390°

5 things PS4 needs to win next gen

GC writes, "PS3 was off to a rocky start. The incredibly high loss on each system was devastating, as was the billions in R&D costs. The launch line-up was lackluster and the $600 “get a second job” price was ludicrous. SONY endured through the billions in losses thanks to initial PS3 madness and has managed to take the brand back to profitability, but in the state their in now they need to of learned from their mistakes. The PS4 needs to be success. We have a few ideas regarding how".

Read Full Story >>
gamingcapacity.com
Jackhass4242d ago

I have a feeling Sony is going to have a nice rebound next generation.

blumatt4242d ago (Edited 4242d ago )

Sony needs a competitive price. $299/399 would be preferable.
They also would benefit greatly from either coming out before Microsoft OR coming out a couple months right after MS.

Keep the online free. That will still serve as a huge reason for people to choose the PS4. Keep PS+ as the premium option for free games and extra services but keep online gaming and cross game chat and a party system ALL FREE.

Other than that we need those network features we were missing on the ps3: cross game chat and a unified party system.

We know their hardware will be great and reliable.

We know the games will be there. Look at all the great games coming out on the PS3 lately and soon to come.

I'm also pretty sure the PS4 will have a new media standard in 4K Blu Ray discs capable of playing 4K movies. The games, for the most part, won't be 4K. Most will be 1080p and 720p. There might be some PSN titles like Stardust HD that do 4K but Uncharted 4 won't be 4K. New Blu Ray discs means even more storage capacity for games and media on the disc. They might finally start selling games and movies together on one disc as an option (e.g. Transformers movie and coinciding game).

We also know that Gaikai will play a big part on the PS4. Cloud steaming of games could eliminate the need for a PS5 anytime soon, possibly allowing for an even longer console cycle.

PS Home is a tricky one. They might axe it due to its niche appeal but they might keep adding to it and make it even more robust with more free games and social experiences.

@reddeaddan. (below)

Free online DOES NOT necessarily equal a poor service. Look at Steam on the PC and pretty much every PC online game. Plus, the PS3 is really only lacking cross game chat and a unified party system. Is that really worth paying for?

Swiggins4242d ago (Edited 4242d ago )

If the PS4 does all of that, then the only reason for me to keep using Xbox will be a couple of games and the controller....and I could always get a modded controller for the PS4 that's shaped like an Xbox Controller

Edit: That's not a slant against the Dualshock, it's an amazing controller, one of the best designed ever, but I just prefer the Xbox controller, fits better in my hands and I like the triggers more, the bad D-Pad doesn't bother me.

It would be beautiful!

-Alpha4242d ago

Yup,

-Humble price
-Humble hardware for devs to work with
-Before Xbox 3
-Strong launch line of old IPs and new
-Good slogan (PSFour + Lots of Four Sequels-- K4, UC4, GoW4, Jak 4, etc)
-Branded, overhauled PSN for free/Gaikai/Home (I think Home is too far in to quit now, and that Gaikai/new hardware will bring out a better potential
-Official, alternate controller for those uncomfortable with Dualshock to really win over the fans that just have trouble

BitbyDeath4242d ago

Don't forget Motorstorm4 XD

THESONYPS34241d ago

Dont forget with Gaikai the PSVita will be pretty ultimate, as we have built the PS4 to take advantage of the PSVita with an expirence the PS3 couldn't match. Also backwards compatability through psstore etc.

SolidStoner4241d ago (Edited 4241d ago )

All I want is a not cheap, but best system on marked possible, It could cost 600$, but it should be damn good with at least 7 year guarantee (to be supported with games). It has to be better then PC (not better then "THE" best PC, but average best home PC) if PS4 is that Im buying it anyway, cost is the last thing I care (I dont have much money if you think Im rich or something, Im not!). If I want cheap gaming or something I could buy X-box, no need to rage, Im not saying that its a bad or cheap console, its very good for its price, and I like any console as long as they have good games on them!

EDIT. I prefer SONY brand only for one reason its Gran Turismo series and other titles only Sony have, so in my case I will buy PS4 anyway, no matter what. I trust them!

b163o14241d ago (Edited 4241d ago )

One feature I would like to see, the ability to download off PSN while I'm playing online. It might seem illegitimate, but it'll be a plus to me.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4241d ago
FACTUAL evidence4242d ago (Edited 4242d ago )

I would say it needs basic online features of a 360 to even stand a chance for next gen. I will not give Sony my money and wait a decade for a decent feature. almost 7 years in and we don't have voice messaging, nor 1 button notifications? I'm not playing the waiting game next year with sony....I made this mistake once, not doing it again.

