130°

Will You Be Buying A Wii U?

Gamer Euphoria writes:

''The Wii U has generated discussion since it was revealed. The concepts behind the system and the subsequent games have all been the target of questioning and debate. With the price tag now officially revealed we asked ourselves if we would be picking up Nintendo’s newest system. Does the price point scare away fresh investment so late in this generation? Do ports of games appeal? Everyone had their own reasons for their answers.

Read Full Story >>
gamereuphoria.com
Neonridr4193d ago

I am a gamer, and I love to experience all that is available. I have a 360, a Wii and a fairly decent PC gaming rig. I will be purchasing the Wii U and then one of the future systems (either the 720 or PS4 - depending on which interests me more). I am looking forward to all the 1st party Nintendo IPs in HD along with some new and innovative games that take advantage of the unique controller. ZombiU is going to be the first game I boot up in the machine in just over 3 weeks.

guitarded774193d ago (Edited 4193d ago )

Got mine pre-ordered and paid for... just counting down the days. Super Morio U, Zombie U, Nintendo Land, wand, navi and a pro-controller coming with it.

darthv724193d ago (Edited 4193d ago )

yes.

@ neon...you need to be careful at how you use the phrase "gamer". Pretty much everyone is a gamer that plays games but some take offense more than others if you single them out from the rest of the crowd. such as your list of platforms you have. Notice there was no PS model referenced.

some of the more dedicated PS gamers would likely disagree with your comment on that premise alone. And yet you werent making any disparaging remarks for or against.

i too am a gamer and a collector as well. I find that there is just so much to enjoy when it comes to games to limit myself to this or that. I try to play the field as evenly as possible but even someone in a neutral mindset will still get disagrees.

I live life like this. I am married to one woman but Im a whore when it comes to games. i just cant commit myself to one platform like i do my woman.

NukaCola4193d ago (Edited 4193d ago )

Yes, but not until next Christmas when the big time exclusive come out. I think it's rushed out to get a head start and my purchases for games outweigh what the Wii U has to offer now. ACIII, AC3Lib, God of War, Beyond, Bioshock, Last of Us, PSASBR, Ni No Kuni, Halo 4...etc.

So I can wait a little longer, but I will get it. I mean, this is the time I finally get my Nintty games in HD and I am pretty stoked for that.

Neonridr4193d ago

surprise surprise, I'd ask you to elaborate, but I see you are out of bubbles already..

attilayavuzer4193d ago

It's a simple yes or no question, no need to elaborate

Megaplaynate4193d ago

I won't, but I also won't be buying the other 2 at launch.
If I were to express an opinion, you'd be allowed to disagree with me, but just disagreeing with someone because they are stating they won't be buying the WiiU is uncalled for.

ConstipatedGorilla4193d ago

We will disagree with whom we please and you will like it.

live2play4193d ago

people dont always give a disagree because they DISAGREE

people use the disagree button with things they didnt like,
or got bothered by

the way you say its ''uncalled for'' makes it seem like they punched him in the face or something

corrus4193d ago

I am with you i'll wait for the real next generation to come out

victoryscreeeeeech4192d ago

Excuse me ma'am I believe u have dropped your thun thun thun.

stragomccloud4190d ago

Are you still on about these articles?!
Or, are you another troll that's secretly so in love with Nintendo that you always have to appear on these comments sections so you can bash, and then hear comments to the contrary just so you can hear the sweet pro-Nintendo praise you're fishing for?

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4190d ago
sal774193d ago

yes getting new super mario u, nba 2k13 and zombie u

jghvhv4193d ago

Yep,I got it pre-ordered.

LOGICWINS4193d ago

I'm sure I'll be buying one in the future. Not now though. I'm done buying consoles at launch. Why buy a console at launch when it's at it's most expensive price, it has it's SMALLEST library of games, and when the games that TRULY take advantage of the console's strengths aren't even out yet?

I prefer to buy things when they are cheaper and better.

darthv724193d ago

The only pro to being a day one buyer is the bragging rights. i mean seriously, the system that someone gets 5 mo or more down the line is essentially the same system someone paid through the nose to get at launch.

By that example i am referring to those who buy and then sell for profit. I believe in making $$ but looking back at the PS2, Wii, 360 ps3 and the amount of profiteering going on was CRAZY.

I would get mine and think about doing the same thing but then..nahhh. i want to play it and enjoy it. I cant really blame them though. At first i would think those who did that arent real gamers but then it didnt really matter. Whatever they do is up to them and I shouldnt care one way or the other.

Its not upsetting being late to the party. i was late to the ps2 and ps3 but still went back to get some of the defining games of their respected launches.

