An Israeli who devised a video game based on a Jewish uprising at Auschwitz has cancelled its launch, saying he is distraught by the negative reaction.
8K UUHD with path tracing at 5000 FPS is great, but what if you only have $300?
So the BG3 guys found an optimization for all other platforms by way of the little engine that could... interesting.
Read the article headline and think “this sound like a Microsoft own site “ click on it read windowscentral and almost spayed my boss with water 🤣
Now about the article I’m not going to read it🤷🏿
"[...]but what if you only have $300?"
Apparently you would have to keep saving money. LOL no seriously. The console they show for this article cost $350. The irony...
I didnt know you could spay using water. That's such a common procedure so maybe they can now?
But why your boss though?
A mid-mid-gen upgrade will never be called a new gen console, no matter how you put it or how many excuses you try to make up.
In this case why bother cause they could have started with XSX, which was out only 1 or 2 years..
We need proper experiences worthy of new gen of consoles. XSS is a laughable attempt..
Y'all can add Lords of the fallen to the list of titles that PS5 outperforms series x.
Yup. Way too much advanced asset management for the Xbox to handle with that one.
The typical "it's holding us back" argument aside, from a sales perspective, the S is selling way more than the X (wasn't it like 75% of total?), so you could make the case that if it wasn't for the S, Xbox would have like 25% of the sales they have now...
Not necessarily. If the S wasn’t there, maybe the X would have sold more units as there was no option?
In the end it’s anybody’s guess with the “if’s” and “but’s” imo.
Crazy that they're only around 5 million Series Xs out there compared to PS5's 40 million.
Xbox has shown they couldn't give a shit about hardware, which is a shame and one of the reasons I feel like if you own a PC there is 0 point in having an Xbox. They want game pass on everyone's phone, PC, TV, fridge, you name it. They are a software company first and foremost.
Eventually the end goal will be game pass on Playstation and they can sack off consoles altogether, whether Sony would be up for that, highly doubt it, but that's their end game in my opinion.
Yah highly doubt playstation would ever allow that. It's like Mcdonalds allowing their big macs to be sold at burger king. Kind of like their intent to buy nintendo, nice thought but never going to happen.
Exactly why i didn't get a series console, it was time for a new pc i just needed a reason to bite the bullet. Im always putting off buying a new pc and just upgrade and upgrade but it was time and GPU came with gamepass so win win i guess. I was going to get a series x but ps5 seemed like a better option when i considered my pc.
I seriously doubt we will see gamepass on PS5. Things have been getting crazy lately so its not a definite but i just cant compute Sony going along with the idea.
I personally think CoD is the start.. they'll buy up IP to back Sony into a corner and give them no choice. Want Call of duty and Elder scrolls on your platform? Along side Halo, gears Forza and all the other shit tonne of IP we own? Brill, we will leave the console business, but you put game pass on Playstation like you've done with EA play.
Makes perfect business sense to me. I wouldn't want that to happen, I'd rather they focus on making games that compete with Sony, but Phil already said they will never outsell Sony, similar to how they'll never outsell Apple when it comes to hardware. They'll go down the windows route and get all of their software on any available platform. Steam Deck, playstation, switch 2, whatever.
Mark my words that shits coming.
From now on then that's what I'll see it as...just an option.
In other words ..all mainline PS5 consoles are much more powerful than the mainline Xbox series console...
So yet again PlayStation holds the most powerful console and gamer share.
Wait, how does that make PS5 more powerful than Series X? Please explain that logic?
I have both systems, but that makes zero sense
@GamerRN
No point trying to reason with fanboy logic. By extension, they're implying that the Switch was the most powerful console last gen.
This is what happens when you have people jumping the gun for some quick doom and gloom headlines. Not to mention getting opinions from devs that were possibly frustrated that they would have to do some extra tinkering for the S. And to an extent, rightly so. But the optimization and trades are there to make a game play on the S. It's a budget console and it should be treated as such.
But I have to laugh at the rest of the crowd who actually told people that the S was holding back this gen and pretended to be shocked that the S wouldn't have the bells and whistles that the X or PS5 would.
It's almost as if they were reaching, hard.
@attilayavuzer
they look a lot better while having a weaker console than the X, that alone should tell you everything
Did you forget the original pr blurbs for the s? What about the original announce video that ms then privated after launch? You know ms over promised on the s and it has caused problems, too many devs have claimed it for it to be a lie.
https://youtu.be/u6ftY7t8bJ...
