One of the most anticipated games of the decade Diablo III is released, almost 10 years after its predecessor but it carried a sort of a restriction, one that requires users to be perpetually connected to the internet if they wanted to explore the hellish dungeons or slay the demon overlords in Diablo III. Many a user has complained about DRM that has been implemented in several PC games. Assassins Creed II had DRM but the hackers got around that with little difficulty. That means that the hackers can get a crack for Diablo III too right? Wrong. Wait maybe Blizzard will patch the game for offline play? Nope, it’s not as easy as it sounds. It’s not about changing a bit from 0 to 1 so people can play without the internet, it’s much more complicated than that.
Diablo III just doesn’t have DRM that requires you to register their game on their servers by entering the CD-Key. It requires you to play the entire game from their servers. The placing of NPC’s or monsters to the amount of loot you find is all obtained from Blizzard’s servers, so hacking the game is not as easy as you think. Blizzard implemented the DRM primarily because of the auction house but also to stop piracy.
One month after the release of Diablo III and there was still no way for people to play the game without buying it(a.k.a. pirating it). One of the well known pirates, going by the name of Skidrow, had promised people that they would find a work-around to the Blizzards DRM. They posted the collector’s edition of the game for people to download and wait “till the crack was ready”. Finally Skidrow announced, more than a month later, that they had made an emulator for the game and it was still in alpha. Users rejoiced as it meant they could now play Diablo III for free(and offline) but there was a hitch.
As I explained earlier, all of the loot drops were calculated and delivered by Blizzard’s servers and not the game itself that is residing on your hard-drive, which means that the emulator that was released by Skidrow was not a true representation of the game but a mere attempt to stay true to the original game. This means that the location of NPC’s, the amount of loot that you get won’t represent the true game.
What Blizzard has done with Diablo III has almost effectively killed piracy for the game. Yes there are people who will still play the glitchy pirated version rather than spending $60 for the game, but these are probably the kind of people who would never play games if piracy did not exist.
And this brings us to the future of single player games. Will Ubisoft, EA, and other publishers follow the steps of Diablo III? Will offline single player gaming be dead? This would require developers to drastically alter the code of their game to ensure that players can play their games smoothly. This will also increase the costs of maintaining games with regular upkeep of servers for several years. Do you like opening up some of your older consoles like the SNES and playing 8-bit Mario? Maybe 20 years down the line you would like to open up your Xbox 720 to play the single player campaign of Halo 5 but guess what Microsoft pulled down the servers15 years ago.
I don’t see this taking place this gen but come next gen, offline gaming could be dead as we know it.
Tales of Kenzera: Zau is a 2.5D Metroidvania action RPG that's rooted in the culture, myths and spirituality of the African Bantu people.
Join us as we take a look at House Flipper 2 in our PS5 review. The game has finally arrived on consoles. Does it build on past foundations?
Jas checks out the oddly named Nyaaaanvy in his latest review. Will this cat-based party game be purrfect or a load of hiss?
Nice blog Dare :D
They need to stop them gold farmers and bots !
The DRM doesn't bother me too much as it offers some good advantages, but not to offer a LAN mode aswell seems a little harsh.
My main issue with the game is that certain areas lack polish & there are missing features at launch , such as:
- No PvP at Launch
- Nothing to do but gear grind at a certain point in the game in order to progress placing faith in an unreliable AH , which robbed me of gold for sold items earlier.
- ACT III & IV shorter and feel a little rushed , maybe these can be fleshed out in the future
etc etc
At the moment it feels like Activsion has had a part in pushing the product out the door by putting pressure on Blizzard to please the Stakeholders that have a 52% share, while Blizzard maintain a 48% share and maintain independent development (correct me if I'm wrong) , but it doesn't help the quality Blizzard is known to be poisoned by Bobby Kotick and his business strategies. I have no problems with name changes and stuff like that to make extra money because it's optional , but to sabotage the product is not on.
On the positive side of things , I'm really enjoying the game shortcomings aside and looking forward to the new content that will be coming out in the future , also there has been an official response from Mike Morhaime( http://us.battle.net/d3/en/... , detailing future improvements & acknowledgement of feedback , so Diablo 3 is far from a bad game, just a little rough around the edges due to said issues.
*sigh* I have StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty and I was excited to get to play it. Went to Best Buy, bought it, and installed it on my computer. Shock and surprise follow as I learn that StarCraft II now requires you to have to be online to play the single player campaign (which is amazing by the way). This was a drastic turn from the original StarCraft and it's expansion Brood War, where you got to play the single player campaigns without having to log on.
I know Blizzard is going on this anti-piracy tirade, but it can really bug us legitimate customers. So many times have I wanted to play through the StarCraft II single player campaign only to receive a notification at the log in screen that it was going through maintenance...which would take two to four days to finish. It's a good thing I have a lot of games offline in this instance.
DRM has its strengths and weaknesses. Yes, it is a good tool to use against pirates and hackers. Pirates cannot get what they need to do whatever coding they need to lift the game and copy it. Hackers get in trouble and the activation code they used to install SC2 gets banned so the only way for them to play the game is to buy a new one. In other words, Blizzard's message to pirates and hackers is this, "Suck on that!".
The bad things about it include if my internet modum isn't working, then I have to fix it (thus I can't play the game by itself offline) and if I only want to play the single player portion but maintenance is going on then I can't. So although those are minor gripes, they are still very annoying. And who knows what DRM could lead to ultimately?