220°

Why No, I Don't Want to Control Netflix With My Hands, Thank You Very Much

Dick Ward writes: "Remember ‘Minority Report‘? After that movie came out, tech developers seemed to lose track of everything that wasn’t a fancy hands-on interface. This started out simply enough, with an increase in the amount of touchscreen phones hitting the market. But the new range of motion control products takes it too far."

Read Full Story >>
highdefdigest.com
Why o why5025d ago

more accurate and less tiring

air15025d ago Show
Double Toasted5025d ago (Edited 5025d ago )

Well, you can't if you don't have a 360. Or I should say you won't be able to. But then again, the title is shitty, so I just assume the entire article is no less the equivalent.

Edit: Air1 why o why has at least 8 internet browsers in front of him.

mastiffchild5025d ago

I don'tr think there's anything unfair about the article or it's headline. It comes over a bit too harsh if you don't read it all but basically he's just saying what we've all thought from the first time SONY showed us this type of idea with eyedentify(IIRC in 2006)-that it's a cool looking gimmick on stage or demo but in real life you'd look a tool and sound a tool basically waving and to your console to change channel or navigate a menu.

It just won't be as good and to really worek it needs to improve on what we already have and it's fact that buttons do this as well as we could possibly manage to do it in other ways and gesture and voice control would be both slower and less accurate than buttons alongside making you look a little silly.

@double toasred-I don't see why you have such a downer on this article when, unlike a ton of Move, PSN+ and Kinect articles of late it does, at least, make a very valid point and the suthor has bothered learning his stuff and hasn't tried any FUD a=at all. The "you can only play Kinect in(insert whatever it is today-standing, naked, with an erection)" and all the "Move is too complex n it's bundles for us thick gamers and will die because of that rather than, y'know, games on it!" articles lately have been BS but this one just says what I feel we all thought(most of ua on whatever side of the console preference divide you may stand)when being shown this kind of thing by both parties at past E3 events.

Dan Ward never said this would harm Kinect or say it would fail at retail because of it at all-just that the whole "minority support" stuff was a bit daft, pointless and would be a short lived giggle for most with the tech to try it out. I confrss that I'd prolly be impressed by the maker giving me a go but that won't change the fact it's got little hope of working well enough to seriously make people thinkabout it as a real button alternative FOR THIS JOB.

On a wider note this generation on Wii has seen a TON ofd devselopers putting waggle features into games that never suited or needed them to begin with ansd certainly not in all the places they got squeezed into by devs eager to make it seem they were finding exciting new stuff but just gave us the limne of least developer resistance and we never got innovation and got stuck with games playable just as well and usually better with a pad. Same problem lies in store for both Move and Kinect but Sony have got some decent looking games lined up even though neither company have anything really interesting to gamers in the longer term. If this gesture controlled TV viewing is what's on offer doesn't it seem bit shallow to pay out the asking price anyway?

Article is among the least inaccurate on these kind of subjects and just speaks the VERY obvious. If anything that's the complaint about the whole thing.

siyrobbo5025d ago

id probably use it if i was really lazy or couldnt find the remote, but i dont think id use it by default

KingME5025d ago (Edited 5025d ago )

Yes I do want to control netflix with my hands. That was just be one more option to my disposal. And if I decide to use the remote, I can do that too. But, yes, it would be cool to be able to use gestures as well.

People saying no and downplaying it are probably just saying that because they can't or have no means to do it. AKA Haters

Biggest5025d ago (Edited 5025d ago )

Please think for minute. It won't be a simple flick of the wrist (because Kinect can't see wrist movement) or small gesture. Dream as much as you want about what is going to happen with the Kinect. Think of the potential. But see the current reality. You are not Batman.

http://www.snapbuzz.com/ima...

KingME5025d ago

Who said anything about wrist movement? BTW, the part of your name you forgot was "HATER"

Wolfie5025d ago

OMG!

Biggest i lol'd so hard when i saw your url :D Bubbles!

candystop5025d ago (Edited 5025d ago )

I hate reaching for the controller (trying to find it)and then pressing the wrong buttons to start it over or forward by accident. Controlling it with my hand would so simplify mistakes that happen to me almost everyday. Handsfree is the way to go folks.

"Its faster to push a button"

not when you need to find the remote.

