“A lot of western RPGs focus on creating a world and award the player a great deal of freedom in it, instead of focusing on a story. I think the interest in Japanese RPGs is divided based on how people feel about that difference in style,” Sakaguchi told Nintendo Gamer, via CVG.
All North American release dates for JRPGs coming out in 2023, including softly confirmed and still to be announced titles.
Good list though. Hopefully they will keep it updated and rolling along. So many jrpgs coming out this year or so.
After 2 long years, we finally have a release window for Final Fantasy XVI. But the names behind the title, are probably largely unknown outside of the Final Fantasy XIV bubble. So allow us to introduce you to the team of Final Fantasy XVI and why you should be excited!
Same, what has been showcased so far doesn't leave me excited but I have faith in Yoshi P.
That's like saying Cyberpunk was automatically in good hands because the Witcher 3 was amazing and GOTY
Each new project is a a blank slate, always expect the unexpected, not everything is going to be good because the last thing the team did was.
Agreed. Not that I wouldn't be excited about a future game from a renowned studio. But, I am already put off by the FF16 trailer. The combat just doesn't seem fun to me and I need to know more of the story. It doesn't seem exciting to me. It just looks like it's trying to be safe.
Combat looks more fun to me but i like action game combat.
And a Final Fantasy game going with a Devil May Cry style combat system is nowhere close to tying to be Safe.
A turn based combat system would be the safest combat system to use.
But has Square put a out a game as bad as Cyberpunk was? No they haven’t not even with the likes of FFXIII and XV
They haven't put out a FF game that bad...but they did release Balan, Quiet Man and Left Alive.
The point isn’t about if it’s broken
It’s about automatically giving a pass on a new game because the last developers game was great. So because FFXIV is great this is automatically going to be? Yeah it shouldn’t work like that.
Umm, to a point, I agree.
1. Of course, you must also realize the inverse is true. A terrible game made by a studio doesn't mean the next game will be bad. Even a bad track record doesn't suggest that the next game will be bad.
2. I would say it is moreso a matter of playing to a studio's strengths that matters above all else. In the instance of Cyberpunk, I haven't played it, but my sense is that it's a good game if it wasn't such a buggy mess. A high quality production wrapped in poor testing/optimization. I would also say that CDPR is probably much better at making open world fantasy RPGs than FPS games. I think they're similar to Guerilla in this context; Killzone was never a strong series in my opinion, but they really hit their stride with Horizon. FromSoft made Tenchu which I loved, but they also hit some rough patches until the Souls games, which have been pretty consistent in quality (DS2 is arguably the worst, but was still an enjoyable experience). For that reason, I see it as playing to one's strength. Some studios are far more versatile like Naughty Dog, Insomniac, etc. Others are kind of one trick ponies. So I would say that if the FFXVI team plays to its strengths, it'll be a solid game.
Just my thoughts on the matter.
@Foxtrot I'm with you on this one.
Kingdom Hearts isn't what it used to be, Final Fantasy XV was very crap compared to what we've seen from vs XIII and like I said in another post about this game I think it just looks very uninspired.
I used to buy every SquareSoft/Enix game without a second thought, now I have the complete opposite.
Things are looking good. But really, we should all wait til we play it ourselves to tell if it's a good game. Ffs (not including the mmos) been needing a big W in a very long time. The remake of ff7 although good, wasn't anything amazing.
Yoshi-p did amazing with 14 but it doesn't mean they can do amazing with a sp mainline ff game.
There is always a chance! But most of the team behind XVI has also worked on FFIX, Tactics and XII. The team definitely has a certain style of game they want to make. Which I would mostly attribute to working with Yasumi Matsuno, after combing through heaps of interviews. Most of them cite him as a massive influence on them.
Z writes: "Shin Megami Tensei V and Persona 5 are both great JRPGs from Atlus, but it's time to find out which is the better game overall."
I feel like this is just trying to stir the pot. They’re both great in their own way with slight familiar mechanics shared between the two.
Depends on what you want. Persona 5 is probably the general choice being more user friendly, but that's okay. Also a more relatable story goes a long way. But that doesn't take away from SMTV because ATLUS delivered top tier for both titles. In the end I still think Persona 4 Golden is my fav. Also the comparison is rough seeing p5 royal is a pretty damn good upgrade let's wait for the second version of SMTV to turn it up. Either way, they're both great additions to the series
If it’s anything like Royal, it’ll be worth the price. Royal was essentially a new game compared to the vanilla version
idk that I'd go that far. Final Fantasy can see a lot of changes from one title the next. Classic turn based FF such as VII-X; maybe but even that might a stretch...
But you're right, it is pointless to compare these two. Anyone who knows something about the Mega Tensei series is that both games fall under the same umbrella. One is the original while one is a spin-off. They both share a turn based system similar enough to one another [one uses a Persona and party while the other uses oneself and demons], they both share verbiage [spell names], many-most of the same demons appear in both franchises, etc.
At the of the day the best is going to be subjective. Some may prefer the execution of an SMT game & how it executes its ideas/story while others will prefer the bonds and execution of Persona. At the end of the day they are similar games offering very different experiences.... imo there is no right answer as this is a subjective question. In short, to each their own.
I would love to know his opinion in the decline of the series he created.
Toriyama on FF13:
“He[Toriyama] also believes that it becomes very difficult to tell a compelling story when the player is given a huge amount of freedom to explore.”
Even then FF13's story turned out one of the worst in the series. How did that happen?
Funny, considering WRPGs have far better writing than JRPGs.
He is exactly right. Not to mention japanese rpgs use different battle systems, art styles, worlds, and other things that make them a genre I cant live without.
Oh and also this is not an east vs west thing........he didnt make those comments to say 1 was superior.......he just said what he saw in terms of strength
I have never encountered a western rpg that delivers an emotional story quite like jrpgs due
Not to say I won't, I just haven't yet.
This is one reason why I have and love my xbox. Lost odyssey, blue dragon, last remnant and final fantasy 13.