940°

Final Fantasy XV Battle Gameplay First Look Trailer Hits Home

New gameplay trailer for Final Fantasy XV showing party play and possible destructible environments.

Vivi3961d ago

THIS LOOKS ABSOLUTELY INCREDIBLE

LaChance3961d ago (Edited 3961d ago )

One of the best multiplats at E3 !!

edit: come to think of it, if it would have been a PS3 exclusive it would have looked nothing like this. Its actually a good thing they are bringing it to both Xbox One and PS4.

bintarok3961d ago (Edited 3961d ago )

A deadly cool game, gratz SE!

Another incredible game came out of nowhere :
http://www.youtube.com/watc...

darthawesome903961d ago

I haven't seen one bad comment...so why all the disagrees for EVERYONE???

Well the game looks amazing BTW. I love turn based but I can overlook that because this action styled gameplay looks amazing.

shoddy3961d ago

Damn I miss the good old turn base systems and good summons.
that's what final fantasy is about.

I don't like the look of button smashing rpg.

I hope ff16 get turn base.

pompombrum3961d ago (Edited 3961d ago )

Am I the only old skool FF fan who was left disgusted with this? This game isn't a JRPG, it's a slasher.. looks more like DMC than it does the FF games I grew up loving.

@shoddy.. thank you, someone finally seeing sense. All these comments using fancy buzz words with capital letters, if I didn't know better,I'd say Square are learning some PR tricks from Microsoft.

Outside_ofthe_Box3961d ago

^^^ This is the direction FF needs to go. Turn Based games are outdated. Sure there have been great turn based games this gen, but none match the graphical beauty that Final Fantasy strives for. It would totally kill immersion to have a separate battle screen with turn based combat. Real Time battle-Kingdom Hearts/FF12 style is the way Final Fantasy needs to go.

Final Fantasy is back! Good job Nomura!

dragonrage003961d ago

@Outside_ofthe_Box
No its not. I couldnt care less about graphical beauty. XIII/XIII-2 were beatiful games... so what?
@shoddy and @aiBreeze
you guys are not alone. im sure there are quite a bit of fans like ourselves that can look past the pretty visials and realize this isnt a FF game

shoddy3961d ago

Button smashing is action rpg.

the true beauty if final fantasy is just rpg wich need tactic like blind, slow, or fuk up your enemies somehow then finish them off with summon and limited break. That how I like it.

button smash is for simple mind player just try to hit the button as fast as possible hoping to make the most damage.

Final fantasy characters should be more unique not just human but mix race.

I hope ff16 won't become a shoota.

Irishguy953961d ago

Pfff Final Fantasy was never tactical. If you were stupid sure it might seem like it is tactical.

Toon_Link3961d ago

This gameplay reminds me of the action sequences from advent children. And to all the people upset with the exclusion of turn base gameplay I got a feeling square is planning on making more games for XV with more traditional controls.

rainslacker3961d ago (Edited 3961d ago )

I have to agree with a lot of the people that this doesn't look to play like a main title final fantasy game.

Final fantasy games had definite styles to it's battle system. They were fairly simple, yet there was always strategy to them provided by the turn based system. FFXIII deviated from that, and put more importance into the paradigm system, but one of it's number one complaints was that mostly all you did was press X the whole time.

Now this looks to be a bit more involved, and I do like the battle style, but I feel re-branding this into FFXV isn't proper. There is nothing in the battle system that I saw that resembles anything from prior FF games. It does look more involved than hank n' slash, and there's nothing wrong with that for a spin-off/secondary FF title. But this is an ACTION JRPG, not a CLASSIC JRPG that moves that genre forward, which is something that FF has almost always done, sometimes in a good way, sometimes in a questionable way.

It'll probably be a good game though, and it does look like fun, and has incredible graphics. But a main series FF game it is not.

