jetpacksheep4229d ago

Nice, I like how they include high performance specs.

CommonSense4228d ago

c'mon ubi! give my comp a challenge.

maybe crysis 3 will do it.

pandehz4228d ago

Why u want ur comp challenged, spare it some life

Heating reduces life span

I want an optimized smooth playing experience with good graphics, no such requirement to overkill

CommonSense4228d ago (Edited 4228d ago )

uh? cuz i want better graphics and physics? i have the room to spare. i just built this thing last week.

DigitalAnalog4228d ago (Edited 4228d ago )

I'm actually very concerned about the "hi-specs". Take note this is coming game built from a console. What kind of post-processing effects would require an unbelievable amount of power to pull it off? Even if next-gen starts, this is the kind of requirements that can theoretically run those games at 1080p/60fps assuming the "rumored" next-gen console specs were valid.

Hell isn't this the same bloody specs to run the UE4 tech demo?

Hazmat134228d ago (Edited 4228d ago )

the gameplay they been showing is it console or PC gameplay?
Edit: oh ok thanks brah. has there been release of a picture or gameplay on console?

Ducky4228d ago (Edited 4228d ago )

It's been PC, with a controller.
That's what they do with most of their games, unless specified otherwise (like the MP footage of FarCry3 which I believe was on PS3)

I wonder if they'll cripple the PC version with DRM again.

EDIT: Sony's E3 conference had co-op FarCry3 footage on PS3.
It starts at the 44:30 mark:
http://www.youtube.com/watc...

RickHiggity4228d ago

Ubi has pretty much abandoned always online DRM

NeotheGamer4228d ago

Intel Core i7 2600
8gb RAM
Nvidia 550 Ti

^ do not game on PC much. no way would i spend over 200$ on a graphics card so i bought a cheap one :D

Ducky4228d ago (Edited 4228d ago )

Should've went with an i5 and use the extra dough for a better GPU.
... assuming that your primary intent was gaming.

Now you'll have to live the rest of your life with remorse over your poor hardware decisions. Muhahaha.

DoomeDx4228d ago

i7 for gaming is overrate.
The diffrense between an i5 and i7 for gaming, is zero.

I7 uses Hyperthreading, which speeds up the OS, and some other software like Video Editing.

You shoukd have bought an i5, and buy a GTX570 or something

BattleAxe4228d ago

I'm still using my nVidia GTX 260, which I bought in 2009, and I'm still able to crank out games on max settings most of the time. I'll just continue to use this card until whenever if decides to crap out on me. I probably won't buy a PS4 for the first few years after it has finally been released, so I'll be depending on my PC in its current form to take me into the next generation.....and into the Age of Aquarius!

Intel i7 920
Patriot 6 GB Memory
GeForce GTX 260
Corsair VX-550W

decrypt4228d ago

That PC will last you a very long time.

All you would need for next gen is a good heat sink, OC the CPU to 4ghz, thats pretty darn easy. Heat sink will cost you about 80usd max for a very good one.

Next just get a new GPU whatever good GPU is out at that time, Something around the 300usd mark. Thats all you will need to keep this rig tanking along.

That will cost you around 400usd, the machine will be a beast again. You get to keep all your BC and you get a machine thats much more capable than any console will be.

Allsystemgamer4228d ago

MY 6970 2GB OC EDITION IS READY!

Show all comments (27)
70°

Our Favorite Villains in Gaming - Roundtable

There have been plenty of great villains in video games over the years. Now it's time for the VGU crew to name a few of their favorites.

90°

Which Far Cry Should I Start With? - A Beginner's Guide 2023

If you’re new to this long-running franchise, we’ve got you covered.

Read Full Story >>
gameluster.com
masterfox407d ago

Farcry 3 and literally thats it! lol

GamingSinceForever406d ago (Edited 406d ago )

I recently tried 3 for the first time but the frame rate was a turnoff.

I liked 5 and 6 though.

banger88405d ago

If you have a Series X or S, the Xbox 360 version runs at 60 fps with fps boost. It's a shame the remaster doesn't.

isarai407d ago

2 and 3, pretty much the only ones i really enjoyed. 1 was amazing for the time but aged quite poorly. 4 has the elephant gun, all i can praise from any entry after 3 lol

cooperdnizzle406d ago

Ummmm 3 than stop.