I find it funny how there is this mindset that the time to buy determines how you enjoy it. Meaning that if someone were to get a 360 now, people would look at them and say there isnt anything coming out to play. Does that some how invalidate the great games that have already been released?

I was late to the ps2 party by at least 2 years but that didnt stop me from enjoying the back catalog of games available. So just remember that when you do decide to buy into a platform, there will be something to play be it thinking about potential titles or ones already available.

There is always something available.

jmc88884193d ago

Depends. If you like to play multiplayer games, alot of those games are done now.

Some games like Battlefield 2: Modern Combat have their servers completely shut down.

Others are deader than Abraham Lincoln.

Now for single player games you have a point. Sort of. I mean yes, the games would still be fun, but part of all this is how games progressed.

Games in the 80's were fun, because that's all we had. If someone had let us play with a 360 for a month in the 80's, then took it away, suddenly the Apple II games wouldn't look as fun. Basically I'm saying that games progressed through the life of the system.

So early 360 games were fun at the time, but pale in comparison to games that came out later. While Madden produces crap games with little innovation, if you look back 6-7 years to the first one, you realize that first one sucked REAL BAD.

Same thing for CoD. The first one seemed fun at the time, but now, it sucks compared to the most recent ones, and now BLOPS2 is taking a step up.

So yes, there are reasons that some great games from then won't be great now.

Same thing on the Sony end. You can't play Metal Gear Solid Online anymore. WHile there were some major problems with that game, I still had a blast hiding in a box and waiting for a guy to run by only to pop out and shoot him. Hilarous fun. Or rolling inside a barrel and bowling people over. Now if someone picked up a PS3 and bought that game, they wouldn't be able to experience that at all.

Especially with multiplayer games. There are so many communities wither in a few months. Hell buy Assassin Creed a few months late? It can be hard to play multiplayer. Granted 360 is better in this regard than say PC, but all in all, when you wait to buy games, you do lose something.

Multiplayer aspect are either diminished, or if years later potentially non-existent. (for some gamers that's most of what they play)

Singleplayer aspect is that games progress and once something's been topped and you've seen or played it, the stuff that came before it, isn't as fun.

But I get what you are saying. For someone who doesn't have one, getting one now there is still lots of fun to be had. Though I'd rather wait at this point and get a Wii U or whatever. To me at this point it doesn't make too much sense. If this was 2010 it would make sense to buy one then late to the party, but at late 2012, it IS WAY late to the party.

Plus the whole time you are watching all the better games be played and you're catching up with stuff people talked about a 'school' ago. Wow my friend were talking about that in 5th grade, and you're in college. That to me is way too long to wait.

But I've grown up with games and almost always bought the systems within a year or so of launch. Hell even though I was born in 1978, my family ALREADY had an Apple II. So whether it was Apple II/Atari/Arcade gaming has just always been there already. When new systems came out, I was already ready for them, and had already played the older stuff.

live2play4193d ago (Edited 4193d ago )

very logical
BUT

you act like people dont know that later it will be cheaper, later it will have more games, later systems might not be faulty if the first ones were

ofcourse people know that

DARTH
you think the main reason to buy something DAY 1 is because of BRAGGING RIGHTS? youre kidding me right?

im buying the wiiu day one

yea later more games will come, a price cut will come, more features will come
that are not going to be availiable day one

im buying it because i enjoy what nintendo has to offer
and i have the luxury to not have to wait for things i enjoy

same reason i see midnight premieres for movies

darthv724193d ago

i didnt mean for it to look like it does. I should have typed it as "one of the pro's" but yes you are right. It is not the main nor should I have implied that.

thanks for the heads up.

There are quite a few pro's but for what I have seen lately in this schoolyard mentality is more people bragging about what they got before anyone else instead of just enjoying it.

i myself have been a day 1 consumer of many things. That instant gratification is something everyone should experience at some point in their life. But then later on you begin to rationalize and wonder if it was worth the trouble when you knew you could get it any time after.

and yeah, there are times i could kick myself for NOT being a day 1 buyer because of limited runs or when they are gone...they are gone.

LOGICWINS4193d ago

"you act like people dont know that later it will be cheaper, later it will have more games, later systems might not be faulty if the first ones were"

??????

Show all comments (71)
80°

Nintendo's Massacre Of The 3DS And Wii U Is Finally Complete, Regrettably

Hanzala from eXputer: "The cruel hammer of Nintendo has fallen. Farewell, 3DS and Wii U, you surely brightened my life and many others; you won't be forgotten."