PiTCHBLaCK3961d ago (Edited 3961d ago )

@ shoddy + bubble

No Idea why you have so many Disagrees, and those who disagreed should be ashamed of themselves, I Miss the old ways of Final Fantasy to, That was truly epic times. I Know SE is trying to do action RPG, but they shouldn't at the expense of the Final Fantasy name.

Name it something else.

pompombrum3961d ago

@waltercros

I think the disagrees are obvious.. just look at all the shills in here with their capital letter buzzwords.

Temporary3961d ago (Edited 3961d ago )

Ok ... I've just seen the video and i'm pretty goddamned souped! They didnt even show us the Magic spells and I'm blown away, WAIT TIL WE SEE THE MAGIC, I bet they're making us wait to see a spell other than Fire and Sword Shield :D

Edit: Whether it's turn based or not, the geniuses behind this game, the TEAM, is fantastic. They've wowed us before, and they're going to again. Nomura and is team are going to hit a grand slam with this one. The voice acting sounds amazing in Japanese, I hope to be able to play in Japanese with subtitles.

shutUpAndTakeMyMoney3960d ago

Shpold be leading on ps4. More powerful anyway.

papashango3960d ago

looks like monster hunter...im interested

xGrunty3960d ago

@dragonrage

I completely agree. While I do agree this game looks and probably will be fun to play. This IS NOT a FF game. Turn based games are not dying. There are plenty of great turn based JRPG's that have come out in the last 5 years that are simply astounding. I always like to throw out Radiant Historia lately, because that was probably one of the best DS games I have ever played. You're crazy to think the original JRPG is dead.

That being said I'd really like to bring my own opinion on this, because I talk about it with my hardcore RPG friends too. How does Square Enix live with themselves? They use to pride themselves so hard on what they do, but this is seriously a joke. Versus XIII got announced at THE SAME time as XIII and now they change the name and move it to another platform? 7 years for this? It's all you sad fans who buy anything because it "looks pretty" that really make me sick. FFXIII and FFXIII-2 were a joke, with the most unforgettable characters and laughable character depth. It's seriously sad the direction this company has gone.

indysurfn3960d ago (Edited 3960d ago )

I can't blame the people that wished this was turn based. I'm one of them. A turn based RPG would have insured I bought a ps4 on day one. This seems more like a devil may cry with final fantasy characters to me. I know the old and new Square enix just a couple months ago said they will return to their roots. I didn't expect they could do it this fast so I will not judge the new President for this.

@Outside_ofthe_Box your all inside the box. Case in point, you said turn based are outdated. That is a bad assumption, all inside the

assumption box. First came pen and paper. Second came action RPG'. Third came turn based rpg's (which make them newer the action rpgs).

Fourth came strategy RPG's. fifth came delayed turn based rpg's also called active time battle (most likely for marketing reasons). America

only has 5% of the world populations, and are one of the few places that people prefer action rpg over thinking (I mean turn based).
Even in Japan when for a few years (not this one or last) the overall country got smaller. But the JRPG market got bigger!!!!! Meaning more

and more people are playing less of the other games and more of the jrpg turn based. In other countries (save USA) turn based have grown a lot.

this is not the way rpg's need to go! If that was the case everyone would make a rpg that has gameplay that reminds you of devil may cry.

square has been doing action rpg's since ffx and have been going down since also!!! While all the other RPG companies in japan have gotten

bigger without merging!!! They need to get back at it.
mean while the Japanese games market only grew 1.2% but squares game share continue to slide. As they make non rpg games and half western rpg games. the other Japanese companies have grown by leaps and bounds. If you have been looking at magicbox.com for the last few years you would notice that it went from 16% of the top 50 games being jrpg's to over 40% of the top 50 game sales leaders being jrpg's week by week!!! That shows that Sqaure was dead set on trying to make people like action rpg over turn based (even though action rpgs are the oldest).

