280°

Microsoft isn't the only company targeting Youtube partners

A few days it came to light that Microsoft had changed it’s Content Usage Policy, basically forbidding anybody to make money using footage of their games, but they aren't the only game company taking earning from Youtube partners...

Read Full Story >>
c-techworld.com
majiebeast4205d ago

Dont get this dont streamers and youtube vids just promote,advertise a game with no costs to the publisher so what if those people make some money of that doesnt cost em a thing.

DragonKnight4205d ago

You know these companies. They have to be the only ones making any money and even though youtube partners aren't cashing in the big bucks with these vids, these companies think that it's money that THEY could be making. What I wonder is, if they want to make money off this stuff so bad, why don't the companies make their own youtube channel do these let's plays and walkthroughs themselves. Win/win if they do it that way. But you know, that would give them credit for being smart and we all know corporations are frickin' retarded.

ChronoJoe4204d ago

The money they'd earn from doing so would be so miniscule it really wouldn't be worthwhile. It's not a particularly profitable endeavour for a business, 99% of yt partners have a day job.

DragonKnight4204d ago

Money is money. They have a problem with people making that miniscule amount after all.

TheRealSpy4204d ago

They are going after a community of people who do what they do because they love it. It's such a shame because without the tiny compensation that they do get, they may not bother at all. Maybe they'll even grow to not love it quite so much...

TheFinalEpisode4205d ago

Exactly! If I recall correctly Minecraft and Slender own most their success to youtube.

A-Glorious-Dawn4205d ago

Yeah if it wasn't for Youtube I would have no clue about slender.

I guess I know who to blame for the nightmares, curse you, youtube!!

vortis4204d ago

DayZ is in the same boat.

Literally, that game would not have sold as much as it did if it weren't for YouTube.

Pushagree4205d ago (Edited 4205d ago )

Because you can't make a profit off of something that is not yours to begin with. MS games are branded ant patented, so that means that every cent their intellectual property creates has to go to the people who created it and own the patent for it. You can't advertise a MS product and expect to pocket the money the you get from it when you don't own the rights to it in the first place.

RIPSKATEDESTROY4205d ago

Surely publicity leading to game sells is more important than youtube money. This is like that pissy kid next door that had all thegreat toys but wouldnt let you play with them, you had to watch the kid play with them...

CockSplash4204d ago

By this same logic, any editing software used to create videos should make the videos belong to the company that made the editing software. You purchase an ability to use it in any way you see fit, including games. It's not like a company can own the rights to how you play the game just because it happens to be uploaded to YouTube.

admiralvic4204d ago

The sad thing is that video game footage isn't eligible for monetization on youtube. It really doesn't matter if you agree or disagree with what anyone says, if it's against the terms you agree to... where exactly are the rights you claim? I mean sure it sucks, but thats how it goes.

DragonKnight4204d ago

@Pushagree and admiralvic: That mentality could extend far beyond what you posted. By that logic a person could not go outside and film their day to day life because it would inevitably show clips of stores, car lots, etc.. with products they do not own the rights to and thus they wouldn't be allowed to make video blogs without censoring out the names of those places. It also means that all videos would have to center directly on the face, be shot with a one color background, and could in no way contain any logo unless it was self-made because then companies would state that the views on that video were from their product and they don't want anyone making money off that but themselves.

Game videos are completely legal under fair use laws, and the money being made is off of clicks and can be argued as such.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4204d ago
Blaze9294204d ago

this article is very, uninformed. That's all I'll say

admiralvic4204d ago

I didn't see anyone mention this, but it's against Youtubes terms to even make money off these videos.

"Your video is not eligible if it contains content that you didn't create or get permission from its creator to use. You need to be able to show written permission for the following video elements:

Audio: recorded music, live performances, cover songs, background music, etc.
Visuals: images, logos, software, video game footage, etc.
Any other content you don't own worldwide commercial usage rights to."

