Comments (86)
« 1 2 »
TheBeast  +   1702d ago
Good going EA >.>
Christopher  +   1702d ago
Wait... DA2 and Crysis 2 are listed as $60 games. I know I bought DA2 on PC for only $50 on Steam, the usual price for PC games. Why are they $60 from EA? Shouldn't it be no more than $50 considering they're completely removing the middle man?

I don't mind EA sticking all their games on their own service to promote it, I can still play them with Steam enabled. But, if they're removing the middleman _and_ raising prices, that's over the line.
Ducky  +   1702d ago
Isn't that $10 usually for console versions because of some publishing fees or something?

Most PC games still launch at $50 (check out the 'Coming Soon' section on Steam).
A few publishers such as Activision and EA have decided to go for the $60 price. People end up buying the game anyways so they figure they might as well make more profit.
#1.1.1 (Edited 1702d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(0) | Report
EliteAssass1n  +   1702d ago
Looks like I won't ever be playing Crysis 2.
Christopher  +   1702d ago
@FatOldMan: Exactly. Licensing fees and a little extra to go with it (~$5 for licensing fees and ~$5 extra profit). I'm fairly certain most PC games will still release at $50 (*looks at CoD releasing at $60, though*). Heck, you can get the PC download of DA2 on for $50 still, but EA's Origin site lists it at $60.
#1.1.3 (Edited 1702d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(0) | Report
darksied  +   1702d ago
Ubisoft, EA, Activision ... there's others too. They all list their new titles for $60. It's the times, I guess. They see the extra money coming it and they're like "more please!"
MAJ0R  +   1702d ago
if you do this to BF3 EA I will... well I don't know but I'll be super pissed and won't be playing BF3 the way I was going to
gamingdroid  +   1702d ago
Although EA has every right to pull their games from others service, it is incredibly stupid to do so. Way to go minimizing exposure of your game!

EA doesn't have enough clout to do this.... The only game I'm buying from EA anyhow is Mass Effect 3 and maybe Dead Space 2 (if it goes low enough and is the LE). Otherwise, EA can go fekk themselves.
SweatyFlorida  +   1702d ago
Well regular console users pay $60 all the time since this gen started. and PC are supposed to have the superior version of the games so why should they get special treatment and pay less than consoles?? Think EA finally realized this and jumped on board.

But this makes it clear that Steam is better than Origins.
iamgoatman  +   1702d ago

When EA releases a game on either of the consoles they have to pay license fees to Microsoft and Sony to do so, which is why you see the price difference. If EA now decide to increase their PC game prices to match those of consoles then they're essentially raking in another $10-20 in profit, which isn't fair to PC gamers.

I doubt regular console users would appreciate a $20 price hike knowing all that extra dough is going straight into EA's pockets either.
evrfighter1  +   1702d ago
that's pretty ballzy of EA.

but this is how it works EA. If it's not on steam. I as a customer do not buy it. that's just way too much software I need on my pc.

and now Origin???

I want all my games on one central platform. When it comes to BF3 I hope someone at EA has a head on their shoulders. I'd rather buy it retail than go through another client.
#1.1.9 (Edited 1702d ago ) | Agree(7) | Disagree(0) | Report
Ducky  +   1702d ago
^ You *might* have to go through their client if they get ballsy enough.

You know how a steamworks game works right? What if EA copied that and made it so that all BF3 purchases have to be activated on Origin?
Rhythmattic  +   1702d ago
For digital delivery... a US $60 game, taking into account the exchanged rate and adding GST it should be around $62 - 65 Aussie dollars.

DeadSpace/Crysis2/Mass Effect 3 and more .... $80..

I Still cant beleive it !!!! OMG

$80 on the Oz store ??????? GO F yourself EA !!!
#1.1.11 (Edited 1702d ago ) | Agree(4) | Disagree(0) | Report
Persistantthug  +   1702d ago
@cgoodno.....Must have been a deal for you, because Dragon Age launched at $60 on Steam....
So did Dead Space 2, Crysis 2, and most other EA Games.
Megaton  +   1702d ago
I've bought plenty of their titles on Steam. I don't own Mass Effect 2's DLC simply because they don't have it on Steam. They force you to buy "BioWare points" on their site.

I think I'll go with Demonoid instead of Origin for all future EA titles.
Kon  +   1702d ago
I always bought my EA games from EA Store, i don't see it as a problem.
dirthurts  +   1702d ago
I personally don't like the idea of using more than one download client. I want all my stuff running in steam.
It's reliable, and simple.
user858621  +   1702d ago
^ pretty much this, its only steam for pc games or nothing

Ironic this news comes out and Darkspore is on sale on steam :/
#2.1.1 (Edited 1702d ago ) | Agree(8) | Disagree(3) | Report
darksied  +   1702d ago
Most of my EA titles are either from the EA store or actual retail stores. It might not be the popular opinion, but I also like their store (not really the store, but the EA download manager). Say what you want about EA, but they did make a good client in the EA download manager (or Origin, if they're calling it that now). One activation, unlimited installs, DOESN'T NEED TO BE RUNNING = happy me.
radphil  +   1702d ago
"I always bought my EA games from EA Store, i don't see it as a problem."

It increased in price from the previous location.
Pandamobile  +   1702d ago
wtf are you doing, EA?
Ducky  +   1702d ago
It is worthy of noting that if you check the BF3 page on Origin, it states that the Back2Karakand free expansion is only valid on Origin.
This might explain why D2D's pre-order doesn't list the expansion and why steam has yet to make BF3 available.

I suppose EA realizes that they have a killer line-up coming up and want to take the opportunity to pull PC players to their platform. Wouldn't be surprised if they keep their future games exclusive to origin.

I just hope Origin behaves like the old EADM in that I don't have to leave it running at all time just to play a game.

Surprised about the Crysis2 thing. You'd think with all the publishing partnerships Valve and EA have had, the two would play nice together.
#3.1 (Edited 1702d ago ) | Agree(7) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
Theo1130  +   1702d ago
Orgin beta doens't require you logging in to play.

On topic, This seems really strange, Orgin or Ea only sell EA games on their store, so how is this going to take consumers from steam, steam has multiple publishers, and it's a great. I just don't see why they think having a service for just their set of game is beneficial to them.
Ducky  +   1702d ago
^ Having their own store means the sale revenue goes directly to them (instead of a retailer/distributor getting a cut of the pie)

I think Activision does this with a few digital games such as Starcraft2.

I'm not sure what they plan to do with Origin. Whatever it is, I hope they keep running the client optional. I tried Origin and it seems to eat more memory than steam. Though I did like it's visual look.
Pandamobile  +   1702d ago
Guess I'll have to buy BF3 retail :(
Ducky  +   1702d ago
I've bought a couple of games from the old EA Store, as Theo above you said, it doesn't currently work like Steam or GFWL.

The game essentially behaves like a retail game (except that, you can download it from EA's Download Manager whenever you want). So if anything, it's better than steam since you don't need any other clients running to launch the game.
I was going to buy BF3 from origin anyways (along with BF2142), assuming they don't make it obligatory to have the origin client running.

Though if the physical warfare pack ends up being retail-exclusive, you might as well go for retail for the extra items. Though I'd expect EA to make the pack available on Origin too.
#3.2.1 (Edited 1702d ago ) | Agree(5) | Disagree(0) | Report
bumnut  +   1702d ago
I already ordered battlefield 3 from retail, I paid £23 which is a pretty good deal.

How can it be cheaper on disc than dd?
BubbleSniper  +   1702d ago
who cares? Crysis 2 was a pile of failure.

on the other hand... it leaves me worried whether EA will take out more games...
#3.3 (Edited 1702d ago ) | Agree(5) | Disagree(3) | Report | Reply
badjournalism  +   1702d ago
I smell anti-competitive practices....
RememberThe357  +   1702d ago
From EA? No way!
B1663r  +   1702d ago
How is it anti-competitive to pull your game off of the largest internet store and try selling it yourself?

