300°

No New Xbox Hardware to be Shown at E3 2012

Microsoft's David Dennis has announced today that no new hardware of the Xbox 360 will be shown at the E3 2012 event.

Read Full Story >>
gamedemption.com
NYC_Gamer4417d ago

Would be foolish to show case new hardware since MS still have Halo 4 to promote

Nitrowolf24417d ago

That's what I'm thinking. Both MS and Sony I'm betting will have something by next year or 2014. I think MS is gonna focus a lot on Halo 4 and Kinect this year and try to have one last huge push on the 360before they move on.

Muffins12234417d ago

not maybe...yes.Think about it.No good future launch exclusive game for the 360 right now but halo.

sikbeta4417d ago

Halo 4 Xbox 3 believe!

:P

tehpees34417d ago (Edited 4417d ago )

I disagree. Microsoft at least sound to be rolling ahead with their new Xbox. They shouldn't let Nintendo take the stage like that especially since they are likely targeting core gamers.

E3 will most definitely be eating out of Nintendo's hand now. Provided they don't screw up price that is.

morganfell4416d ago (Edited 4416d ago )

Where is EvilDead360 in this thread. He mist have seen it. Why is he not composing a wall of text concerning this being fake news from MS and they will still surprise us all.

http://n4g.com/news/957645/...

http://n4g.com/news/930677/...

There are plenty like that. Over and over again.

I have said repeatedly, REPEATEDLY there would be no new hardware from MS or Sony this year. MS will not release new hardware in the same year or even announce in the same year thier flagship title, HALO 4 - a game I am greatly anticipating, is launching on the 360.

And to those persons going down the dual platform in the same year launch and believed against all common sense that MS would let you purchase HALO 4 on the 360 and then tell you that you paid for the last gen version, time to swallow the red pill.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4416d ago
BlindGuardian4417d ago

maybe not "shown" but it might be mentioned, and then properly shown the following year when it's near its release

gamingdroid4417d ago

Since the Xbox 360 platform is still going strong it does seem a little premature, but then again there is always early next year to build up hype for the following Fall. At least that is what I'm hoping for as I'm ready!

glennco4417d ago

i wouldn't say "going strong" in regards to performance, just sales. i care about performance, i don't have a stake in the sales... the damn thing has sold enough to warrant a successor so bring it on already. i'm tired of playing BF3 with only 24 players but have no desire to get a PC just for 1 game.

gamingdroid4417d ago

... and there is nothing wrong with it's performance relative to it's peers?

I have an indirect stake in sales, in that if the product does well, MS will support it better. As it stands, MS has re-invented the dashboard, Xbox Live and a host of other things already. This isn't likely something a company would do without significant profits.

That said, if you care about performance (and I assume hardware) and not sales then PC is the platform for you. It seems to have both!

xtreampro4417d ago

"Would be foolish to show case new hardware since MS still have Halo 4 to promote"

That's assuming the Xbox 3 won't be B.C and will launch as soon as it's announced and all existing 360 owners will be forced to buy a $400 Xbox 3 on day 1 and all their 360's magically disappear making all of them unable to play Halo 4.

Which is obviously absurd.

How gullible can people be on this site? It's going to be shown this year, and if not then MS has a nonsensical business plan that should be laughed at.

If Sony doesn't show anything then "lulz" on them too

Plagasx4417d ago

You really think MS is going to survive the rest of the year with just Halo 4 and some shitty Kinect titles?

NYC_Gamer4417d ago (Edited 4417d ago )

360 has been doing fine with the limited amount of exclusives.MS will promote Halo 4/Forza and announce some new xbl features/dlc deals.some type of price drop on the 250 gb with kinect bundle is more expected in my opinion instead of new hardware.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4416d ago
Fishy Fingers4417d ago

If they dont, and nor do Sony, they're gifting Nintendo a good start with the Wii U.

turokgames4417d ago (Edited 4417d ago )

Which in turn benefits Sony and Microsoft. Competition helps them improve the next-gen products.
@below: very true.

Fishy Fingers4417d ago

That's a stretch, hardware wise, I imagine both MS and Sony have that all but buttoned up, they have to have preliminary specs at the very least to provide to developers.

OC_MurphysLaw4417d ago

@Fishy Fingers preliminary hardware specs are hardly final specs. Think back to the Xbox 360 and how late in the game they decided to go with 512mb of Ram vs 256mb. I could easly see them deciding after GDC to respec some of what they have preliminarily mapped out... Development can certainly still continue for games with a base set of specs as a road map.

If this really does hold true...and who knows if its truth or just a ruse, MS could be taking the time to redesign some aspect of what they had planned. Could be a smart move, its just really hard to say at this point.

Fishy Fingers4417d ago (Edited 4417d ago )

Perhaps, but I think that story is thrown around a bit too easily, exactly when in the 360s development did Epic come in with that?

Like you said, it's hard to say either way, but it's looking like several 3rd parties have dev kits, Epic recently demoed UE4 on different 'devices', who knows what stage their at, but my guess is they're further along than they'd have us believe.

DA_SHREDDER4417d ago (Edited 4417d ago )

Indeed, if done correctly I will be buying all my third party games on it.