"more accurate and less tiring "

Less accurate if you press the wrong button. Most people lift there arms with a remote as well so how the heck is that tiring lol.

SillySundae5025d ago (Edited 5025d ago )

.
"not when you need to find the remote."
... I personally have the remote / DS controller already before I actually am able to navigate, and select a movie. My DS3 controller is usually beside my PS3. I am not sure where other people keep theirs or why they would place it so far from the console.
.
.
"Less accurate if you press the wrong button. "
... selection on the screen VS button on your thumbs, either won't resolve hand-eye issue of the user IMHO. So I think it's the user.
.
.
"Most people lift there arms with a remote as well so how the heck is that tiring lol."
... The issue they're referring to might be when you're navigating through menus (which sometimes take a while trying to pick the movie you want, especially from NETFLIX libraries).
For a PS3 controller / remote (which you don't need to point due to bluetooth), your hands are rested on your legs while navigating through menus.

candystop5025d ago

Yes I see where your coming from but personally think we should just wait and see if the user interface is fairly simple. Also I'm not sure if you can just point a finger or need to extend your arm. We should all know in a few more months just how tiring or simple the device is to use.

HolyOrangeCows5025d ago

Not everyone is dull enough to lose their remotes.
Mine are always by their respective consoles.

LOL, "if you press the wrong button"

Way to reach.

bjornbear5025d ago

you must be extremely clumsy and forgetful if its THAT hard to find your remote and press a button -_-

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5025d ago
Rocket Sauce5025d ago (Edited 5025d ago )

I'd feel like a dick talking to my DVD player or waving my hands at my TV. I could see myself using it once to see what it's like, then just using the remote from then on.

Using the camera on kinect to watch movies with friends is very cool, though.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5025d ago
HeroXIV5025d ago

Anyone else read it as "Dick Wad writes"? :p

NeutralGamer5025d ago

I red it like Dickward.

You know like Squidward from Spongebob Squarepants, then just a dick instead...

Simon_Brezhnev5025d ago

I wonder if Kinect will pause auto if the movie actually said the word pause.

B-Real2065025d ago

I think you have to say x-box first as in x-box stop, x-box play, and so on...

NeutralGamer5025d ago

What if they say "x-box pause" in a movie?

One day that might happen..

What if you watch the E3 MS congress on your xbox with kinect?
Will it stop each time they say the word sentence "x-box [command]"?

What happens if you watch a movie with someone saying "x-box rocks", then what is the xbox going to do?

What if you watch a movie with someone saying "x-box suck"... Then what is it going to do? XD

El_Colombiano5025d ago

Haha yeah and when someone says "Man Xbox is DA BOMB!"...I can't wait!

IHateYouFanboys5025d ago

youre forgetting that Kinect has to be 'trained' the commands by your voice.

so you could have 100 people in your lounge room, all screaming 'XBOX PAUSE!!!' and it will not pause unless their xbox account is signed in on the xbox, and they have gone through the kinect voice training on that xbox.

so again, unless Bill Gates is signed in on your xbox and has trained Kinect with his voice, playing a video through the xbox in which Bill Gates says 'XBOX take over this guys house' will have absolutely no effect on the xbox.

nice try at trolling, but next time try something thats not so easily proven to be idiotic.

on the topic, i will use kinect to control my streaming videos from my PC. its not like you have to sit there waving your arms the whole time - i just sit down, say 'xbox on' and it turns on. i hold my hand over my media for a few seconds, i choose a video with my hand for a few seconds, i say 'xbox play', then im done. half an hour later when the show finishes, i raise my arm for a few seconds to choose another one. easy.

B-Real2065025d ago (Edited 5025d ago )

whoops

HurstDarkStar5025d ago

come on people,if ony or nintendo said that all you needed to do was move your hand without a controller to navigate i doubt i would see so much HATE ..........pure HATE

Greywulf5025d ago

*just like kinetic*--gasp--

so hilarious that the thing does nothing innovative, yet everyone just gives it the benefit of the doubt based on absolutely nothing but hype.

I'm convinced MS could sell an empty box to peop... oh wait.

