730°

Official Sony Listing Calls PS3 Camera the ‘Eye 2′

"For awhile there’s been speculation surrounding the most recent iterations of the PlayStation Eye. Many users have noted that the overall visual quality has improved, and that they’re old PSEye cameras just didn’t work as well with the Move. Well, if this listing is anything to go by, we now know why."

Read Full Story >>
playstationlifestyle.net
Nitrowolf24902d ago

Interesting, i saw a patent a while ago about Sony doing some sort of Kinect thing i will post later

ftwrthtx4902d ago ShowReplies(7)
blumatt4901d ago

... the Eye 2 is just referring to the fact that it's the successor to the EyeToy. If Sony was going to release a new Eye it would have done so when Move launched and would have packed it in with the Move bundles. They wouldn't wait until after the Move launched to come out with a new Eye camera. lol That would be dumb.

NJShadow4901d ago

To my knowledge, the PSEye branding is completely different from the Eyetoy. I don't see why they would have to use '2' anyway, unless there was a PSEYE 2.

blumatt4901d ago

Sony will NOT come out with another PS Eye until the PS4 comes out. They're not like MS who shits on their consumers by releasing the Vision camera and then a few years later, oh, let's release ANOTHER camera, the Kinect for $150, a hundred and fifty bucks!!, which is a completely ridiculous price.

CYCLEGAMER4901d ago (Edited 4901d ago )

I am so sick of this "Kinect is more expensive than the Move".

Lets do some math:

Currently all you need to buy is one Kinect sensor (comes with one game and 3 demos) and it recongnizes up to 6 different people and lets two people play at once, you don't need to buy anything else.

With the move you have to spend $100 for the bundle (one controller, Pseye, 1 game) if I want to enjoy the full experience of the games I have to buy a second controller at the cost of $50, if I want to play with one friend I have to buy that $50 controller as well, so that's already $150 which is the cost of the Kinect (not including tax) now if I want a sub controller that is an extra $30 each. If I want to play move with 4 people at once i need to buy 2 more move controllers at $50 each....now you tell me which is more expensive..........don't worry I will wait.

1) Ps move bundle = $100
2) Full experience of move games = $150
3) 2 people at once = $150
4) 3 people = 200
5) 4 people = 250
6) Any sub controller = $30

That is almost like if I sold you a car but the seats are sold separately at half the price...in the end the Move cost more.

Lol...if you disagree, back your sh@t up, don't click and run.

BrianG4901d ago (Edited 4901d ago )

@ Above

Kinect only supports 2 players at a time. So it is unfair to compare the prices of 4 moves to 1 kinect.

Also, since when was it a huge deal to play with friends and family in the same room on the same console? It was never that important for me.

Move is like saying you have to buy another dualshock to play regular games with another person in the room, seeing how they are both 50 dollars.

by you logic, 4 people for kinect is 300 dollars. Since with Move 4 people have to play at once, and not switch turns like Kinect.

Rybnik4901d ago (Edited 4901d ago )

Adding to BrianG's already excellent points, the $250 extra that you say is necessary for a "complete" move experience you are going to have to spend anyway (monthly) since your apartment has to have a big enough living room to handle the oh so 'amazing' Kinect

UnwanteDreamz4901d ago (Edited 4901d ago )

Move cost me the price of one controller to try the tech at home. I had a cam and there were free demos. Your argumentfails cause you can't do the same with Kinect. 150$ no if ands or buts. If Move never gets supported well I'm only out 50$ not a single person who buys Kinect can say that.

CYCLEGAMER4901d ago (Edited 4901d ago )

First of all you have a couple of things wrong, I never said that Kinect let you play four players at a time, I also never said that you had to have friends or family over to enjoy either, but what about the millions of people (like myself) who constantly have friends and family over that love to play video games.

Second, do you have a psmove? I do, I like to get the best out of my gaming experience, and in order to get that with move games you need 2 move controllers, so that it can track both hands (motion sports is the best example of this). Also if I want to play my hardcore games with move I cannot do that with one controller. If you have a ps move lets wait a couple of months then tell me how much you spent on it, I bet you well have spent $150 or more on it when it all said and done.

@unwanted dreams
Who the f#$* had a pseye already?? Maybe about 10%-15% of ps3 users?? Also since you already had a pseye which (before the move came out) was about $40-$50 you really spent about $90-$100 to try out the tech.

We all already know that microsoft is going to support the Kinect to the fullest so I'm not worried about an eyetoy situation.

@rybnik
since you want to get personal...lol :o) Not entirely true in my situation, I have enough space in my place, in fact I did a little shopping around a month ago and the smaller places in my radius is more expensive than the deal I have at my place now unless I move back to the ghetto and that ain't happening.

