100°

New Halo 4 Promethean Information + Pictures

The Halo Counncil Writes: GameInformer October just came out with quite a bit of information about Halo 4 new enemy class called the: Promethean.

Read Full Story >>
halocouncil.com
otherZinc4236d ago

Nice! Cant wait to see the other weapons & enemies on November 6th.

Allsystemgamer4236d ago

Every single bit of new info wow. It's looking amazing. Nuff said

SolidSystem4236d ago

if these are really forerunner, they look nothing like what had previously been described.... their appearance and characteristics remind me of Precursor.

GearSkiN4236d ago

They are part od forerunners. I'm sure will see some more on halo 5-6 I bet their like the gods..

SolidSystem4235d ago

still doesn't match the description of the forerunner, I'll wait to see the explanation.... but Guilty Spark told Chief he was a forerunner (halo3), when he really wasnt.... the Forerunner have been described as 12 feet all, long legs and arms. they look very similar to human, but have pale skin, white hair.

Even in the Halo Legends shorts, we see the Forerunner as very humanoid.... So I'm just really concerned 343i is re inventing the Forerunner and fucking over any lore pre-established. Thus sort of penalizing anyone who is actually interested in the lore.

Allsystemgamer4235d ago

They're not forerunner. They're prometheans. Forerunner created AI.

OrKuun4233d ago

Well they're not true Forerunners. From what I've guessed from hints given, they used to be Forerunners but they were converted into robotic AI by the Composer.

Real Forerunners probably look much more humanoid.

SolidSystem4233d ago

then it defeats the purpose of naming them Prometheans, are we going to call Cyborgs humans or Americans? just seems like sloppy writting imho. if we created Cyborgs we could leave them with a different name than what we call people or identify our people by....

OrKuun4233d ago

@solidsystem

I think you're just nitpicking. There's nothing really wrong with calling a Promethean AI in a robotic body based (however different) on their real ones a Promethean.

And yes, as a general term, I'd call a human cyborg a human.

Ge0rg1aB014235d ago

For those of you worried that the Prometheans don't match the discription of the Forerunners, here's some clarification. The Prometheans are NOT actual Forerunners. 343i have described the Prometheans revealed so far as a form of Forerunner AI. That means the Forerunners will most likely look completely different from these new enemies. After all, Greg Bear's Forerunner Trilogy (written in collaboration with 343i) describes the Forerunners exactly as they have been described up to this point. So rest easy, Halo is in great hands.

SolidSystem4233d ago

and then in halo 3 we had a great line "you are forerunner" (guilty spark to master chief). I'm really not sure this franchise is in good hands.

Ge0rg1aB014232d ago

Keep in mind that 343 Guilty Spark has been rampant for quite some time before this (evidenced by his humming/talking to himself and his erratic behavior) so this line could be dismissed as part of Spark's rampancy or his confusion as to Master Chief's race (he seems to think Chief is a Forerunner in Halo: CE as well). I say "could" because its highly likely that Bungie intended for us to learn something very important about Chief and the human race in general.

In response to your belief that the franchise is not in the best hands your opinion is your own and I respect that. However, I would like to point out that many of the 343i members are ex-Bungie as well (I'm assuming you would prefer Bungie) so I wouldn't worry about them distorting the Halo universe too much. If you have the time, I'd love to hear your arguments so long as you present them in a clear, calm manner (which I'm sure you will).

SolidSystem4232d ago

I like 343 more than I like bungie. I originally blame bungie for the bad story telling in the first place.

why can humans activate Halos....which are massive weapons created by their enemy?

I doubt the US would hand launch codes for its nukes to the middle east.

Blacklash934235d ago

It seems kind of lame to introduce a completely new faction of enemies after all these years and then have only 3 main types of them. Not very interesting if you ask me and I hope there's more than this.

OrKuun4233d ago

There is. 7 new enemy classes were announced, with the Watchers and Knights and their varients making up a single class each. This means, along with the Watcher, only 3 have been seen so far; 4 more and their varients will likely be introduced.

50°

Master Chief Became More Than A Machine In 343's Halo

In Halo 4, 5, and Infinite, Master Chief became a more nuanced, human character.

In spite of the Halo series’ struggles, 343 deserves praise for adding nuance and characterisation to the ever-beating heart of Halo - The Master Chief. Playing through Infinite, it's abundantly clear that the events of the current and previous trilogies have irrevocably changed the iconic hero. He’s no longer the ‘blank slate’ that was previously presented by Bungie. He’s a fatigued, damaged and fallible protagonist, and one who is meandering through currents of grief, while reveling in his newfound agency. Giving the Chief a compelling and meaningful voice was no small feat, and 343 should be proud of that victory.

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
kingnick398d ago

This article completely misses part of the appeal of the original iteration of character in the original game trilogy. It was the Chief and Cortana vs an entire alien collective. The blank slate Bungie displayed in their games was genius, he was an mysterious hero a wide audience could identify with because he wasn't as clearly defined as most characters.

The books added a lot of lore and backstory but most Halo players just want a fun game with exposition that doesn't get in the way of gameplay, it's why the Cortana level in Halo 3 was derided.