MorganX5025d ago

I do. But not bad enough to buy a Kinect to do it. Maybe when it's $49.99

Show all comments (67)
20°

Joy Ride Turbo - The Beginning of the End for Xbox Kinect

Joy Ride Turbo launched 10 years ago today. The first title was Xbox Kinect exclusive, yet this sequel failed to support the device at all.

300°

10 of the Biggest Video Game Hardware Failures Ever

Cultured Vultures: "Sadly, not all hardware is created equal, and no matter how much developers might try, some gaming hardware just fails to hit the mark. We’ve compiled a list of 10 gaming hardware fails, and boy did some fail hard."

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
Knightofelemia817d ago

I would label the Power Glove, Kinect, and that Tony Hawk skateboard more as hardware addons hardware failure would be like the Virtual Boy and one day Stadia.

Magog817d ago

Kinect was bundled with every Xbox One and inflated the price on an already underpowered and low RAM machine so for the One it wasn't an accessory as much as a white elephant.

CaptainHenry916817d ago (Edited 817d ago )

Definitely the RROD but that power glove had a lot of issues as well. The Kinect just didn't work

817d ago
CrimsonWing69816d ago

Hardware add-ons are more like RAM or a video card, basically components that enhance capabilities or performance of the computer.

If you really want to get technical the Kinect is more of a peripheral device, kind of like a keyboard or mouse to a computer.

ThatsGaming816d ago

The person in this article obviously is not up on their gaming history....

Sega Saturn, Sega Dreamcast, Coleco Gemini, Commodore 128, Commodore Amiga, Atari 5200, Atari 7800 were all massive failures and in most cases cost their companies participating in future gaming generations.

Gamer79816d ago

Sega saturn (successful in Japan) and dreamcast were not failures.
Seems like you're not up on you're gaming history

septemberindecember816d ago

@Gamer79

How in the world are the Sega Saturn and Dreamcast not seen as failures? They both sold around 8M each, which is much lower than the ~30M that the Genesis had sold before it, and even the Master System before that. They were both the worst selling consoles in their respective generation (PS1, N64 outsold Saturn, PS2, GC, and Xbox outsold Dreamcast). Both of the consoles were incredibly short lived. The Saturn was discontinued in every territory but Japan after just three years. In Japan the console was discontinued after six years. Meanwhile the Dreamcast was discontinued worldwide in 2001 after launching in most territories in 1999 and in Japan in 1998. The failure of the Saturn and Dreamcast lead to Sega pulling out of the hardware market. Which, by the way, all of this occurred when Sega was massively dropping the price of their consoles quickly to compete. Sega was hemorrhaging money at this point.

None of this indicates a successful console. Saying the Saturn was a success because it did better in Japan is like saying the Vita is a success (they both sold around the same amount of units in Japan). Even the Wii U outsold these consoles worldwide.

Magog817d ago

The picture should be the 360 RROD. When I think of gaming hardware failures that's what springs to mind. Kinect and it's bundled price tag definitely hobbled the already underpowered Xbox One though for sure so I would give it a close second place.

porkChop817d ago (Edited 817d ago )

That's not what the author means by failures. It's about hardware that failed in terms of sales (Wii U) or just failed to deliver on its promise (Kinect).

Magog817d ago (Edited 817d ago )

Given that the 360 had a year head start, much easier hardware to develop for, was cheaper, and still ended up in third place I think it qualifies especially when you factor in the frustration and huge losses incurred by RROD.

porkChop816d ago

Selling over 80 million consoles isn't a sales flop. We get it, you don't like Xbox, but that doesn't mean the 360 is suddenly a failure.

Rhythmattic816d ago

Porky....
You know how many people I know bought a 2nd or third 360 due to RROD? Even when MS had to confront the issue with replacement systems, my mates couldn't wait for even the turnaround of sending it in, and waiting for a replacement.,,..,..
If that's how you consider it a win... OK.. but so is having 5 , of which 3 don't function.... Its a win win....mwhahahahaha

porkChop816d ago

"my mates couldn't wait for even the turnaround of sending it in"

You're acting like it would take months. When I sent my 360 in I got a new one literally 5 days later. As soon as MS had tracking confirmation that you sent yours, they'd send a new one to you the same day. No one is going to spend hundreds to buy a new console instead of waiting a week. I swear you guys pull some of the dumbest shit out of nowhere and think people will actually believe it.

