530°

5 Reasons Why Every Controller Should be like the Xbox 360 Controller

The Xbox 360 controller is one of the sleekest and most comfortable controllers ever made. Here are 5 reasons why every controller should be like the Xbox 360 controller.

Read Full Story >>
gamenacho.com
Shok4255d ago (Edited 4255d ago )

The 360 controller is the most comfortable controller I've ever held. I prefer it's stick configuration (one high, one low), they're concave, and the trigger buttons are perfect for shooters and racers. My ONLY gripe with it is that damn D-Pad. If it weren't for the D-Pad, I'd call it the perfect controller.

I seriously CANNOT play fighters on the 360 due to that D-Pad.

Abash4255d ago

Im sorry but what makes the 360 controller's stick placement any better than the DualShock 3's? I have never preferred either, the both feel exactly as comfortable to me. Now, what I hate is having the D-pad below the left stick, bending my thumb in that direction while inputting commands just doesnt feel right to me in all honesty.

Shok4255d ago

Nothing factually makes it better, it's just my PREFERENCE.

Kran4255d ago (Edited 4255d ago )

Its the fact that it fits in someones hand perfectly. Left thumb at the top (which im sure most people are right handed) and right hand at the bottom.

The PS3 controller is a little awkward because your thumbs are forced to be stretched out to reach the thumbsticks.

ufo8mycat4255d ago

The reason the stick placement is better, at least the left analog stick, is because the left analog stick is in the natural position of the thumb, making it more comfortable and less stress on your thumb tendons and joint.

It's a FACT - The 360 controller IS more ergonomic for the reason above.

Another reason : The 360s handles fit nicely in your palms, giving more support and provides less stress on your wrists.

The DS3 is completely opposite, it has less support for your palms, therefore more stress on your wrists.

And we all know about it's analog sticks. BOTH are in a unnatural position.

The DS3 still has the same design for 2d games and side scrolls. Remember back in the PS1 days, we used the DPAD A LOT more, that was the primary control, but things have changed. 3D games have been around in a while, so it makes sense to put the left analog stick in the primary position, but Sony haven't

Does this make the DS3 uncomfortbale?

No, but that doesn't make it good for your hands.

You can get use to sitting on the most uncomfortable, hard chair if you sit on it for long enough.

Only reason it's comfortable is because people are use to it, or because they have tiny hands.

After using the 360 controller now for some time, going back to the DS3 is like going back to sitting on that hard, unergonomic chair.

The Meerkat4255d ago

The DS3 also does not have enough resistance on its thumbsticks.

nukeitall4255d ago

The fact that MS spent gobs of money on researching ergonomics for the original Xbox controller.

My hand cramps when I play with the DS3 and it takes a lot longer for my hands to cramp with the Xbox 360 controller.

Lvl_up_gamer4255d ago (Edited 4255d ago )

@ufoatemycat

You are absolutely correct. Anyone who disagrees with you are either ignorant or are fanboys of a different system and will never acknolodge something good about ms and the 360.

The 360 controller is the most ergonomicly correct controller on the market. The 360 controller is the most copied controller by 3rd parties.

The ps3 controller is an out dated design dating back 3 generation. The thumbsticks are placed in a manner in which forces the thumbs to be in a strained unnatural position. The convex design of the sticks also forces your thumbs to slide off when your thumbs sweat and results in the thums actually hitting and rubbing against each other in high tense twitchy gameplay like shooters.

Nintendo has also now decided to add a controller to their wii u that is strongly influenced by the 360 controller knowing very well that the 360 controller is the most comfortable controller for all aspects of gaming.

I have never used the dpad for fighting games and have always felt the analog sticks give a more fluid motion when making power movers. I have e gears of war 3 controller with the retractable dpad and it's perfect.

People have their perefeferances and there is nothing wrong with preferring he ds3 over the 360, but it's ignorant to disagree that the 360 controller isn't the most ergonomicly correct controller on the marker to date.

linkratos4255d ago (Edited 4255d ago )

Here's a run down of each component:

Face buttons - PS3
Bumpers - PS3
Triggers - 360
Sticks - 360
Shape - 360
D-Pad - Both Suck

Anon19744255d ago

Somebody pointed this out to me before and I had to pull out my old Dreamcast controller to verify. Check out the Dreamcast controller's button/thumbstick/bumper layouts. Then check out the 360's. The 360 controller is essentially a Dreamcast controller with an additional thumbstick. Even despite the way the body of the controller looks, if you hold one in your hand and compare it to the 360 controller, the feel of it and the button/dpad/bumpers/joystick placement feels identical.

Like I said, I doubted the claim myself until I pulled out my old Dreamcast controller and compared the two. I prefer the 360 controller, but it's something how similar the two controllers were. It's a shame the 360's d-pad is so useless though. Between the 360's controller and the Dualshock though I really have no preference. I didn't care for the Dualshock back when it didn't have rumble and Sony was lying about why but when the lawsuit was settled and they added it back in it felt better with some weight to it. The Sixaxis controllers that originally came with the PS3 just felt far too light for my liking.

da_2pacalypse4255d ago (Edited 4255d ago )

I wish I could play my PS3 more, but the fact is that the controller is too small for my hands, and I often get hand cramps after playing for more than a few hours. I have to take very frequent brakes with my ps3 due to the size of the controller.

I mean, that controller size was perfect for when I was kid (and had a ps1)... But it's too small now. I much prefer to 360 controller now.

I can see from the disagrees to other posts that there are a lot of PS3 players reading this thread :P But I'm a neutral party, i like both consoles :)

PS3Freak4255d ago (Edited 4255d ago )

I was a mega Dualshock fanboy for years, but after buying a 360 8 months ago; I have come to like the 360 controller more.

I have a bit of an issue with tendons in my wrists and after prolonged hours of playing PS3 my wrists tend to hurt( 2 - 3 hours). With the 360 controller, I can play for 5 - 6 hours straight without having any sort of pain. That speaks volumes for me personally.

I can't believe I'm saying this after flaunting the dualshock over the 360 controller for so long; but everything Shok said is spot on. That's not to say that I don't still have a soft spot for the Dualshock.

@ufo8mycat

What you say about stress on your wrists is 100% true. I'm proof of that.

miDnIghtEr20C_SfF4255d ago

360 controller is easily the best there has ever been. Can't count the times my thumbs have crashed into each other while playing the Dualshock 3 controller. Never had that problem with the PS2 dualshock, but that's because my hands weren't used to what was to come with this generations controller.

Sucks playing with dualshock compared to xbox controller now. agreed that the d pad sucks on the 360 controller though....

And by the way... the new Durango controller will have built in rumble on both analog sticks, and built in rumble on the trigger buttons as well. Also, there will be screen in the middle of the controller that you can't see when it's turned off. Mark my words.

Mainsqueeze4255d ago

I like everything about the 360 controller more except for the dpad as well. I hate the convex thumbsticks on the Dual Shock 3 as well as the fact that they are at the same height and so close together, my damn thumbs are always touching eachother when i play on my ps3 and i hate it for some reason lol. Plus the triggers on the 360 just feel more natural or something. I do like the Dpad placement much better on the ps3 controller though.

PoSTedUP4255d ago (Edited 4255d ago )

when i hold my ps3 controller, my hands rest nicely on the thumb sticks because they are symmetrical like everyones hands (unless you are deformed) then sorry about that.

and the concave sticks on the 360 controller make it unnatural to rotate my thumb around, the ps3 controllers sticks are more comfortable because the convex shape gives your thumbs the free mobility you need to move them around, its simple physics really.

the 360 controller is comfortable to hold. but the lack of analogue buttons (pressure sensitive buttons) makes it stupid, racing games yo can only go fast or roll. even the ps2 had pressure sensitive buttons, gt3 you can press the X button down a little for the proper speeds for turning etc. i dont even think the 360's triggers are analogue, playing GTA4 you can only go fast or just let go of the trigger while driving while driving, there was no middle speed (just my observation).

the 360 triggers fit your fingers better so you the have to buy the grips for the PS3's "pedals", but the ps3 controller doesn't put strain of your hands or an extreme gamer like me would have arthritis by now and it would be a wide spread issue for gamers, which isn't the case, because in joint and bone health when your hands or any joints are strained out long enough it causes arthritis and injury, so nice try.

some people prefer the 360 controller and some prefer the 360 controller, and it may be a fact that your hands are uncomfortable on the ps3 controller but its not a fact that its an uncomfortable controller because everyone's brains, hands and fingers work differently.

technically and factually the ps3 controller is more advanced, better technology, better buttons, more accurate inputs etc.

preferably the 360 controller may be more comfortable and work better for you you, that's about it tho.

SnakeforPresident4255d ago

I don't understand the logic behind of set stick being more "natural". Last i checked wen i grab something with two hands one thumb isn't higher than the other. Idk about you but even when i pretend to hold a controller in my hands, my thumbs are even. In fact i always felt behind the TERRIBLE D-pad the of set sticks were wat kept me from really loving the 360 controller. Its is definitely incredibly comfortable to hold, its a good size and weight and the big pads give your something to hold. I also enjoy the trigger design, thought i dnt give it the worth others do. Im also NOT a fan of the sticks themselves. I actually think concave pads are a negative not a positive. Again idk about everyone else but Me and most of the ppl i have seen dont play with their thumb directly on top of the stick but push on the sides on an angle, thus concave sticks reduce your contact point compared to a convex stick. Also in my experience its harder to make small motions from the central position on the 360 due to the static friction of the plastic 360 stick as apposed to the rubber of the DS3.

edgeofsins4255d ago

I hate the 360 analog placement. I prefer my hands to be in symmetrical positions. I don't like having my wrist moved up and twisted under a little bit more just to use the left analog. I have big hands and I have that problem.

dantesparda4254d ago

Most of youse are all biased and fanboys. The truth of the matter is that you will think whichever controller you are more used to is the more comfortable one. When i played the 360 alot, i used to think the 360 controller was more comfortable. And when i played the PS3 alot i thought it was more comfortable. I dont have any of these whacked ass issues of discomfort with either controller. They are equal when it comes to comfort. Prefences and opinions are not FACTS, remember that and get it through your thick fanboy infested minds.

moparful994254d ago

I dont know if its because I've been using the dual shock design for years but I have no problems whatsoever with the dualshock design.. it feels very comfortable to me, in fact the stick placement of the 360's controller feels uncomfortable to me especially the left one... Its all about preference...

The Great Melon4254d ago (Edited 4254d ago )

I am kind of getting tired of hearing the 'natural placement of the thumb' argument. At least for me, I have to pull my fingers back towards my hands to use the left stick and buttons on the Xbox controller. Similarly on the PS3 I have to pull my fingers back to reach the d-pad and buttons.

The optimal placement for buttons/sticks for me are closer to the center of the controller. I have more control with the Xbox's right stick than I do with the left stick. This forces me to rotate wrist so that my palm slides under the controller more to reach a more natural thumb placement.

What does this rant all mean. Both controllers suck? NO! People just have to use the two controllers differently to achieve

novcze4254d ago

Looks like people with big hands prefer 360 controller, I don't have hands like lumberjack so I'm completly fine with DS3, fits perfectly.

The Great Melon4254d ago (Edited 4254d ago )

(continuation from two posts above due to inactivity)

What does this rant all mean. Both controllers suck? NO! People just have to use the two controllers differently to achieve similar results.

Rather than bash the two controllers, I'll point out the strong point of each controller.

PS3 - Control
That's not to say it is easier to use, rather, it is just a comment on the capabilities of the buttons and triggers. Almost all of them are pressure sensitive. This gives developers a lot of flexibility in games for control methods. Racing games for example could work with the R2 or any of the face buttons for different levels of acceleration.

Xbox - Functionality
I cannot compliment the layout of the tigers and bumpers enough. The triggers use the ends of the fingers, whereas the bumpers use the knuckles of the fingers. This means that I never have to reach for a bumper/trigger, because I am already there to press it. Hence the reason why bumper jumper had such a strong following in Halo 3.

DragonKnight4254d ago

Wow, I like how a lot of you are commenting on things as though they are fact. For example: "FACT the 360 controller is more ergonomical" or "FACT the stick placement is better."

It isn't FACT. It's opinion. If ergonomical means more comfortable, it's all opinion. I don't know what kind of deformed hands you all have, but humans generally have symmetrical bodies. That means that there is no such thing as one thumb naturally resting higher than another.

Whatever your controller preference is is yours, doesn't make any of them "the best." This article is pointless and invalid.

That said, if I were to join in, I'd simply have to say that of the 2 controllers (360 or PS3) one has won multiple awards for its design and the other hasn't. Therefore, industry experts have come to a consensus on which one is better.

BattleAxe4254d ago (Edited 4254d ago )

I use a wireless 360 controller for some of my PC games, and while I really like it, I still prefer the DS3. I find that the analogue sticks feel like they're in a more natural position. I find that it feels weird when I'm using my 360 controller, and when I need to press the left bumper...it feels like the left analogue stick and the left bumper are too close together.

Revolver_X_4254d ago Show
EVILDEAD3604254d ago

'What I get from these stupid comments are the 360 controller is more comfortable to heavy set ppl'

And you called those comment 'stupid'..irony at it's best. Only a fankid would pretend that gamers complaining about hand cramps equals obesity in the US..

IMO..the 360 controller is is gaming perfection and one of the reason for it's success this gen. I even bought a 360 knock-off controller for my PS3 to play Killzone and Resistance lol...

Ir's no secret the 360 D-Pad gets criticized for fighters, but NO fighter is even CLOSE to being unplayable at all. Which is why fighters still have good success on the 360.

But the new silver 360 controller just fixed the D-pad and even enhanced it for '360' control for the those hard to pull of diagonal moves.

Milons have their preferences, but the 360 controller definately was one of the best moves Microsoft made this gen, and the reason the 360 controller is essentially now on the Wii-U.

Evil

OneAboveAll4254d ago

The left stick is in a more natural position. As for Shok. The new controllers with the transforming d-pad for the win. Now it's the perfect controller.

PS3 controllers feel cheaply made imo. Also, most FPS games have it set to use the shoulder buttons to ADS and fire. Why not actually use the triggers? Then again, the triggers are pretty terrible also. :|

DragonKnight4254d ago (Edited 4254d ago )

@EVILDEAD360: Does MS pay you enough for the crap you spew?

kneon4254d ago

The only reason for the different joy stick position on the 360 controller is so it wouldn't look just like every other controller.

If the stick above the dpad is the "right" position then how come they didn't do it for both sides?

The DS3 configuration is actually better because in that position your thumbs have a greater range of motion.

RBlaze4254d ago

"You can please some of the people all of the time, you can please all of the people some of the time, but you can’t please all of the people all of the time"... This famous phrase is the reason this article falls apart. People's preferences can always be different. Something I could see as an advantage to the 360 pad could be seen as a huge weakness by somebody else!

Also (taken from the article)... "I do believe it is the controller that all other controllers should look too.". C'mon... "too"... Really?

X

SilentNegotiator4254d ago (Edited 4254d ago )

I don't see any big differences between the PS3 and 360 controllers.

I've never used either and felt uncomfortable, even after that multi-hour game play. Moving my thumbs an inch doesn't make me cry. They both curve perfectly to my hand. They're basically the exact same size.

The only thing I can see anywhere near to being "deal breakers" (in the most petty of fashions) is the D-pad and triggers. And like I said....petty differences as far as I'm concerned.

It's just used as fanboy ammo on sites like this.

"..AND they just fixed the D-PAD"
-
Nope. It still uses the dinner-plate-on-a-stick design mechanics. The new controller just allows the D-pad to stick up.

Dee_914254d ago (Edited 4254d ago )

I been use to playing with both since the og xbox days after i got the a for x and b for o down i was good to go
really became easier when playstation started making o the go back button instead of triangle.

jeseth4254d ago

What a bunch of babies.

Each cotrol;er has its ups and downs. The DS is great, Xbox's is great.

I laugh at how some people seriously complain about the ergonomics of a video game controller. Sounds pathetic. Been playing PS mostly since Nintendo dropped the ball after SNES ... Never had my hands cramp up or have to stop playing because the controller was too small! LMAO. Sad. Like the MS controller for shooters especially but never had y hand cramp up from gaming.. LOL ... who says that? Are your hands out of shape?

If your hands can't handle gaming ... you must be one out of shape slug! Hand cramps ... hahahhaha. Pathetic.

NewZealander4254d ago

i have to agree with shok, the stick placement on DS3 just doesn't feel right, also the sticks feel far too loose and flimsy, and the convex shape to the sticks is horrible. the triggers being kinda spongy also feels awkward.

360 has the best controller even despite the crappy d-pad.

jadenkorri4254d ago

what i find funny is all these articles, why the 360 better than the ps3, why the 360 controller better than the ps3 controller... etc etc. If it is "so" much better, why are you trying to convince me or are you still trying to convince yourself its better.

EVILDEAD3604254d ago (Edited 4254d ago )

'@EVILDEAD360: Does MS pay you enough for the crap you spew?'

@ Dragonguy

LOl @ once again your b-hurt in a 360 article...easily one of the biggest trolls on n4g right now hands down..and YOUR pretending that people get paid for N4G comments..GTFOH

Evil

Omnislash4253d ago

@EVILDEAD360

http://careers.microsoft.co...

Here you go, If youre not getting paid for spewing a bunch of BS all over video game sites you might as well look for a job opening.
No need to thank me.

EVILDEAD3604253d ago (Edited 4253d ago )

'Here you go, If youre not getting paid for spewing a bunch of BS all over video game sites you might as well look for a job opening.'

Hey loook..it's the B-hurt Multi-account troll party..

Awwww..did the wittle troll get upset because somebody said something good about the wittle console hes's twolling all the time?

Sowwy..lil guy..

Hey here's some advice..if you claim something is B.S...just click the little disagree button or maybe use your words like your mommy taught you.

