Comments (9)
GusBricker  +   1039d ago
If Michael Ironside isn't in it?
DevilishSix  +   1039d ago
Me to. Ironside was Sam Fisher for 5 games, 10 years, and two console generations. If they wanted to change it then it should be a new character. In my opinion, this is much worse then those complaining about the new DMC, cause at least that was called out as a reboot origin story. That is not the way this new Splinter Cell is being marketed.

First the excuse was motion capture was extensive and Ironside couldn't do it, but that is crap because technology is such that motion capture and seperate voice over can be synced perfectly. Then the excuse was that Ironside didn't like the script. This is all hogwash. They didn't want to pay Ironside in Conviction until the community had such an uproar about.

I think they didn't want to pay him again and the publisher doesn't care and are trying the skirt the subject.
#1.1 (Edited 1039d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
RustedMan  +   1039d ago
I loved the older splinter cells, (pandora tomorrow, Chaos Theory).
But if the stealth aspect of those games is no longer present in Blacklist, then I couldn't care less.
#2 (Edited 1039d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
gillri  +   1039d ago
Coudn't care less!!!!!!!!!!!!!
FarCryLover182  +   1039d ago
I am ready for a new Splinter Cell. I, however, do not want a new "Splinter Cell."
Fishy Fingers  +   1039d ago
If the game is good, I'll play it. Really is that simple. Dont really care about whether the other "gamers" do or not.
deadfrag  +   1039d ago
RuleofOne343  +   1039d ago
Yes I am.
MrKim12  +   1039d ago
Only if Montreal and Ironside return. But I'll keep this game on my radar.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login