Regardless, none of this changes the fact that this isn't what the article is even about.

Rhythmattic815d ago (Edited 815d ago )

Porky
"You're acting like it would take months"
Sometimes it could.. FFS.. 'Strya here...
Best turnaround I reckon was 2-3 weeks.....
Either way, My mates experiences still exist.. So Sorry, no point trying to earn Xbox Achievements when it doesn't feature in what was a situation you never dealt with,,,,
3 of my friends would disagree (overall, 10 extra Xboxes purchased)
Regardless.. MS sold a lot of 360's that was due to this reason.. That is sales. Fact

"none of this changes the fact that this isn't what the article is even about."
Headline says HELLO !
Oh and "Sadly, not all hardware is created equal," that's enough to pass this on without taking your article bias into consideration.....
As for the rest.... Ok.. But you've actually gone out of your way to give MS a Pass... Fap on.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 815d ago
Aloymetal816d ago (Edited 816d ago )

Yup, and because of that big fiasco MS had to fork out 1 billion but knowing them I think they're very proud of the 360, it's the only time a MS console reached 80mil+ sales, RROD played a big part of that and a record they will never break again.

Rhythmattic816d ago (Edited 816d ago )

So true.. Even when MS accepted they where caught out in the biggest lie of any generation, The wait for a replacement was outweighed by just buying another, and having one be returned as a backup, which, btw, generally failed on first swap.
I own honestly can't believe MS tards are just supporting , or arguing why and what MS did by just dismissing it....

lonewolf10817d ago

Lol I had the Atari Jaguar, surprised its "competition" the 3DO isn't on the list too, both as "popular" as each other.

SullysCigar817d ago

Lol same. Played the crap out of Aliens Vs Predator and Tempest 2000 .... aaand that's about it really!!

lonewolf10817d ago

Sad but true that was pretty much it.

Kurt Russell816d ago

Agreed, I never actually saw a 3DO make it to retailers in the UK. At least the Atari Jaguar was sold for around 6 months.

lonewolf10816d ago

It made it to some my brother got one, fared just as well as the Jaguar so most probably hard to find in general.

darthv72816d ago

3do had way better games. Jaguar not so much. Neo Geo sold less than both and yet isnt considered a failure. Go figure.

LWOGaming817d ago

Stadia is a weird one. It hasn’t sold at all well but in terms of how it works it’s still miles ahead of Xcloud in terms of stability and performance. Xcloud is still a way behind and that needs sorting but it will be in time. Stadia for me is one of those things that will go down as a what could have been moments. With better marketing it could have been a roaring success. I still play it and it remains the best place in my opinion to play CyberPunk 2077. Only platform I have played it on without having any issues at all. The tech is great. The concept is fine. Marketing terrible. Shame really.

Magog816d ago

The sales model was awful. They should have teamed with an existing player to allow for local and cloud access to games or a gaming subscription service.

LWOGaming816d ago

It was a strange mess from such a huge company, as I said, as a system it works really well but without gamers it’s nothing. Such a waste,

LWOGaming817d ago

The Xbox One was Microsoft’s Nintendo Wii U. Undercooked, undersold and just an unholy mess. The thing is with any of these failures is to learn from them and thankfully both Nintendo and Xbox did just that to the benefit of gamers everywhere.

Show all comments (39)
120°

Pivotal Decisions in Gaming History - Xbox Goes All-In on Kinect

Xbox 360's Kinect had flopped yet Microsoft insisted on mandatory Kinect for Xbox One, driving the price up and alienating their potential customers.

Read Full Story >>
techstomper.com
darthv72993d ago

the tech was pretty damn good but their focus on making it the centerpiece was not. Had they opted to keep it as a secondary or even tertiary device, it may have found new use for AR/VR.

PrimeVinister993d ago

Maybe. But they were two early for VR and too late for motion control

993d ago Replies(2)
Godmars290993d ago

Their focus was marketing metrics. Information gathering for targeted advertising. Also "event curating" or head counting for special TV events. If MS had had their way with always online and mandatory Kinect pre COVID, as and during it they'd likely be turning into dominant presence in many Western homes. Be getting subsidized by Disney and other streamers as well as the NFL.