Do you think ffxvi will be turn based? I hope so come on nis/gust!!! port the real JRPG's that are not ashamed to be jrpg's to the US of A!
PLease?!!! by the way guys there is a new rpg out called atelier Ayesha it is awesome youtube it see the 14+ gameplay demos of it. Actual turn based this is just early game stuff so it is nice on the battles from the start.

bigrob9043960d ago

for the people that don't like the action based gameplay i don't really understand. sure i love ff10 just as much as the next guy, or ff7 for that matter but i would be lying if i said i would rather the turn based gameplay more than real time fighting. i hate the fact that i just have to stand there and let somebodies attack hit me when i clearly see it coming and can move. that's why i love rpg's like kingdom hearts so much because it got away from that turn based gameplay. sure with turn based you get that time to pick out your moves and so on, but it also takes away from immersion because you're sitting there picking out attacks while everyone is just standing there. you cannot tell me what you see in this video looks less fun then turn based.

indysurfn3960d ago

@Outside_ofthe_Box your all inside the box. Case in point, you said turn based are outdated. That is a bad assumption, all inside the

assumption box. First came pen and paper. Second came action RPG'. Third came turn based rpg's (which make them newer the action rpgs).

Fourth came strategy RPG's. fifth came delayed turn based rpg's also called active time battle (most likely for marketing reasons). America

only has 5% of the world populations, and are one of the few places that people prefer action rpg over thinking (I mean turn based).
Even in Japan when for a few years (not this one or last) the overall country got smaller. But the JRPG market got bigger!!!!! Meaning more

and more people are playing less of the other games and more of the jrpg turn based. In other countries (save USA) turn based have grown a lot.

this is not the way rpg's need to go! If that was the case everyone would make a rpg that has gameplay that reminds you of devil may cry.

square has been doing action rpg's since ffx and have been going down since also!!! While all the other RPG companies in japan have gotten

bigger without merging!!! They need to get back at it.

indysurfn3960d ago

@bigrob904 you just proved you DONT like ffVII as the next guy! Just like American review media you say things like; i hate, wait, just stand there!!! But then you speak glowing of the opposite action rpg which means you like twitch game play, and the turn based is cerebral gameplay! They are exact opposites one is for reflex action based, and one is for short/medium/ long term thinking and resource managing! Two different kind of super heros: Batman outsmart-hulk smash. This game is HULK SMASH THINGS!

bigrob9043959d ago

@indysurfn i in fact love that game, as a matter of fact i bought it off the ps store to play it on my ps3 because it's a good game. you miss understand, it's not that i dislike turn based because it allows me to think about my attacks because truthfully you can do that with real time gameplay. people are under the impression that action rpg means hack and slash, no, thats God of War(which i also love). if you think about it, it's very stupid that your character's are just standing there looking at the enemy doing nothing waiting for you to finally decide what you want. it takes more skill to do it in real time. kingdom hearts for example you have to make sure not to get hit while also selecting the right spell you want. i'm not saying one is necessarily better than the other, but look at that trailer than at a turn based game. i feel it speaks for itself.

+ Show (19) more repliesLast reply 3959d ago
Jaces3961d ago

hopefully the fighting will be more reminiscent of KH style. It wasn't truly button mashing but neither was it turn based exactly. I can get behind that.

3961d ago Replies(1)
G20WLY3961d ago

'True' FF game or not...did this just bitch slap Bayonetta, or did I imagine it?!

3959d ago
thehitman3961d ago (Edited 3961d ago )

Gameplay amazingly good but idk if its releasing on the ps4/xb1 then I sort of would've thought the graphics look better than it is. Seems like this game shouldve still been on PS3 and not on next-gen consoles. Im still dissapointed that it never made it considering it was one of the reasons I bought a ps3.

MoveTheGlow3960d ago

There's an amazing Gaf thread on what this means for the gameplay system. It seems like yes, there's magic, the menu changes when you use it. You can equip a ton of weapons and use them in Linkform, including duplicates.

I just... this looks like what a Crisis Core 2 should be, and I couldn't be happier.

