460°

CES 2011: Sony launches Bravia HD 3D TV without glasses dedicated

A few hours after the start of the conference by the Consumer Electronics Show, CNET reveals the product SONY house in the field of high definition TV and 3D: Sony Bravia HD TV Free 3D Glasses.

In practice, it is Sony's answer to Toshiba in proposing a solution to end users HDTV with 3D technology accessible, and wears glasses.

The TV will be available by year-end 2011.

Read Full Story >>
cnettv.cnet.com
Pedantic914849d ago

But it'll be a while til' i could even afford one.

Iamback4849d ago (Edited 4849d ago )

Sony is amazing

Led-Zeppelin4849d ago

Dang all those early adopters of 3D TV with glasses must be pissed now!

Baka-akaB4849d ago (Edited 4849d ago )

not really . The tech hasnt caught up yet in quality compared to glasses based tvs .
And they still enjoy 3d right now .

Besides the more consumers , the more and better 3d content available .

Thecraft19894849d ago

Led-Zeppelin no I'm loving my 3dtv. When I bought It I accepted the fact this might come along.

But the tech has got a long way to go before viewing angle is sorted out and making the image more like 3d with glasses than just bit of added depth.

newhumanbreed4849d ago

@Iamback

Almost every electronic company has glasses free tv's in development. Only Toshiba has released theirs so far.

DualConsoleOwner4849d ago

toshiba is not well known for TV and their glassless tv has viewing angle problem.

i would wait for glassless tv from Sony, Panasonic, Samsung, LG, Pioneer. those TV giants.

as Cnet says one that Sony is releasing late 2011 has wider viewing angle.

Boody-Bandit4849d ago (Edited 4849d ago )

Don't you just love comments like LZ's?

Yeah because all those that purchased 3D displays that require glasses will all up and stop working once the glassless models hit retail. WOW

Comments like that are so cliche. Why take shots at early adopters that want new technology now instead of waiting, waiting, waiting and waiting, for something better to come along? I have news for you. When you walk out of a store with the latest and greatest anything? Bigger, better and more bad ass latest and greatest(er) is already in production and about to hit the store shelves before you can blink.

Let's all go back to rotary phones and dial remoteless black and white tv's while we wait for glass(less) 3D. Anyone want to play pong?

Anon19744849d ago

"The TV will be available by year-end 2011."

This video didn't say that, it said this was a cool tech demo and it's a ways off yet before we'll be seeing these. Anyone know where the "year end 2011" came from?

At any rate, I don't think people who purchased glasses based 3D need to worry. Glasses based 3D still offers superior quality and depth compared to these screens, and something that 3D glasses are able to do that these glasses-less screens is make it seem like images are coming right out at you. Glasses-less screens will always just be like looking through a window. Not even close to the same level of immersion, even with the glasses.

Microsoft_Spokesman4849d ago

Glasses based TVs are RIDICULOUS.
Pros: It's cool to have 3D for those few games and movies early, you can show off to your friends the cool tech you have.
Cons: Wearing glasses on top of your reading glasses, wearing glasses indoors, the glasses make the images much more darker, you need to recharge the glasses or get new batteries, you gotta pay $150 per pair, you can't mix and match TVs and glasses, if you have a large family or have a big party you will most likely not have enough glasses for everyone and cinema 3D still outperforms TV 3D.

To all early adopters, I know it sucks that you blew $1500 + many other fees to be an early adopter but it's comical to see them trying to defend what they bought. I'm glad I waited for the 3D and will most likely wait even few more years after the glasses free 3D TVs.

People need to be patient.

HolyOrangeCows4848d ago

At least they're keeping their options open. But I doubt that glasses-less TVs will take off as fast as the normal setup, due to expense and view-angles being so awful on glasses-less 3DTVs.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 4848d ago
GWAVE4849d ago

Woot woot! PS3 3D game compatible?

newhumanbreed4849d ago (Edited 4849d ago )

I read that the new tv's make anything 3d compatible. Meaning that game developers don't have to develop in 3d.

Boody-Bandit4849d ago

newhuman
simulation is never as good as the real thing.
Certain model 3D displays can simulate anything into 3D and although it adds depth it's not even close to movies and games made in 3D. It's like watching a 480p DVD upconverted to 1080p. It might look a little smoother but it's not hi def.

Peppino74849d ago

It is awesome but from what I understood, glasses was ridiculously expensive and still far away from being put into homes.

pain777pas4849d ago

Sit back and relax. No hurry really. I will get a 3D TV once they know what they are doing. This is what everyone wants. 3D without glasses. This is an investment I can get behind if you can disable the effect at will.

fr0sty4849d ago

the 3d effect isn't as good as with them, and you can disable the 3d effect on any 3dtv, glasses or not.

kneon4849d ago

Well I'm interesting in one particular feature that will be available using glasses long before it ever comes to glasses-free 3D TVs. That feature is full screen local multiplayer. Rather then using the glasses for 3D they are used to show each player their own full screen. It's much better than getting 1/4 of the screen for each player.