But, you can't use your words other than..bu-bu-but you work at Micrsoft b-b-because you do that's why..once again GTFOH..and play an actual game for once..

Or just keep fighting this long dead fake console war..your choice

Evil

+ Show (33) more repliesLast reply 4253d ago
MastaMold4255d ago

I dont have small hands and thats the complaints that I have heard about the DualShock that its made for people with small hands, but my opinion is with its comfort alone the DualShock is the overall better controller its also had the same design for over 15 years it almost feels like i've been using the same controller ever since the PS1

dalibor4255d ago (Edited 4255d ago )

Well you have been using the same controller with just tweaks added for each new generation of systems. The Ps3 controller does fit well but it depends on how you place your thumbs on the joysticks. I use the tips of my thumbs but if you lay your thumb on the joystick so it's more flat and extended a bit than you could essentially hit your other thumb on the joystick by accident depending on the rotation of both joysticks. This could be remedied if the middle part of the Ps3 pad was stretched out hmm maybe half an inch I'd guess. In that case it would fit anybody's hands as well as extending the two handle bars a bit(where you rest your palms). But controllers nowadays are all great. It would have been cool to try out that boomerang controller for the Ps3 that never came to be.

Oh_Yeah4255d ago (Edited 4255d ago )

honestly if you pick up a ps2 controller, it does feel slightly different.. more comfortable than the DS3 in my opinion, it weighs more and the sticks are tighter...feels like its built of better quality materials and feels bigger for some reason also.

moparful994254d ago

I have very large hands as i'm a big guy and the ds3 feel great in my hands.. I have hitch hikers thumbs which means the tips of my thumbs arc upwards. So I let the joint of my thumb rest on the sticks and it works very well for me. Plus the contoured shape of the 360 controller makes my hands sweat.. SO essentially it all comes down to preference..

Xperia_ion4255d ago

Wow, Nine bubbles, Those Nintendo fanboys hooked you up good. They're both comfortable to me except the 360s dpad.

X-Alchemist4255d ago

yeah I also love the 360 controller it's very comfortable! It's moulded perfectly for my hands, I just hate the d-pad but everything else is great.

Kin23g4255d ago

You took the words straight out of my mouth .. I completely agree with you. It'd have been the perfect controller if it weren't for that stupid D-Pad.

I always play fighters on PS3 for that reason.

NastyLeftHook04255d ago

That 360 controller actually hurts my hand, It feels too bulky and i cannot play fighting games on it because of the d-pad and overall structure. And its also a pain to recharge the double a batteries.

frjoethesecond4255d ago

Same here. My hands are a little small compared to those who prefer the 360 controller. I get used to it after a day or two of using it though.

Swiggins4255d ago

Recharge the double A batteries....yeah...you don't own an Xbox 360....

dragon824255d ago (Edited 4255d ago )

I would argue that it is you who does not own a 360. Both of my 360 controllers came out of the box requiring AA batteries. It was only after purchasing the Play & Charge Kit that they no longer required AA batteries.

user54670074255d ago

The 360 controler is nice but it's only really the best when playing FPS

The DualShock however is a nice all rounder controler for differn't genres.

That is why in my book the DualShock will always come out on top

Aceman184255d ago

i have decent size hands but i prefer my DS3 over my 360 one. i cannot game for long sessions with the 360 one.

Knight_Crawler4255d ago (Edited 4255d ago )

Wish Sony had stuck with the PS1 controller design.

The concave sticks just made it a win.

http://d24w6bsrhbeh9d.cloud...

Tito084255d ago (Edited 4255d ago )

It's both PS1/2 designs, I think it's a big mistake Sony opted to make L2/R2 into triggers, nobody asked for it since to me it was an overall perfect controller... As I also own a Dreamcast controller, it took me a while to get used to the triggers, but one thing I give the DC controller more credit than both the original Xbox & 360 controller despite having almost the same design is the D-pad which I think is the best along with the Dualshock, Xbox & 360's D-pads for fighters are horrendous... Nintendo's D-pads were alright..

4255d ago Replies(3)
the worst4255d ago

the 360 controller suck
d-pad is the worst in gaming history
the sh!t uses batteries (what joke)
its mad heavy

Bzone244254d ago

if you think the controller is mad heavy, you might want to put it down and get off the couch and get some exercise.

ItsTrue4254d ago

You do know that the PS3 controller runs on batteries as well...

xX-StolenSoul-Xx4255d ago

Yeah thats my only gripe with xbox also, the d-pad. I'm a hardcore fighting game fan lol. Then again i got me a fightstick so no biggy.
The battery pack in the back of the controller can also be lived without i sometimes like to stretch my fingers and i cannot.