Hadoukameha3960d ago

I liked CC too but this is FF15, so it should be traditional.

coolfool3960d ago (Edited 3960d ago )

wheres the blood gone?

Edit: I should qualify that by saying that I don't necessary want blood but I remember an earlier trailer for this game having blood in it. I think that was when this game was targeting maturer audiences.

FragMnTagM3960d ago

Is this still turn based?

It is really hard to tell.

I was never a fan of turn based games, but this looks absolutely amazing.

Hadoukameha3960d ago

Are you blind or retarded?

Non4Gag3960d ago

BUY "Final Fantasy Tactics S" millions of times to make "Final Fantasy 16" a TURN-BASED RPG !!!

FragMnTagM3960d ago

Damn Hadoukameha, no need to be an asshole. Bubbled you down for personal attack.

I was just asking an honest question.

I am just not a fan of turn based games. Yes there is strategy there, but it is boring as hell to me.

This game looks great and at certain points in that video it did look like it was turn based. For instance, when the guy was at the top of the stairs with the shield with all the military guys shooting at him, it looked like it was their turn, then he took a turn after they were done shooting.

It might be seamless turn based as in you do not have to bring up a menu if you don't want to.

Sorry for asking a legitimate question sheesh. I don't follow FF stuff as I was never a fan of the series or any JRPG for that matter. I love RPG's just not a fan of overly feminine male characters.

GuyThatPlaysGames3960d ago

Wow. This looks incredible!!!!!!

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 3959d ago
Eamon3961d ago

brb guys, i'm going into cryosleep and waking up on release day.

bootsielon3960d ago

Just make sure you don't wake up 500 years later to fight the atheist league, alliance and unions :)

ILive3961d ago

This, metal gear solid 5, infamous second son, killzone, and destiny are the best looking games ive seen thus far. They are really incredible.

Studio-YaMi3961d ago

Don't forget :

The Division
The Order 1886

Vivi3961d ago

GAME OF THE SHOW BY A LONG SHOT

chestnut11223961d ago

I can sense a lot of Lightinng Pussy fans disagreeing with Us. U mad FF 13 Die Hard Fangirls? These is million times better than Your So called ff 13.

-Gespenst-3961d ago (Edited 3961d ago )

More??!! Oh my God this game looks good!

ALSO, THIS GAME LOOKS LIKE THE BEST GAME OF ALL TIME.

EDIT: Guy in the comments saying the graphics are "underwhelming"

Lovable3961d ago (Edited 3961d ago )

OMG...that was awesome! It looks frigging CGI

It seems like you're too overpowered with all that teleporting going on?

Show all comments (198)
80°

Final Fantasy XV Review – A Royal Road Trip

Gary Green said: With my fondness for (most) Final Fantasy games and my side goal of finishing off games in my collection with loose ends, a return to Final Fantasy XV seemed inevitable. It also serves as my third Final Fantasy platinum trophy after VII and VIII, a reasonable substitute since Final Fantasy IX is nigh on impossible to master.

Read Full Story >>
pslegends.com
150°

Final Fantasy 15 director reveals why he left Square Enix, and announces he's working on 2 new JRPGs

Final Fantasy 15's director has revealed why he left Square Enix back in 2018.

Hajime Tabata famously resigned from Square Enix two years after Final Fantasy 15 shipped in 2016. In a special livestream at the time, Tabata announced his decision to resign from the company, cancelling three of four new story-focused DLC episodes for Final Fantasy 15 in the process.

Read Full Story >>
gamesradar.com
Knightofelemia131d ago

FF15 is like FF13 its subjective people either like it or hate it.

raWfodog131d ago

I liked it. I haven’t played the royale edition yet but I’ll get around to it one day.

gold_drake131d ago

no no, 15 wasnt trash.

15 had a tremendous difficult development.

FinalFantasyFanatic129d ago

I really believe 13 was better put together and more complete than 15 ever was.

