Gamer Limit writes "First things first: the very notion of someone being completely objective is ridiculous. Everyone has their preferences and their biases. "
Toyohashi, Japan is set to host a large-scale Monster Hunter event to celebrate the franchise's 20th anniversary, complete with themed hotel accommodations.
Shaz from GL: "Acting is a difficult craft to master, and what many don't consider is just how hard it can be to perform across different mediums of entertainment."
Interesting article, it doesn’t surprise me because some people are better all a-rounders than others. Regardless of fame or how good they are in their specialty.
This is why I feel like the live action stuff in Alan Wake 2 especially is pretty bad. It also looks really cheap and amateurish.
Chatting with the Face behind Quan Chi Mortal in Kombat Shahjehan Khan: Actor, Musician, Podcaster
I believe there needs to be a middle ground established. I agree a lot with what is said here; it’s important to delve into the emotional responses players evoke from a game. At the same time, since the price of new release games can range anywhere from $20 to $60 on average, with little to no distinguishable differences to offset the quality, it’s important to be somewhat objective about the game.
A good reviewer is able to weigh every factor / emotion that went into the game, and deliver a coherent review that’s informative to its audience.
Excellent, excellent article. I've been thinking along the same lines for quite a while now. Thanks for writing it up in such a focused way.
There's no reason that professional reviews can't be almost fully objective, and they should be.
COuldn't have said it better myself. :-)
Agreed!