Biggest4901d ago (Edited 4901d ago )

You have friends over that love to play video games. Why do they want to play Kinect? You have dancer friends? Would make more sense to go dance. You have yoga friends? Would make more sense to be in a yoga class. People who were waiting for a more active video game experience in the form of physical activity went outside years ago.

Why do you need two Move controllers to fully enjoy Move games? Do you need two table tennis paddles? Do you need two guns for Time Crisis? Do you need an extra controller to fight off a crazed "pharmacist"? Do you need extra controllers to control blocks in "Totally Not Jenga!"? Can you dual-wield in a tactical shooter?

I had a PSEye soon after it was released. I knew that for $30 I could lose my 3yr old daughter and her friends in front of a party game collection. If it had cost $150 she and her friends would be playing Chutes & Ladders.

We don't know that Microsoft will support Kinect to the fullest. We know they'll market it to the fullest. We also know that if it doesn't perform the way the marketing push was built, they will drop it like a bad habit. The Xbox, Kin, and Vista can attest to that. Am I wrong, MELMAN26?

Edit: Yes, I was one of your disagrees. Don't click and run. Respond.

bananlol4901d ago

@MELMAN26
Everyone can play with numbers.

dragon824901d ago (Edited 4901d ago )

One player Move set up:
PS Move bundle - $100

Two player Move set up:
PS Move Bundle - $100
PS Move Controller - $50

Three player Move set up:
PS Move Bundle - $100
PS Move Controller - $50
PS Move Controller - $50

Four player Move set up:
PS Move Bundle - $100
PS Move Controller - $50
PS Move Controller - $50
PS Move Controller - $50

One player Kinect set up:
Kinect - $150

Two player Kinect set up:
Kinect - $150

Three player Kinect set up:
Kinect - $150
Kinect - $150

Four player kinect set up:
Kinect - $150
Kinect - $150

Everything else is not required and is considered optional equipment. Based on the numbers it is cheaper to purchase PS MOVE for 1,3 and 4 players. They cost the same for 2 players. Of course that does not take into account that you will need a second Xbox and tv to play Kinect with 4 players.

CYCLEGAMER4901d ago (Edited 4901d ago )

Me, click and run??? Never....lol.

Now to answer YOUR questions:
Yes I do have friends that come over and play video games (male and female). Sometime is a Call of Duty session, sometimes its a battle to see "who still has it" in Tekken, actually for a couple of day's it was who was the best at Move table tennis, but for the past 2 weeks, it has it has been all Kinect (I didn't think this would happen) specifically Dance Central and Kinect sports. Two of my friends actually brought their kids over to try it out, so he can see if they would enjoy it WITH him if he bought it for Christmas as a family gift.

No I do not need 2 move controllers for the full experience of the games that YOU mention specifically, but for the gladiator game yes (shield and sword), for The Fight YES (cant imagine trying to play that with one hand), volleyball YES, socom 4 YES (sub controller), I can keep going but who knows what else is coming out or what games will support the move in the future.

And lastly they are not going to have a choice but to support the Kinect, its already selling well, but wait till after Christmas, on top of that what many of you fail to realize is that Kinect is a really good product and it actually works really well (didn't know until I tried it) which is another reason that they are going to continue to support it, lets not be fanboys here, give credit where its due. Move improved on the wiimote and Kinect improved on the PSeye.

So there is you click and respond, please be unbiased in your response if you have one.

@banonlol,
Not playing with numbers these are actual cost and realistic senarios although there not many people who play 4 at once, its real. Dragon is the one playing with numbers.

Dragon82
First I never said 4 people can play Kinect at once, not many people do that nowadays anyway. You are missing my point, one of the biggest gripes is the cost, when realistically they cost about the same (minus or add a few bucks).

acky14901d ago

Depends what you want...

2 player of 'the fight lights out' would cost £50 for starter bundle, then either 1 extra controller, +£35, or 3 extra controllers, +£105, for best experience = £155 for 4 controllers(best experience). But then who would buy 'the fight' since its apparently crap...

Then other 2 player games might need another move controller plus 2 subcontrollers (could use ds3) £50 + £35 + £25 + £25 = £135. But who would use their ds3 cos that would definitely be crap....

Point is Move gives you loads of options for what you want. Could end up costing more or could end up less.

Kinect will cost you £130 regardless of what you want.