Okay maybe two as well. But yeah probably 3 and then move on.

JEECE406d ago (Edited 406d ago )

Far Cry 2. People constantly rant about games now being too easy, holding your hand, having too many unnecessary RPG-lite leveling features, etc. People specifically complain about open world games being too focused on tons of collectibles and "checkmarks" that just waste time.

Far Cry 2 is an answer to all of those complaints. It was made by Ubisoft before they fell into all the traps discussed above (and before they started inserting towers into their games to defog the map). It has respawning enemies, weapons that degrade, and the collectible diamonds are very useful in the game (which you find in a similar way to the way you find shrines in BOTW with a radar system). The map you have is an in game item you pull out while playing, not a pause menu that is unnecessarily detailed. Also the enemy AI and physics are much better than later entries in the series.

It has a mixed reputation because people at the time said it was too hard, the weapon degradation was annoying, and then respawning enemies were annoying. FC2 came out in 2008, so this was before games like Dark Souls and BOTW had come out and made it cool to like these types of features.

XbladeTeddy405d ago

Far Cry 2, the one with the AI that find you through walls and trees, can one shot you from a mile away and have 100% accuracy? That was frustrating not fun because cheap AI.

JEECE405d ago (Edited 405d ago )

Uhh, I mean, it isn't one of these games where once the enemies have detected you they will magically forget you exist because you walked behind a wall or went into a bush. And yeah the AI isn't stormtrooper level accuracy. Again, these are positives, not negatives to me.

To be fair, I'm really directing this at the people most critical of "Modern Ubisoft" or "Modern Open World" design elements. Like the type of people who fawned all over Elden Ring because it had a clean UI because they are so burnt out by the "checkbox" type of open world design.

If you like those types of games, then a later FC game like 3 and especially 4-5 would be more your style.

Show all comments (11)
120°

Far Cry 3 Is One Of The Most Important Games Of Our Time

TheGamer Writes "Far Cry 3 is a time capsule of what game design was like in the early '00s"

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
Knushwood Butt489d ago

Beat it twice; once on PS3, and once a couple of months ago on PS5.

Doesn't Far Cry 2 have some of the things they are talking about here? Diamond hunting, healing, malaria medication?

shinoff2183489d ago (Edited 489d ago )

I believe 2 did. I highly doubt it was the only game like that though. I imagine the writer isn't old enough to have played part 2 but I also feel it wasn't the first game to introduce stuff like that

They bring up mass effect 2. I felt mass effect 1 was better. It just seem cut down. The citadel was a joke in part 2 compared to 1. How do you cut back on that.

Profchaos489d ago

Having just replayed the entire me trilogy yeah I think 1 was my favourite I think 2 had better cover and shooting mechanics but everything else in 1 was better

jznrpg489d ago (Edited 489d ago )

Mass Effect 1 was the best . It played like an RPG . The other games were more shooter and lost the feel the first game had unfortunately

gurp489d ago (Edited 489d ago )

I played it on PC when it came out, might play it again some time
Far Cry 3 is the best of the series, it was ahead of it's time

Palitera489d ago

It seems the blogger didn’t even play RDR1 if he thinks FC3 brought these elements to the AAA table. Tiktokers always have a new surprise. Smh

Sgt_Slaughter489d ago

"Far Cry 3 is a time capsule of what game design was like in the early '00s"

>Came out in 2012

Okay then

BrainSyphoned489d ago

If we are going to talk early 2000's game design how about start in the year 2000 with games that are a far cry better than something released 12 years later.
"Chrono Cross, Baldur's Gate II, Diablo II, Dragon Quest VII, Final Fantasy IX, The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask, and Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 2, along with new intellectual properties such as Deus Ex, Jet Set Radio, Perfect Dark, The Sims and Vagrant Story."
The article names things Ubisoft has shoved into games to dumb them down and then claims we should rush off to play it. Maybe instead look back at it as the death of originality from Ubisoft and gaming in general.

glennhkboy489d ago

Far Cry 3 & Assassin's Creed VI: Black Flag are 2 of the very best games from Ubisoft. All Ubisoft games since then are all just copying these 2 games.

ChubbyBlade489d ago

This isn’t an early 2000s game…you’re about a decade to early on that one.

Show all comments (13)