"This means that the xbox series s delivers the same next gen experiance and features as series x, just at a reduced resolution"
All you need is a handful of games to do that for the statement to be true. It's like sony putting 8k on their box.
@Hole "All you need is a handful of games to do that for the statement to be true". Bullshit....it should ve EVERY game because that's what was promised.
Seriously fox? How many times have we seen the series s version with more than just a resolution cut? Almost every single release has way more than that done to it.
Isn't 8k printed on the xbox chip and it's box? hasn't had a single 8k piece of content though has it? So it's more like that, no 🤔
The S means there will never be a current gen. game built specifically for the SX. Most devs and publishers don't have the talent to optimize like BG3.
BTW, I only game at 30,000 fps...This article is a stupid take. The only thing good about the S is that it kept MSXbox way below 2nd place.
The issue is MS trying to have its cake and eat it too.
For the longest they've tried making system power most important, never really utilized such when having that advantage, now they've cut a corner or parallel with the X and S, offering a cheaper console while still chasing after specs, which now leads to the weaker system being lauded over the X on any excuse.
And still they've yet to actually make anything for either system. Are dependent on new acquisitions along with 3rd parties.
*Are dependent on new acquisitions along with 3rd parties.*
Exactly why wouldn't they depend on this? This is basically Sony's issue coming up for the next year, depending on third parties with hardly anything announced from their first party.
Meanwhile MS has a literal MCU like timeline of games releasing because of their many acquisitions.
*now they've cut a corner or parallel with the X and S, offering a cheaper console while still chasing after specs, which now leads to the weaker system being lauded over the X on any excuse.*
What? That whole statement makes no sense. They offered a console with higher specs and a cheaper console with lower specs at a lower price.
No different than car models, TVs or any other electronics you can find that has a high end and low end. What are you on about?
No different than car models, TVs or any other electronics you can find that has a high end and low end. What are you on about?
but the difference is its not like cheap normal corolla vs a sport corolla which has better specs, its more like why would you drive to a race a toyota corolla if you have a lambo, they are not even close to the same league the S with the X is dumb take and it takes away from X, its not just "we use low quality textures, less LODs, low quality lighting and so on"
"This is basically Sony's issue coming up for the next year, depending on third parties with hardly anything announced from their first party."
How many times does it need to be said: MS doesn't have Sony's track record and reputation for making games. Bad enough there's argument that MS should be credited for games in mid production after buying that studio - which they shouldn't be - but then they aren't blamed when "new" games like the last Gears and Halo come out worse. After their studios, ones created by MS, officially take over making games in those franchises.
Which gives credence to the fact that the Philips CD-i is indeed one of the most underrated machines of all time. Once Larian Studios find a way to optimize Baldur's Gate 3 for the CD-i they're sure to find at least 46% VRAM of optimization that'll directly benefit performance for the PC, Series X, PS5, Atari Jaguar and the 3DO.
And the best thing is that the cost of entry is like way cheaper than the Series S even. So no excuse for the broke gamers out there.
Sure, sure, "But it's only one game out of hundred of games, three years in!!" I hear you say. "But it's only one studio!!" You keep whining about. "But the Series S is a bottleneck!" and on and on and on. Well, shut it! Cuz nobody likes a Negative Nancy and facts don't care about your feelings.
Anyways, Philips CD-i redeemed and now sales should eclipse those of the PS5 and Switch for sure. Next Gen gaming starts NOW!
Gotta love it! Thank you Microsawft, Series S and Larian Studios! Based!
Why are we acting like this is some groundbreaking thing? Basically all developers have made the games work on Series S.
But they are downgraded and cost the developers a shit ton of resources just to create some last gen version of the game.
The game is still without a release date. We see some chart showing they optimized it, but yet we still have no gameplay from it.
If these devs didn't have to waste the time me optimizing for that... they could have spent that time making the other versions even better. Or have moved onto their next game.
Declining Xbox console sales while your competitors are selling some of the best numbers ever is proof that they have not made the right decisions.
You can make Doom run on a potato so this point isn’t very good, sure you can get games to run on almost anything if you gimp it enough. Plus it has taken a lot of time after it’s PC/PS5 release
Look, how many devs have f*cking talked about the bottleneck issues with developing games for S and X. I’m glad after how long since the launch of BG3 that, through grueling work and effort, have figured out how to optimize it for S. Let’s put it this way, it was working fine on X from the beginning. So, no, I’m not in support of the S still.
