchises that's why there is another Halo triilogy and COD along with new AC games every year. That's the reason god of war and uncharted will get more sequels and prequels.

Sleeping dgs which is a great game sold 160k unites in ts first month and people asked why activision dropped the game and than RE6 which wasn't as good of a game sells 3 millin. Gaming business is very cruel

Every gamer asks for new IP's but than when it launches the same day as their favorite game they choose the sequel and say I will wait for a price drop. Why KOA didn't sell and skyrim sold 10 plus million is beyond me, KOA is an excellent RPG and now that studio is out of business

So in the future when we are blaming the publisher for sequels and no risk taking this is the reason why. They get the blame but we get the bigger part of that blame

Imalwaysright4184d ago

Yes well, tell that to Sony. They arent afraid to support niche titles like Twisted Metal, HR, LBP or Demons Souls. They have their sure hits like GT or Uncharted but they are one of the few publishers taking risks and looking out for gamers that want more than just shooters.

showtimefolks4184d ago

No doubt but hey have always been like that since entering the gaming business. Beyond 2 souls and last of us. Also games like sly which is getting a sequels and ratchet. Ga,ea's like sky and ratchet wouldn't exist or wouldn't get as many sequels if it wasn't for any, most publishers see a game selling few million and that's not good enough.

DJ4184d ago

Sony and Microsoft are going to have to make game development faster and cheaper if they expect developers to stick with consoles. The media sites and magazines deserve a lot of blame as well. They have consistently raised expectations about how good graphics need to be for videogames, and honestly Xbox 1 was good enough.

4184d ago
Soldierone4184d ago

This is why gaming sucks lately. Everything needs to be simplified, revolving around guns, humans, and "realism." What happen to the simply fun games? They got tossed aside because publishers rather make money than games people want....

A game like Mirrors Edge is called a failure at EA, yet look at the praise it got from fans, and people wanting more. They don't care. Money doesn't come with it, then who cares right?

this is why I'm hoping Sony and MS open the same door Steam opened and allow lower budget titles on their stores. We will see quality games again.

MattS4184d ago

Tell you what. You make a product that is awesome, but costs more to make than brings in revenue for you.

See how long you can keep that up, soldier.

I love how gamers are so quick to criticise game publishers but fail to realise that perhaps, just perhaps, it's not a good thing if a game costs $40 million to make but doesn't turn a healthy profit.

Armchair experts everywhere.

wages of sin4184d ago (Edited 4184d ago )

I'm so glad you said that MattS.

We hear the same claims from other gamers like Soldierone all the time and it's nothing new. Some of you just don't get it. The videogame industry isn't the altruistic world of fan obsessions. I love gaming too and want new IP's but companies have to make money so people that work for them can eat. Have fun in the real world.

Soldierone4184d ago

How about taking out the 100's of people making a single game and put them on different games, and try something new? Instead of rehashing the COD technique every year for every shooter?

Naughty Dog was making games with less than 100 people....and GG is probably Sony's biggest company and makes money off every game sold. How is it EA can make some lackluster titles and not be making money?

How about you guys stop drinking the kool-aid every PR feeds you and stop letting them push you around, then turn around and attack the people that want better? EA releases how many yearly titles to millions in sales? Your telling me none of that is making them money to spend elsewhere?

This is like a Hollywood company crying about losing money shortly before releasing a movie to millions in sales the following weekend....

Indie developers are doing fine. Not EVERY game needs to be AAA quality, some of us are fine with a simply fun game and will gladly buy it. Why not adjust the price point? Developers have been crying about sales ever since they raised the price to 60 dollars, how ironic.

EA has plenty of money, they just want more, end of story.

MattS4184d ago

You can tell @Soldierone hasn't ever been a decision-maker at a major corporation.

So, once again. Armchair experts. If only they realised how embarrassing the crap they say is.

hay4184d ago

If only love and praise would support the teams making those games, and if it would give revenue confidence to the suits running the business, I'm pretty sure Mirror's Edge would span through two sequels and several spin-offs now.

ShaunCameron4184d ago

What do you mean they rather make money than games people want? Of course they rather make money. They're a BUSINESS. Not a charity. Not a non-profit organization. They "stopped" making fun games because the people didn't buy them.

Critical acclaim doesn't pay bills. Money does. Maybe if more people bought the game, it might have gotten a sequel.

Prepare to be disappointed because it's gonna be the same ol' **** again. Haven't they already done it with XBL and PSN?