EternalTitan130d ago

Found the pathetic troll.
How is your jobless life going?
Dot worry, you will never get a job or a girlfriend haha!

Hofstaderman131d ago

Man inherited a train wreck and was expected to release this game in under two years after it spent a better part of a decade in development hell. At one point there was even plans to make FFXIII Versus a musical. He did what he could.

TheColbertinator131d ago

I didn't care much for XV and I always wanted the original vision of Versus XIII but I think the dev team did what they could to salvage the project

Inverno130d ago

And yet people still blame him for the game turning out the way it did, rather than SE for the horrible mismanagement of 13 and Namura for being overly ambitious.

Dwarrior131d ago

Whatever the behind-the-scenes went on over the many years, at the end of the day it was a radical change in direction that I could not go along with. Also why I never bought 16.

gold_drake131d ago

this is also why Sakaguchi (spelling) left.

460°

There are very good reasons why FFXVI didn't sell as much as FFXV

Final Fantasy XVI’s launch was very different than Final Fantasy XV’s and the two mainline game releases are difficult to compare for a number of reasons.

Read Full Story >>
tweaktown.com
closed_account289d ago

While it seems really cool and people seem to really be enjoying it, I'm in the mood for a real jrpg right now, not an action game.

This is the first mainline Final Fantasy game I didn't pick up at launch since the original FF7 on PS1.

I'll certainly get it eventually, just not in the mood for this right now. Personal taste.

FallenAngel1984289d ago

“I'm in the mood for a real jrpg right now, not an action game.”

Implying that action RPGs aren’t real JRPGs?

closed_account289d ago (Edited 289d ago )

If I can't control the party, it's not for me. I actually really like how FF7 Remake handled combat, being able to choose to straight up action it, or slow down time for more strategic party control...regardless of how I felt about them bloating the story.

If this satisfies your jrpg itch, then cool, have at it! The story experience looks amazing though, which is why I'll probably pick it up Black Friday.

shinoff2183289d ago

You know what he's trying to say. Most of us learned of jrpg during the golden age of jrpgs and they were very very different. While I'm liking ff16 it doesn't really feel well jrpgish at all.

FallenAngel1984289d ago

@ OtterX

Props to you if you don’t like the game. Not here to say you’re wrong for not enjoying it

Just saying JRGGS come in various ways and it’s disingenuous to say one is less real than another

@ shin

JRPGs have a large variety. Even during the golden age there were plenty of quality action RPGs. It’s absurd to say there’s only one way to design a game in a genre that has so many design principles

closed_account288d ago

@FallenAngel1984 lol, yea I'm not going to dive into a semantics debate. enjoy the game, I'll catch up with it later. cheers, mate.

shinoff2183287d ago

Fallenangel

That's not what I'm saying at all. I enjoy action rpgs just as much. Star ocean is one of my favorite series. The year star ocean 6 released I've even said it was my personal game of the year. Im not thrilled they changed the combat in ff particularly, but combat aside ff16 didn't feel jrpgish at all.

MadLad287d ago

When you're basically just a spectacle fighter, first and foremost, then just call yourself that. It's like jokingly arguing GTA San Andreas was an RPG because they had a couple skill trees in it, and you can get fat.

--Onilink--287d ago

While FF16 is absolutely a Final Fantasy game (setting, characters, story, etc) it is barely an RPG, and its not just about combat.

If you want an example of an Action RPG with combat that is just as action focused as this one, while still feeling like an RPG, just look at Tales of Arise.

I’m still loving the game, but it is like 5% RPG, maybe 10% if I’m feeling generous. And what little RPG elements it has, are pretty scaled down.