Indeed Poke. That would be an automatic win for Nintendo. Especially before Christmas, it'll be selling out.

dikturbo4417d ago

I would hardly consider the WiiU a headstart platform. IMHO I don't believe this 'Leapfrog' tablet offers the gaming community anything.

Drekken4417d ago

But really, its not like Wii-U is the jump that 360 and PS3 owners are looking for. It might be a tad bit more powerful than current HD consoles, but its not enough to get my money. No one has solidified third party support will be as strong as it is for MS and Sony...

Plus, remember past gen Nintendo games... Mortal Combat for example how G rated they made them make it. I want a console that supports Blood & Guts.

And the controllers...

gamingdroid4417d ago (Edited 4417d ago )

If MS doesn't release a console next year, it might look like Nintendo has a huge advantage with the Wii U as I think the market is ready for a "reasonably" priced next-generation console.

I'm ready for it, but uncertain if I'm willing to be an early adopter simply because Nintendo has proven to be utterly cr@ptastic at online strategies considering the current state of their online platform and Friend Codes!

Online gaming has turned out to be hugely important to me and I don't generally play Mario and Zelda games.

iamnsuperman4417d ago

I think it is up to Nintendo to take the advantage because if they do not its little to no advantage at all. The third parties will be like the 360 and PS3 versions anyway so its up to Nintendo to either secure exclusives or more likely to take advantage of (rumoured) improved specs.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4417d ago
koston36474417d ago

......if they were going to reveal something do you really think they'd tell us?

Fishy Fingers4417d ago (Edited 4417d ago )

Obviously not, but that's when the standard PR line comes into play.. "MS do not comment on blah blah". It's unusual for them to flat out 'lie'.

Maybe well see some next-gen 'software', but no hardware.

Domer254417d ago

unbelievable............:(

Pokemon_Master4417d ago

Then nintendo kind of wins E3 by default

I mean imagine if they announce asassins creed 3, gta V, darksiders 2, resident evil 6 as launch titles along with pikmin 3 and yoshis story...........

And then you have big 3ds announcements, and then you have smash bros.......

check mate on that event

OC_MurphysLaw4417d ago

Could it also be that MS decided to hold off as they learned some of the final specs for WiiU and don't see it being crazy better than the 360 performance wise? I mean if they feel there is no longer a rush to come to market then why not hold off another year and really flesh out something that hits a homerun?

Pokemon_Master4417d ago

No offense but I dont believe that for a second.

Whats more likely is they decided to hold off after they realized they would probably get pwned in terms of news coverage to whatever nintendo is planning......

thats what happened last year

GuyManDude4416d ago

This. I'm still baffled that Nintendo hasn't realized this will be last gen all over again in terms of third party support. Devs are "excited to develop and experiment with the hardware". But when the PS4/Xbox? come out and completely dwarf Nintendo's WiiU from a technical capability standpoint, devs will get bored of WiiU's "last gen" graphics and leave it by the wayside.

And even if the devs do support it as strongly as the PS4/Xbox?, which console do you think the COD/Madden/Skyrim type of gamers will buy? The one with inferior graphics and a giant screen controller? Or the normal one with high-end PC graphics?

The WiiU will sell (if priced right), but not to people who buy software. It's 2006 all over again.

Show all comments (64)
90°

10 Weirdest Video Games of All Time

Plenty of unforgettable games have completely messed up their players throughout the years, all the way back from the PS1 days to the dark recesses of the modern internet.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
JonTheGod13h ago

Why are the Katamari games not on the list??

120°

It's A Crime That There's No Sleeping Dogs 2 Yet

Huzaifah from eXputer: "Sleeping Dogs from the early 2010s is one of the best open-world games out there but in dire need of a resurgence."

LG_Fox_Brazil3d ago

I agree, I consider the first one a cult classic already

isarai3d ago

You say "yet" as if it's even possible anymore. United Front Games is gone, along with anyone that made this game what it is

CrimsonWing692d ago

That’s what happens when games sell poorly. And I’ve seen people wonder why people cry when a game sells badly… this is your answer.

solideagle2d ago

Majority of the time it's true but if a company/publisher is big (in terms of money), they can take a hit or 2. e.g. I am not worried about Rebirth sales as Square will make Remake 3 anyway but if FF 17 doesn't sell then Square might need to look for alternative. <-- my humble opinion

Abnor_Mal2d ago

Doesn’t Microsoft own the IP now since they acquired Activision?

DaReapa2d ago

No. Square Enix owns the IP.

Abnor_Mal2d ago

Oh okay, Activision owned True Crime, but when that didn’t sell as intended it was canceled. Six months later Square Enix bought the rights and changed the title to Sleeping Dogs.*

*As per Wikipedia

boing12d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Sleeping Dogs was a sleeper hit back then. It was fantastic. It actually still is. Would love a sequel to this, or at least a revive of True Crime series.

Show all comments (10)
100°

Lord of the Rings: Battle for Middle-earth II - PC Wore it Better

Lord of the Rings: Battle for Middle-earth II was an intriguing and unique RTS title, that sadly suffered in its console port.

dadavis19923d ago

Was just thinking about this game and wishing I had a way to revisit it. The way EA scrubs these titles from existence once their licensing runs out is horrid.

Michiel19892d ago

there is a client made by modders and it also works online.

kevco332d ago

Indeed. The game can still be played online on PC.

Xbox 360 players, though? Bang outta luck.