Show all comments (28)
430°

Microsoft Will Be Debating Right Now Whether Xbox Consoles Have a Future, Says Peter Moore

It feels like the video game console is at a crossroads. With Xbox Series X and S floundering in the ‘console war’, Sony suggesting PlayStation 5 is approaching the second half of its life after missing sales targets, and uncertainty around the release of the Nintendo Switch 2, there is growing concern that the traditional video game console business could be under threat.

TheEnigma31339d ago

It's obvious that MS is leaving the console biz. MS may have tons of money, but that doesn't mean they want to keep losing money on the gaming division to prove a point. Thanks Phil

crazyCoconuts38d ago

It's likely but not entirely obvious. The messaging is leaving a lot open to interpretation, and they haven't forked over their crown jewels to PS just yet.
It's POSSIBLE that the upcoming Xbox exclusives do so well they see an uptick in console sales and... change their mind??

Michiel198938d ago

I feel like it's way too late in the console cycle for that, by the time some of them are out we are 1 year further. I think a better bet is to maybe make them with next gen in mind and make them cross gen between this and the next as to give their next console a great launch if the games turn out well. I feel that's their best bet to stay in the console business.

GamerRN38d ago

You should pray they don't exit. If they do, you will see the collapse of the gaming industry.

Aloymetal38d ago (Edited 38d ago )

Here we go again with that false sense of relevancy for the xbox platform.
I told you yesterday that the gaming industry was fine before MS entered the space and it will continue to do even better when they're finally gone. MS is/are not the ones keeping this industry healthy, far from it and most won't even bat an eye if they're gone.
...And Having lots of money doesn't mean success it just means you can keep failing for a long time.

SeTTriP38d ago

Xbox was spearheading the collapse of gaming.

MrBaskerville38d ago

They will just leave room for another competitor. Maybe someone who is more succesful at competing.

UltimateOwnage38d ago

Nah. We might see some real competition again. Maybe from a company that actually loves gaming. Like Sega.

helicoptergirl38d ago

Ridiculous. Acting like MS are the linchpin holding everything down and if they let go, then gaming will be ruined and prices will soar astronomically and creativity will be stifled and thwarted at every turn. It's a fallacy. I'm not saying it's preferrable to have MS out of the console space, but I am saying that all this fearmongering over what will happen if MS were to bow out is overexaggerated and overblown.

andy8538d ago

Collapse? It was here before Xbox and it'll be here long after. What exactly do they do to benefit it? Barely any game output, theyve taken studios and made them worse and they've hurt it trying to make everyone move to streaming.

Bathyj38d ago

Haha.
I'm actually laughing in real life at that

Why exactly?
What are Microsoft contributing to the industry that will be missed?

They're just taking a slot that should belong to someone better.

My vote is for Valve and a Steambox.

GamerRN38d ago

Since you guys clearly don't understand how this all works, I won't explain it to you. You guys will simply see it if it happens, then you'll quietly sit there acting like you saw it coming.

But you can research what Pachter and the other analysts have stated...
🤷

DarkZane38d ago

If anything, Xbox leaving the industry is actually what will save it and make it thrive. They don't contribute anything good to the industry and if anything, any bad practices today, they're the ones responsible.

Take a time machine, go back in the past and erase Xbox from existence, you'd come back to a present where the industry is much better. Remove Sony and/or Nintendo though, there is likely not going to be anything left.

InUrFoxHole38d ago

@Aloy
With competition sony has failed to deliver a diverse generation. Has shifted focus to Gaas, has put the support of their vr platform into the hands of PC, has jacked up the price of their service, is moving you into day and date on PC... Be careful what you close your eyes to. If you wish for MS to be gone, sony is heading in the same direction with less funding

IRetrouk38d ago

Didn't when sega switched it up🤷🏻‍♂️

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 38d ago
Lightning7738d ago

Have fun waiting till 2040 somethin.

Charlieboy33338d ago

Have fun waiting till 2040 for Xbox to make a great game

itsmebryan38d ago

@theenigma
The same can be said if not worst about Sony. Who lose $2 billion of value, lose 26% of there operating income, missed sales goal by 4 million, and has no 1st party games coming out till next year? Console sales are not helping Sony. They are a much smaller company and how long can they afford to lose so much money?

Bathyj38d ago

They are not losing money. They make profit. They bring in more then they spend. It's a business thing. Get a grown up to explain it to you.

You know a dropping stock price is not like that actually had to give 2 billion to someone. That didn't sell their shares. And failed to meet sales expectations? Still sold over 20 million in a year. You must be dizzy from all that spin.

S2Killinit38d ago (Edited 38d ago )

Just making up stuff to feel better? I dont blame you.