ALLWRONG4255d ago

The 360 controller is so good even Nintendo needed one.

Captain_Freud4255d ago

Holy crap, reading the Agree / Disagree spread of the comments below remind me that this site is FILLED with PS3 fanboys. Every article that's favorable to the PS3 is lauded with praise, and every article that's critical is deemed stupid and unfair.

ThanatosDMC4254d ago

You missed N4G before PS3 launched and the first year of PS3.

belac094254d ago

just means more people like ps3, thats all. (on this site.)

ZoyosJD4254d ago

The title of the article and the entirety of it's contents are flamebait, and definitely did it's job of generating hits.

The entire premise of the article is Bullsh*t. It's like saying one size fits all. F' that. I'm not going to wear XXXXL clothes because you think they are comfy.

Matpan4255d ago

Completely agree. The 360 feels, In my opinion, ergonomically better. My only gripe is with the AWFUL D-PAD. Apart from that, it´s pretty much the definitive joystick for me...

DS3 is a nice one though. Can I play my PS3 with a 360 controller BTW?...

Dark_Overlord4254d ago

http: //www.redmondpie.com/cronus-ad apter-turns-any-xbox-360-contro ller-into-a-ps3-controller-and- vice-versa-video/

:)

Dark_Overlord4254d ago

Due to the retarded spam filter on here that won't let me post a link, i've sent you a PM about an adapter you may be interested in :)

Bon Scott4254d ago (Edited 4254d ago )

Buy the 360 the controller with the adjustable d pad,
it works great for fighters

oops there goes my bubbles with high disagrees for not preferring the awkward ps3 controller.
silly site

geddesmond4254d ago

Yeah The 360 controller is not comfortable to me. Everytime I play a 360 for more than an hour the bottom of my left handed thumb where it meets the palm of my hand gets really sore and stiff. I've played with a PS controller since 1996. My hands are well used to a dualshock controller.

meetajhu4254d ago (Edited 4254d ago )

FK controllers! KB+Mouse or i DIE

StraightPath4254d ago

Xbox 360best controller of all time no doubt.

chaldo4254d ago

I hate the xbox controller. I dont want to reach waayyy over there with my left thumb for the analog stick.

Bzone244254d ago

If you have to "reach waayy over there" with your left thumb for the analog stick, you must be holding the controller wrong.

wsoutlaw874254d ago (Edited 4254d ago )

see I disagree that the 360 controler is better or more comfortable. When ever I hear someone say that that plays a 360 its usually because they are used to holding it like a 360 remote where you fully grab both the hand parts with your palms instead of just letting it rest in your fingers. you would only hold the ds3 that way if your hands were small. You dont need to really grab it because its so light compared to the 360 that you barely notice its there. The less weight probably makes it better for your wrists also, not worse. However which ever is more comfortable is up to you. when I hold the DS3 and relax my hand, my thumbs line up almost perfectly with the sticks. I dont know whos thumbs are lined up offset but thats just crazy placement. You do get used to the offset analog sticks but I can never get used to their terrible decision to make them concave. Making them like that makes it more uncomfortable when moving it around than the DS3. When your moving the stick why would you want your thumb held in the same spot. I have also never heard of anyone who plays the ps3 a lot saying that their thumbs slide off because of it. The DS3 analog sticks just seem much better. They are more precise because they have more movement area, less dead zone, and less resistance. The better analog sticks make it much more precise in shooters and really sell it for me. I personally don't care much about triggers on the 360, but i dont really care for them on the ps3 either. I actually would rather use the RB or R1 to shoot on both. The trigger it self are good i just dont like the trigger to rb/lb. the ds3 has better feeling buttons and d pad. The DS3 also all have rechargeable batteries and are wireless. But hey, if the 360 feels more right too you in your hands than that makes sense to choose it.

Pushagree4254d ago

I would probably quit gaming if every controll was like that deformed pseudo-dreamcast abomination. There is no reason for a controller to be that big, have the button placement it does, or to even be called a good controller. How anyone could possibly say that putting the analogs in a diagonal position was a good idea ill never know. It must be that MS fanboys have simply brainwashed themselves to such an extent that they actually think that that is a logical thing to do while you outstretch your hands to fit on it. Every time I have tried to play an xbox controller, i always takes me several moments to adjust to it's poorly designed layout. When I use a dualshock, my hands instantly form to the button configiration as if it were a part of me. That is what a controller should be. You should not have to struggle for it to accept you. It should BE you.

showtimefolks4254d ago

With controllers it's just personal choice. I have no complains at DS3 because I been with PS brand since PS1, but I do believe for ps4 it's time for change. But DS3 isn't as bad as many of y'all make it up to be. NAND the 360 controller is a copy of dreamcast controller with a extra thumb stick.

