Comments (17)
tr00p3r  +   1046d ago
If this is a next-gen title, I would just like to see more of the same from BF3, but with better graphics, like a lot better than what we see at the moment. The gameplay is fine, so it doesn't need too much work. More tanks, jeeps, jets, equipment, unlocks..gonna be epic if this is next-gen.
Ares84HU  +   1046d ago
In next gen I want better graphics and physics obviously. But I would love to see 64 player battles on consoles in the next Battlefield game with true destruction.

I feel that BF3 was a step back from BFBC2 in the destruction area which is really bad I think because it was one of the biggest features I really loved in the game.
DasBunker  +   1046d ago
i agree on the inferior destruction in BF3... hope BTK is better... i dont really like the design in at least 3 of the current maps in BF3..
emekcrash  +   1046d ago
Battlefield 4 is the best game I have ever played. I have high expectations for Battlefield 5.
#2 (Edited 1046d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
SJPFTW  +   1046d ago
looks like a fail attempt to roll lol
sublIME2s  +   1046d ago
Wait, what? You're already playing BF4? Damn dude...
Gamer-Z  +   1046d ago
60fps and 64 players on consoles like what they advertised in all those videos (what a bunch of bull).
AndrewE  +   1046d ago
You bought into that? That's why you're the sheep consumer and they're the superior publisher.
#3.1 (Edited 1046d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(4) | Report | Reply
ufo8mycat  +   1046d ago
As long as the maps are designed with 64 players in mind sure. Most of the BF3 maps fit 24/32 players better then it does 64, except maps like Caspian Border.

If theres one thing that needs to be done is get rid of SP. It is not needed. The time spent on SP, could of been made improving and removing bugs in BF3.
awi5951  +   1046d ago
Only if call of duty does HD next time lol. It never was HD really lol.
Geralt  +   1046d ago
My guess:
2012 -- Bad Company 3
2013 -- Battlefield 4
sycnation  +   1045d ago
Didn't you see the medal of honor plug/tease in the bf3 box...
MoH $3quel 2012
Bf4 2013
0neShot  +   1046d ago
Talking about a game that is set to release 3 (three) years from now? For all we know there might be another shooter that will overshadow both COD and BF. So, move along, there is really nothing important to talk as of this point.
BattleTorn  +   1046d ago
AFter years of COD withdrawl, I can't believe I ever say... "More of the same!"

I think we can expect both COD, and BF to be around for, at the very least, a couple more iterations.

BF on consoles (if current gen or not) need more players in matches (not cut-down maps, as well)

I notice quite often, while playin Rush on Xbox360, that the server is only filling up to around 8-9 players, and staying consistant.

Now of course this is temperary issue, but I've noticed it's clearly affecting some maps more than others.
awi5951  +   1046d ago
Never play rush conquest is the only Battlefield mode the others dont matter lol.
GrumpyVeteran  +   1046d ago
rofl, why would you want a new game out already in 2 years? Sigh, this generation lol. People happily played BF2 for 5+ years.
Hufandpuf  +   1046d ago
DICE will try to capitalize on the COD fatigue. It would be smart for them to let acti do their thing next fall, just to see how consumers react to the COD over saturation. Rest assured, we'll see BF in some form or another in 2012, they make a game a year but they are not full featured releases (heroes and play4free).

But right now it'd be best to lay low so that next year people will be saying "remember that other shooter, BF3? Yeah that was an amazing game". It's best to fade in the shadows and and return once the industry seems to be at a standstill.

As of BF4, it's too early to talk about it now, and frankly I'm content on improving the one we already have.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember