120°

Game Fan Destroys Journalism out of Spite

Rare is there a case in which a videogame was met with such vitriol as DmC: Devil May Cry. The new Devil May Cry even generated animosity between fans and the gaming press, but ultimately, the press failed to highlight either side of the debate like good journalists should.

Read Full Story >>
gamingadvance.com
Blacktric4080d ago

"...but ultimately, the press failed to highlight either side of the debate like good journalists should."

Exactly, and rest of the article does a fairly good job to explain what Ben Parfitt's mindblowingly stupid article failed to acknowledge.

inb4 someone brings up the "fans hated it because of the hair" argument...

WarThunder4080d ago (Edited 4080d ago )

So called game "Journalism" are bunch of pathetic wannabe gamers, think they know everything about games just because they throw some random "opinions" and score at games they like or dislike...

People should stop listing to their reviews/opinion, its one opinion vs millions. Their point of view is rubbish and some of them get credit $$$ for giving a game high scores to boost sales.

dennett3164080d ago

No, reviews should NOT be ignored, you should find the ones that matches your style most closely and stick with them. Reviews are consumer advice, and gamers end up buying drivel like Colonial Marines precisely because so many of them didn't wait for/ignored reviews.

This attitude of telling people to ignore what critics say sounds an awful lot like what publishers would prefer gamers to do....mindlessly open their wallets and buy everything they release.

Of course there are bad review sites, and reviewers not to be trusted. That's where it becomes important to get a few different opinions. The really crooked reviews - such as the abysmal effort from the clown at EGM who gave Aliens a 9/10 while having zero depth in his review - well they are fairly easy to spot. Saying that people should disregard reviews is dangerous and stupid. People need to learn that it's OK to disagree with reviewers, and that when you do, it doesn't mean that that person's opinion is automatically less valid than your own, or that reviewers don't know what they're talking about.

theWB274080d ago

It's a good game.....just not te game traditional fans wanted. It affected sales in that regard...if it had been the old Dante I beieve it would had made its target. I enjoyed the game but understand the other side to an extent.

ThanatosDMC4080d ago

It's not about old Dante. It's the whole package.

theWB274080d ago

That's why I said it's not the traditional game fans wanted..

Krimmson4080d ago (Edited 4080d ago )

I swear, it's almost like every defender of DmC always goes back to the hair, like as if that there are absolutely no other complaints for the game and that is literally the only reason why fans of Devil May Cry do not enjoy DmC.

That is the equivalent of someone shoving their fingers in their ears, going "LALALALALALA I CAN'T HEAR YOU LALALALA" while the other person tries to say why they didn't like whatever it is that they didn't like.

dennett3164080d ago

It could be argued that the older fans do the exact same thing whenever anyone tries to point out the positives of the new game, or even the areas where the new and old don't really differ all that much and they've simply tweaked the approach.
Old fans want it the same way, or no way...and I understand that to an extent, being a fan of old school Resident Evil games. But even then, I could appreciate the game that Resident Evil 4 become as there was enough of the old school spirit left in the game. I look on DmC the same way....enough of the spirit of the original game is there.

TongkatAli4080d ago

This, but lets throw rocks at the the people who enjoyed the reboot /s.

NorthernOracle4077d ago

I know I'm going to get flamed for this, but as someone who's relatively neutral-positive towards the series, I totally understand where Parfitt is coming from.

I've seen some very intelligent arguments against DmC's existence, and while I don't agree with most of them, I respect them. But the ratio of ignorance to intelligence I've seen in comments all over the Web is astonishingly skewed towards the former. Comments that obviously come from people who refused to play the game (or only tried the demo) and make points that are plainly contradicted by the game itself.

Who do I blame for the franchise's current predicament? The fans? No. Ninja Theory? No. Capcom? Yes, but not for the reason you might think. If they jumped straight from Devil May Cry 3 into DmC, I would have been mad. But 4 was a huge indication that the series was in danger of stagnation. My opinion, of course.

200°

Ranking the Devil May Cry Series

VGChartz's Mark Nielsen: "Upon finally finishing Devil May Cry 5 recently - after it spent several years on my “I’ll play that soon” list - I considered giving it a fittingly-named Late Look article. However, considering that this was indeed the final piece I was missing in the DMC puzzle, I decided to instead take this opportunity to take a look back at the entirety of this genre-defining series and rank the entries. What also made this a particularly tempting notion was that while most high-profile series have developed fairly evenly over time, with a few bumps on the road, the history of Devil May Cry has, at least in my eyes, been an absolute roller coaster, with everything from total disasters to action game gold."

Read Full Story >>
vgchartz.com
VersusDMC4d ago

First to last for me...3,4,5,1,2.

VersusDMC4d ago

Me leaving it out should be telling of my thoughts on it. Better than 2 as a DMC game.

Still a good game though.

Exvalos3d ago

What a weird name, it's essentially devil may cry, devil may cry lol

Cacabunga3d ago

Best to good for me: 3, reboot, 1, 5

2 and 4 are trash, didnt like any of them.
5 has very good gameplay variety but i hated the foes.. it is just insects the whole time. Reboot has the best foes for me

Friendlygamer4d ago

3,1,4,5 to me, never played 2. 5 gameplay is amazing but level design was really disappointing to me, just a bunch of plain arenas, the story felt like a worse written rehash of the 3rd and the charater models looked weird ( specially the ladies ). Another problem with 5 was that there was not enough content for 3 charaters so I could never really familiarize with any of them

monkey6024d ago (Edited 4d ago )

2.
Dmc.
4.
5.
1.
3.

God DMC2 was an awful game.
And in case this isn't obvious it goes worst to best

Yui_Suzumiya3d ago

1 and DmC. The rest are unimportant.

DarXyde3d ago

Order changes depending on your focus. I tend to focus on gameplay/fun factor, so...

5, 3, 1, 4, 2.

I really didn't like 4 but commend Dante's weapon diversity. The retreading of old ground was pretty unacceptable to me.

But even then... Still more enjoyable than 2 for me

SeTTriP3d ago

This right here is my order as I thought DMC 5 was amazing and obviously 3 comes after 4 was great and 1 for the nastilgic value it holds 2 was so terrible that my local GameStop gave full refunds to people who returned it.

Show all comments (14)
70°

5 Years Later, Devil May Cry 5 Still Quenches My Hack-And-Slash Thirst Like No Other

Huzaifah from eXputer: "Devil May Cry 5, the latest iteration in the iconic DMC franchise by Capcom, still holds its own as a fantastic hack-and-slash in 2024."

50°

Devil May Cry 5, Gears Tactics, and The Crew Motorfest Highlight This Week's GeForce NOW Additions

NVIDIA continues to add games to GeForce NOW. This week, Devil May Cry 5, Gears Tactics, and The Crew Motorfest lead the charge.

Read Full Story >>
wccftech.com