Shooters and raceing games better with 360 but fighting games better withDS3 because the d pad sucks of 360.

andrewsqual4254d ago

So no analogue buttons (for example, on PS2 games you could accelerate slowly in GTA by pressing the X button lightly and put an armed gun away quietly in MGS without firing off a shot by releasing the fire button lightly, the 360 controller does not have this), a shitty ass d pad AND mandatory source of power be it batteries or rechargeable battery packs makes a controller the best ever? Who knew? Oh and the bumper buttons are also a piece of shit.

indubitably4254d ago

The fact that there are more disagrees with this proves n4g is mostly sony fanboys. I know plenty of ps3 owners who prefer the ps3 but admit to how good the 360 controller is.

Dee_914254d ago

more so the fact that you think people who prefer ps3 makes them a ps3 fanboy shows that your a fanboy.
get over the disagrees and agree button
its a completely pointless feature on this sitee until its mandatory that you reply to agree or disagree.

+ Show (22) more repliesLast reply 4253d ago
black9114255d ago

1.Buy a SEPARATE Rechargeable Battery Pack.

JellyJelly4255d ago

Instead of having to buy a brand new controller when the battery is worn out.

Why do you think Sony made their charging cables so short? They don't want you to be able to play comfortably when the battery in the controller dies.

dalibor4255d ago (Edited 4255d ago )

A usb extension cable will do wonders. In fact I have one that is like 6ft added with the charging cable that came with the Ps3 system and you not only have a long cable but you could use this for a pc setup if you wanted to use a controller and wanted some distance from the monitor/tv.

Just wanted to add either way all batteries die eventually so you are screwed one way or the other. Now imagine having a controller that somehow charges itself by momentum or similar to solar panels. That would be pretty cool.

DigitalRaptor4255d ago (Edited 4255d ago )

No, Sony want you to be closer to the screen, thus closer to the action! See, I can make things up too.

With all things considered, both have their shortcomings in design. If you charge a DualShock 3 that's low on battery, it will be back to almost 3 full cells in about 15-20 mins. Or if it's that much of a problem, get an extension cable, like dalibor has said. No worries there. And let's not forget that the DS3 will last you a generation easily, unless you get mad trying to compete Demon's Souls and throw it out the window.

Using rechargeable batteries is a different matter. Consider that rechargeable lithium ion batteries were standard in phones and similar electronics of 5 years ago.

chrisarsenalsavart4255d ago (Edited 4255d ago )

7 years After and my ps3_controllers work just fine.
Do not criticize quality if you can,t emulate it.

edgeofsins4255d ago

Yeah they definitely want people to play uncomfortably. Damn evil Sony damning us to limited cable length.

The battery in PS3 controllers last over 24 hours. It takes no more then 15 minutes to recharge them to full. So evil Sony!

MrBeatdown4254d ago

After enough gameplay time to earn 59 platinum trophies, my battery is just fine. There's no need for the battery to be replaceable when the battery doesn't need to be replaced.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4254d ago
scooterbaga4255d ago

Right idea, but there's a better solution. Buy rechargeable AA's. (Avoid something restricted to one device.) The initial investment of replacing everything in the house can be substantial, but it's well WELL worth it. Decent rechargeables can last for years compared to a few weeks with the traditional type.

More money for games.

Lord_Sloth4255d ago

I prefer the DualShock so I disagree with your article. That's the funny thing about opinions, no?

R_aVe_N4255d ago

I agree I prefer the DualShock over the 360 controller, but there is nothing wrong with that controller either I just prefer the DS.

NastyLeftHook04255d ago

likewise, i just like the crisp L1 R1 buttons of the dualshock.

dalibor4255d ago

Imo this article contradicts itself. Just look at reason number 4. The dual shock was the first controller with as many inputs suggested in the article hence a pioneer to the amount of inputs found today in most gamepads. You could literally just have had put Ps3 controller in the title and it would be the same. But the truth of the matter is that there is no perfect gamepad. I enjoyed game controllers from previous generations as well and they will continue to improve.

MrBeatdown4254d ago (Edited 4254d ago )

This!

It's always funny hearing the ways people try to justify why something like a controller is better than the other when they each have their positives and negatives, making it all a pure matter of opinion.

If you want to get down to technical aspects, yeah, you could probably make a case, but a controller is more than the sum of it's parts so even a technical comparison feature by feature is worthless. Who cares if one controller has the better analog stick if the placement is uncomfortable?