Im all ears, please do tell.
Christopher  +   1702d ago
I gotta admit, I know badjournalism meant well with his statement, but I did get a pretty big chuckle at it because it didn't make any sense to me either.
RememberThe357  +   1702d ago
Taking a popular products and isolating it to one vendor is anti-competitive. The other vendors cant compete because they don't have the product, hense the prefix "anti". Trying to sell it yourself is not anti competitive but only selling it yourself is. I could understand if they were a small dav and selling it themselves was the only way to do it but they're EA. Instead of getting the great deals you'd get from Steam or other DD providers your stuck with EA's 59.99 pricetag because there is no competition to lower the price.
#4.2.2 (Edited 1702d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(1) | Report
Christopher  +   1702d ago
***Taking a popular products and isolating it to one vendor is anti-competitive. ***

Only if doing so would result in an imbalance in said market. For example, it isn't anti-competitive when only one broadband carrier offers a specific phone, such as the iPhone for its first few years out on the market.

Steam already controls the majority of digital PC game sales in North America. Removing EA games won't change this.
RememberThe357  +   1702d ago
But the concept is sound. Having the iPhone only with AT&T was anti competitive because no one could compete with product pricing. Now, Verizon has the iPhone AT&T dropped the price to 49.99. Those whole point is competition. If a business practice removes competition than it's anti-competitive by nature. Whether it's right or wrong in an other issue but it is what it is.

You seem to be looking at it from the perspective of the seller not the consumer. The consumer doesn't care if Steam is the biggest DD provider, the consumer cares if they're getting a good deal. Keeping products exclusivity to one seller doesn't allow good deals to happen.

Taking away pricing competition is anti-competitive.
Christopher  +   1702d ago
*** Now, Verizon has the iPhone AT&T dropped the price to 49.99.***

That happened because it's the 3GS phone and practically no one is buying it anymore since the iPhone 4 is out. That did not happen because Verizon was added.

For example, the iPhone 4 is still the same price it was when it was originally released on AT&T, just now the same price with both service providers.

*** If a business practice removes competition than it's anti-competitive by nature.***

But it doesn't remove competition. You can still buy this for the PC at other retailers. They only limit the digital distribution of it, which is far from enough to make a claim of anti-competitive practices.

***Taking away pricing competition is anti-competitive.***

Crysis 2 @ Origin EA: $59.99

Crysis 2 @ $51.96 on disc or $47.99 as download

Removing it from Steam doesn't remove your options for buying the PC game.
mrv321  +   1702d ago
What in the world is Valve competing about the FIRST I've heard of origina was at EA's confrence and I can't tell if it's new or old.

EA, realize a great deal of profit can be made by selling their stuff at 100%

HOWEVER They fail to see that there's a great deal of cost involved, update, dlc, anti-cheat... you get the picture. IT COSTS A LOT OF MONEY. Something Valve has overcome BY HAVING A LOT OF PEOPLE SENDING THEIR GAMES IN.

Ok, ok... battlefield 3 will still sell, but really EA do you even for one second think ANYONE will turn on your store daily? People will log-in to buy BF3 and only use it to play BF3. They won't use it to buy other stuff.... like your indie games, the ones that don't have a 200 million ad budget. So after this do you think Valve will just let you release the smaller games on their store while you keep the big ones for yourself?

Activision are the only ones who can create a store, they chose not to... they aren't big enough. YOU AREN'T BIG ENOUGH. Suck it up, your losing 30% to Sony and Microsoft and more to retailers, lose however much Valve charges you. YOU CAN'T CONTROL PC NOT NOW.

EDIT: Did not know about Activision and that's the point, not many people will know.