280°

Xbox's Preservation Step Sets A Much-Needed Example, Especially For Nintendo

Hanzla from eXputer inquires: "If Xbox can care about preserving its games and legacy, what exactly is wrong with Nintendo, trying to kill game preservation single-handedly?"

purple1016d ago

Ahh yes the good old game preservation of saving all your games to a removable hhd on the Xbox 360, taking it round your mates house, setting up multiple tvs to
Be met with “save data corrupted, please re download”

Or how about removing 360 games
From the store
, download them now or else, and, better hope to god that save data doesn’t corrupt, or it’s lost for ever

Nice one ☝️

Zeref5d ago

It's better than what Nintendo and Playstation is doing. It might not be perfect but at least they are TRYING. Unlike the others.

DarXyde5d ago

Trying? Take off the blinders for a moment, mate.

1. A failure to preserve games is just that: a failure to preserve games. Don't try to sugarcoat it: NO ONE is doing it properly. Better than awful is nothing to write home about.

2. At the time of this comment, isn't it the case that you need an internet connection to play Xbox games even if you buy physical discs that are hardly in circulation anymore? I don't have a Series X and I can't verify, but I think that is correct. I'm fairly certain you can at least play PS5 games at version 1.0 (not much of a win really when many games require day one patches). I think Microsoft's all digital, licensing approach is by far more aggressive than anyone else's. They really try to push you to game pass where you lose your entire library by umm.... Skipping a month of payments.

I don't think anyone is doing it right whatsoever. Don't get me started on Nintendo, who goes after anyone looking to preserve their games better than they ever would with extreme litigation.

Don't be a simp for any of these companies. Get it together.

PhillyDonJawn5d ago (Edited 5d ago )

@DarX never speak on Xbox again. You lost all credibility with your internet connection comment. Smh you have 0 clue and misinformed yet speaking on something you don't no squat about.

Einhander19725d ago

What has Sony done exactly? You guys keep deflecting to Sony but I am not actually seeing any results, and ai am certain nothing that you can come up with even comes close to what Microsoft has done and what they have tried and failed to do, like tie all your disks to your account on xbone.

Microsoft removed their whole indie section when they moved to the xbone because they were going to only allow games on the service that came from a publisher, id@xbox started after xbone launched and it only exists because Sony embraced indie and Microsoft was forced to cancel their plans and reverse course.

And every single game that was part of games for windows live including disk games (I have gta 4 on disk that won't work) so hundreds of games that use that DRM no longer work unless the company themselves patched it out which of course very few did.

MrBaskerville5d ago

Not trying. Tried. they killed of the backcomp program years ago. They set something up again, but sounds like it's more of an attempt to save the current library on whatever they are planning next. With luck they save everything and more, but let's see. I could see them killing off parts of the OG xbox and 360 libraries. Can't imagine that they would allow us to play Forza 5-7 in the future.

With that said, I do like what they've done and really wish they could have done more.

shinoff21834d ago

Zeref

So killing off physical media is trying what exactly. Ms don't really give a fk if you think they do your kidding yourself.

Profchaos4d ago

They are not trying this team is established for forward compatability the team is. It interested in preserving Xbox or 360 games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4d ago
isarai6d ago

Is that why Hellblade 2 is digital only?

Zeref5d ago

Just because it's digital only doesn't mean you can't preserve it. Just put it on an external and you have the exact same functionality of what a disc does.

MrNinosan5d ago

Guess you're trolling, but if you actually think that's how it works, I'd recommend buying some braincells.

mkis0074d ago (Edited 4d ago )

Volitile vs nonvolitile data. A disc will not corrupt either. A drive can be corrupted.

Einhander19725d ago

This is just a scammy PR move to distract from the fact they are going digital only and trying to push streaming and subscriptions only.

No gaming company has pushed harder to remove ownership than Microsoft.

Without discs there is no preservation, preservation can't be done by the rights holders it can only be done by the consumers, anything else is a lie.

5d ago Replies(3)
Einhander19725d ago

Anyone remember xblig which Microsoft removed their whole 360 indie section removing hundreds of games from people?

5d ago
5d ago
Zeref5d ago

Do you know you can put your games on an external and preserve them that way? There are no benefits to discs. ZERO. Idk why some of you are still obsessed with them.

DarXyde5d ago

Because games like Persona 5 exist. It's STILL V1.00. On Playstation, that's a win because 1.00 is installed on the disc—no need to download anything.

If a game does not require any updates, it's all on the disc.

Extremely low bar in the modern era, of course. It's not much of a win by any stretch.

But for now, physical media does have a purpose, at least on Playstation.

Einhander19725d ago

That is factually not how game licensing works, try plugging your hard drive into someone else xbox, It's not going to work, and it won't work if the licensing servers ever go down.

Einhander19725d ago

Anyone remember games for windows live.

I have around a dozen games, some on Steam itself that will not work because Microsoft shut off the licensing servers.

