After a bit of time without the internet, Liam had nothing to do but think. And so think he did and he wondered why EA hasn't received the backlash that Atomic has for its game set in the war in Fallujah.
"The Seattle-based (Washington , the US) indie games publisher Victura and indie games developer Highwire Games, are today very happy and excited to announce that they have just released three new missions for their first-person tactical shooter "Six Days in Fallujah", nearly doubling the content in the game (the new missions is available right now for PC via Steam Early Access)." - Jonas Ek, TGG.
Six Days In Fallujah is a controversial military sim which just hit Early Access. Jump Dash Roll dives into the battlefield to give its first impressions on a possible rival to Call of Duty.
14 years after its original controversy-filled announcement, Six Days in Fallujah has made its way into Early Access. How does this milsim game fare?
Maybe because there is very little information on the title?
"It was because the game was set in Afghanistan, a hugely unpopular war particularly in America."
And the Iraq war is popular?
Iraq.... Afghan.... No difference as long as my m-4 has fresh bodies to munch on! Hmm Mk-19 hunger for brains as well...
people are just too damn sensitive, ITS A GAME NOT REAL LIFE, who cares where its set, if its good its good, a game will NEVER recreate the true feeling of being at war ever.
Fallujah was a controversial battle which is why the game Six Days in Fallujah copped so much slack.
Medal of Honor on the other hand never said they will feature a Fallujah encounter. For all we know the game may have a fictional storyline.
Point is, Six Days in Fallujah wasn't banned for being in Afghanistan, it was banned for Fallujah.