Unknow_Master4901d ago

''Sony will NOT come out with another PS Eye until the PS4 comes out. They're not like MS who shits on their consumers by releasing the Vision camera and then a few years later, oh, let's release ANOTHER camera, the Kinect for $150, a hundred and fifty bucks!!, which is a completely ridiculous price. ''

come explain dual shock3/sixaxis

explain HD version of a 5 years game so that you can enjoy instead of releasing the ps2 firmware on ps3(btw it IS milking)

and ps move is way more expansive thann kinect
kinect is 150 while the wiiripoff is can go past 150 for 1 player and you have to buy a game for that .
come to think of it, if the wii is cheap and not in competition why whould you do a ripoff of that.

dragon824901d ago (Edited 4901d ago )

"Dragon82
First I never said 4 people can play Kinect at once, not many people do that nowadays anyway. You are missing my point, one of the biggest gripes is the cost, when realistically they cost about the same (minus or add a few bucks). "

Stop being so damn defensive. I never said you did. All I did was respond to your figures with some that were a little more clear. They show that Kinect is only cheaper for 2 players otherwise its cheaper to get Move.

AAACE54901d ago

Still delusional huh?

In reguards to your comment... "Sony will NOT come out with another PS Eye until the PS4 comes out. They're not like MS who shits on their consumers by releasing the Vision camera and then a few years later, oh, let's release ANOTHER camera, the Kinect for $150, a hundred and fifty bucks!!, which is a completely ridiculous price."

Remember that Six Axis controller that launched with Ps3 that was their entry into motion gaming? Then they came out with DS 3 controllers. Now they have the Move!

You guys have bought 3 different controllers in 4 years! And don't say you haven't because as much of a fanboy as you are, you were there from the launch and will probably buy anything with Sony on it... You probably have one of their Walkman Mp3 players as well!

wsoutlaw874901d ago

haha i just can not picture 2 guys playing dance central together.

Weaksauce11384901d ago

Above 2 player kinect games, the players just take turns so your math is fail

Cenobia4901d ago

But Sixaxis controllers still work on all recent games. I didn't HAVE to buy a new controller to replace the one that came with my PS3.

Meanwhile...how is buying those 'play & charge' kits going for you? It blows my mind that MS would release a new controller without a lithium-ion rechargeable battery built in.

+ Show (15) more repliesLast reply 4901d ago
Coffin874901d ago (Edited 4901d ago )

You mean like ... EYETOY?!?
Stupid kid.
...
Stupid, stupid kid.

GrandTheftZamboni4901d ago

Eye Toy appears after Kinect in that video, therefore Sony copied MS. And Kinect is more fun: people are laughing more playing it.

/S

beardpapa4901d ago

you know it's interesting when you guys say kinect supports up to 4 players. So far, from what we've seen on youtube, Kinect + 2 players already involves physical accidents. I can't imagine how 4 players would be like. Might as well start a fight club.

zeddy4901d ago

wait a sec isnt kinect eyetoy 2?

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4901d ago
Claudinho694901d ago

koo we get kinect for cheaper

blackburn54901d ago

It would be nice to get a new PSEYE if it has new and advanced features features and enhances our over all Move experience. But it would be strange if they release it right after they already sold you the PSEYE and Move together. Free upgrade maybe? Future PSEYE successor? I know that trolls will jump to say 'Emergecy plan if Kinect happens to succeed'. Unlikely. PS4's PSEYE? Nah. Couldn't be.

Ju4901d ago (Edited 4901d ago )

Such a thing wouldn't change the Move experience. In combination with Move controllers, the current PS Eye is completely sufficient.

However, for controller less games, or augmented reality games, a better camera would be very much appreciated. Body tracking in low light situation is a problem of the current eye. Low light currently produces too much "noise" and requires some sophisticated algorithms to filter that out. I think this is the main problem of the current camera.

Also, I would think, a new camera upgrade only can be transparent for current games (incl. Move). It would just add increased precision for games that need it. Head tracking for example could simply recognize the camera - but from an API standpoint wouldn't change how it works. Upgrade the camera and get better response - for pure optical image recognition or games which rely on that - mainly current or next gen Eye(Toy) games.

Umbrella Corp4901d ago

Sony is always stepping up thier game even when its unnecesary :D

user83971444901d ago (Edited 4901d ago )

If sony does this than they screwing alot of people. Why? because they should have released it with the ps move.

NJShadow4901d ago

If you read the full article, it's pretty clear that that's what they did. Different model numbers, better response, etc. So I'd say tons of people are already using it.

Ju4901d ago

I have an older Eye and one which came with the Move starter bundle. I can't really say they are any different. I will go take a look ASAP I am home. But if it's improved, then not by a lot.