Which makes it interesting in the fact that fans of the series might choose to skip it because of the little RPG in it (I would still heavily recommend it though) and non fans of the series might also skip it because it keeps being labeled as an RPG, when its basically an Action Adventure game

--Onilink--287d ago

@Otter

Interestingly enough, if you did choose to get into a semantics debate, it would honestly just make it even less of an RPG haha, as there is practically zero ROLE PLAYING in the game.
Its a linear story, a defined character with defined choices and dialog, no ability to customize your build or jobs/classes, cant modify (or use) your party members, equipment is basically irrelevant, leveling is almost as irrelevant, skills are practically based on preference as there is no elemental advantages, etc

I dont get why people seem hesitant to say this game really isn’t an RPG, its an Action Adventure game with some very light RPG mechanics (and which game doesn’t have them these days).

It doesnt mean the game is bad just because its not an RPG, if anything, it might help bring people over that DONT like RPGs

closed_account287d ago (Edited 287d ago )

@--Onilink-- ha yea, I did end up engaging in the semantics more today. (below) Yesterday I had kids running around the living room, couldn't focus enough to engage. X'D

But yea, you hit the nail on the head - it's not "enough" of a jrpg for me. It's watered down, and I was never a big fan of DMC games. I still want to experience the story eventually though.

GhostScholar287d ago

I’m my opinion jrpgs are typically turn based and not real time. People will deny that but ask how many peoples favorite jrpgs are turn based and like 99 percent would be. It’s not insignificant

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 287d ago
Pyrofire95288d ago

Do you mean a turn based combat game?

closed_account288d ago (Edited 288d ago )

No, it doesn't even have to be turn based. I love Tales games even. Just JRPG elements like switching between characters, buffing, finding enemy elemental weaknesses etc.

Back in the 90's we would have called this an action rpg, as it distinguishes the playstyle. I was recently playing through Secret of Evermore again on SNES, and while I love it, it was considered more action oriented:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wi...

Even the Zelda devs don't call Zelda n rpg, they call it an action-adventure game with rpg elements.

At the end of the day, it's just semantics. Yes, it is a jrpg in the sense of leveling up etc... but it's very much an action jrpg. That's all I'm saying. If you want to call it a classic jrpg, then cool. Go for it, I'm not going to stop you. 👍

Amplitude288d ago

@OtterX: It's N4G man you gotta fight in the comments, not be nice to people. You'll figure it out

closed_account288d ago

Oh man, I deal with enough screaming kids at home. I'm willing to let this one go. 😂

Shane Kim288d ago (Edited 288d ago )

It's not about that. It's that he is factually wrong. If this isn't an rpg, then what would you call Uncharted or Tomb Raider?

closed_account288d ago

@Shane Kim - I answered above. It's an action rpg. We had them back in the 90's. I gave an example. But I concede, it's still a "classic jrpg", it's just a matter of acknowledging the sub-genre.

What do you call Zelda?

Shane Kim287d ago

An action rpg is an rpg, so I don't k ow what the discussion is.

I have only played the original NES and SNES Zelda games, wich I would call action adventure games.

MadLad287d ago

@shane

Notice how Bioshock has puzzle elements, but we don't call it a puzzle game. Mafia had a racing segment, but nobody would compare it to Forza.

If a title has any sort of element that fits even the remote criteria of a certain genre, it's disingenuous to associate it with that genre.
Again, if I sold you a copy of Bioshock and told you it was a puzzle game, you'd go home and end up either highly confused, or genuinely annoyed.

This is a Final Fantasy game. It should be sold as a Final Fantasy game. The caveat being it's an entirely different experience than people have in their head when they hear Final Fantasy, and RPG/JRPG should be nowhere near the marketing for it, because it's 100% about the action and a linear story.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 287d ago
Rocketisleague287d ago

Understand what you're saying lad, for me though this is what was missing from ff since ff10. As it is my favourite franchise alongside maybe metal gear...ffs have just missed the mark in quality since ps2 era.

For me ff 16 is starting to finally hit the full potential of ff. You don't watch those long summon cutscenes anymore. You play them.

