240°

Red Dead Redemption 100% Guide Plus More

Need help getting 100% on Red Dead Redemption? Can't find out which animal your missing to get that achievement? Well your in luck, here's a guide to help you complete Rockstar's latest game 100%. Plus more, such as the animal list, best horse locations, and much more.

DelbertGrady5080d ago

The only thing I can think of that's not very good in RDR are the tutorials. They should have paused the game whenever there is text on screen and use "press A to continue" or something.

Instead my first duel went like this: "Ok, it's time. Hey look! There's text in the left corner explaining how to duel! Let's see, press RT to...*shot dead*. Wtf!?"

bviperz5080d ago (Edited 5080d ago )

My first dueler was slow as molasses. After I read the tutorial I still had time to put every bullet from my six-shooter in his dome. Yee-HAW!

knight6265080d ago

do u know if u dont get a chance to read the tutorials fast just press start and go to journal it shows u everything it says...evey GTA game has had this before i dont know y people dont ever explore the pause menu then just the game

lh_swe5080d ago

I still don't know how to mark people in dead eye mode (embarassing I know) but I feel they should have done a better tutorial for many of the things but thats as far as my complaints go for this game and I know MP has some bugs but I have yet to buy a wifi adapted for my 360 (I will soon though), almost eager to buy two copies one for the PS3 to play MP and play SP on my 360...what do you guys think? I have 3 months of Live from buying a hard drive but I sorta wanna wait till Reach comes out...

yoghurt5080d ago

How long does it take to complete the game?
I mean not including all optional missions, just the main bulk of the game?

poindat5080d ago (Edited 5080d ago )

Well I've been playing for about 10-12 hours (give or take), and I've just reached Mexico, which apparently is approximately the halfway point of the game. I've also gone out of my way to do side missions and challenges, but a large bulk of my play time has been the main story, although I am taking my sweet time and letting the details and setting soak in.

So just doing the story should last you long enough (and give you enough enjoyment) to get your full money's worth out of the game. Add in all the side missions, optional tasks, and online play, and you've got one hell of a bargain for $60.

knight6265080d ago

going to mexico is not even touching the half point of the game u r long way from the ending this game is pretty long so enjoy it

yoghurt5080d ago

thanks for your replies, I was actually asking because I don't like games that are too long, 1) because I get bored (GTA4) and 2) I don't get loads of game time so it'd take months to complete! so you could be looking at 25-30 hours for RDR, which for me is perhaps too long I think to keep me interested, may give it a spin though

drdre745080d ago

This is a good one. I was wondering about the horses and this tells me where they are and what they look like so great.

Lirky5080d ago (Edited 5080d ago )

Online i completed all survivalist challenges.. however theres a bug that doesnt let u see other herbs u need i emailed this photo to report the bug to rockstargames support. The bug : it doesnt let you scroll down to see the other herbs u need. I manage to guess and found the herbs at random and got lucky.

http://img245.imageshack.us...

T9X695080d ago

That's not a bug, that's all the herbs in the game, you cant scroll down because there are no more.

Show all comments (13)
120°

15 PS3 Games That Would Absolutely Shine as PS5 Remakes

GB: "With this feature, we talk about 15 games on the PS3 that should be remade for the PlayStation 5."

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
kenpachi9d ago

You left out The Darkness games bring those back

fan_of_gaming8d ago

The head of Nightdive Studios has posted that The Darkness is on their list of games they want to do, so hopefully something comes from that

Yi-Long8d ago

Little Big Planet 1 and 2 deserve a mention, IMO.

Good call on Motorstorm, a game released 2 gens ago but still looks and feels so good. Motorstorm 2 and Motorstorm RC were gems as well. They followed up the Motorstorm games with the brilliant Driveclub, which still manages to put modern racing games to shame. Imagine closing down a studio as talented as that ... (!) Incredible.

A little 'arcade-gem' back then was The Last Guy, a top down 'follow the leader' snake-like game where you had to find and lead survivors to safety during an alien invasion, on terrible looking 'Google-earth' maps. Graphics were poor, even back then, but would love that same gameplay with modern maps and graphics.