Also, updating system can be VERY costly indeed, as can a lot of thing Valve provides, the back-end to steam is beyond belief... It's not just some dude on a computer type titles, it's many people on servers etc, you need a support line. While some may not see it as valuable but for users having a hub is brilliant.
#4.3 (Edited 1702d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
Ducky  +   1702d ago
"They fail to see that there's a great deal of cost involved, update, dlc, anti-cheat."

To be fair, the costs involved are just server maintenance. Updates and DLC aren't all that different from general game downloads (although I don't think Origin has auto-updates/patching yet)
Anti-cheat isn't provided by the digital distributor.

Activision does have it's own digital store. So do a lot of other publishers.

EDIT: Yea, steam's function is bigger, but it also handles a lot more games from various publishers.
EA has been running their Store for quite a while now, and they feel they're ready to take the next step with Origin. They'll only be handling EA games by the looks of things, so they should have an easier workload than steam.
#4.3.1 (Edited 1702d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report
darksied  +   1702d ago
Here's how I see it: I say let them do whatever they want. It's not affecting me, since I've bought things from the EA store before and I really like their download manager (better than the steam client in some ways, worse in others).

BUT ... if they want to keep getting my business, especially if they're selling their games exclusively from here on in, then they need to be competitive with their prices. If not, I'll just go to amazon or retail stores. If I can get a game cheaper on amazon than I can on the Origin or EA store thing, then I'll go to amazon every time.
GrilledCheeseBook  +   1702d ago
Valve games if I remember correct, digitally are only sold on Steam
dirthurts  +   1702d ago
They just cut a huge chunk of their market out right there...
That was pretty idiotic, not to mention greedy.
GrumpyVeteran   1702d ago | Bad language | show | Replies(2)
Spinal  +   1702d ago
Petty EA that is just petty. Although i plan to buy two of your games this year i will be giving you my money with a pinch of salt
MidnytRain  +   1702d ago
They don't care how much salt you give them. THEY HAVE YOUR MONEY. XD
jetlian  +   1702d ago
really! just buy it when its cheaper or better yet used!
Spinal  +   1702d ago
LOL i know xD but i can't resist buying SWTOR and Battlefield 3 :D
Xristo  +   1702d ago
I am all for competition but IF EA continues this trend and ultimately uses Origin to keep all EA games exclusively, I will not support it and I hope it dies a horrible death.....segregating the community is bad, mkay?

Sucks that BF3 is EA because i MUST buy that game....I can probably live without most other EA games...ok maybe not ME3..or Kingdoms of Amular...or Dead Space(s)...NOOO!!!!


edit: I say this in regards to my love for Steam as a one-stop shop...EA should use Origins for exclusive "sales" and let people who love Steam buy it full price if they want it on Steam....I think that makes more sence...keeps mostly everybody happy...ok, maybe not all but at least me lol
#8 (Edited 1702d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
darksied  +   1702d ago
Segregating? Do you mean splitting up Steam into Steam and Origin? What about D2D, Impulse, GoG, Gamersgate, etc.? I think the PC download market is segregated enough.

If you actually use it and hate it, fine. I've used it and I like it a bit better than the steam client ONLY because it doesn't need to be running in the background when you play single player games (unlike steam, using up lots of memory).
Xristo  +   1702d ago
All those other digital download services are not fully interactive like Steam and how Origin claims to be. (ie. chat and such) By making all EA games exclusive to Origin, if EA goes that route, I feel it might segregate the community. Steam is a great online service, very competitive to PSN and M$Live (actually better in my eyes), which lumps PC gamers into one big community. Do we really need another service like this? Wouldn't you like to play any game and interact with any friend through one client? My fear is that this might lead to making too many pools of gamers, thus segregating the PC population. If EA sees some success you can then bet that next Activision makes another service like exclusive to all their games.....then THQ...then Ubisoft...hopefully this is just an over-exaggerated thought.