DarthBigE4849d ago

better start saving now. well for me at least lol

Dragon_Hiko4849d ago

Wow, simply wow. I remember reading articles only a year or so back that said we would literally have to wait 10 years for 3d without the need for glasses. All I have to say is I am continually amazed at the advancements in technology, it keeps getting better and better faster and faster!

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4848d ago
redwolf4849d ago

this will be worth the wait

Balt 4849d ago (Edited 4849d ago )

Good for eyeglass owners/wearers. I don't see 3-d tv taking off for another three years tho.

silkrevolver4849d ago

...this is the 3D TV I’d buy, for sure.

Shazz4849d ago

im gna need to start saving

Show all comments (64)
280°

Sony Taps Bungie's Head of Revenue to Lead Live-Service Games

Sony has recruited Bungie's head of revenue Jaremy Rich to head up its live-service gaming division, Rich has announced on social media.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
ChasterMies11d ago

Please do not put Destiny’s monetization into Sony’s first party games. The monetization is what’s driving players away from Destiny.

just_looken11d ago

The new temp boss is the sony cfo bean counter so i can see this being a thing get every penny.

Cacabunga11d ago

PlayStation officially losing it.. fans will never support gaas games

just_looken11d ago

@car

The new boss did a interview in japan he wants to tap into the mobile market like nintendio so he give 0 fucks about gamers/fans

https://www.pushsquare.com/...

Redemption-6411d ago

@Cacabunga
You only speak for you and those who think like you, but most fans will support what they want. Playstation and PC fans are literally supporting Helldivers 2 and that is a gaas. Maybe you wouldn't, but many more would if they like it.

Huey_My_D_Long11d ago

@Redemption-64
Look, Im not making any judgement calls about this guy, but I will say that Helldivers 2 GaaS model is unique to Helldivers, and legit the only other game I can think of thats similiar was the Avengers game except HD2 pass is still better.
The fact that you can earn in game currency in a way that doesnt make you feel like you have to grind forever, as well you being able work on that pass that you bought...on your own time without a time limit...that right there is fucking huge to me, and I can't name any game other than avengers that avoided trapping players with FOMO logic...I think GaaS on HD2 shouldn't be compared to the rest of the industry...it should be copied.

Einhander197211d ago

Cacabunga

Helldivers 2...

Redemption-64

In Europe it's a 60 40 split favoring PC.
In the US its a 60 40 split favoring PS5.

So PlayStation owners supported the game just fine, it's not getting carried by PC or anything like that.

FinalFantasyFanatic11d ago

@just_looken,
I'm perfectly fine with the way Nintendo entered the mobile market, I never touched their mobile games, meanwhile, the console/handheld stayed the way it is. As for being a bean counter, he's probably going to reel in these massive budgets that Sony's studios have had lately, I haven't played Spiderman 2, but I cannot see how they almost tripled the budget for that game.

@Redemption-64,
That's an exception to the rule, I'm expecting a lot of these GAAS games from Sony to fail, to be fair, they only need a few to succeed, but I would have preferred that they put more of their resources into other types of games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 11d ago
DivineHand12511d ago

True their monetization is driving players away and at the same time, their decision to chop out content and convoluted systems is keeping new players away from the game.

Joe91311d ago

I don't think that will happen based on how things worked out at Naughty Dog now that we know what we do, seems they had the option to fully commit to live service games or stay making single player experences so they gave up on their live service game. We are not sure how things came about with Bend making a live service game but I hope that was not a forced situation. Sony doesnt seem like they are forcing studios to switch up but we will see, Sony's bread and butter is single player games it is how they dominated the console market.

Obscure_Observer11d ago

Yeah, I though Sony learned something from all their failures in the LS segment under Bungie´s disastrous leadership and supervision which led to games been cancelled, studios closed and all the people laid off.

Looks like Bungie still plays a major role in Sony´s LS initiative and Sony is not backtracking on their GaaS plans.

S2Killinit11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

Are we forgetting that Destiny is also a highly successful franchise? I feel like that definitely deserves mention here.

Besides, there is no reason why a person cant learn from past experiences.

Joe91311d ago

I agree, people act as if Destiny flopped when it came out lol it took 9 to 10 years for the numbers to fall yet people are still playing it add the success of Helldivers 2 no wonder Sony is going forward down this path.

S2Killinit10d ago

Personally, I see no problem with Sony also having service games as long as they make good ones, and more importantly they deliver the AAA story driven games that they are known for. So yeah, I agree 100% with you.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 10d ago
Christopher11d ago

I mean, this person made some pretty bad decisions at Bungie. I hope they've learned from them because I definitely don't see those type of ideas as good for PlaySation in general.

CrimsonWing6911d ago (Edited 11d ago )

Honestly, what’s to learn from? How to make people happily continuously dump money into a single game over its life-time? Buy season passes continuously for several years with a smile on our faces?