S2Killinit38d ago (Edited 38d ago )

Whats crazy is that when some xbox fans were cheering the acquisition of a large part of the multiplatform gaming, they didn’t realize they were cheering on what was to pave the way for xbox to leave console space.

Oh the irony. Karma?

StormSnooper38d ago

True ^
Yup, they celebrated taking games away from others even though they weren’t getting anything they wouldn’t have got anyway. Now it turns out it was all a plan to end Xbox as a console. Heh 🤦

Profchaos38d ago

Exactly right everyone thinks Microsoft is willing to bankroll an underperforming division simply because they can afford it however that's not how these companies operate they might bankroll something for a year or two while not gets established however now is the time they bare expecting a return on the investment and it's clear Xbox is underperforming.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 38d ago
rlow139d ago

Good article and this is not a duplicate. The link that @Maximus Prime shared is just a small portion of the full interview. This post is the full interview.

Times are changing quick, the same ol way the industry been is changing. Where people play is changing.

ChasterMies38d ago

“What I think Phil is doing is setting up some smoke signals that we're thinking very differently”

I’m surprised how slowly Microsoft is moving toward Xbox as a software platform. They usually don’t care so much about upsetting their customers with unpopular changes like they do with every other version of Windows.

badz14938d ago

yeah like they just very recently removed support for Android apps on W11 without much of a warning. simply because they claimed that not many are using them. Sony got a huge flak when removing OtherOS support form the PS3, I think the same should be happening to MS to for removing the apk support. such a dick move!

FinalFantasyFanatic38d ago

That is surprising, I know big companies can't move fast, but they're moving at a glacial pace, everything they've done with Xbox for the past decade has been moving at such a slow pace. I suppose they have money to burn with how big the company is.

derek38d ago

This "console market hasn't grown narrative " is overblown. The market has grown just not as fast as say smartphones. But so what? There is still money to be made in the business and just because Microsoft has failed doesn't mean the entire industry is facing sudden collapse. Gaming will be fine, every industry has to go through periods of restructuring. AAA games are made becuase its what attracts gamers the most and is where they spend the most money. (Demand/supply) Microsoft abandoning hardware should have happened years ago, they clearly lost interest at a base level in producing games and/or paying 3rd parties to back during the tail end of the 360 generation. Tired of hearing about the future of gaming, just make great games and/or invest in one's made by other to attract people to your platform.

hiroyukisanada38d ago

@derek Right! It's so obvious that all Xbox has needed to do is create great first party games like every successful console has done since the original Nintendo. It's not rocket science lol I have lost so much respect for Microsoft over the last 10 years and their rabid fanboys that do not represent their base as a whole. Literally just MAKE Great games and people will invest in your platform. It's not rocket science or excuses. It really is that simple lol
This victim mentality that Phil has instilled this generation has really turned me off the brand for good. Really enjoyed OG Xbox and, while I couldn't wholeheartedly support 360 due to that atrocious failure rate, they had some killer games and services. Ever since Gears of War judgement dropped in 2011 and they shifted completely to Kinect, it's been so bad.

Ninver38d ago

It all started going down hill after Don Matrick stated "stick with the xbox 360 if your don't have any internet.

That man singlehandedly destroyed the xbox brand then jumped ship as it was sinking 😂

DarXyde38d ago

Ninver,

Don had the look of a sleazy businessman, but I don't understand why that moment gets a bad rep.

They were super honest in that moment, and I have to say, it sucks that this is the direction the company would take, but it was such a mask off moment that really highlights their plan.

Nowadays, you have Phil, who isn't direct but is very much still going in the same direction.

What it comes down to, at least from my observation, is Don and Phil were/are just the messengers. Don took a dive following the backlash, so they repackaged the messaging approach with a new person to make it seem like the company is taking a new approach. Nothing has really changed.

So I don't think Mattrick did anything that he wasn't asked to do by his own higher-ups.

He's like a landmark really. Just a reference to a point in time when things got bad. In reality, it was Microsoft's vision for Gen 8 going forward that destroyed them, not Mattrick.

That's my read of things, anyway.

badz14938d ago

Don was honest, Phil is sleazy! don't blame just Don for that downfall, Phil was part of the team back then too. the one announcing the price for the xbone on stage was Phil, remember?

LucasRuinedChildhood38d ago (Edited 38d ago )

Reminds me of when the Wii U's poor sales led to speculation that consoles are dead. It's so repetitive and annoying.

Some people act like we're all about to switch over to cloud gaming when the internet infrastructure and data caps alone would take decades to accommodate such a change.