As for the Origin client, I will admit that I have not used it so I have nothing negative to say about the quality. But for your last comment, my Steam client is currently using 61megs of 6gigs of RAM....I don't see that as "lots"

I am an average gamer so if I am wrong and proven wrong I will gladly thank those for correcting me. This is just how I see it with my limited knowledge and view. I truly do hope Origin is a good thing because competition is good for the consumer....I just have a bad feeling about it, tho. :|
GillHarrison  +   1702d ago
Wow, any chance I had of picking up this game is now gone. What pisses me off even more is the fact this this no doubt means Battlefield 3 will only be on Origin.
Beahmscream  +   1702d ago
I only buy off of Steam for digital copies. Period. Another stupid move on EA's part imo.
#10 (Edited 1702d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
Christopher  +   1702d ago
Steam + for me so far. I have no issue buying from EA's store option if it's a game I want since I can play any game with Steam, even if I didn't buy it from them.
ginsunuva  +   1702d ago
No wonder they quit onlive.
Surfaced  +   1702d ago
Wait... so BF3 for PC won't even be sold in physical retail stores?
iNcRiMiNaTi  +   1702d ago
Pretty sure there will be retail versions but as for digital downloads it'll prolly be Origin only
#12.1 (Edited 1702d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
Psychotica  +   1702d ago
I have it reserved through my local gamestop
led1090  +   1702d ago
For me its actually a very good thing. I live in india and over here games usually sell for 20-22$. On Steam it will only be available for 50$. But on the origin page for india its listed as 999rs which is equal to 22$. So am a happy chap
Xristo  +   1702d ago
Well that is actually pretty cool....I have no oversight on those types of issues concerning services like Steam (being from the US) but I guess I can see how this could be a good thing for some.
noxeven  +   1702d ago
well i guess i wont be buying crysis 2 now. I was waiting for it go on a steam sale but now that its been pulled I highly doubt i will buy it and if i do it shall be retail when its like 10 bucks cause I really like having all my games bound to steam. Oh well power to you ea for trying something sorta new but if it fails you better put it back. I personally think they should offer it on both just do better deals on there origin program if they wanna win some people
TheColbertinator  +   1702d ago
Its Steam,GOG,and D2D on my end.I don't plan on using Origin now or ever.
MARKUS_MAX1MUS  +   1702d ago
People seem to forget EA are just as bad as activision, they are all corparate wankers, id honestly like to see DICE get enough money to go out on their own or perhaps find a publisher who will give them the freedom to market their game and sell their game where they want.

The pre - order exlusives are just one lame idea and Origin is just another.
#16 (Edited 1702d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
palaeomerus  +   1702d ago
Hopefully Steam will have some kind of a "#@#$ you EA" sale over this. :)
Bolts  +   1702d ago
I can see why.
Maybe because Steam policies are stupid and they offer zero support to their customers?

Lets see now...

1. Steam games can only be activated at 9 AM instead of on the stroke of midnight like other digital downloads. Want to stay up late to play that hot new release? Sorry, we can't activate your game now because we're all at home watching Glee.

2. Want the latest patch that fixes broken stuff and new content? Sorry, the patch came out on Friday and at Steam, gaming is a Monday to Friday business hence the guy who pushes the button these patches has gone home. Don't worry, he'll be back on Monday and you'll get patch at 5:00 PM. Oh what? You need same patch as the game's server so you can play online? Cry more noob, and wait until Monday.

3. So the patch is finally here. See that didn't take long...but oh, we have our own ways of doing things here at Steam. So instead of downloading a small 250mb file like everyone else, you get to download the entire game again. All 7 to 9 gigs of it!! It'll only take an hour or two, not too bad, and you'll have to redownload the entire game again each time there's a new patch. But look on the bright side, you brought your game on Steam and it comes with achievements!

#18 (Edited 1702d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
Xristo  +   1702d ago
Being an owner of "The Witcher 2" on Steam, I sadly agree this post. Downloading 9gb for a 50meg patch sucks...