Well when it makes up 75% of already meager sales one will have to say MS got it right....S
A bunch of questions for the usual crowd of nay-sayers.
How many games run like crap on Series S but run perfect 4K 60 FPS on PS5 and Series X?
How many games like Gotham Knights are running easily 60 FPS on PC when it's supposed to be the weak Series S fault for the 30 FPS?
And last but not least why are companies bothering to create games for Xbox Series S?
Why do you make it your mission in life to white knight for anything and everything MS does? Are you on the payroll or just extremely desperate to validate your purchase?
Why do you complain about my positive stance on agreeing with the article discussed here!?
Several ppl here disagree with the article just for hate of the company so I asked some questions that should be easy to answers if Series S was so bad
Yet nothing?
And for your info I don’t have a digital console only because I still believe in the concept of buying physical.
Microsoft was not right if I wanted to play a game that was nerfed I would get the last gen version. Microsoft should have followed Sony. Same machine same specs all that is missing is the disc drive. Where I live nobody wants the Series S they litter pawn shops, Gamestops, and pop up on the used market all the time. The Series S was poorly planned it's meant for the light duty gamer or for kids to play Fortnite on.
"But what if you only have 50 bucks and a pack of gum, shouldn't there be console for sale that you can afford"....
This is some incredible spin trying to give the credit for Larian's hard work getting the game to even run on the console to Microsoft....
Have they even said it will be able to have split screen or any other missing feature?
BTW here is what success looks like
Gap change over last 12 months: 2,122,276 - XOne
Down year-on-year 1,098,414 units (-20.7%)
You have to submit in mind body and soul to Microsoft. You have to accept blame for not seeing there perfect plan. You must beg for forgiveness.
That's how he comes off.
I get what Microsoft were thinking. But I think it's definitely held back Xbox X development. But for me honestly I'm not a big Xbox fan so Series S would be enough to experience there games. The biggest mistake was only making Series S digital only. Downloading everything is shit for me. I had a series S sold it for mainly that reason. But I don't want to pay out for an X especially with the amount of times I would play it.
Backwards capability: the ability to make current games look like backward compatible titles.
It's a bad value. Even for a casual gamer and/or cash strapped adult, I'd still recommend that they be a bit more patient and save just a few more clams toward a PS5 or Series X.
Don’t buy Series S. Don’t tell your friends to buy Series S. It’s under powered and won’t get you through this generation.
I don't know how I feel about it these days, the Series X is probably the best built console ever made in my opinion, but it's clearly being hamstrung by the Series S at this point. While I don't hate the series S, the idea of a cheaper point of entry to gaming for those on lower income, or parents who wanna get their kids a console I think it's commendable, but it's now having a negative impact on the PS5 and Series X.
Massive shame really, like i said the Series X is an amazingly designed console and when you have a dev who can get the most out of it's better GPU i.e Remedy with Alan Wake 2, it's great. But Xbox has the Series S, and not many if any devs that are actually good at making games at this point.
Give that hardware to naughty dog and insomniac and they would squeeze every fucking ounce of power out of that thing, they have no one able to show off what the hardware can do, and that's a real shame for the Series X and the peope who engineered it, felt the same way about the Xbox one X, top tier hardware, shit software developers.
Lol. Ridiculous, and pretty much verifiable false. Especially when the DEVELOPERS THEMSELVES say otherwise...
Plenty will never admit if Microsoft and Xbox ever do anything right or well. Sadly.
I do think most people are happy with the visual quality of games on the Series S. Casual gamers would rather spend around $300 for a console and get their foot in the door of next gen gaming. Options are good BUT nobody can deny that M$ made it harder on devs and themselves—kind of how Sony did with the cell on the PS3.
It's time to admit this is an article from windowscentral so to say it's less than impartial is a massive understatement.
Honestly, there is WAY too big of a push for 4K games. I will take 1080p 60fps all day over 4K. The vast majority of TV is 1080p! Drop 4K, and go 2K! Nobody will even notice!
The vast majority of TV's ain't 1080p in 2023, at least not in households with PS5 or Series S/X.
I'm a way yer they where right. The one X must of sold terrible. After the whole Teraflops and 4k 4k 4k from the rooftops. They realised Xbox gamers just don't care about 4k at all.
