430°

E3 2012: The Big Games List

The Electronic Entertainment Expo (E3) is quickly approaching. Press conferences begin on Monday, June 4th followed by the show on June 5th through June 7th. While we expect a ton of surprises to be revealed during the show, there are also plenty of games we know about ahead of time.

The following list is every game that we know we'll be seeing at the show. To clarify, there are plenty of other games that we're pretty sure will make an appearance, but the games listed here are only those that publishers have specifically confirmed to IGN as guaranteed E3 games.

Read Full Story >>
games.ign.com
MultiConsoleGamer4373d ago

Dig the IGN E3 Game List. Look forward to it every year.

Its going to be a great show!

LOGICWINS4373d ago (Edited 4373d ago )

I look foward to seeing the single player presentation of AC3. Its gunna wow a lot of people. The next Splinter Cell and Rainbow Six: Patriots will likely make an appearance as well. Ubisoft is set to have a great conference.

I expect we'll learn more about GTAV at Sony's conference.

StrongMan4372d ago

I think we'll see GTAV at MS's conference. They had a timed exclusive DLC deal for GTAIV and I expect the same for GTAV.

Nimblest-Assassin4372d ago (Edited 4372d ago )

My E3 wishlist

-Assassin's Creed 3 + Awesome AC3 trailer, which will then be literalled by Tobuscus

-Bioshock infinite gameplay

-Last of Us gameplay

- God of War:Ascension gameplay

-The announcement of Battlefront 3/Half-life 3

-An Infamous 3 announcement (maybe)

- Halo 4 Gameplay

-Microsoft getting the f**king hint and reduse the mindnumbingly annoying kinect presentations

-WiiU Info

-New Zelda/Mario shown

-New characters for Playstation all-stars Battle Royale

-Nintendo actually showing a trailer/gameplay for smash bros Next

-New vita/3ds games announcements

All of those things and I will be a very happy man, some of them I will be happy still

ThrazN74372d ago

GTA isn't a sony thing anymore and it really never was

YodaCracker4372d ago

And I think we'll see GTA V at neither Sony's conference nor Microsoft's conference.

MultiConsoleGamer4372d ago

Rockstar isn't dumb enough to put all their eggs in one basket. GTA V probably wont be at E3 2012. But if it was, I doubt very much they would have an exclusive showing for just one platform.

You fanboys need to let it go. GTA was never a "playstation franchise." That was all just fanboy spin.

ForeverGamer4372d ago

@Nimblest-Assassin
ADD the last gaurdin to that list too
the lineup from sony look sooo good
and i can't wait for GTA5 too

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4372d ago
Sithlord-Gamble4372d ago

Just give me some GOOD vita announcements and ill b happy.

TekoIie4372d ago

I'm interested in the new Tomb Raider because it looks amazing and M$ has taken an interest in it which is unusual. They never seem to care about a game unless it's guaranteed to sell well or has attracted a lot of interest in the gaming community.

Yangus4372d ago

FF Versus XIII
Metal Gear Rising
Maybe Bayonetta 2?
-WiiU and games-
RE6
Killzone 4?

Kyosuke_Sanada4372d ago

Ahh DMC, who bets that the video will still begin with "Footage Represents A Game Still In Development". Fear is a serious thing........

Show all comments (25)
60°
5.5

Soul Covenant (PC VR) Review - CGMagazine

Soul Covenant feels like a game from the early 2000s, with its repetitive gameplay loop, waggle controls, and nonsensical story.

Read Full Story >>
cgmagonline.com
130°

Cold VR is all About Acting Super Hot

Indie developer Carlos Alfonso is working on Cold VR, a game where standing still isn't an option. The complete opposite to SUPERHOT VR.

Read Full Story >>
xrsource.net
Abnor_Mal5h ago

This sounds very interesting, Superhot was a great game to take inspiration from.

Babadook73h ago(Edited 3h ago)

I liked the VR version of SUPERHOT. If this ends up being as good I'l pick it up (once available) for PSVR2.