Besides the three facts pointed out by Fanboi, I still love Steam and Valve! Here's to hoping they, someday, change their release day policies and fix their boinked (for lack of more fitting but vulgar word) patching system....

edit: yah yah I know I know...I should of bought TW2 on GoG....hindsight is a b :(
#18.1 (Edited 1702d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
Motorola  +   1702d ago
I have to pay tax with Origin. Not with steam.... GTFO EA
Persistantthug  +   1702d ago
@Motorola.....Out of Curiosity....What state do you live in?
Do you live in California?
Motorola  +   1702d ago
New York. And Im not 100% sure about the tax with origin BUT before when I used EA download manager and the EA store, I had to pay tax
#19.1.1 (Edited 1702d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report
caboose32  +   1702d ago
Wow you have to pay tax with Origin? Thats an extra $5 I can save. Looks like ill be sticking with steam.
Charmers  +   1702d ago
Hm EA vs Steam, that fight isn't going to end well. If EA were dismayed about software sales on the PC before then they haven't seen anything yet if they cut steam out of the equation.

The only thing I don't understand is why does Valve still use this cretinous publisher to publish it's games ? Surely when you have a publishing partner that takes every opportunity to metaphorically "knife you in the back" you would want to break ties with that partner.
nightmarex121  +   1702d ago
I think its a good move hate it or not though, steam was a monopoly for digital anywayz, i think every company wanted to see if it works that's why they gave their stuff to steam, just like how hulu there used to be almost every tv show but now you have to go to their site if you want to watch the full episodes like and
But like everyone say they need to price their games right or it gonna fail.
darksied  +   1702d ago
yeah, I think what people don't realize is Activision, Ubisoft, Valve, etc. all of these guys and more already do this. Stardock only sells on impulse, Valve only sells on Steam ...

EA mentioned during E3 they would do this. They just have to be competitive and they will get fans. They need to price their games like everyone else is, have sales (like their Facebook sales which kick ass) and they'll be fine.
BeastlyRig  +   1702d ago
oh boy! Now this can only mean they will do it with BF3!
#22 (Edited 1702d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
Apotheosize  +   1702d ago
BF3..ME3..only on Origin
led1090  +   1702d ago
Bad Company 2 for the pc must have sold most of its copies on Steam. And it did sell a lot considering that it sold as much as the ps3 and 360 versions. This is EA simply not wanting to share a piece of their pie with Valve. I highly doubt it will be very effective though. People love Steam, and for good reason. But that does not mean that if a game you want isn't available on steam, then you shouldn't buy it. Steam is just a distribution platform. But many of you people are treating this in the same light as the my console vs other consoles war.
ylwzx3  +   1702d ago
There are strings attached with Origin.. LOL..

Origin removes your games after 2 years.. ..

You have to pay a fee per game to have their service extend the holding of it to a MAX of 5 years....
#25 (Edited 1702d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
ninjagoat  +   1702d ago
Whats it mean for say me that brought it already on steam with future updates etc map packs and that. I own a retail version of BFbC2 and can't get Vietnam of steam.
ATiElite  +   1702d ago
EA Pulls Crysis 2 from Steam Store
1. Who cares, oh by the way wheres the DX11 patch?

2. I only buy DD games from Steam as they have stated that in the "unlikely" event that Steam closes down they will release code so your games are FULLY functional offline. (Although you can do that NOW) Which means with Steam you own your game.

3. If Battlefield 3 is only on EA Store i will happily buy a retail copy.

4. Only use Steam cause even though they are in it for money they respect the Gamers and Gaming while all others just want to rape you of your cash.
NYC_Gamer  +   1702d ago
well,i'm sticking with steam anyway.
TheCampfireSong  +   1702d ago
Games for windows still has it up

chak_  +   1702d ago
I made a poll on EA forum about BF3 on steam

feel free to vote, the more, the better
« 1 2 »

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login