Show all comments (65)
280°

Sony Taps Bungie's Head of Revenue to Lead Live-Service Games

Sony has recruited Bungie's head of revenue Jaremy Rich to head up its live-service gaming division, Rich has announced on social media.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
ChasterMies13d ago

Please do not put Destiny’s monetization into Sony’s first party games. The monetization is what’s driving players away from Destiny.

just_looken13d ago

The new temp boss is the sony cfo bean counter so i can see this being a thing get every penny.

Cacabunga13d ago

PlayStation officially losing it.. fans will never support gaas games

just_looken13d ago

@car

The new boss did a interview in japan he wants to tap into the mobile market like nintendio so he give 0 fucks about gamers/fans

https://www.pushsquare.com/...

Redemption-6413d ago

@Cacabunga
You only speak for you and those who think like you, but most fans will support what they want. Playstation and PC fans are literally supporting Helldivers 2 and that is a gaas. Maybe you wouldn't, but many more would if they like it.

Huey_My_D_Long13d ago

@Redemption-64
Look, Im not making any judgement calls about this guy, but I will say that Helldivers 2 GaaS model is unique to Helldivers, and legit the only other game I can think of thats similiar was the Avengers game except HD2 pass is still better.
The fact that you can earn in game currency in a way that doesnt make you feel like you have to grind forever, as well you being able work on that pass that you bought...on your own time without a time limit...that right there is fucking huge to me, and I can't name any game other than avengers that avoided trapping players with FOMO logic...I think GaaS on HD2 shouldn't be compared to the rest of the industry...it should be copied.

Einhander197213d ago

Cacabunga

Helldivers 2...

Redemption-64

In Europe it's a 60 40 split favoring PC.
In the US its a 60 40 split favoring PS5.

So PlayStation owners supported the game just fine, it's not getting carried by PC or anything like that.

FinalFantasyFanatic13d ago

@just_looken,
I'm perfectly fine with the way Nintendo entered the mobile market, I never touched their mobile games, meanwhile, the console/handheld stayed the way it is. As for being a bean counter, he's probably going to reel in these massive budgets that Sony's studios have had lately, I haven't played Spiderman 2, but I cannot see how they almost tripled the budget for that game.

@Redemption-64,
That's an exception to the rule, I'm expecting a lot of these GAAS games from Sony to fail, to be fair, they only need a few to succeed, but I would have preferred that they put more of their resources into other types of games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 13d ago
DivineHand12513d ago

True their monetization is driving players away and at the same time, their decision to chop out content and convoluted systems is keeping new players away from the game.

Joe91313d ago

I don't think that will happen based on how things worked out at Naughty Dog now that we know what we do, seems they had the option to fully commit to live service games or stay making single player experences so they gave up on their live service game. We are not sure how things came about with Bend making a live service game but I hope that was not a forced situation. Sony doesnt seem like they are forcing studios to switch up but we will see, Sony's bread and butter is single player games it is how they dominated the console market.

Obscure_Observer13d ago

Yeah, I though Sony learned something from all their failures in the LS segment under Bungie´s disastrous leadership and supervision which led to games been cancelled, studios closed and all the people laid off.

Looks like Bungie still plays a major role in Sony´s LS initiative and Sony is not backtracking on their GaaS plans.

S2Killinit13d ago (Edited 13d ago )

Are we forgetting that Destiny is also a highly successful franchise? I feel like that definitely deserves mention here.

Besides, there is no reason why a person cant learn from past experiences.

Joe91312d ago

I agree, people act as if Destiny flopped when it came out lol it took 9 to 10 years for the numbers to fall yet people are still playing it add the success of Helldivers 2 no wonder Sony is going forward down this path.

S2Killinit12d ago

Personally, I see no problem with Sony also having service games as long as they make good ones, and more importantly they deliver the AAA story driven games that they are known for. So yeah, I agree 100% with you.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 12d ago
Christopher13d ago

I mean, this person made some pretty bad decisions at Bungie. I hope they've learned from them because I definitely don't see those type of ideas as good for PlaySation in general.

CrimsonWing6912d ago (Edited 12d ago )

Honestly, what’s to learn from? How to make people happily continuously dump money into a single game over its life-time? Buy season passes continuously for several years with a smile on our faces?

GaaS is a design decision that is everything wrong with this industry. The fact that Helldivers 2 did so well and people defend the monetization because it was $40 and is a fun game, scares the sh*t out of me to see that the door is open and all shift will probably be to replicate that in future games. We already know the ROI for traditional game dev cost isn’t doing it for them.

I thought with Jimbo leaving we’d see a change for the better… I’m not so sure now.