Thats straight from the monetization page. So if you're violating the terms to begin with, why should this matter in any way?

r1sh124204d ago

I got offered YT partner ages ago.
I monetised all my videos, but after a while each just started dropping off.
Activision actively started asking for videos to be removed, or for monetisation to be halted, EA did the same on the few BF3.
Rockstar tried to do the same, but I contacted them and they were cool about it.
The craziest thing about it, Im literally getting minuscules amount of money, its not even worth calling it pocket change.
I pretty much gave up a long time ago, but its too unfair.
The rights of these companies to claim copyright is a little too unfair, I created the 'content' and the events in which they occurred because I played their game like that.
@ChronoJoe - Youre 100% right, when I last checked I had £3.61 or so after having like 3000+ hits with a few clicks on the ads, it just makes no sense for them to chase such small amounts of money.

THey are literally targeting their own communities, how on earth is that even allowed, let alone being very unethical?

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4204d ago
ZeroChaos4205d ago

I must have missed this but why was Sony/PlayStation used in the tags when there is no mention of them in the article?

bubblebeam4204d ago

I think the flames were already in existence, thus no further spark was needed. I'd say it was more like dropping a can of kerosene onto the flame.

Amazing what they will do for hits, however 'subtle' it is. Just waiting for someone to say "Sony does it too though!!" without reading the article.

Now THAT would be a spark.

Summons754205d ago

RVB will be fine, they are partnered with MS and 343I. RVB is a huge part of the Halo community, they aren't just going to let that die.

psvitamanfan4205d ago

I read the same thing somewhere. apparently you can get a license to use their stuff, but its only going to be the people with the big money who can afford to do it

bubblebeam4204d ago

The Red Vs Blue case is interesting. When they started off, they slowly got more attention, eventualy leading to Bungie contacting them. They said they were scared to contact back, as they were expecting a law suit with them or Microsoft.

When they contacted, Bungie pretty much said it was hilarious and they would love for it to be continued. So they are perfectly safe, and if hypothetically they weren't safe, there would be a huge backlash, affecting the Halo community. Though that is like saying what if hypothetically 2+2 isn't 4?

Sucitta4205d ago

greed greed greed. when will the useless eaters have had enough?

Straightupbeastly4205d ago

You knew it was only a matter if time. When random youtubers make more than the ones that make the game, you know dam well something is going to be done.

And no youtuber should bank on YouTube as their full income because they have no control like they would with their own website, so at any moment they can have their shit shutdown out if their control.

Show all comments (43)
220°

EA Hopes to Use Generative AI to Drive Monetization and Make Development 30% More Efficient

Today Electronic Arts CEO Andrew Wilson provided a look into his ideas for the use of generative AI in the company's development processes.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
thorstein43d ago

I wonder what the next buzz word they'll slap in front of AI to make it sound exciting next? "Generative" as if it's creating its own content. Lol.

Cacabunga42d ago

EA is already dying a painful death..

peppeaccardo42d ago

i have a better idea .. why the whole exec team doesn't get replaced by chat bots ?

just_looken43d ago

Though i agree the ai thing is already in other forms of media there have been ai translations/scripts/voice over and even full ai commercials aired on tv. Ubisoft has created a ai game creator story/vo/music except the building of the game

The new unreal engine has auto terrain creation tools

In the world of greed in which it is winning without any major blow back ai is our future.

everyone want's biden dead on the mic or a criminal instead of a woman and now we are getting ai everything because no one will stop watching/playing ai created media.

GamerRN42d ago

Maybe they should just focus on making good games?

Just a thought...