It's just dumb watching people try to convince each other that there is some obvious winner between two controllers that each have their ups and downs, and when other aspects of it come down to pure comfort. I can imagine all these people in a mattress store.

"No, you moron! The FIRM mattress is the best! It's the best for your back! FAA-aaaa-ACT!"

"You must be a Sealy fanboy. Everyone knows a softer mattress is more comfortable! And Sealy mattresses will catch fire faster!"

"Yeah, well MY mattress is resistant to pet urine! Lots of it!"

SCW19824255d ago

I also prefer the Dual Shock but I do like the 360 triggers much better. To each their own.

Venoxn4g4255d ago

I prefer Gamecube Wireless Wawebird controller

dalibor4255d ago (Edited 4255d ago )

Well the best fps controller would be the N64 in my opinion. It felt like you were holding a weapon. I could be the outcast on this but I prefer using L1/R1 as triggers on the Ps3 controller and it's not b/c of the triggers which are indeed not as great as the 360's but I feel I get more precision with them. Hence when you use a pistol in a game your rate of fire is way better using L1/R1 rather than triggers.

And I think you meant to say wavebird instead of wawebird lol

Ripco_Keller4255d ago

The problem with the n64 controller is, and I may be in the minority here, but I don't have 3 hands. The controller was pretty obviously designed for people who do have 3 hands, and power to em.

scooterbaga4255d ago

I preferred the wired version in the hands, but not enough to stay wired. However, I think somewhere between the X360 and GC controller would be the best.

The form of the GC is near perfect... However, the B/Z buttons and C stick could be better. The B button should've been a third "bean" like the early prototypes. The Z button should be larger and have a mirror on the left side. The C stick should have been full sized.

The Great Melon4254d ago (Edited 4254d ago )

People always hail the Xbox controller as the most ergonomic, but everyone seems to always forget the gamecube controller. That thing was simply a delight to hold. It's trigger/bumper analogs may not be in such a functional design or fully featured and the c-stick d-pad were a little small, however, Nintendo rewarded you everytime you picked that controller up. Your hand literally wraps around the controller and your fingers rest in ergonomic triggers.

Venoxn4g4254d ago

especially l and r buttons..mmmm :) sooo comfortable..I wish all controllers had like those and maybe even perfected

Show all comments (249)
120°

10 Weirdest Game Consoles of All Time

From systems that could keep your beer cool, to oddities trying to get in on the popularity of VHS and laserdisc, you’ve got some very, very weird video game consoles out there.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
darthv7214d ago

I had the LaserActive... it was a nice collectors piece but not very practical. Especially when it came to needing recapping. I think i paid all of about $50 for the floor model from an incredible Universe back in the day. I ended up selling it many years later for $300 at the time due to it needing a new laser and the aforementioned recapping.

An honorable mention not on the list would be the VM Labs Nuon. It basically looked like any regular DVD player but it had ports on it for controllers to play specific games. one of which is still exclusive to it with Tempest 3000. It also offered nuon enhanced DVD movies with extra content not accessible by regular players.

_Decadent_Descent14d ago

Wasn't there some KFC console, or am I mistaken?

CoNn3rB14d ago

It was announced but it never actually came out as far as I know

90°

History Lesson: The consoles that ‘failed’

Virtual Boy, Sega Nomad, Ouya and the other troubled game systems that nobody bought.

Read Full Story >>
videogameschronicle.com
Wasabi1573d ago

How has this article missed out Sega's Dreamcast and Nintendo's Wii U, two consoles that were actually superb devices in their own right, but were seen as failed due to lacklustre sales at the time of release?

Knightofelemia1573d ago

Wonder how long before Stadia appears on the list surprised the Ngage is not on that list

william_cade1573d ago (Edited 1573d ago )

I enjoy these kinds of articles.

rlow11573d ago

Talk about a blast to the past.......I remember trying the virtual boy at Toy R Us and it was cool but I did feel slightly disoriented afterwards......good article.

110°

OUYA marketplace revived from the dead by internet archivists

The Ouya, a failed Android gaming console from early in this generation, is getting a second lease on life thanks to Internet archivists and some new software.

Read Full Story >>
gamerevolution.com
Double_O_Revan1605d ago

That's pretty cool they were able to bring it back. It sucks when something online only gets killed.

I got mine when it first launched, however it wasn't good for anything other than retro emulation. I couldn't sell the thing fast enough. Managed to get almost all my money back selling it on eBay.

Xaywhat1605d ago

Just let go homies. It was DOA

JEECE1605d ago

I guess the Stadia launch is bringing back memories of other failed consoles/services.