230°

Tomb Raider Remastered just quietly censored one in-game detail

Tomb Raider 1-3 Remastered players are ticked off by the game’s most recent patch, which censors in-game pin-up posters of Lara Croft.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbible.com
rlow16h ago

This is why gaming is screwed. When people change things to fit someone’s agenda, it’s a slippery slope downhill.

Christopher5h ago(Edited 5h ago)

Even if that agenda is of the developer? Way to remove developer rights.

***One player called it a “huge problem with modern games,” saying they can now be “ruined AFTER people buy them”.***

The level of drama. Yes, I recall sitting there for more hours than I did anything else in the game. These two pinups are the core of the game, after all!

coolbeans3h ago(Edited 3h ago)

rlow1's cringe catastrophizing aside, I do think developers *ought* to strive to maintain an original work to the best of their ability. The language of a "remaster" tacitly implies that - for good or ill - what's being resold is what fans remember but better.

Profchaos3h ago

Games can be ruined after purchasing them yeah we know this not from this but from GTA IV which had half it's radio content patched out due to licensing expirations and to me that was a huge deal.

This pin up poster is a bit of nonsense but the whole argument of modern games can be ruined post launch is Absol true.

DedicatedDark2h ago(Edited 2h ago)

It's not their work to censor. They are incharge of restoration & remastering the work, not overwriting it.

Barlos1h ago

It's not the agenda of the developer though, they're pandering and trying to increase their ESG score.

Way to support censorship...

victorMaje1h ago

It’s not the end of the world for sure, but I understand the hate towards this kind of change. I believe it’s also a matter of principle.

Imagine a Picasso painting being restored & the restorer deciding there aren’t enough strokes, or some lines aren’t straight enough or curved enough…not sure it would/should sit well with people.

Have all original devs signed off on this change? Even if it’s the case, are we saying older gamers are better mentally equipped to process what was there than current gamers, hence the change?

Enough time ago the case was made that games are an art form. We’re supposed to have won that case.
So which is it? Are games art or not?

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1h ago
Eidolon1h ago

Hasn't this been happened for over a decade since remasters? I can't see that it's any worse now. Maybe if Sweet Baby starts getting their hands on remasters we will definitely have a problem.

Rebel_Scum4h ago

tbh I dont see something like this as censorship. Does anyone else not find it strange for someone to stick pin ups of themsleves in a locker room?

Now of it was a pin up of some half naked firefighters it might make sense as Lara might like that, and if they removed that I would cry censorship. But removing pin ups of the main character, yeah I get it.

Barlos1h ago(Edited 1h ago)

It's a game, and they were placed there for the audience. It's not real life. If it was, she wouldn't have fought a T-Rex now would she?

Yes, it's censorship but it's a bit less in your face. If they were in the original game, then they should have been in the remasters. It's bad enough that they have that ridiculous unnecessary warning at the start, but then they start removing things post launch. I don't care how small the change, they shouldn't be doing it. It's nothing but ESG pandering but in a subtle way.

Rebel_Scum23m ago

Look bro, if you have pictures of yourself naked on a bear skin rug up in your house let me tell you, its not normal.

SimpleDad1h ago

By the year 2030, this remaster collection will totally be changed and censored. Probably will remove Lara as a playable character. It's ridiculous. Glad that my family didn't buy this.
I still have Tomb Raider 2 PS1 as a memory.

CobraKai45m ago

It’s mentioned in the article, and it’s a point i 100% agree with, it’s the fact that they can censor a game after you buy it. That’s total bullshit.

Killer2020UK28m ago

Whilst it's an overreaction to say this has "ruined" the game, it's still problematic that this has happened post launch and for many, post-purchase.

I don't want someone to change a product for the worse after I've bought it. The same goes for implementing micro transactions after reviews.

I wonder why they did this? Nobody was kicking up a fuss as far as I'm aware.

maykhausonninh20m ago

Nobody was kicking up a fuss as far as I'm aware.