I dont agree with the topic, why should i read the article, get trolled in ? I learned a long time ago that to the contrary to what is being told, not every opinion is equal.
"DigitalSmoke + 14m ago I dont agree with the topic, why should i read the article"
I know this is an extremely difficult concept for a lot of people, but simply reading the title doesn't qualify you to agree or disagree with the content.
As you yourself said, not every opinion is equal, and your opinion in this case is invalid.
:D ..actually didn't mention Far Cry 3 in the title, or in the piece until towards the end on purpose. To make sure it's just an example of what happens when shooters become more narratively consistent, in the specific way Far Cry 3 is.
So I kind of agree with people who read the title here and rolled their eyes :p
Hmm, while I don't think Far Cry 3 perfected the genre, I believe it nearly perfected "nodal objective markers", by allowing us to comfortably roam the island without being overtly shoved back to the objectives. Overall, the thrill of clearing an outpost undetected cannot be undervalued, and it may be the most fun I've had in a shooter in a long time.
Fun game, but dont get crazy.
It has nothing to do with the game mechanics.
Read it, it's a great article
I learned a long time ago that to the contrary to what is being told, not every opinion is equal.
I dont agree with the topic, why should i read the article"
I know this is an extremely difficult concept for a lot of people, but simply reading the title doesn't qualify you to agree or disagree with the content.
As you yourself said, not every opinion is equal, and your opinion in this case is invalid.
My opinion in invalid because you don't agree with it?
Thats women logic, so you my friend, are dismissed.
So I kind of agree with people who read the title here and rolled their eyes :p