They want something as cheap as possible and they prefer to rent games rather than buy and no that's not me taking a jab I actually owned a s for nearly a year for the exact reason above.
Oh no, and what if people only have $200 or $100? We need to make even weaker consoles. Oh wait, but what if people have only $50? We need one that can do 15fps at 240p. At the age of people spending way more on cellphones, this bullshit argument doesn't fly.
Sarcasm aside, this argument is only valid if the $400 PS5 doesn't sell.
Agree I couldn't afford a PS3 at its launch so you know what I did saved more for it. Seems were in the age of instant gratification I need something and need it now I can't wait 6 months until I can afford it
Facts: 75% of Xbox gamers wouldn't know what current gen games look like. When they see their friends playing on ANY PS5, they would question why games on PS5 looks and runs so much better.
Slower machines always hold back the the industry in some way, imagine every PC gamers have 4090 and the latest CPU, you guys will see some crazy shit that would otherwise be impossible when developers have to optimize a game for millions of slower machine.
I liked your comment..but 32x was more powerful than the original compared to ss which is less powerful?
I know but I guess I was getting at the fact it was more of a parallel system to the Saturn Sega wanted to position it as the entry point to the 32 bit era back in the day.
And also I got a laugh at the thought
If games are taking months longer with MS’s help to release it’s not a good decision.
MS isn’t going to send help for every game.
Releasing months later with less features is proof it’s a mistake.
We already know 2023 has been a banger year for video games, but we now have the stats to back it up.
author could have mentioned final fantasy 16 but instead mentions hi fi rush as a below 90 game that's decent. although i agree with the main sentiment that the industry is volatile and there are a lot of layoffs. The author of this article only talks about recent events when it suits him or her.
Completely disagree. Tbh the best game of the year comes out tomorrow. Star ocean 2 remake, to this day one of the best jrpg, and the best space rpg
Nah, 2007-2008 was legendary, but it's been a pretty good year. I'm hoping for good announcements too at the VGAs
There is a generation of low paid game “journalists” that weren’t cognizant of the gaming industry in 2007-2008.
I promise I'm not TRYING to.be contrarion with this comment bit I bought FF16 and couldn't finish it. To me the story seemed boring compared to classic FFs and seemed as though it was more interested in being a game of thrones clone than a true final fantasy. Just my opinion.
Interesting. I've played/tried every FF and its the only one since 7 with a good story to me, mainly because its finally devoid of any weaby cheesy dialogue.
Kind of a mixed bag for me unfortunately. But yea, definitely a great year for many.
Not 2 decades. Maybe one. 2013 had the last of us and GTA V. Those still outshine most of what we have had in recent years…
Too many lazy ports, cross Gen. games, micro transactions (VF6 and Cities Skyline hold back content to sell it again) this year has had some bangers but this gen is straight up anti consumer
I'm surprised anyone could call this the best year in 2 decades, that's a stupidly huge claim (one we hear every year), there were some many things that went wrong and so many flops/mediocre games, those handful of gems just save this year.
Chile regulator Fiscalía Nacional Económica (FNE) approved Microsoft's purchase of Activision Blizzard on Thursday. In the press release, the regulator explained that with other big third-party companies such as Electronic Arts, Epic Games, Ubisoft, and others, there was still plentiful competition.
"As other responsible regulators review the facts, we expect more approvals like this one," said Lulu Cheng Meservey, EVP of corporate affairs at Activision Blizzard.
So what, they gotta get approved from every country just to aquire them. US, EU what matters right
Every country that both parties are a trading entity in failing the approval they need to remain seperate entities in that country or pull out which means they would likely require a new distributor in that country like another publisher best example I can think of is how Capcom publish some Rockstar games titles in Japan like the GTA games after localisation. In most cases it's not drawn out or public like this.
EU may not approve it. FTC case isn't as strong as it could be. There are better arguments they could have made for sure.
it's true, every country could approve but once US disapprove, everything becomes rejected. or cancelled.
I think a certain number of countries (FTC) equivalents have to approve the deal. I think it's like 16 of them. However, lawsuits like the one the FTC launched can kill the bid I believe no matter how many countries pass it. The more approvals the deal gets I would say makes the lawsuit weaker.
https://seekingalpha.com/ar...
"The acquisition needs antitrust approval from 16 countries."... from the source above.