BehindTheRows5d ago (Edited 5d ago )

I do. I STILL have games (Gears of War being the big one) I cannot access because Games for Windows LIVE is total garbage and no one has held Microsoft accountable.

Zeref5d ago (Edited 5d ago )

You don't have an Xbox apparently. Because you can 100 percent plug in your external and play games from it on any Xbox console lol. You just have to be logged in to prove ownership.

Chevalier5d ago

"You don't have an Xbox apparently. Because you can 100 percent plug in your external and play games from it on any Xbox console lol. You just have to be logged in to prove ownership."

Damn how many times do people got to explain your idiocy to you? You can take a copy of Persona 5 like someone used as an example and play that game on ANY console WITHOUT logging in which means I can lend the game to a friend without internet and they can play my game. Can you lend your hard drive to anyone without logging in for them to play? NOPE. That is a huge difference and if you think otherwise then sorry you're an idiot.

Tacoboto5d ago

"No gaming company has pushed harder to remove ownership than Microsoft."

Ubisoft is literally erasing games people bought from their libraries... My PS1-3 discs are useless on modern hardware. Nintendo's re-published and resold almost their entire Wii U library, and the eShop is completely dead with no BC mechanism in the Switch software. Microsoft publishes everything they make today day one on Steam and Xbox/Windows. Sony only brings to PC the titles they think you might want some years later and Nintendo won't even design a functional long-lasting joystick.

You're absolutely trolling and not serious if you think Microsoft today is the worst offender.

shinoff21834d ago

Yay steam

Not everyone fks with computers though. The disc is still the best way as a console player. Period.

Tacoboto4d ago

How do Sony and Nintendo feel about these discs from 2001-2013?

Don't be stupid, you know Xbox is the best at this today.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4d ago
Hofstaderman5d ago

Nobody wants this. Sales or the lack of it in the case of XBOX is very telling. I wonder how the adorably all digital series X will fare. Adorably dismal perhaps?

crazyCoconuts5d ago

Only time will tell, but for from someone like me suspecting that Xbox is trying to gracefully exit the console market, that "forward compatibility" team is trying to get Xbox games playing on Windows PCs. I mean, it's nice that they're not planning on exiting with a "enjoy your games while the hardware still works" message, so that's nice. They still have a brand to protect via Microsoft so probably feel obligated to have a better exit strategy.

Xeofate5d ago (Edited 5d ago )

That is not their plan, their plan is to transfer users accounts to the cloud.

Phil Spencer himself said as much a few months back, plans could have changed but I think people are reading way too much into one statement where Phil said he would allow Epic on xbox because he wants to be able to sell xbox games directly on other platforms. Aka, instead of selling Sea of Thives through PSN he wants to have an xbox store to sell his games on PlayStation without giving PlayStation any money.

Again, it's extremely unlikely that Phil plans to put PC on xbox and licensing would prevent them from just giving out other publishers games purchased on xbox copies of thier games on PC, Microsoft does not own their games.

crazyCoconuts4d ago

The thing that doesn't align with the cloud strategy is the giving up on exclusives. You'd still need strong exclusives for cloud streaming - it's still a "platform" , just with a lower upfront hardware investment. I feel like they've learned what PS learned with PSNow long ago. We're not ready to stream games and it's only gonna lose them money to try at this point

FinalFantasyFanatic4d ago

I would love that, I'd buy up some of the Xbox games if they could run on PC, like the Rare Replay, Lost Odyssey and Dead or Alive Ultimate, probably a pipe dream though.

Show all comments (43)
90°

Nintendo's War Against Player-Made Content Will Hurt The Company In The End

Danish from eXputer: "Nintendo has historically gone against player-made content and emulation of its games. This has done much to harm the company's image."

XiNatsuDragnel12d ago

I agree nintendo hire some these folks to help in your games it'll help imo.

banger8811d ago

They need to stop announcing these mods and fan remakes until they're finished. Finish it, upload it, and then if Nintendo dmca's it tough shit. Once it's online, people can share it around, even if the original download gets taken down.

Jingsing11d ago

True, but most modders need constant admiration during the process to motivate them.

PRIMORDUS11d ago

Yup, once it's a torrent nothing can be done Nintendo is helpless at that point. But it would be wise if they just had a site on the dark web, it's also easy to use with Tor and no one will bother you.

mastershredder10d ago

This is all coming from the mouth of short-sighted fandom and grifting madness.
No.... it wont. There is a clear defined reason why they don't. This is nothing new. Make your own shi7 from your own original ideas especially if you are trying to capitalize of it it. Duh.

Yeah, hire people that have zero respect or understanding for an established process. Wow. Yep. Totally makes sense.

shinoff218310d ago

Those guys that made that sonic game got a gig from sega or something along those lines and that game was dope as hell. One of the best sonics as of late.