Ok, well it started out well. After we first heard of Generals 2 being announced we have to admit, we were excited. However, EA has decided that it’s best to follow in C&C 4′s direction for the now defunct Generals 2, making it everything the fans didn’t want.
A spiritual successor to the 'Game I Want To Play - But Haven't Been Made' opinion piece series. This first chapter of the new and re-titled series looks at the potential to a true (and not cancelled) sequel to the classic title 'Command & Conquer: Generals'.
Much to the dismay of anyone looking forward to the new Command & Conquer, the game was shelved by EA on 29 October but it looks like it's now being moved to a new studio and development will resume.
That is probably the plan as they stated a new studio would make the game now.
Anyway I agree that they should of stuck to the original plan before canning it, and making more F2P garbage.
will it still be using the Frostbite 3
will it be good like Tiberium Wars?
I hope so!
An alpha forum post from somebody claiming to be a (former) Victory Games employee has stated that the press release line about Command & Conquer being shut down due to unfavourable feedback about the alpha was “total bs.”
Oh EA, what are you on? No single player as well?
Goodbye c&c.
Is anyone really surprised? Remember the last c&c title?
the last good c&c was generals + zero hour
One does not simply follow the already clear road to success during the development of a Command & Conquer game.
Starcraft 2 : "You do not have enough minerals"
C&C : "You have not yet purchased that unit" , what good is that in an on-line battle , OH sorry you lost because you didn't whip out your credit card fast enough while your opponent macroed you to death.
Wish they would stop calling them free 2 play games tbh , Micro Transaction Play (MTP) would be more accurate.