Google Stadia was shut down and died a horrific death just 1 year ago. lol

darthv7238d ago

If you are looking to something like the PS2 as the measuring stick... keep in mind that there was a percentage of units sold that were replacements for bad lasers and then you had others buy replacements because of model revisions. I'd venture a guess and say the real market saturation point is somewhere between 125-140m. And yes that includes handhelds because even those have users who invested in different variants over the coarse of their lifetime.

You can't truly use units sold as a measure of individual owners. you are right though, the market has certainly grown from something like the 8/16bit era to today, but nowhere near as quickly or as large as the smartphone/tablet market. You figure there are entire swaths of people who dont play consoles/handhelds but they do play on their phones.

crazyCoconuts38d ago

Agreed. I think if you look at the number of concurrent players playing the popular games of the time, it's always breaking records, not decreasing. Sure there are ppl that play on their phones, but a crap ton of kids and adults are sitting down at their computers or consoles to play. Are they all playing the same kinds of games i used to play? not really. But that doesn't mean consoles/computers are going away - they're gonna play games.

343_Guilty_Spark38d ago

It’s grown based on what. What PS console has ever hit 200 million? Even with Xbox doing poorly it’s the same customers who were already going to buy a PS console

derek38d ago

@353, Console sales are not the end goal but the gateway they're not the only measure of growth. You sell consoles to sell games and subscriptions to your platform and that has grown substantially since the ps1/ps2 generations. Revenue and profits have grown meaning the business has grown. Sony's concern is with their margins which have shrunk recently (some from the cost of producing a ps5 not decreasing like in past cycles, some from paying off the bungie purchase, some from growing development costs). So they cut jobs and will look to were they can save on development. Not saying that decision will be proven correct but this is a normal but unfortunate part of the business cycle and its happening across tech. You're talking about the addressable market, but as Layden said if you want to attract new people to console gaming then different games will have to be made then your traditional gta, cod, GoW etc that will interest them.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 38d ago
CrimsonWing6938d ago

They don’t. TVs have Gamepass and everything’s on PC.

Show all comments (76)
190°

Former Xbox Exec Explains Why Microsoft Encouraged The Console War

Peter Moore has revealed how the console wars narrative helped foster a competitive spirit at Xbox.

Read Full Story >>
gamespot.com
MIDGETonSTILTS17623d ago

For money.

And because brand loyalty can help you hold onto a market share without actually having anything new to retain said share of the market.

XbladeTeddy623d ago

Brand loyalty isn't helping, what's helping them keep market share is Gamepass (yeah I know you either love it or hate it but it's working well for them). They're just trying to do what Valve did with Steam. Games aren't their main focus. A platform for games seems to be their direction now.

MIDGETonSTILTS17623d ago (Edited 623d ago )

We’re talking about the Xbox 360 era, you dodo bird.

Ie, the lead up to the Xbone’s drought. Brand loyalty 100% kept Xbox afloat between the Halo/Gears era and the Game Pass era.

When they promised for a decade that “the games ARE coming”, were they planning Game Pass at the time, or making promises to break (and relying on blind loyalty to tolerate it)?

Lightning Mr Bubbles623d ago

That era was insane, might be the reason N4G even exists. I still remember Peter Moore would show off tattoos of each exclusive Xbox would steal from Playstation 3. And the N4G community was on fire, each story would get like 300 comments of fanboys fighting each other.

darthv72623d ago

...and the open zone was like the wild west

Godmars290623d ago (Edited 623d ago )

How come that "competitive spirit" never translated into regular production of games? Not even talking quality games just games in general.

There were like 2-3 game droughts during the 360 era alone.

Bathyj623d ago (Edited 623d ago )

The Xbox OG was a great console. They were hungry, they wanted to break into the industry. The hardware was great. They kept that drive for a while with 360. It started strong, with good games. But they lost their vision and direction and games took a backseat. And they never recovered and have had lacklustre output ever since.

And I can pinpoint the exact moment it happened. E3 2009. The day Kinect was unveiled. It was literally the time Xbox lost their way. That's a long time to be so bad at something and still in it. They hardly realeased a game after that and we thought the next gen launch would be stacked. It wasn't.

XBOne was their worst console for games releases and again we thought the next launch would be stacked. Again it wasn't.

I swear if it wasn't for their Trillions of dollars there's no way they could still exist in this business. Is that a good thing? Should we cheer for a rich kid whose dad bought their way into a team when they can't perform?

Now they want to turn gaming into a bargain basement bin because they can't compete in quality and they can't compete selling games, so they want to starve their completion out or force them to follow suit. They're buying up everything they can to win their war of attrition.