Not every character has to be a damaged soyboy, a soldier has to suck it up and do his duty.

BandarHub397d ago

A lot of people give the 343 version of Master Chief a lot of slack.
But Fundamentally he is still the same character, he just has a couple more dialogues. He has not changed in terms of attitude.
"Not every character has to be a damaged soyboy, a soldier has to suck it up and do his duty."
And that's what he has done at the end of the day, he did his duty. Watch his partner die, and was ready to destroy the weapon in Halo infinite....he is still the same soilder that everyone remembers

Halo Infintes one was a nice balance between both.

slate91397d ago

Chief and the halo franchise became a joke under 343

Sciurus_vulgaris397d ago

The 343i Master Chief has is based on the books. However, in Halo 4-Infinite, the Master Chief overtime become. gradually becomes more willing to show some emotion.

Obscure_Observer397d ago

"However, in Halo 4-Infinite, the Master Chief overtime become. gradually becomes more willing to show some emotion."

Which is awesome! I love how Master Chief become more John and less soldier.

Sciurus_vulgaris397d ago

I didn’t even notice my typos,lol

50°

Halo's Identity Problem Began With an Admirable Mess

It’s a law of nature that eventually, every long-running game franchise will have a particular entry that gets dinged for straying too far from what made it so fun in the first place. Your Super Mario Sunshine, your Dragon Age II, Assassin’s Creed III, and so on. Whether or not that opinion changes more favorably over time, the initial specter of negativity will forever hover it. Microsoft’s Halo is no exception, except that negative specter hasn’t hovered over one particular game, but one whole studio.

The3faces517d ago

True Halo 4 was a sign of 343i's incompetence and the decline of Halo.

180°

10 Years Later, Halo 4 Proves Itself a Disappointing Omen for Halo Infinite

Halo 4 released 10 years ago today, and its disappointing reception was just an omen of things to come with 343 Industries at the helm.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
Sonyslave3526d ago (Edited 526d ago )

Halo 4 and infinite have a 87 on metacritic and five a 84🤣. 343i need contents and everything else will play it self out.

ChasterMies525d ago

Halo 4, 5, and Infinite reviews are good examples of the pressure on review sites to score everything between 8-10 out of 10.

ChubbyBlade525d ago

As if reviews scores are any indication of a franchises health.

Halo has been in shambles for YEARS

-Foxtrot526d ago

Halo 4-6 are like the Star Wars sequel trilogy

They all just seem like a brand new games with small connections to the last one but no solid arc connecting them, you’re just told stuff that happened off screen in between the games and nothing makes sense

It’s like they didn’t plan a new trilogy out

CoNn3rB525d ago

That's actually a pretty good way to sum it up

LucasRuinedChildhood525d ago (Edited 525d ago )

I would argue that the new Star Wars trilogy is still better. lol

Most Halo fans would kill for the equivalent of The Force Awakens at this stage (a competent rehash of what came before it). Halo Infinite tried to be that but was undercooked and failed. Halo 4 wasn't that either - they started messing with the formula straight away although the story was okay.

There was nothing particularly compelling about Halo 5's story besides the fake plot they advertised. The Last Jedi is a divisive movie but as RedLetterMedia would say, it was "sporadically interesting" because it tried some new things and set up things that could have been great (like Kylo teaming up with Rey after backstabbing Snoke). That conversation with Yoda is great and it felt like the real Yoda, not that CGI thing in the prequels.
- "Skywalker, still looking to the horizon. Never here, now, hmm? The need in front of your nose."
- "The greatest teacher, failure is ... Luke, we are what they grow beyond. That is the true burden of all masters."
- "That library contained nothing that the girl Rey does not already possess." (because she already took them, haha).

The Rise Of Skywalker is the only one where loads of stuff happens off screen ("Palpatine has returned") in between and nothing makes sense because ... they just needed a main villain and 100 star destroyers to blow up. They could have done something much better.

MrChow666525d ago

no, all disney star wars sucks also disney marvel and everything godamn disney touches

526d ago Replies(3)
Yui_Suzumiya526d ago

Um, didn't Halo 4 have the best campaign out of the new Trilogy? Lol

ChubbyBlade525d ago

Yep and even then it wasn’t very good.

Levii_92526d ago

I'm getting a good gaming laptop soon and i'm finally going to play through the Halo franchise again plus Infinite but i never played Halo 4 before .. can anyone tell me how's the campaign in comparison to the games before it and compared to Halo 5 ?

Stanjara525d ago

Halo 4 campaign great, multi bad.
Halo 5 campaign trash, multi good.

Best Cortana halo 4.

ChubbyBlade525d ago (Edited 525d ago )

Halo 4 was when they started turning it into a “modern” game. Aka taking tips from CoD.

The older titles were sandbox based with weapons that all filled a niche and vehicles that did the same. Open levels with multiple ways to approach in different spots with different weapons etc.

Halo 4/5 doesn’t have that. It’s a linear shooter and nothing else. The story is alright but that’s about it. If it wasn’t a halo game, it would be ok but because it is a halo game, it’s outshone by the previous games.

It’s a hell of a lot better than 5 though. I found infinite pretty meh

Show all comments (25)