In my honest opinion Sony took way too much from us than what they really gave us this gen. A lot of fans try to deny it but they all know it's true. Thank god for the games, but even recently the sequels to half of these games were a disappointment.

I really hope Sony does have a plan for next gen because I have lost faith in them. I used to love ps to the point of collecting every trophy. Now if I bother to turn on my ps, it's for corny ass mw3 for just quick action, or scrolling through the boring xmb looking at my friends list. I'm just tired of MS and Sony...I think I might not even be a gamer next gen the way this is shaping for me.

Rhythmattic4241d ago (Edited 4241d ago )

"I will not give Sony my money and wait a decade for a decent feature. almost 7 years in and we don't have voice messaging, nor 1 button notifications? "

Does this really matter to you on a gaming system? I dont need either to enjoy gaming. Just good damn games is what matters to me.

And for your closing comment, It seems your not actually a gamer "this gen".......

Seraphemz4241d ago

Voice messaging??? How about a "basic" feature like WEB BROWSING...?? The 360 rocked that right out of the box huh?

extermin8or4241d ago

wtf because voice messaging is the be all and end all of whether a device is any good.....

50Terabytespersec4242d ago

If they release GT6 on PS4 then I will surely not buy another Sony product again. why? cause then what? GT 7 on the PS5 lets be real this is BS..

The PS3 is still Amazing and minus the blurry crap visuals GT6 better be coming to PS3!! Same with another Killzone and more Metal Gear Games!

calis4241d ago

There is no reason to think GT7 will be a PS5 game.

blumatt4241d ago

I'd rather they take their time with GT games than try to make three of them on one console like Forza. That's called over-saturation. At least there's been a lot of updates (free) to GT5 since its release.

GT6 as a PS4 launch title would be ideal and would be an amazing launch game.
Just release one GT game per console and give out free updates and more track packs and cars as DLC.

Gwyn-Lord-Of-Cinder4242d ago

im pulling 4 them . i use to be all about xbox untill i saw how much support sony had to the hardcore gamers . they really do desrerve to lead the way this genaration.

andibandit4241d ago (Edited 4241d ago )

Sony seriously needs to shift a couple of gears up this coming generation. Microsoft has already realized that the hardcore gaming market is too small and are now gunning for apple in the battle for the living room. Nintendo struck gold with the casual market and are trying more of the same. Im am a bit worried that sony will get left behind with a smaller hardcore userbase and all the developers will focus on whatever console has the biggest userbase, and ps4 will get a slew of ported games like we did half thru this gen.

WeskerChildReborned4241d ago

Hopefully, i can't wait to see what next gen will look like.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4241d ago
NastyLeftHook04242d ago

the same 5 things sony did to win this one.

1. exclusive aaa games (uncharted, lbp, infamous, metal gear solid 4, heavy rain, god of war, journey, the last of us ect..

2. reliable hardware

3. free online

4. bluray (maybe 500 gigs( ps4)

5. crossplay.

ReDDeaDDan4242d ago (Edited 4242d ago )

But they didn't win this one. They came dead last.

Free online = Poor service - FACT

EDIT: Online Console service.

BitbyDeath4242d ago

'Free online = Poor service - FACT'

You do realise PC has always been free and is the best online service available?

one2thr4242d ago

@Red
Pc online gaming is free, and it has been a fantastic service for me so far...

**Remember, one does not simply has a better online service just because they paid for it**

Because at the end of each day, and pay period your only giving the company your paying money to, the right to charge you use your OWN BANDWIDTH, and the other 50% of your purchased games that have a multiplayer option... Think about it...

NastyLeftHook04242d ago

im talking from a gamers perspective.

ziggurcat4241d ago

@ reddeaddan:

sure, if you consider hardware sales to be the defining factor, but even then the wii would be the victor. the reality is that the quality of the gaming experience (i frankly don't care about the ability to chat with people while playing a different game or creating a party) has been vastly superior (in my opinion) on the PS3.

so in that respect, i believe sony came out on top.

also, free online =/= poor service. PSN is just fine, i've had zero problems with their service. free online means not having to pay an extra $60 just to play half of the game you already paid $60 for...