Gregero287d ago

100% the reasons I'm not getting it either. No full party control and just looks too linear for me. I'll wait for FFVII remake part 2. I'm playing FFIX again for the first time in a long time and it's perfect.

Rocketisleague287d ago

Ff7 remake was much more linear than this, this is the 3rd most open one

closed_account287d ago

FFIX is one of my favorites! I hope they do a more lighthearted stylized one again some day.

I want to see Final Fantasy Tactics revitalized too. I adore the world of Ivalice. Moreso in Tactics & Tactics Advance games.

andy85287d ago

See the the thing is, FFIX is pretty linear and so are most of the older ones until late in the game. You're on a set path from area to area with no deviation like FFXVI. It's only once you get to disc 3 it starts to open up

Tapani287d ago

I can recommend Dragon Quest XI, Nier Replicant, Nier Automata, Valkyrie Chronicles IV, Persona 5 Royal, Persona 4 The Golden, Dark Souls I-III, Elden Ring, Chained Echoes, Shin Megami Tensei: Nocturne, FFX/X-2, Monster Hunter World & Rise, Ni no Kuni I & II.

On top of that you have the classic versions with great mods to make them better than the PS1 versions: Chrono Trigger, FFVI, FFIV, FFVII, FFVIII, FFIX and Chrono Cross.

closed_account287d ago

Solid lineup! You have great taste.

HomoLuden287d ago

Same here, not buying as I want a jrpg not an actionn game as of now.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 287d ago
lodossrage289d ago (Edited 289d ago )

Well,

FF15 launched on more platforms than FF16
FF15 cost less to buy than FF16
The PS4 install base was bigger when FF15 released compared to the PS5 for FF16

shinoff2183289d ago (Edited 289d ago )

The install base was alot bigger if I recall. I'm not reading the article but if it's implying it's ps5 exclusive as the reason sure maybe it would've sold a little more but out of the million sold of ff15 on xbox one I have a hard time believing all one million sales came at launch

_Decadent_Descent287d ago

I love how people downvote you as if you're not stating objective facts that certainly make a difference.

MrNinosan287d ago

And what matters most was when the games where released. FFXV during Black Week, and FFXVI during summer.

andy85287d ago

And FFXVI released on a Thursday and XV on a Tuesday

TheKingKratos287d ago (Edited 287d ago )

And just like that... you made that article completely worthless .

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 287d ago
repsahj288d ago (Edited 288d ago )

I don't understand, Tales of Arise is a jrpg. It's also an action rpg, it even has less jrpg elements than FF16. The impact of PS5 exclusive is really strong.

goldwyncq288d ago

Less JRPG elements? That’s just flat out wrong. Arise has party member switching, status ailments, and elemental weaknesses, which XVI doesn’t have.

--Onilink--287d ago

No one that has played both games would ever say that Tales of Arise has less RPG elements. If anything, as you say, its the perfect example of being able to do heavy action combat and still being an RPG

MrCrimson288d ago

The FF16 numbers are quite good.

shinoff2183287d ago

That's not completely true repsahj. I'm sure it's having an affect but I'm a ps fan. Loved tales of arise, star ocean 6, ff16 doesn't seem jrpg or rpgish much. Some of us long time since ff1 back on nes fans have real complaints and to brush it off to the side as a console exclusive thing is just ridiculous

repsahj286d ago

I understand I'm also an RPG fan since SNES. My first ff is FF3. And also tales is one of my fave series. But for me, Arise is my least favorite Tales. Yes, the graphics are superb but everything else is just ok to me, but I still accept it. That's what I'm saying with FF16, even the change when done right is very ok to me.

Viryu288d ago

I'm currently somewhere in the middle of FF XVI I think, and so far I'm enjoying it. Problem when comparing the two is there is a lack of bromance in FFXVI and it's less open worldish. In FF XVI the accompanying characters feel more like accessories that don't bring much to your playthrough outside of cut scenes.

Pyrofire95288d ago

As far as I've seen it has been tho.

Show all comments (76)