Yes the place where MS sells their game on PC doesn't care as well as the place CoD doesn't belong.... Also, Steam develops about as many games as Xbox so I'd hardly call them "games creator"
What do you mean “doesn’t belong”? Switch is the only ‘mobile console’ so to speak, why should I not be able to play COD on my switch? 🤔
Sony and any gamer who realizes where this leads should be against this sort of conduct.
Where does this lead? The fact is you nor I know where this could lead. It could…
1. Lead to Activision being more Microtransaction heavy based on the fact that all games will be on Gamepass
2. Lead to Activision classics and standards to have more development time and be of higher quality
3. Lead to more low quality games and us being beta testers
The fact is you do not know and neither does Sony. Gamers in general seem to not care or be on board for this. I for one, would love to not pay $70 a year for CoD if I can get it on Gamepass. Not to mention all the great Blizzard games I can play on my crummy pc via Xcloud. As of right now, I don’t see anything but positives with this… not to mention to Sony owners, this would lead to more synergy between Microsoft and Sony. I would love for Microsoft to leave the console space and just live off of their GamePass app on my PlayStation in the future. Best of both worlds
Sony should have realized where this was headed when they failed to give Microsoft any respect. So many Sony fans put Microsoft down no matter what. That led to game exclusivity for Sony and lower sales for Microsoft. It was completely predictable that Microsoft would eventually start buying companies once they got ceo support.
And then there is the idiot comment above. He wanted respect for some reason. And this is what we are up against people. A bunch of ego hurt MS fans going along with MS buying up multiplayer games so that they can talk about what they have exclusives wise. Nevermind that they would have had the same games even if MS hadnt bought Activision.
S2killinit
You know Jackshit where this leads.
You're anti-anything-MS , your bias shows.
Sony and their minions seem to be worried that MS might get an edge in the market with this deal.
It will lead to permanent GAAS as Microsoft ultimately wants. They tried with the launch of the Xbox One an got a huge backlash when gamers rejected their always online requirement and they had to backtrrack. Now they have been slowly pushing the same thing with the Gamepass service and have gained a foothold.
Eventually gamers will have no choice but to pay a regular subscription to access the majority of the AAA games.
@Jack
I know exactly where it leads, they are buying up the industry that used to make multiplatform games to make them exclusive, thats where it leads. Games everyone including xbox owners would have enjoyed anyway are going to become exclusive and xbox fans should he happy for some reason even though it just makes the industry a smaller place. If you are too blind to see that others will do the same and where that goes then keep following Microsoft but then dont bitch later when the shoe is on the other foot.
This acquisition will lead to anyone with deep pockets rushing in and making their own walled gardens. Say goodbye to being able to play almost any game anywhere. THAT’s why Microsoft PR has been banging on about wanting to make games available and all that, its because they were planning this shit show the whole time and they are doing the exact opposite.
Fu&k em for pulling this crap they should have made their own studios and added to the industry not eat up multiplatform publishers.
While some gamers may realize where it leads, Sony realizes and care about their lost profit only.
Nintendo approves because it sees this as a way to destroy Sony and because they know their console sells because of their exclusive franchises like Mario, Zelda, etc.
Lol steam they aren't on board they just don't cause it doesn't effect them. Nintendo is Nintendo they don't care cause it doesn't effect them either and cod online multiplayer is trash on it that what people play it for
May take a little longer than originally thought, but as has been said in the past, the deal will go through. So tired of waking up every day to a Xbox+ABK article. ABK & their employees wants this, MS wants this, it will not hinder competition, let it go. Interested to see what the FTC argues in court on this, if their best examples are from 20 years ago case seems weak.
It doesn’t matter what MS wants or what the employees want. There’s still rules/laws in monopolizing competition to take from competitors. I agree that this is becoming more of an annoying daily read than anything but it doesn’t just work by what they want. What they want and what they get are two different things.
True…. So let’s talk about the ‘monopoly’ then, which is a situation where there is a single seller of a commodity in an industry market place. What percentage of the market would MS own should this deal go through that makes this a monopoly? Interested in a serious and objective discussion btw
And how exactly would MS have a monopoly if the own Activision? Nobody has ever explained that just a bunch of BS speculation…
@Hardknock & Speaktruth
Im not sure if the LEGAL threshold to block such move is “monopoly” or “anti-competitiveness” but I do know that as a gamer Im concerned for its anti-competitive effect on the industry. Not just now, but also in the future. If deal goes through, others will follow, yahoo, google, apple, sony, amazon, tencent, etc. This merger & acquisition will set legal precedence, and anyone with a deep pocket will rush in to grab a chunk of the industry.