I'm nearly 50, been gaming over 40 years and I think this could be my last gen. I'm glad this is happening now towards the end of my gaming, not the beginning. If I was starting now gaming wouldn't have been as big a part of my life as my was. Just not into the direction it's taking.

Godmars290623d ago

They were arrogant.

They may have been hungry, had an apatite, but above all they were arrogant.

Thought that as a major PC company they could easily move into consoles, take the #1 spot from Sony the way they had from Nintendo, then move consoles towards PC. That's where they lost their way; not being focused on consoles in the first place. Kinect, an unfinished add on they intended to make the main system, was just the cherry on top.

FlavorLav01623d ago

Amen. I’ve been saying the same thing to my buds. Feels like I’m aging out of my lifetime favorite hobby. Time to find new things to care about in between the long droughts of high tier titles I remember all 3 major console manufacturers (4 if we’re including Sega) making for us to enjoy. The 3rd party stuff were always the side dishes for me compared to many of the big amazing 1st party IPs we came to know each company for. Sony and Nintendo seem like the only ones truly still running with that torch the best they can.

Bathyj623d ago

Typical arrogant head in the sand Microsoft fan response. In case you're too dense to notice I didn't always game on only PlayStation. I was on Xbox from the start. I bought all consoles. Not my fault they are an absentee landlord. Can't provide for the platform they made.

The only good thing you guys can talk about now is gamepass and the only good thing you can say about that is that it's cheap, not that it's good. I don't want cheap, I want good. So no need for Xbox. And I'm not alone. Why does that disturb you?

You're right but, when PS6 rolls around I will likely still get it cause at least someone is still doing games the right way and that should be nurtured.

High quality, high frequency. No gamer can deny that. If you do youre just painting yourself green.

Lightning77623d ago (Edited 623d ago )

"The only good thing you guys can talk about now is gamepass and the only good thing you can say about that is that it's cheap, not that it's good. I don't want cheap, I want good. So no need for Xbox. And I'm not alone. Why does that disturb you?"

No you got it all mixed up. You were the one complaining about what MS is doing and there direction then you said you were going to quit gaming because of it. Sony's following suit to some extent. Did you not say that? You're just complaining, about things just whine. You said Gamepass isn't good and it's bargain bin games. Any rational person can see that's it's not. You don't gotta shill or fanboy out for gamepass to see that it's generally a good service. Unless you call, Naraka Blade: Blade Point: TMNT As Dusk Falls upcoming high on life plus more bargain bin games. Is Guardians Of The Galaxy Bargain bin game? How bout Redfall and Starfield next year those bargain bin games? Wo Long also? It's a Mix of 3rd and 1st party stuff. Everyone likes Stray and it's a 4 in a half hour game. Luckily that's on the premium because 30$ is hefty for that type of experience. is that bargain now? How bout Sifu? You live in a glass house You speak from inexperience and hate. You need to develop self awareness in the stuff you say and stop speaking from angry emotion. Your not making sense.

"You're right but, when PS6 rolls around I will likely still get it cause at least someone is still doing games the right way and that should be nurtured."

Well you just admit it you weren't going anywhere like I said you weren't. See you not doing nothing.

"doing games the right way." well weren't Sony fans kicking and screaming whenever Sony announces they're putting their games on PC? I'm glad you're finally accepting the reality of things, that Sony isn't your best friend, but a buissness, that's like making money.

MIDGETonSTILTS17623d ago

Try a PS5. And if you didn’t have a PS4, then they have a great upgraded back catalogue ;)

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 623d ago
VenomCarnage89623d ago

Because it's easier to smack talk the competition while just pretending you are a legit competitor. That way those who don't know better can pick that side and defend it for 20 years straight, despite still not being given games on a regular basis

Godmars290623d ago

To their credit MS has bad mouthed Sony or Nintendo. Just kept insisting that they had the best gaming platform while typically having nothing that really lived up to the claim. Even now it seems the best they can do is buy 3rd parties.

Their fans on the other hand, people some idiot marketing person chose to actively whip up, is a whole other thing sadly.

Show all comments (19)
40°

Peter Moore on the future of sports and the history of games

From GI.biz: "As an executive at Sega, Microsoft, and then Electronic Arts, Peter Moore was unquestionably part of the games industry for the better part of two decades. Then he left for the world of sports and the chance to be CEO of his favorite childhood football team, Liverpool FC.

After three years in which Liverpool enjoyed considerable success and a Premier League championship, Moore stepped down and seemingly returned to games with an executive appointment at Unity and a board position for mobile publisher Nifty Games."

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz