230°
3.0

Medal of Honor: Warfighter Review | EDGE

EDGE: "While another six months in development wouldn’t have removed the lingering bad taste from one of the more tasteless marketing campaigns in recent memory – including tie-ins with the real-world manufacturers who make the in-game ordnance, and a branded tomahawk that was later removed from sale – it would have done much to help smooth out the kinks in a game where at least the multiplayer has genuine potential. Instead, what’s shipped is rushed, uninspired and cynical."

Read Full Story >>
edge-online.com
Soplox4190d ago

Ouch!
Too bad LP were involved in this game.

JellyJelly4190d ago

Why? They suck even more than the game so I think they make a perfect match.

HammadTheBeast4190d ago

It isn't. I wouldn't call it great, but it's no this bad. Edge just goes overboard with the bandwagon and their scores make them feel special.

WilliamH4190d ago

Edge do tend to go a little crazy with their scores sometimes, that;s what gives them their edge /s

TheDopeFiend4190d ago (Edited 4190d ago )

It really isn't that bad of a game, it's just more of the same really, that shouldn't lower the overall score by that much, I would give it a 5 or a 6 at least.

The problem it has is it brings absolutely nothing new

Hopefully they'll go back to making WWW1/2 games after this

Emilio_Estevez4190d ago

I would truly love for them to back to WW1/2, I would buy it in a heartbeat. Frostbite 2 with destruction and all those classic guns!

IIC0mPLeXII4190d ago

This game got blasted. Looks like another game joins the ranks of Ninja Gaiden 3 And Op Raccoon City

Trunkz4190d ago (Edited 4190d ago )

It's true, the Buddy system is awesome. I usually stick to Teamplay games like Battlefield but this game actually has Teamwork, wtf why hasn't CoD managed to add something unique like this? Not that I would jump to CoD because of that but CoD is on its 5th title I think since CoD4 and they never managed to come up with such a neat idea, they just repackage the same old crap and sell it.

StoneyYoshi4190d ago

Somebody needs to post this on N4G

Th3 Chr0nic4190d ago

WOW finally someone that understands!!!!. this needs to be plastered everywhere.

he hits it on the head so hard that it explodes in a gory gibfest of awesome writing!!!

InTheLab4190d ago (Edited 4190d ago )

"Medal of Honor’s Battlefield 3 style sound and shooting mechanics are much more satisfying, and ooze authenticity much more so than Call of Duty."

"Second to that, the much newer Frostbite 2 engine and full DirectX 11 support offers fantastic, immersive visuals that actually do take the first person shooter to a new technical level of brilliance. So, we’ve got both game-play shooting mechanical improvements, and 100% technically correct and objective technical improvements. Tell me again how Medal of Honor doesn’t do things as well as the competition? What are these writers smoking?"

A PC guy who's also a Battlefield fanboy that hates CoD and thinks MoH is just as good as Battlefield...

And 9 people agreed with this link?

How do you call out bias and DO THE EXACT SAME THING?

I agree that some of these low scores might be sour grapes but if you actually read...really dig into these reviews, you'll see that it's more than that. A lot of critics site technical issues like disappearing enemies, poor A.I., 1 slo motion breach too many...etc.

It's not all, "well, it's not like CoD so it's s***" like the author claims.

Periphereality4190d ago

I actually dislike Battlefield 3.
Reviewing the game without taking Call of Duty into consideration is stupid, considering everyone reading the review will be doing it.
Medal of Honor does have better sound and visuals than Call of Duty - a point about innovation.
I didn't find the AI to be poor, at least not with regards to the competition.

I find this trend of people assuming what games I enjoy quite interesting. I've clocked 300 hours plus in Arma II, and Red Orchestra 2 is my current favourite first person shooter. I don't play Battlefield 3, and have played more Call of Duty MW and MW2 than Battlefield 3.

Your preconceptions are interesting, but your extrapolations are worrying off point. Thanks for reading, though.

Periphereality4190d ago

I don't have enough "bubbles" so I'll reply on this thread.

I wasn't quote mining, they're the summary quotes found on Metacritic. You say that I "chose lines that seemingly support your argument." Nope. They're the actual lines taken from the summaries. The fact that they "support my argument", being blatantly right there, in your face, actually further supports my argument.

"that's what I can't understand." (why I rate a "mediocre" game as "good")

Because I found that whilst the campaign was visually fantastic, it was mediocre - but the multiplayer was fantastic, which made the game 'good'. Not great, but good.

And guess what? I enjoyed the slow motion breaches. Why? Because I enjoy head-shots. Am I wrong to enjoy them? Not really.

In my review I stated they sold themselves short for trying to appeal to the Call of Duty fans "rather than nurturing their 2010 child", but that alone didn't make it a bad game. Certainly not one worthy of 40, or by Edge's standard, 3/10.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4190d ago
Show all comments (27)
210°

9 Video Game Sequels So Bad They Killed The Series

Alongside death, taxes and terrible Adam Sandler movies, video game sequels are just another crushing inevitability of life. Sequels and franchises are the lifeblood of the industry, so you can bet any halfway successful game will be aiming towards at least five more follow-ups and spin-offs in pursuit of more delicious money.

Yet even major franchises tend to run themselves into the ground eventually, where they can either reboot themselves and come back stronger than ever (think the new Tomb Raider games) or stay buried in the past.

Read Full Story >>
whatculture.com
2257d ago Replies(2)
140°

Top 5 First-Person Shooters of All Time

This new Top 5 video series is starting with a bang, and quite possibly some teabagging, as I run through my favorite first-person shooters.

Read Full Story >>
gamerevolution.com
knifefight2820d ago

Doom 2 was the one that opened me up to the genre. Still love it.

lastking952820d ago (Edited 2820d ago )

Halo ce
Halo 2
Halo 3
Halo 4
Halo5
Before i liked halo
007 goldeneye
Doom 2
Crysis 3
Cod WAW
MOH

NukaCola2820d ago (Edited 2820d ago )

Killzone 2
Turok 2
Medal of Honor
Time Splitters
007 Agent Under Fire
Bulletstorm

robtion2820d ago (Edited 2820d ago )

Old school would be Wolfenstein, Doom, Hexen, Duke Nukem, and Rise of the Triad.

More recently Half-Life 2, BioShock (original), Wolfenstein the new order, Timesplitters 2, Medal of Honour.

Some personal favourites Singularity, Resistance series, Killzone Series, Bulletstorm, Dishonored.

Kallisti2819d ago (Edited 2819d ago )

Duke Nukem was a side scroller on Dos

@robition Duke Nukem wasn't a FPS 'til the 3rd one, Duke Nukem 3D

robtion2819d ago

Sure. Talking about FPS's here though.

AsunaYuukiTheFlash2819d ago

1.Haze
2.Haze
3.Haze
4.Haze
5.Haze

robtion2819d ago

Great concept(Nectar) and fun but a bit of an iffy execution and didn't live up to its promise. I finished it at launch. Shame they didn't quite get it right.

170°

5 Video Games That Ruined Their Franchises Badly

The video game industry is one based on the backs of its scholarly properties. Like movies and books, it’s a space that draws vigorously on strong sequels and innovative new thoughts. Notwithstanding, not all sequels surpass the enormity of their forerunners, and a chosen few of them check the start of the end for their →

Read Full Story >>
sumogamer.com
Stupid2874d ago

Assassin's Creed series was ruined after Black Flag, Ubisoft made it annually game. I played Dead Space 1 and 2; were awesome but Dead Space 3 failed to make gosip. As MOH Warfighter was good game

NukaCola2874d ago

Black Flag was the redeemer after 3. ACIV is my favorite of the series. Unity was bad, Syndicate is actually pretty good. So they are up and down. As for Dead Space, I thought the original was like Uncharted series. The first one was a great story and a little rough, but #2 was incredible through and through. Uncharted 3 is awesome, unfortunately DS3 was indeed a terrible terrible game. Warfighter was a good game, but aren't we all burned out on shooters???

Stupid2874d ago

That's right Assassin's Creed series had awesome games till AC Black Flag, AC III was terrible

monkeyDzoro2874d ago

I disagree on AC Black Flag. Black Flag was a good PIRATE game but a very mediocre AC.

2874d ago
CoNn3r_B2874d ago

I preferred Revelations over Brotherhood. AC Brotherhood had such a boring story while AC Revelations tied everything up very well for Ezio and Altair, if I was going to pick a game where it all started going downhill for me it would be AC 3 but despite that AC 1,2, Brotherhood, Revelations, 4, Rogue and Syndicate are all good games.

RondoMachete2874d ago

Lost Planet as far as I remember went like dead space with the third game (round based type play) it just felt like it was just a map clearing game with multiple horde survival. Call Of duty went and died long ago. Ghosts didn't help its cause but now we have three development houses it's going from bad to worse. GTA to me anyway was saved with five to me the driving up until then was awful. Mario and sonics died along time ago to in my eyes.

Bobafret2874d ago

These titles get worse and worse.