Then.. they will all put up their walls and have gamers pay for their walled gardens. So you are looking into a future where instead of picking from a multitude of multiplat games, you will have to determine which monthly service you would like to pay for. You will lose access to all games in the way you have access to them today. THIS is the future Microsoft is pushing for.
Follow them at your own risk. This buyout will not give xbox gamers more games than they would have had, it just deprives others from what they would have had. Put yourself in others’ shoes for a second.
@ S2Killinit three things:
1. This is the CURRENT state of gaming. Where can I go to play FF16 next year?
2. You do not KNOW that that is what MS will do. On top of this, they have made PUBLIC assurances. This would be pretty tough to walk back
3. The basis of this conversation WAS monopolies. Let’s not pivot away from it now that it’s not a provable point.
@Hardknock
"What percentage of the market would MS own should this deal go through that makes this a monopoly?"
They won't ever answer or explain that. It's all just repeated talking points from the few here
What's anti-competitive about the deal. Say something tangible. Anti-competitive based on what?
Flake
Do a little industry research (because I ain't doing it for you) and go look up numbers and stats, and you will find that this deal doesn't even come close to a monopoly.
Better yet , look up the definition of monopoly.... this isn't it.
Jez goes to great lengths to keep the name of the country out of the headline.
"Microsoft's purchase of Activision Blizzard approved in Chile"
Doesn't quite have the same impact does it?
Can we just all be honest here and admit that most people are looking at this with an emotional response to whichever "Side" they are on? Like for instance if it was Sony buying ABK, most people would be praising it in my opinion. All these companies practice scum tactics. I think no matter the outcome of this deal, the new thing to do is just what Sony is doing. Instead of buying other companies, let's throw them $$$$ to keep said game off of said platform. Maybe you see MS throw out enough to get FF17/Dragons Dogma 2 only on Xbox because this will become the new way to battle Sony. The landscape of gaming is constantly changing, so let's see where this leads.
MS would have to overpay a lot to get FF exclusive . I doubt Square would consider it unless it was the most insane amount of money ever.
Just because MS has money that doesn’t mean companies are going to hurt their standing with fans that’s actually buy games just to take money from MS .
"because this will become the new way"
Were you around for the 360 generation?
yeah, just like they are doing with all the old IPs they currently have and already bought, right?
/s
EU and US are all that matter. Without those, it simply won't happen. Won't be worth the regulatory juggling.
Honestly if they made a call of duty title an series x exclusive it wouldn’t bother me none the only thing they do for cod nowadays is making it look good n then boom multiplayer I would not be missing out the last time I played call of duty was modern warfare 2 on 360 back when it was actually dope
Saudi Arabia, Brazil, Chile these bastions of economic prosperity and clout and totally not nations where you can if you wanted probably buy your way through regulators assessment....
All these small countries can be easily bought. For them to mention Epic games says alot about how uninformed the Chile regulators are. What Epic games are there apart from Fortnite?
Ms is a trillion dollar company but they make they're money from p.c software , now your taking that money to bully real game creator's out of gaming this is hostile in nature and doesn't nurture competition but kills it,
It's a pay to win tactic.ms cares nothing for gaming yet they want to consolidate gaming I really can't understand how we as gamers don't see this as a huge problem.
Must companies would've went broke or opted out of the gaming sector after 4 consoles failed (a clear sign you don't belong here) to make a profit but MS pockets are so astronomically huge that the can just bully their way (even while losing) to the top, take massive losses just to degrade something they care nothing about other then money to the detriment of the consumers who actually care about the product you want us to consume.
This is basically the last moment to stop a games version of Disney from forming. This entire deal is so dam transparent, i'm shocked people can even be ok with this.
Negative reaction? Isn't that a shock. We're only discussing the single most disgusting, controversial thing of the 20th century. Who knew? Let's do what the rest of the world wants us to do and forget about the whole thing, until it's time to donate to another museum.
The subject is very much controversial as half of the world sees that from this incident,israel has gained the most.Game is game.Why bring controversy in it?
Very dissapointing news. VERY, very dissapointing.
They heard Uwe Boll recently made a holocaust movie and they didn't want people to associate their game with such a horrible thing as a Uwe Boll movie.