GaaS is a design decision that is everything wrong with this industry. The fact that Helldivers 2 did so well and people defend the monetization because it was $40 and is a fun game, scares the sh*t out of me to see that the door is open and all shift will probably be to replicate that in future games. We already know the ROI for traditional game dev cost isn’t doing it for them.

I thought with Jimbo leaving we’d see a change for the better… I’m not so sure now.

S2Killinit10d ago

Service games are being offered by everyone. Sony cannot afford to only create single player AAA games. No one can. They already said they will be doing both.

Abnor_Mal11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

Ps5 gamers in 2023 seemed to play more live service types of games, so regardless to how people feel about them, numbers don’t lie and Sony is going where the money is. I mean look at the excitement around Helldivers2, people are showing that they want live service games.

Christopher11d ago

They play long-time existing live service games like CoD, Fortnite, Apex Legends, Destiny 2, and the like. Mass majority of new live service games are considered failures and aren't moving gamers away from older games.

just_looken11d ago

Yep the huge issue with live service is they need paid players along with a reason to play them.

You forgot mobile market that also taps into that player base as well as the eve online style games there is only a certain amount of krakens/whales blind supporters compared to the amount of live service games we have its not sustainable math wise.

700 restaurants making food for every seat for 1000-3000 eaters just does not work out

Einhander197211d ago (Edited 11d ago )

Christopher

I am not a big live service fan and literally own zero of the games you listed, but that is not true, unless you call games that aren't the top games to be failures.

There are tons of live service games that are profitable.

Games don't have to be the biggest game ever they just need to make more than they cost.

I challenge you to show professionally prepared data that shows that more live service games fail than make enough to keep going.

Because all the data that I have seen shows that live service is less of a gamble than making a big AAA budget game which needs to survive off retail sales.

FinalFantasyFanatic11d ago

I sometimes wonder if we're at saturation point, where it's hard for a new game to join those ranks unless it's particularly exceptional, people only have so much time and money to devote to these types of games.

romulus2311d ago

Correction, they have no issue playing good live service games

shinoff218311d ago

Lol it's not even a quarter of the ps5s sold. Helldivers may have been a hit but let's not say most are enjoying it because truth is most(the real most ) don't care about it.

S2Killinit10d ago (Edited 10d ago )

I play what is fun. If a live service game is good I’ll play it as long as its not a money scheme which Helldivers is not.

And Im a single player gamer.

mastershredder11d ago

How do you kill a franchise that already been killed?
Destiny’s grind, cash-in-on-playbass-cha-Ching, and pop-culture-insertion mainstream-me-too bs totally killed any rep Bungie had. Sony/Bungie, if you are doing this to ward-off players, it’s already working.

crazyCoconuts11d ago

Headline truncated:
"... off a cliff"

Show all comments (43)
80°

Sony May Soon Let You Decide How Much NPCs Talk In Games

Sony has patented to add multiple dialogue modes to let players switch between how many conversations with NPCs they want in the game.

blackblades17d ago

Sony is like the only ones outta the 3 that has atuff like like this pop up changing thing in ways.

just_looken17d ago

Sony in the past has always been first at bat with new ideas/tech but in the end never fully use it or just toss it away.

blackblades17d ago

I think they did use some but yeah most usually never happened but at least they thought about it. Sony seeks things like this and other, Nintendo seek different ways of playing going by there different controler designs and console designs.

just_looken17d ago (Edited 17d ago )

some of the other stuff sony want's/owns never used
https://gamerant.com/sony-p...
https://gamerant.com/sony-p...
https://www.eurogamer.net/s...
https://metro.co.uk/2023/03...
https://decrypt.co/114754/s...

monitor/adjust game difficultly as you play
https://www.techradar.com/g...

Sony nfts
https://www.theblock.co/pos...

Pay ai to play the game for you
https://thebusinessofesport...

Oh all the above last 12 months

I just imagine a evil scientist with test subjects when it comes down to sony recent patent reports.

Kaii17d ago

Will we get dialogue options that won't spoil puzzles in a matter of seconds? :p

280°

Judge rules in PlayStation's favour in $500m patent infringement lawsuit

Genuine Enabling Technology was seeking damages, claiming the tech allowing PlayStation consoles and controllers to communicate infringes its rights.

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
S2Killinit19d ago

Big victory for Sony. And a long time coming.

DarXyde19d ago (Edited 19d ago )

Crazy to think the savings from this lawsuit allows them to develop one AAA game.

Make it Bloodborne 2, please and thank you.

19d ago
Profchaos19d ago

Sounds like patent trolling they tried the same thing against Nintendo with the same pattern.

Motion and control input traversing over higher and lower frequencies seperate from each other allowing the controller to do both

Pyrofire9519d ago

Patents suck. Most of them are complete garbage.

Knightofelemia19d ago

So to recoup the money Genuine is going to take on Nintendo or Microsoft next. I hate patent lawyers they are some of the worst bottom feeders out there.

Show all comments (13)