Street Fighter 4, once it finally had a full roster, was quite good, but it was always an ugly game, sadly. Imagine bringing that back while using the current SF6 engine.

fan_of_gaming8d ago

Good suggestions, I'd be in for
LittleBigPlanet
LittleBigPlanet 2
Motorstorm: Pacific Rift
Motorstorm: RC

purple1017d ago

God damn I love motorstorm so much

At the time I had a low-mid range sony 40” tv, The latency to the controller was waaaay too high, would to play a modern version

In saying that later I got a 3d lg tv and playing the 3d motorstorm in my bedroom with the environment crumbling around the track, was something special, specially compared to what others were playing at the time, will always remember that

Skuletor8d ago

Some good choices here and Resistance: Fall of Man is my most wanted PS3 remaster/remake. Not sure about their claim it was Sony's answer to Gears of War though.

CrimsonWing698d ago

I’d rather have sequels than remakes. Look at Dead Space 1 Remake. Would’ve been cooler if we got a new entry and it failed with sales sealing the fate of a sequel rather than just replay the same game and it fail in sales and we never get a new entry.

Remakes are great for things like PS2 and earlier games to really get a crazy new graphical coat, but I think we should ease up on all these remakes and actually do sequels.

fan_of_gaming8d ago

Yeah for sure, sequels would be ideal. But in the current market environment where many big publishers are risk-averse, I'd rather get a remaster or remake that a developer can do on a budget that will be approved, rather than nothing for an IP.

Inverno8d ago

I rather they remaster and port over to PC and current gen all the games permanently stuck on PS360. Those games don't need remakes, they need to be given a chance to live again outside of their confined consoles and then give a few proper sequels. Like Sleeping Dogs, Motor Storm, LA Noir, should get another entry.

fan_of_gaming8d ago

Yeah I'd be fine with remasters of PS3 games too, they don't have to be remakes.

Show all comments (17)
160°

For just $6 you can play the Red Dead Redemption port on Xbox and PS5

Rockstar Games’ shiny new Red Dead Redemption port is now on GTA+, and you can play it while claiming some tasty GTA Online benefits.

Read Full Story >>
theloadout.com
Profchaos22d ago

Rockstar still strying to make GTA plus work
Should be $6 for the rdr game on sale not 6 bucks for a months playtime

Exvalos22d ago (Edited 22d ago )

I hear ya, 49.99 or whatever the price on that game is, is a bit stiff seeing as it's just a port.

anast22d ago

Why would anyone rent this game?

jznrpg22d ago

One of my favorite games from PS3 generation. I have the remaster as there was a buy 2 get 1 free deal a while back but the price they are charging for the port is way too high although not surprising at all.

CobraKai21d ago

Still tryna milk a dried up cow

200°

Red Dead Redemption Title Update 1.04 Notes (PS4 / Switch)

Improvements have been made to the stability of the game

Read Full Story >>
support.rockstargames.com
OtterX38d ago

I still think this release was a big waste of time. I would have been a day 1 purchaser if they had redone the game w RDR2 graphics. I still own my PS3 copy, so don't see the point in picking this up if it's minimally improved.

CobraKai37d ago

I bought the game cheaper than the remaster on 360. There’s no reason in releasing the game at that price with so little improvements if any.

Profchaos37d ago

It's nice to have it as a handheld game I guess if you travel a lot but yes the ps5 release was a joke

kaos8937d ago

It plays at 60 fps on PS5 and a higher res if you value that.

OtterX37d ago (Edited 37d ago )

Yea, PS3 graphics at 60fps and 4k doesn't warrant the price. It was severely disappointing considering they already created so many of the assets north of the San Luis River (New Austin) in RDR2 and could have reused a lot of things, or reworked things bc they are the same area at different times in a fairly close history. It's friggin' Rockstar - you know they have the money and resources to have done it.

jznrpg22d ago

I like that I can play the game on current generation console but it would have been nice if they did more to make it look better.

Profchaos37d ago (Edited 37d ago )

They should have released the game in its current state not the state it launched in. Obvious we all wanted this to be a expansion to rdr 2 given that the original map was already remade in the game lots of people though this was just going to be added in later as paid DLC.

Now the game runs at 4k 60 fps on ps5 and can be brought on sale it's actually worth playing.

At launch the game was priced far to high and was a ps360 era game that couldn't run at 60 fps.

I'm in no way a frame rate snob I defended games like tears of the kingdom in the past for being 30 fps experiences but rdr was a joke at launch