Thing was, Kinect as an actual game system, its games, just weren't ready. MS moved on it too soon. Thankfully.

Atticus_finch993d ago

Sorry but it was incredibly bad for gaming. The thing barely worked as intended and the games were broken shovelware. And let's not forget all the lies from Xbox to try and sell it. What happened to Milo?
It's like Xbox it's a perpetual lying machine.

PrimeVinister993d ago

I had almost forgotten about Milo. It looks so unbelievable in retrospect. How did anyone believe it?!

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 993d ago
TheEnigma313993d ago

Kinect requirement, TV focused, DRM, and $100 buried Xbone before it even stared.

PrimeVinister993d ago (Edited 993d ago )

I think Kinect was the worst of the bunch. They reversed DRM overnight and try to play down the TV stuff when they realised it made them look disinterested in gaming.

Kinect stuck around for six months, preventing sales and making more and more people upset when they dropped the Kinect and the price.

Atticus_finch993d ago

Don't forget the inferior hardware which affects their game development to this day.
And the constant boasting and lying that hasn't change very much to this day.

kayoss993d ago

I was kind of excited for the kinect. It had potential. That was until i tried it at one of their Microsoft store. The thing was so laggy and worker who was there, had no clue what he was doing. It kind of made rethink about buying an Xbox One with Kinect.

PrimeVinister993d ago

I had already been turned off of the idea by Kinect for 360. Even when it worked, the games were bad and showed no potential.

Wii made you understand what they were going to do with it within about 10 seconds of Wii Sports. It went on to become a bit of a joke but at least it worked and had a purpose.

Thundercat77993d ago

The damage to the Xbox brand was so hard that til this day they are just the last place brand in the market.

PrimeVinister993d ago

Totally. They haven't been really all that relevant since.

Godmars290993d ago

That has to do with repeatedly failing, having to reaffirm only to again fail at creating a competent flow of decent games.

@PrimeVinister:
Until Game Pass and BC are mentioned. Only for the point to be missed.

kayoss993d ago

thats because they dont know what they want to be. A gaming console, Television, or a gaming service?

Godmars290993d ago

@kayoss:
They wanted, expected, to be Steam. To have everyone coming to them and paying for the privilege. That's the exact mentality on display when they tried to push always online.

brewin992d ago

Its sad because the Xbox one version of Kinect was actually pretty solid. Not for motion games, I couldnt care less about those, but for the other features that are now commonplace in the gaming ecosystem. Things like voice control and optional motion features in games. Stuff that Sony did with the PS camera was pretty sweet and they could have done some of that stuff with Kinect.

The tech was pretty sweet when implemented right though. Who remembers the implementation in Dead Rising 3?! You could lure zombies away by saying stuff into the kinect, it was a bit hokey at first, but it actually enhanced the game significantly once you learned all the different voice commands. There was and still is nothing else like that!

The focus on TV seemed to be an issue for people, but the TV pass through had some real potential. They could have had cable companies giving the XBone out instead of cable boxes! I understood what they were trying to do, but they needed to show the games too, and thats where they lost the core gamers. Being able to jump right to a sports event or TV show with out leaving the console was actually a pretty cool thing. I spent many nights switching between NHL games or TV shows and jumping right back into my games seamlessly, just by telling Kinect to do so. It was better than people care to admit, but I loved it!

People say XBone had no games, but on launch I got Dead Rising 3, AC Black Flag, Watch Dogs, Killer Instinct, Battlefield 4, Forza 5, and Ryse. That was actually a pretty solid lineup in hindsight! Then later on it got gems like Quantum Break, Dead Rising 4, Sunset Overdrive, Gears 4 and 5, the Ori games, Rare Replay, Forza Horizon 3/4, State of Decay 2, ReCore (SUPER UNDERRATED GEM), Halo 5, Halo Wars 2, and all the great 3rd party stuff as well! I dare anyone who sat on the Xbox One to go back and give it a shot now.

It was actually a pretty great console all things considered. Yes the PS4 had better 1st party stuff, stuff that MS just couldnt top or even compete with, but there are some really great games that a lot of people missed out on that they would probably really enjoy if they actually played them. Thats why I recommend a Series S and Gamepass to a lot of people, as its a great way to get an awesome lineup pf games for super cheap!

Show all comments (22)