Kiryu199242d ago

Exactly EA are just pure evil. When they are beating Bank of America to be voted the worst company to work for that’s saying a lot

Good thing I don’t buy their games day one and wait for deep deep sale years after launch (the select few games I am actually interested in)

Gaming is making so much money yet the greed of these companies is never ending

CEO’s and people on board making millions yet cutting jobs to those who are actually making the products

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 42d ago
Knightofelemia43d ago (Edited 43d ago )

EA is still a shady shitty company even with or without the help of Skynet. All they will use AI for is new ways to milk loot boxes and come up with the same sports title with a different year on the label. They are one company I truly do hate with a passion. They single handedly ruined some great franchise with their death touch. ME, Dead Space, Alice Returns, Dante's Inferno.

Stuart575643d ago

EA layoffs followed by 'Generative AI to Drive Monetization'

I knew it. Wonder what AI salary looks like? Nothing.

ChasterMies42d ago

I having a feeling that most of the layoffs in the industry are based on the idea that AI will do the same job for less.

DarXyde42d ago

Very likely, yes.

Made worse by the fact that the execs aren't changing their compensations.

My deepest fear at this point is that we are now in the capitalism endgame.

At this point, we really should just burn AI to the ground. Executives cannot be trusted to do the right thing.
How are those people expected to support families if everything gets automated?

Barlos43d ago (Edited 43d ago )

And take away creativity, and people's jobs as we've been seeing. Got it.

No thanks. I want my games created by people, not AI.

CobraKai43d ago

Exactly. If or when games start becoming more AI than people, im done with gaming. AI and companies like EA can suck donkey d***k.

just_looken43d ago

Though i agree remember this is no ps3/360 era were we got up to 3 games in one generation from on developer like gears/halo/bioware/sony/ms

The people today are pro esg/sweet baby for the most part AAA gaming is imploding right now.

We should be stepping back re evaluate everything as a whole this year xmen 97 written/directed by a woman that is nuts and its also being made by a group reshaping bodies to be less sexual like wtf. A dam famous cartoon from the 90's is being rebuilt with millions spent to be worse in everyway.

Gaming/movies/tv shows made today are worse than what we had 7years ago ai won't change this but that ai is also being made by these groups so either way we are screwed.
https://www.youtube.com/wat...

Eonjay42d ago

Don't be of afraid of women. Sexy characters in games and movies still exist. Got my Stellar Blade on preorder!!! Everything all the time doesn't need to be sexual...that's stupid, childish and dull.

Chocoburger43d ago (Edited 43d ago )

EA doesn't want to lose their title of worst gaming company ever, always trying their best to remain the champs!
What's sad is that they have so much potential to be a decent publisher.

SSX Tricky / SSX 3
Def Jam Vendetta / Fight for New York
NBA Street
NFL Steet
Mirror's Edge
Bad Company
Burnout 3 / 4 / 5

Remember when EA used to be awesome? It's all over with now. Unpolished, if not out-right broken games these days. Endless monetization and gambling in their sports games, and let's not forget wasting hours of your life trying to unlock characters or equipment using "surprise boxes!"

Show all comments (37)
80°

EA And Sony Layoffs, Entertainment News And More Skewedcast

Gareth, Justin, and JoeyZ look at Layoff news for EA and Sony and reasons behind the downturn in the industry and more.

220°

EA - Continuing to evolve our business and teams

EA CEO Andrew Wilson writes: "In this time of change, we expect these decisions to impact approximately 5 percent of our workforce. I understand this will create uncertainty and be challenging for many who have worked with such dedication and passion and have made important contributions to our company. While not every team will be impacted, this is the hardest part of these changes, and we have deeply considered every option to try and limit impacts to our teams. Our primary goal is to provide team members with opportunities to find new roles and paths to transition onto other projects. Where that’s not possible, we will support and work with each colleague with the utmost attention, care, and respect. Communicating these impacts has already begun and will be largely completed by early next quarter."

LG_Fox_Brazil50d ago

All the big ones doing the same stuff. Terrible. I just hope that all these people are able to get a new job as soon as possible, God know that it is horrible to be left jobless when you have your kids or your parents depending on your financial help

Jin_Sakai50d ago (Edited 50d ago )

2024 so far.