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4241d ago
CommonSenseGamer4242d ago

The big winner this generation, like it or not, has to be MS for establishing themselves as a real player in the console gaming market. In terms of market share Sony is this generations biggest loser.

youndamie4242d ago

LOL real player? by abandoning their hard core gamer market?. At the start of the generation I would agree, but as of now Sony is the clear leader.

one2thr4242d ago (Edited 4242d ago )

@Common
Kinect, viva pinata, the game where players can tickle a tiger, a racing game that requires no effort to play, 3 ip's compared to 10 ip's from both nin and sony, RROD(which caused gamers to buy multiple xbox's, so that people can boast about sales figures), lacking HDMI for about 3 years since launch until system revision, doesnt support HD-Dvd's, and its media format is DVD-9 which doesnt have the option to increase storage capacity like regular dvd's, proprietary components; harddrive, memory card, etc., giant non-rechargeable battery looking power supply, scratches its own disk when reoriented, can't copy music, pictures, videos, etc. to various storage devices, doesnt support 1080p, its best selling game wasnt system compatible and went through a series of updates, and it was an exclusive title to that system, and its new exclusive title is a continuation of 1 of the 3 mentioned worth talking about ips, i'll make it 4(counting Alann Wake)....

The list goes on, but why bother....

And MS (Xbox), won this generation how?....

And oh the PS3 was out selling it since launch apparently...

tommygunzII4241d ago (Edited 4241d ago )

In terms of gaming, Xbox customers are the biggest losers lately.

thorstein4242d ago

As everyone knows there were no "winners." Nintendo, Microsoft and SONY all released enormously successful platforms. If you compare sales to the PS2, well, no console has come close to that behemoth.

This gen was solid from the start and is finishing even stronger. But the BS about "winners" or "losers" becomes completely moot once those systems reach 10s of millions of units sold. And as hardware figures go, SONY and MS pale in comparison what Nintendo does. So, sales do not make a solid argument that sales equal quality (see Apple).

AAA Games and Exclusives have been argued to death with the PS3 crowds yelling about the plethora of exclusives and MS crowds screaming that their exclusives have better quality.

Reddead claims that the Free Online for PSN is a poor service and that it is a FACT. Which brings me to the worst part about this generation: fanboys spreading lies about the other system. Online gameplay differs in one aspect between the Xbox and PS: cross game chat. (Note: just talking about online play and NOTHING ELSE). I have heard so many lies about the Xbox and so many lies about the PS3 that if they were all to be believed both systems would have been so bad that neither would ever have been able to play games let alone be connected to a television without blowing up entire city blocks.

Enough with the BS. No one really believes it. You sound like democrats and republicans arguing about which of their guys is better. The only difference is that if you put a room full of PS3s or Xbox360s in a room by themselves they could govern the USA better than the current crop of idiots.

Malice-Flare4242d ago

the important #6 - a big marketing budget with a competent marketing dept...

Treian4242d ago

Sony has never been focused on winning. They have been focused on delivering quality games and entertainment...

JellyJelly4241d ago (Edited 4241d ago )

Yes. Multinational corporations like Sony love losing money. Are you really that gullible? They went into the console business because they saw a market window. Sony took a large market share with the PS1 & PS2 that they have lost most of to MS and Nintendo this gen. Judging by the Vita they aren't doing anything to change their strategy for the better.

Some of you need to drop this childlike mentality towards the gaming business.

wishingW3L4241d ago (Edited 4241d ago )

if they keep delivering then gamers will naturally flock to their systems. Don't you think this is a better business plan for us and for them if it works? Gamers aren't stupid, they will chose the system with the better games. Or at least this is what I think....

Treian4241d ago

hey I am just quoting what one of the sony higher ups said. don't hate.

Blu Ray34242d ago (Edited 4242d ago )

Sony needs to invest in ADVERTISING in the USA to outsell the new MS console.
Ps4 will have cross chat.....GAME OVER:)
Hell,they've beaten them worldwide.
Blu Ray is an amazing perk!!
As long as MS doesn't jump on the bandwagon like they always do.
If Sony can go head to head with MS on the USA advertisement front,they'll have no prob taking back the crown:)

CommonSenseGamer4242d ago

So, is the getting the crown back important or not? The post above yours would suggest its not important to Sony.

Hicken4237d ago

What makes you think they can't do both? Blu Ray3 mentions things that shouldn't at all hinder what blahblah346 quoted. Can they not "get the crown back" by "focusing on delivering quality games and entertainment?"

Seems to me like doing the latter would put you in a good position to do the former.