S2Killinit12d ago

Service games are being offered by everyone. Sony cannot afford to only create single player AAA games. No one can. They already said they will be doing both.

Abnor_Mal13d ago (Edited 13d ago )

Ps5 gamers in 2023 seemed to play more live service types of games, so regardless to how people feel about them, numbers don’t lie and Sony is going where the money is. I mean look at the excitement around Helldivers2, people are showing that they want live service games.

Christopher13d ago

They play long-time existing live service games like CoD, Fortnite, Apex Legends, Destiny 2, and the like. Mass majority of new live service games are considered failures and aren't moving gamers away from older games.

just_looken13d ago

Yep the huge issue with live service is they need paid players along with a reason to play them.

You forgot mobile market that also taps into that player base as well as the eve online style games there is only a certain amount of krakens/whales blind supporters compared to the amount of live service games we have its not sustainable math wise.

700 restaurants making food for every seat for 1000-3000 eaters just does not work out

Einhander197213d ago (Edited 13d ago )

Christopher

I am not a big live service fan and literally own zero of the games you listed, but that is not true, unless you call games that aren't the top games to be failures.

There are tons of live service games that are profitable.

Games don't have to be the biggest game ever they just need to make more than they cost.

I challenge you to show professionally prepared data that shows that more live service games fail than make enough to keep going.

Because all the data that I have seen shows that live service is less of a gamble than making a big AAA budget game which needs to survive off retail sales.

FinalFantasyFanatic13d ago

I sometimes wonder if we're at saturation point, where it's hard for a new game to join those ranks unless it's particularly exceptional, people only have so much time and money to devote to these types of games.

romulus2313d ago

Correction, they have no issue playing good live service games

shinoff218313d ago

Lol it's not even a quarter of the ps5s sold. Helldivers may have been a hit but let's not say most are enjoying it because truth is most(the real most ) don't care about it.

S2Killinit12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

I play what is fun. If a live service game is good I’ll play it as long as its not a money scheme which Helldivers is not.

And Im a single player gamer.

mastershredder13d ago

How do you kill a franchise that already been killed?
Destiny’s grind, cash-in-on-playbass-cha-Ching, and pop-culture-insertion mainstream-me-too bs totally killed any rep Bungie had. Sony/Bungie, if you are doing this to ward-off players, it’s already working.

crazyCoconuts13d ago

Headline truncated:
"... off a cliff"

Show all comments (43)
80°

Sony May Soon Let You Decide How Much NPCs Talk In Games

Sony has patented to add multiple dialogue modes to let players switch between how many conversations with NPCs they want in the game.

blackblades19d ago

Sony is like the only ones outta the 3 that has atuff like like this pop up changing thing in ways.

just_looken19d ago

Sony in the past has always been first at bat with new ideas/tech but in the end never fully use it or just toss it away.

blackblades19d ago

I think they did use some but yeah most usually never happened but at least they thought about it. Sony seeks things like this and other, Nintendo seek different ways of playing going by there different controler designs and console designs.

just_looken19d ago (Edited 19d ago )

some of the other stuff sony want's/owns never used
https://gamerant.com/sony-p...
https://gamerant.com/sony-p...
https://www.eurogamer.net/s...
https://metro.co.uk/2023/03...
https://decrypt.co/114754/s...

monitor/adjust game difficultly as you play
https://www.techradar.com/g...

Sony nfts
https://www.theblock.co/pos...

Pay ai to play the game for you
https://thebusinessofesport...

Oh all the above last 12 months

I just imagine a evil scientist with test subjects when it comes down to sony recent patent reports.

Kaii19d ago

Will we get dialogue options that won't spoil puzzles in a matter of seconds? :p

280°

Judge rules in PlayStation's favour in $500m patent infringement lawsuit

Genuine Enabling Technology was seeking damages, claiming the tech allowing PlayStation consoles and controllers to communicate infringes its rights.

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
S2Killinit21d ago

Big victory for Sony. And a long time coming.

DarXyde21d ago (Edited 21d ago )

Crazy to think the savings from this lawsuit allows them to develop one AAA game.

Make it Bloodborne 2, please and thank you.

21d ago
Profchaos21d ago

Sounds like patent trolling they tried the same thing against Nintendo with the same pattern.

Motion and control input traversing over higher and lower frequencies seperate from each other allowing the controller to do both

Pyrofire9521d ago

Patents suck. Most of them are complete garbage.

Knightofelemia21d ago

So to recoup the money Genuine is going to take on Nintendo or Microsoft next. I hate patent lawyers they are some of the worst bottom feeders out there.

Show all comments (13)