Feb ’28 Electronic Arts (EA) 670 (5%)
Feb ’24 PlayStation 900 (8%)
Feb ’24 Vice Media Group Several hundred
Feb ’24 Buzzfeed 16%
Feb ’24 NowThis 26 (50%)
Feb ’24 Paramount Global 800 (3%)
Feb ’24 SiriusXM 160 (3%)
Feb ’24 Snapchat 10%
Jan ’24 TechCrunch 8 + subscription product
Jan ’24 U.K.’s Channel 4 200
Jan ’24 Business Insider 8%
Jan ’24 Microsoft Gaming 1,900
Jan ’24 Riot Games 530
Jan ’24 Sports Illustrated Possibly all
Jan ’24 YouTube 100
Jan ’24 Pitchfork (Conde Nast) Undisclosed
Jan ’24 Universal Music Group Hundreds
Jan ’24 Discord 17%
Jan ’24 NBC News 50-100
Jan ’24 Audible 5%
Jan ’24 Google Hundreds
Jan ’24 Amazon Hundreds
Jan ’24 Duolingo 10%
Jan ’24 VideoAmp 20%

DATA AS OF FEB. 28, 2024

outsider162450d ago

Is it possible maybe this whole ai thing is in play?

just_looken50d ago

Another long list that skips over UPS cutting 12,000 jobs those workers as we know work without ac low pay and old box trucks but that company had to cut 12k jobs do too loosing billions of dollars year 2 year.

https://edition.cnn.com/202...

The greed and lack of transparency/oversight is disgusting.

Ups are still making bang but not enough for a golden boat fleet.

Remember we all use ups at some time even stuff in our stores this is going to be a huge issue gong forward i know in my area they removed half the state ups stores northern half least population got some 3rd party running packages now from minivans.

Sonic188149d ago

When I explan this I get called a troll 🤔 like wtf

thorstein49d ago

@just_looken

UPS is a different story altogether.

They are paying the people doing the actual work/ earning the money more and eliminating management.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 49d ago
CrimsonWing6950d ago (Edited 50d ago )

You do realize around this time this happens all throughout many industries (not just the game industry), right? It has to do with taxes for these major companies, like tax subsidies for downsizing. You want to know a little secret? Around May or so you’ll see a spike in hiring…

It blows my mind that people are oblivious to corporate workings.

Andrew33650d ago

So over 25 huge companies cut jobs every year like this and it only got noticed this time?

CrimsonWing6950d ago (Edited 50d ago )

@Andrew336

Yes, that’s exactly what I’m saying. Google it up if you’re uninformed of how corporations work. Only gamers seem to live in a bubble and when they see things like crunch, acquisitions, and lay-offs they act like this is the only industry it happens to and how shocked they are about it.

Welcome to the real world, kid.

thorstein49d ago (Edited 49d ago )

EA CEO Wilson's total compensation was 20 million. Let's take away 19 million (I'm sure he can survive on 1 million.... somehow).

1 million is the salary of an in the chair developer @100,000 for 10 years.

He could earn 1 million a year.

And save the jobs of 15 in the chair devs for A DECADE (plus benefits) with ONE YEAR'S compensation.

RhinoGamer8850d ago

No Executive accountability or firings I see...

just_looken50d ago

Do not worry they will take over 40mill say sorry then get hired by playstation or xbox

blackblades49d ago

I heard Japan does it better, they do layoffs like what's happening with companies in the west. The higher ups also being agreeing to to lower there own salary. These MFs like jim and Phil isnt gonna do that they want that $

Sonic188150d ago

Like I said earlier, this is happening all around the gaming industry.

Petebloodyonion50d ago

The point I feel is problematic about all of this is that focusing on Owned Ip means more sequels, remasters and more of what was selling last year.

TheColbertinator50d ago

EA is certainly among the worst,if not the worst

Show all comments (35)