Show all comments (79)
280°

Sony Taps Bungie's Head of Revenue to Lead Live-Service Games

Sony has recruited Bungie's head of revenue Jaremy Rich to head up its live-service gaming division, Rich has announced on social media.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
ChasterMies13d ago

Please do not put Destiny’s monetization into Sony’s first party games. The monetization is what’s driving players away from Destiny.

just_looken13d ago

The new temp boss is the sony cfo bean counter so i can see this being a thing get every penny.

Cacabunga13d ago

PlayStation officially losing it.. fans will never support gaas games

just_looken13d ago

@car

The new boss did a interview in japan he wants to tap into the mobile market like nintendio so he give 0 fucks about gamers/fans

https://www.pushsquare.com/...

Redemption-6413d ago

@Cacabunga
You only speak for you and those who think like you, but most fans will support what they want. Playstation and PC fans are literally supporting Helldivers 2 and that is a gaas. Maybe you wouldn't, but many more would if they like it.

Huey_My_D_Long12d ago

@Redemption-64
Look, Im not making any judgement calls about this guy, but I will say that Helldivers 2 GaaS model is unique to Helldivers, and legit the only other game I can think of thats similiar was the Avengers game except HD2 pass is still better.
The fact that you can earn in game currency in a way that doesnt make you feel like you have to grind forever, as well you being able work on that pass that you bought...on your own time without a time limit...that right there is fucking huge to me, and I can't name any game other than avengers that avoided trapping players with FOMO logic...I think GaaS on HD2 shouldn't be compared to the rest of the industry...it should be copied.

Einhander197212d ago

Cacabunga

Helldivers 2...

Redemption-64

In Europe it's a 60 40 split favoring PC.
In the US its a 60 40 split favoring PS5.

So PlayStation owners supported the game just fine, it's not getting carried by PC or anything like that.

FinalFantasyFanatic12d ago

@just_looken,
I'm perfectly fine with the way Nintendo entered the mobile market, I never touched their mobile games, meanwhile, the console/handheld stayed the way it is. As for being a bean counter, he's probably going to reel in these massive budgets that Sony's studios have had lately, I haven't played Spiderman 2, but I cannot see how they almost tripled the budget for that game.

@Redemption-64,
That's an exception to the rule, I'm expecting a lot of these GAAS games from Sony to fail, to be fair, they only need a few to succeed, but I would have preferred that they put more of their resources into other types of games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 12d ago
DivineHand12513d ago

True their monetization is driving players away and at the same time, their decision to chop out content and convoluted systems is keeping new players away from the game.

Joe91313d ago

I don't think that will happen based on how things worked out at Naughty Dog now that we know what we do, seems they had the option to fully commit to live service games or stay making single player experences so they gave up on their live service game. We are not sure how things came about with Bend making a live service game but I hope that was not a forced situation. Sony doesnt seem like they are forcing studios to switch up but we will see, Sony's bread and butter is single player games it is how they dominated the console market.

Obscure_Observer13d ago

Yeah, I though Sony learned something from all their failures in the LS segment under Bungie´s disastrous leadership and supervision which led to games been cancelled, studios closed and all the people laid off.

Looks like Bungie still plays a major role in Sony´s LS initiative and Sony is not backtracking on their GaaS plans.

S2Killinit13d ago (Edited 13d ago )

Are we forgetting that Destiny is also a highly successful franchise? I feel like that definitely deserves mention here.

Besides, there is no reason why a person cant learn from past experiences.

Joe91312d ago

I agree, people act as if Destiny flopped when it came out lol it took 9 to 10 years for the numbers to fall yet people are still playing it add the success of Helldivers 2 no wonder Sony is going forward down this path.

S2Killinit12d ago

Personally, I see no problem with Sony also having service games as long as they make good ones, and more importantly they deliver the AAA story driven games that they are known for. So yeah, I agree 100% with you.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 12d ago
Christopher13d ago

I mean, this person made some pretty bad decisions at Bungie. I hope they've learned from them because I definitely don't see those type of ideas as good for PlaySation in general.

CrimsonWing6912d ago (Edited 12d ago )

Honestly, what’s to learn from? How to make people happily continuously dump money into a single game over its life-time? Buy season passes continuously for several years with a smile on our faces?

GaaS is a design decision that is everything wrong with this industry. The fact that Helldivers 2 did so well and people defend the monetization because it was $40 and is a fun game, scares the sh*t out of me to see that the door is open and all shift will probably be to replicate that in future games. We already know the ROI for traditional game dev cost isn’t doing it for them.

I thought with Jimbo leaving we’d see a change for the better… I’m not so sure now.

S2Killinit12d ago

Service games are being offered by everyone. Sony cannot afford to only create single player AAA games. No one can. They already said they will be doing both.

Abnor_Mal13d ago (Edited 13d ago )

Ps5 gamers in 2023 seemed to play more live service types of games, so regardless to how people feel about them, numbers don’t lie and Sony is going where the money is. I mean look at the excitement around Helldivers2, people are showing that they want live service games.

Christopher13d ago

They play long-time existing live service games like CoD, Fortnite, Apex Legends, Destiny 2, and the like. Mass majority of new live service games are considered failures and aren't moving gamers away from older games.

just_looken13d ago

Yep the huge issue with live service is they need paid players along with a reason to play them.

You forgot mobile market that also taps into that player base as well as the eve online style games there is only a certain amount of krakens/whales blind supporters compared to the amount of live service games we have its not sustainable math wise.

700 restaurants making food for every seat for 1000-3000 eaters just does not work out

Einhander197212d ago (Edited 12d ago )

Christopher

I am not a big live service fan and literally own zero of the games you listed, but that is not true, unless you call games that aren't the top games to be failures.

There are tons of live service games that are profitable.

Games don't have to be the biggest game ever they just need to make more than they cost.

I challenge you to show professionally prepared data that shows that more live service games fail than make enough to keep going.

Because all the data that I have seen shows that live service is less of a gamble than making a big AAA budget game which needs to survive off retail sales.

FinalFantasyFanatic12d ago

I sometimes wonder if we're at saturation point, where it's hard for a new game to join those ranks unless it's particularly exceptional, people only have so much time and money to devote to these types of games.

romulus2313d ago

Correction, they have no issue playing good live service games

shinoff218313d ago

Lol it's not even a quarter of the ps5s sold. Helldivers may have been a hit but let's not say most are enjoying it because truth is most(the real most ) don't care about it.

S2Killinit12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

I play what is fun. If a live service game is good I’ll play it as long as its not a money scheme which Helldivers is not.

And Im a single player gamer.

mastershredder13d ago

How do you kill a franchise that already been killed?
Destiny’s grind, cash-in-on-playbass-cha-Ching, and pop-culture-insertion mainstream-me-too bs totally killed any rep Bungie had. Sony/Bungie, if you are doing this to ward-off players, it’s already working.

crazyCoconuts13d ago

Headline truncated:
"... off a cliff"

Show all comments (43)
80°

Sony May Soon Let You Decide How Much NPCs Talk In Games

Sony has patented to add multiple dialogue modes to let players switch between how many conversations with NPCs they want in the game.

blackblades19d ago

Sony is like the only ones outta the 3 that has atuff like like this pop up changing thing in ways.

just_looken19d ago

Sony in the past has always been first at bat with new ideas/tech but in the end never fully use it or just toss it away.

blackblades19d ago

I think they did use some but yeah most usually never happened but at least they thought about it. Sony seeks things like this and other, Nintendo seek different ways of playing going by there different controler designs and console designs.

just_looken19d ago (Edited 19d ago )

some of the other stuff sony want's/owns never used
https://gamerant.com/sony-p...
https://gamerant.com/sony-p...
https://www.eurogamer.net/s...
https://metro.co.uk/2023/03...
https://decrypt.co/114754/s...

monitor/adjust game difficultly as you play
https://www.techradar.com/g...

Sony nfts
https://www.theblock.co/pos...

Pay ai to play the game for you
https://thebusinessofesport...

Oh all the above last 12 months

I just imagine a evil scientist with test subjects when it comes down to sony recent patent reports.

Kaii19d ago

Will we get dialogue options that won't spoil puzzles in a matter of seconds? :p

280°

Judge rules in PlayStation's favour in $500m patent infringement lawsuit

Genuine Enabling Technology was seeking damages, claiming the tech allowing PlayStation consoles and controllers to communicate infringes its rights.

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
S2Killinit20d ago

Big victory for Sony. And a long time coming.

DarXyde20d ago (Edited 20d ago )

Crazy to think the savings from this lawsuit allows them to develop one AAA game.

Make it Bloodborne 2, please and thank you.

20d ago
Profchaos20d ago

Sounds like patent trolling they tried the same thing against Nintendo with the same pattern.

Motion and control input traversing over higher and lower frequencies seperate from each other allowing the controller to do both

Pyrofire9520d ago

Patents suck. Most of them are complete garbage.

Knightofelemia20d ago

So to recoup the money Genuine is going to take on Nintendo or Microsoft next. I hate patent lawyers they are some of the worst bottom feeders out there.

Show all comments (13)